Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-22 Thread Gary Aitken
On 01/22/13 07:59, Richard Gitschlag wrote:

 Floats belong to whatever layer or mask was current when the clipboard 
 content was pasted in.
 You can only do two things with a float: Make it a new layer by
 using the 'add layer' command, or use the 'anchor' command to merge
 it down into whatever layer or mask was already selected when the
 float was pasted into the image.
 
 That is correct, but because the Layers dialog displays the float at the top
 of the entire layer stack there is no visual indication in the dialog of which
 layer it belongs to.  If we merely changed the display of the dialog so that
 the float is always displayed just above its source layer (actual 
 functionality
 unaffected), this would make it more intuitive to the user.

While voting doesn't count ;-), I would second that as a suggestion.  I've meant
to make the same comment before.

Gary
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-22 Thread Steve Kinney
On 01/22/2013 11:19 AM, Donald Miller wrote:
 Hello Experts
 
 Because I started this thread, I should comment.
 
 I once spent a year of intense image editing in photoshop. Now I
 only occasionally use PS or GIMP, so esoteric capabilities
 are far less important than ease of getting back into harness.
 Simply combining image snippets is now easier in PS.
 
 Keep all the features you want, but include easy startup for folks
 who are not, nor want to be, experts in the software.

I can see where you're coming from:  How much can I do with image
files today, without a substantial learning curve?  It's no surprise
that a commercial product may serve this need better than the GIMP
in many cases; it pays to meet this need, in the most literal sense
of cash on the barrel head.

Ease of use can have two meanings:

1)  Easy to figure out how to do a range of common, practical image
editing tasks.  A substantial part of the Photoshop user base is
looking for this and only this, and supporting them makes Adobe more
than enough money to pay their developers to make supporting these
users a prime directive in their design paradigm.

2)  Easy to do complex tasks including ones that the program's
developers did not anticipate, through access to flexible modular
tools and functions.  A substantial part of the GIMP user base is
looking for this, which is fortunate because the GIMP project does
not have a budget to support make it easier for beginners to the
extent that Adobe does.

Photoshop experts can do complex tasks any way they want to get
the results they are after; GIMP beginners can learn to do all the
most important photo editing basics in a few hours.  But the style
and design paradigm of these commercial  Free programs is
different, and these differences matter more to casual users than
hard core image grinders who spend whole workdays doing horrible
things to pixels.

Thing about the GIMP is, it's Free Software.  That does not mean you
can't charge money for it.  If someone wanted to take the GIMP and
rebuild it to for increased appeal to casual users, they could sell
their remixed version as a commercial product.  If Adobe was not
such a dominant player in the market, this would have happened already.

:o)

Steve




___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-22 Thread Ofnuts

On 01/21/2013 05:19 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:

 Original-Nachricht 

Datum: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:57:56 +0100
Von: Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net
An: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:

As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in GIMP
and they really are something that needs to be killed off with fire
because of how big a stumbling block they are to new users.

*applauds*

The useful feature of anchoring those floating selections down to the active 
layer is what usually gets in the way of just removing them. any ideas for that?



The only difference I see betwen Paste to floating selection/Anchor 
and Paste as new layer/Merge is that the former remembers the active 
*drawable* when the paste happened and use that for the anchor... but I 
don't find this very useful in my daily Gimp usage except when 
pasting to channels.


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-21 Thread Rob Antonishen
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.dewrote:

  Von: Richard Gitschlag strata_ran...@hotmail.com

  Sometimes I really miss the fact that GIMP has no paste in place
 command
  like Inkscape does.  Feature request?

 You should add a description of how this works in Inkscape, and how you
 expect this to be handled in GIMP - e.g. what is the place if you paste
 to an image of totally different size, at a different zoom level, ...


Some old discussion on this:
http://www.gimpusers.com/forums/gimp-developer/12672-gimp-ux-paste#message58351

I created a paste into selection script (scales the copied image to fit
the current selection using default interpolation mode):
http://pastebin.com/fKUxE8Ag

More useful (imoo), I also created a paste as new layer centered script
which pastes the clipboard content as a new layer centered on the current
selection , the current layer (if no selection), or the canvas if no active
layer.

