Nem W Schlecht wrote:
Any update on this, Bill?
Thanks for the reminder. Okay, I have uploaded the code to the
Gimp Plug-In Registry, at:
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4169
You should have a working gimptool-2.0 in order to install it.
Best,
-- Bill
__ __
For what it's worth, I went ahead and implemented a true variable blur filter,
by modifying the blur plug-in code from 2.0. I'll put the code in the plug-in
registry after a little bug-fixing, but anyway, I put together a comparison of
what you get with variable blurring versus what you get with
http://gug.sunsite.dk/pictures/1080149573.png
This is looking really great !!!
Hope to play with it soon.
Thanks
--
Przemek Gawronski gawronskip#at#wp#dot#pl
Linux Registered User 239544UIN:8358522
http://counter.li.org/
On 20 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Combining a blurred picture with an unblurred picture using layer mask
seems to work well for me. Of course it's not the same but it should
look reasonably similar.
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Jakub Steiner wrote:
Just create an appropriate selection for the blur
On Po, 2004-03-22 at 09:12 -0800, William Skaggs wrote:
Neither of these techniques work, as you will see if you try to apply them.
When you mix a blurred image with a sharp image, the result does not look like
a less-blurred image, it looks like a sharp image whose contrast has been reduced.
V Po 22. 03. 2004 v 11:38 -0800 pe William Skaggs:
Uh? It works pretty well I'd say:
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/linearblur.png
To my eyes this image looks sharp in the lower 2/3, and uniformly blurred
in the upper 1/3. What you _do_ get using this method is a nice smooth
On Saturday 20 March 2004 14:38, William Skaggs wrote:
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
would be to modify the blur filter (found
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does not have the
ability to do this, although there are ways to fake something that looks sort of
like it. The easiest way to get it would be to modify the blur filter (found in
randomize.c in the plug-ins directory) so that the
Hi,
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
would be to modify the blur filter (found in
On 20 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
would be to
Hi Gimpers
I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with a
gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a sharp pic but
gradualy get more blured and more and more ... (going from left to right
for example).
I would be thankful for sugestions on how I can do that in
Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with
a gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a
sharp pic but gradualy get more blured and more and more ...
(going from left to right for example).
Make a copy of the layer you want to
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 11:04 +0100, Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
Hi Gimpers
I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with a
gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a sharp pic but
gradualy get more blured and more and more ... (going from left to right
for
On Friday 19 March 2004 07:36, craniac wrote:
Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with
a gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a
sharp pic but gradualy get more blured and more and more ...
(going from left to right for
14 matches
Mail list logo
