I really appreciate the replies. In the work flow example I gave earlier
in
this thread, am I correct that there is no other practical way to
accomplish
those steps on a photo other than to perform them destructively on a
single
layer (set levels, hit ok, correct color, hit ok, etc. so that
Thanks for the info. It seems exciting things are on the horizon. I eagerly
await with much anticipation.
/Gary
Correct me if I'm wrong, please, but it seems that in gimp I have to make a
copy of the base layer and apply any adjustments to the copy; and repeat
this for any new
It seems to me that gimp works a bit differently from photoshop. In photoshop
(actually, I'm still using 'elements-2', can you believe? Although I have got
Richard Lynch's excellent hidden power installed which releases a lot more of
the underlying photoshop 7 functionality - and the book was
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Gary Collinsgcatl...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
It seems to me that gimp works a bit differently from photoshop. In
photoshop (actually, I'm still using 'elements-2', can you believe? Although
I have got Richard Lynch's excellent hidden power installed which releases
a
I hope you don't change GIMP too much. I'm just getting
used to the way it works now.
I've never used PS so I don't care how PS does things.
David Gowers wrote:
This is certainly true; all of your points are true.
This is being worked on.
However, the specific idea of 'effect layers' is
On 08/12/2009 04:21 PM, David Gowers wrote:
btw, martin nordholts is doing some great work
on layer trees presently and in the last few months.. they are shaping
up well.
You are confusing me with another M.N.
It is Michael Natterer that has been doing great work recently on
preparing for layer
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/12/2009 04:21 PM, David Gowers wrote:
btw, martin nordholts is doing some great work
on layer trees presently and in the last few months.. they are shaping
up well.
You are confusing me with another M.N.
It is
Ok, but, when you merge, do you not lose the ability to go back and fix
something that you might decide needs adjusting?
Yes, which is why you don't merge until. you're absolutely sure that
everything you're merging is to your satisfaction. And if there are a
couple of layers which
Hi Robert,
On 10 Aug 09 07:29 Norman Silverstone nor...@littletank.org said:
The short answer is yes, this is how I would do things. The only
difference is that when I am satisfied with a stage I would merge
the layers otherwise the file becomes very large. Also, from time to
time I would
I've learned the hard way to SAVE OFTEN!!! Or
you can lose your work when GIMP freezes and dies.
Greg Chapman wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 10 Aug 09 07:29 Norman Silverstone nor...@littletank.org said:
The short answer is yes, this is how I would do things. The only
difference is that when I am
I've learned the hard way to SAVE OFTEN!!! Or
you can lose your work when GIMP freezes and dies.
I don't suffer from Gimp freezing or dying but I have been known to
press the wrong button and loose an hours careful cloning.
Norman
___
Gimp-user
Ok, but, when you merge, do you not lose the ability to go back and fix
something that you might decide needs adjusting? I thought that was the main
point of using layers. I see that xcf files seem to take a long time to save
- I guess that is, I suppose, due to their size. One thing puzzles
Carusoswi wrote:
Ok, but, when you merge, do you not lose the ability to go back and fix
something that you might decide needs adjusting?
Yes, which is why you don't merge until. you're absolutely sure that
everything you're merging is to your satisfaction. And if there are a
couple of layers
I have never really worked much with levels (in Gimp or anywhere else such as
PS) because I've really never gotten the hang of it. So, I was starting
through the 'meet the gimp' tutorials (from session 001!!) and realized that
part of my problem is that I need to change the mode in order to see
Ok, perhaps I'm on the right track, now. Someone tell me if I'm moving in the
right direction. Seems if I copy the background layer leaving the mode
normal, I can then perform most any operation on that new level and give it a
name suggestive of that operation. Then, make a copy of that new
Hi Carusoswi
On 09 Aug 09 22:37 Carusoswi for...@gimpusers.com said:
Seems if I copy the background layer leaving the mode normal, I can
then perform most any operation on that new level and give it a name
suggestive of that operation. Then, make a copy of that new level,
and perform some
Hi Carusoswi
On 09 Aug 09 22:37 Carusoswi for...@gimpusers.com said:
Seems if I copy the background layer leaving the mode normal, I can
then perform most any operation on that new level and give it a name
suggestive of that operation. Then, make a copy of that new level,
and perform some
17 matches
Mail list logo
