Hi Helen,
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Helen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you -- It's surprising how much time I can spend looking in the wrong
> places (googling
> for this instead of just asking).
> I'm sure there are other script-fu filters I had been running, but can't
> ask for the
Thank you -- It's surprising how much time I can spend looking in the wrong
places (googling
for this instead of just asking).
I'm sure there are other script-fu filters I had been running, but can't
ask for them by name because I
don't remember what they were. But you did say "almost all ..."
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Milan Knížek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have been struggling to correct skin tones in GIMP without affecting other
> colours of the image. The problem is that whatever method I use (channel
> mixer, colour mapping, hue/saturation on particular colour
This is how I would do it, tho there may be other ways as well. I would
duplicate the layer, do my color correction. Add a layer mask and paint the
mask such that the areas that I did not want to be corrected showed through,
feathering the mask appropriately where necessary. Perhaps kinda ted
Hi all!
I have been struggling to correct skin tones in GIMP without affecting
other colours of the image. The problem is that whatever method I use
(channel mixer, colour mapping, hue/saturation on particular colour
channels), some other hues are also affected (green, blue).
I tried also Select
Quoting Helen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In the previous verion of Gimp that I was using until recently,
> there was a Script-fu tab, with things like Old Photograph.
> That was gimp 2.2.10.
>
> Now, I've upgraded to 2.4, and I no longer have the script-fu features.
>
> Is there something I can do to
In the previous verion of Gimp that I was using until recently,
there was a Script-fu tab, with things like Old Photograph.
That was gimp 2.2.10.
Now, I've upgraded to 2.4, and I no longer have the script-fu features.
Is there something I can do to recover this feature?
TIA,
Helen
--
Helen E