Either of these could just be keymapped to Ctrl+v.  (The built in Paste as
New Layer could be bound to ctrl+v as well, but I didn't like that it
creates the new layer at 0,0 hence the script).

-Rob A.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-21 Thread Richard Gitschlag

In a nutshell, when the selection is copied it includes the (x,y) offset from 
the upper-left corner of the image canvas, and it utilizes this offset when 
pasting back into the image. Image zoom is irrelevant and so is canvas size 
(mostly).

For now, the quickest workaround we have to paste at a specific area of the 
image is Paste Into then To New Layer -- and what exactly the difference is 
between it and normal Paste I've still got to figure out.

-- Stratadrake
strata_ran...@hotmail.com

Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.


 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:17:14 +0100
 From: schum...@gmx.de
 To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
 
  Von: Richard Gitschlag strata_ran...@hotmail.com
 
  Sometimes I really miss the fact that GIMP has no paste in place command
  like Inkscape does.  Feature request?
 
 You should add a description of how this works in Inkscape, and how you 
 expect this to be handled in GIMP - e.g. what is the place if you paste to 
 an image of totally different size, at a different zoom level, ...
 
 
 Regards,
 Michael
 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
  ___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-21 Thread Steve Kinney
On 01/21/2013 03:57 AM, Ofnuts wrote:

 On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:

 As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in
 GIMP and they really are something that needs to be killed off
 with fire because of how big a stumbling block they are to new users.

 *applauds*

If I recall correctly, floats existed before layers in the GIMP,
as a mechanism for moving pasted-in content around before merging it
into the image.  Floats were not a problem for me when I was
learning how to use the GIMP, and now I take them so much for
granted that it's kind of tricky to think about the impact of doing
away with them.

Floats enable and require the user to explicitly anchor pasted
content somewhere, i.e. make a new layer for it, merge it down into
an existing layer, or merge it down into a layer mask.  Whether I
would be OK with floats being done away with, would depend on the
proposed mechanism for targeting where pasted content lands in the
layer stack:  A proposed replacement for floats would have to
accomplish the same results in a smaller number of steps, or the
same number of steps but in a way that is substantially easier for a
beginner to understand and use.

Right now I can't think of a way to improve on the existing
floating layer workflow.

:o)

Steve




___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-21 Thread bgw

On 01/21/2013 11:06 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:

On 01/21/2013 03:57 AM, Ofnuts wrote:


On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:

As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in
GIMP and they really are something that needs to be killed off
with fire because of how big a stumbling block they are to new users.

*applauds*

If I recall correctly, floats existed before layers in the GIMP,
as a mechanism for moving pasted-in content around before merging it
into the image.  Floats were not a problem for me when I was
learning how to use the GIMP, and now I take them so much for
granted that it's kind of tricky to think about the impact of doing
away with them.

Floats enable and require the user to explicitly anchor pasted
content somewhere, i.e. make a new layer for it, merge it down into
an existing layer, or merge it down into a layer mask.  Whether I
would be OK with floats being done away with, would depend on the
proposed mechanism for targeting where pasted content lands in the
layer stack:  A proposed replacement for floats would have to
accomplish the same results in a smaller number of steps, or the
same number of steps but in a way that is substantially easier for a
beginner to understand and use.

Right now I can't think of a way to improve on the existing
floating layer workflow.

In my experiment, I created a layer group and moved an image into it, and then:
created a second-level layer sub-group within the group;
moved my original picture into the group
selected an area of the image in the subgroup
copied / pasted
To-New-Layered it
moved the new layer into the newly created group.
I supposed that the entire indented activity was a single operation activated by 
the copy/paste activity
The sub-group can be manipulated essentially the same as the float had been; 
then afterward the anchor command is replaced by Merge Layer Group.


I think this might be substantially easier for a beginner to understand and 
use

 -- Burnie
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-21 Thread Richard Gitschlag

 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:06:41 -0500
 From: ad...@pilobilus.net
 To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
 
 Right now I can't think of a way to improve on the existing
 floating layer workflow.
 

