[Gimp-user] how to clone a text layer (not how to do clone on a layer)

2009-02-24 Thread zhangweiwu
Hello. Is there a feature in gimp that behave like inkscape, where a
text layer (in Inkscape an object or a group of object) can have some
clone text layers. If the source text layer changes its color, size,
text etc, the cloned layer automatically change accordingly.

In fact, I am more happy if the cloned layer only changes its text when
the source layer's text is changed.

I need this feature because I have an illustration where a word appeared
multiple times. I need to change this word from time to time. But I have
about 12 layers with the same word, doing the same text change to 12
layers from time to time look stupid. In Inkscape it would be easier.

Thanks in advance!

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] restoring faded transparencies

2009-02-24 Thread geoff
>I was scanning a lot of colour transparencies, some taken up to 40 years
ago,
>and found that in some cases the colours had deteriorated badly.  After a
lot
>of experimenting I have developed an automatic way of improving the digital
>scans using gimp.  I have put a technical article, the gimp plug-in, and a
>collection of the good and bad results at
>www.lionhouse.plus.com/photosoftware/restore. I would be interested in
hearing
>from anyone who has worked on this problem and if you try the plug-in let
me
>know how it works for your pictures.
>
Thanks for all the interest.  By publicizing my plug-in I hope that: (1)
people with faded slides will be able to restore them, (2) that it will be
possible to improve the method by input from others and (3) if (2) happens
someone will take up the task of improving the coding so that the plug-in can
be distributed more widely.

I think that we should keep general discussion of this topic in this forum,
so that everyone can join in, but it would be useful if there was a single
collection of sample images, with commentary and perhaps carefully considered
reviews of the conclusions made from them.  I am happy to put these on my
website along with my own examples.  My email is geo...@plyus.cozm (delete the
x y and z to get the correct address and avoid my getting spam).  Please keep
the file size down, the pictures will only be viewed on a webpage.  Also be
selective about what you send; images similar to existing ones are not very
useful, but examples of good restorations of very poor originals are of
interest as are failures of the method.  It is probably also better if any
very technical discussions are done by email.
-- 
geoff
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Soft proofing in 2.6.5

2009-02-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 08:16 -0500, John Culleton wrote:

> At this point the preferences menu under the files menu 
> shows only the Units dialog. 

Huh? The Preferences dialog is located in the Edit menu (as suggested by
the GNOME HIG).


Sven

PS: Next time please reply to the list. I am not going to answer mails
sent only to me.


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Printing from a batch

2009-02-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 15:02 -0800, Decimator Doseven wrote:
> It does not appear to.  All it has is (file-print-gtk run-mode image),
> which does not do what I need and does not match what I've seen 
> in the various(unfortunately non-working) scripts that I was able to find.

What does it not do that you need? I am pretty sure that the API of
file-print-gtk did not change, so I wonder what those scripts would do
differently.


Sven

PS: Next time, please reply to the list.


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Launching Problem on OSX

2009-02-24 Thread Firefly
I'm using a Mac iBook G3 Laptop running Panther, after installing X11 from the
Apple site and downloading Gimp.app (highest version for Panther is 2.2.11)
all I got after successfully installing both was: X11 and Gimp both opened,
Gimp bopped on the dock for about 2 seconds and then disappeared, occasionally
 when I click on Gimp, a little loading box will pop up saying something like
"Caching Fonts" but disappears pretty fast. I've tried Gimpshop and lower
versions of Gimp.app (including 1.2.5) ALL THE SAME. I tried opening with
Terminal, it says all these files in Gimp don't exist, but they do, ok...
Today I tried downloading Inkscape, same problem except it told me it would
take a while to cache fonts, site even state Inkscape takes a while to open
first try (3 mins for them), activity monitor isn't picking them up though,
s I...am...really...frustrated...Any Mac person, X11
expert, or Gimp user have any idea what is the problem?   
-- 
Firefly
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp w32 unstable releases (2.7) > (was:Logo scripts crash gimp 2.7)

2009-02-24 Thread Alchemie foto\grafiche

 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:18:36 -0500  Alec Burgess 
wrote


> The release I got was: gimp-2.7.0-r28042-i686-setup.exe
> from (I think):
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=121075&package_id=240554
> 
> That file now longer is available there - it still shows up
> in the 
> Google cache:
> http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:EhGRmoW3i74J:sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php%3Fgroup_id%3D121075%26package_id%3D240554+gimp-2.7.0-r28042-i686-setup&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2
> 
> The current version of that page now shows:  GIMP 2.7.0
> (SVN rev.28070) 
> + GTK+ 2.14.7
> no setup.exe files, just three babl, gegl and gimp tar.lzma
> files which 
> I assume (?) are source files.
> 
> Am I looking in the correct place but just jumping the gun
> because you 
> haven't yet created the expected setup.exe file?
> Is an RSS-feed watch on that page the correct way to find
> out when you 
> have created a new win32 build?
> 
> -- 
> Regards ... Alec   (bura...@gmail & WinLiveMess -
> alec.m.burg...@skype)

The "expected exe file "was created and uploaded, i am absolutely sure since i 
downloaded and installed few days ago

If is not anymore there,(i didn't check i trust your words ) i suppose is 
because show evident problems

obviously dev. releases may be unstable and a bit buggy, but in this case, 
instead then the improvement of the text tool described in "what is new" was 
possible only experiment crash each time the text tool was used,
and connected crashes for each of the logos script.

Seems to me a good reason to remove and then hopefully replace the file
.

I reported the problem on the developer list not to hassle the developers but 
only because i thought the problems of that build were critical and not yet 
noticed.

I have no idea why the topic was moved on this list, if you want try the last 
SVN i suggest to build it in linux that is not to hard, compiling for win is 
far more complex, and seems evident that in that build something went 
wrong...so if was removed may be for good reasons.

Then if you really want that exe  should be not hard (i.e. with Internet 
Archives or maybe even using google or yahoo cache) get a copy.

Obviously at your risk, i noticed other  problems (just 1 example,

after cropping the cropped part is still displayed and remain visible even if 
is no more part of the image and so not editable...)

 but i thought was not the case to report them since they may be limited  to a 
peculiar, experimental and unlucky Windows build


  Passa a Yahoo! Mail.

La webmail che ti offre GRATIS spazio illimitato, 
antispam e messenger integrato.
http://it.mail.yahoo.com/  
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] OS X GIMP slow launch

2009-02-24 Thread Kim Cascone
I'm working on OS X 10.4.11 and using GIMP 2.6.4
when I launch GIMP it literally takes 5 or 6 minutes to fully load  
and be functional
I realize I have a lot of filters and brushes which adds to the load  
time
but is this a known issue?
it seems like the splash window spends most of its time on 'looking  
for documents'
and is there any way to shorten this launch time?
I searched through the posts and wasn't able to find any mention of this
thanks in advance

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] loading of script-fu - scripts

2009-02-24 Thread Martin Barth
Hi there,

I have installed a script-fu.scm to my gimp installation. therefore
I've copied the file into the
c/Programme/GIMP-2.0/share/gimp/2.0/scripts directory. 

but when I start the Gimp the Script doesn't show up at all. If click on
the "Filter -> Script Fu -> reload scripts" Button the script is loaded
and works as expected.

what do I have to do in order to get the script loaded at the gimp
startup?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] [Gimp-developer] Gimp w32 unstable releases (2.7)

2009-02-24 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:18:36 -0500, Alec Burgess wrote:

> The release I got was: gimp-2.7.0-r28042-i686-setup.exe from (I think):
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=121075&package_id=240554

> That file now longer is available there - it still shows up in the 
> Google cache:
> http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:EhGRmoW3i74J:sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php%3Fgroup_id%3D121075%26package_id%3D240554+gimp-2.7.0-r28042-i686-setup&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2

The file is still available - just look a bit closer.

> The current version of that page now shows:  GIMP 2.7.0 (SVN rev.28070) 
> + GTK+ 2.14.7
> no setup.exe files, just three babl, gegl and gimp tar.lzma files which 
> I assume (?) are source files.

I had some problems with running GIMP (had to recompile), so I only
uploaded it this morning.

> Am I looking in the correct place but just jumping the gun because you 
> haven't yet created the expected setup.exe file?
> Is an RSS-feed watch on that page the correct way to find out when you 
> have created a new win32 build?

SourceForge has an option to send an e-mail notification (which is
triggered by me), that's probably the best option.

-- 
< Jernej Simončič >< http://deepthought.ena.si/ >
< Contact address: >< jernej simoncic at isg si >

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Scanning into GIMP

2009-02-24 Thread Doug
Michael J. Hammel wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:31 -0600, Rodney Clay wrote:
>   
>> I am new to using GIMP. Can I import images into GIMP from a scanner. If so 
>> what do I need 
>> to do to set up to do this. I have looked in the online manual but did not 
>> find an answer to my 
>> question. 
>> 
>
> On Linux:  install the SANE and XSane packages, including the XSane GIMP
> Plugin.  Setting up SANE is a little confusing for newbies, but it just
> takes a "Doh!" moment to realize it isn't that hard.
>
> On Windows:  I think you need to configure your scanner with TWAIN,
> whatever that is.
>
> On Mac:  I have no idea.
>
> GIMP does not have built in scanner support.  It utilizes whatever
> scanner support is available from your operating system.
>   
On upgrading Gimp from 2.4 to 2.6 I had a bit of a problem getting the 
scanner recognised by Gimp.
However I've now found it just as easy, and sometimes more convenient, 
to keep the scanning separate (ie. on my system - Mandriva 2008.1, Gnome 
- have a panel icon for xsane, /usr/bin/xsane). Then having scanned, 
save the image as a .png or similar file; drop it onto 2.6.

So I wouldn't get too fussed about taking images direct from the scanner 
into Gimp.

Doug
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] restoring faded transparencies

2009-02-24 Thread Doug
norman wrote:
> < snip >
>
>   
>> Thanks for your message.  As you deduce I am more interested in the
>> processing algorithm than the coding.  There are too many poor results at the
>> moment and I suspect there will be modifications to the method when I have
>> more experience of its performance.  For this reason I have not put it on a
>> gimp site.  I am happy for anyone to develop the plug-in further and improve
>> the interface but there is not much point until the algorithm is unlikely to
>> change.  I have killed the spurious hidden image which was left over from the
>> way of correcting the side absorptions.
>> 
>
>
> Geoff, I have started to look at a number of copies of old Kodachrome
> slides and I am beginning to get together several comments many of which
> would be best exemplified by examples. Therefore, I would like to know
> whether, at this stage in the development and because of your main
> interest being in the algorithm, you and other readers would think it
> best if this subject was continued outside this list.
>
> Norman   
>   
The subject's of considerable interest to me and I'd like to be kept 
aware of any developments. So for my 0.02c worth, I'd prefer it to stay 
on the main list.

Doug
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user