I can -- perhaps not changing the actual functionality but the manner in which 
it is displayed in the layer list.  For example, say my layer stack is:

- C
- B
- A

Say I make/float/paste a selection using layer B.  My layer stack now displays:

- Floating selection
- C
- B
- A

Here's the problem:  The floating selection is not at the top of the layer 
stack - it is actually between layers B (the source layer) and C (the layer 
above it).  The layer stack SHOULD display:

- C
- Floating selection
- B
- A

This makes it visually clear WHICH layer the float came from.

(Or, alternatively: )

- C
- B
- - Floating selection
- A

Which is something of a group-like display, but again this makes clear which 
layer the float belongs to.


-- Stratadrake
strata_ran...@hotmail.com

Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.


 :o)
 
 Steve
 
 
 
 
 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
  ___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-21 Thread bgw

On 01/21/2013 03:10 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:

 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:06:41 -0500
 From: ad...@pilobilus.net
 To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

 Right now I can't think of a way to improve on the existing
 floating layer workflow.


I can -- perhaps not changing the actual functionality but the manner in which 
it is displayed in the layer list.  For example, say my layer stack is:


- C
- B
- A

Say I make/float/paste a selection using layer B.  My layer stack now displays:

- Floating selection
- C
- B
- A

Here's the problem:  The floating selection is not at the top of the layer 
stack - it is actually between layers B (the source layer) and C (the layer 
above it).  The layer stack SHOULD display:


- C
- Floating selection
- B
- A

This makes it visually clear WHICH layer the float came from.

(Or, alternatively: )

- C
- B
- - Floating selection
- A

Which is something of a group-like display, but again this makes clear which 
layer the float belongs to.


This is substantially my experiment, Steve - It takes simply replacing floating 
selection by create layer group with current layer and selection above it but 
I confused the issue by responding to gimp-developer rather than gimp-user. What 
I suggested in the developer list was


How about automatically creating a layer group with the selection layer above a 
copy of the original layer?

This appears (at a quick glance) to work in nested layer groups as well. -- 

  -- Burnie


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-21 Thread Steve Kinney
On 01/21/2013 06:54 PM, bgw wrote:
 On 01/21/2013 03:10 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:

[...]

 I can -- perhaps not changing the actual functionality but the
 manner in which it is displayed in the layer list.  For example,
 say my layer stack is:

 - C
 - B
 - A

 Say I make/float/paste a selection using layer B.  My layer stack
 now displays:

 - Floating selection
 - C
 - B
 - A

 Here's the problem:  The floating selection is not at the top of
 the layer stack - it is actually between layers B (the source
 layer) and C (the layer above it).  The layer stack SHOULD display:

 - C
 - Floating selection
 - B
 - A

 This makes it visually clear WHICH layer the float came from.

 (Or, alternatively: )

 - C
 - B
 - - Floating selection
 - A

 Which is something of a group-like display, but again this makes
 clear which layer the float belongs to.

I can't quite wrap my head around that.  Floats belong to whatever
layer or mask was current when the clipboard content was pasted in.
 You can only do two things with a float:  Make it a new layer by
using the 'add layer' command, or use the 'anchor' command to merge
it down into whatever layer or mask was already selected when the
float was pasted into the image.

I thought this might have changed with the new layer groups feature,
but I just did some tests and it looks like that's not the case:
Doing this operation with the source and destination of copied
content in different layer groups works the same as when there are
no groups.

If you want to add content from the clipboard as a new layer at any
specified location in the layer stack, the workflow would be:

1. Select and copy the content you want to duplicate.

2. Select the layer you want the float to be above, create a new
empty layer (Ctrl+Shift+n, Enter).  A new transparent layer appears
above the previously selected layer and becomes the currently
selected layer.  (Or better, Ctrl+Shift+n, type a name then Enter.)

3. Paste (Ctrl+v) and anchor (Ctrl+h).  A float will appear and
merge into the new layer you just created.

I don't understand the reason for inserting a float anywhere but at
the top of the layers list, because it's really just a transitional
place holder.  The float enables the user to tweak the position,
scale and geometry of a copied and pasted selection before merging
it into its destination layer, but that's the only use I see for it.
 Others may know more things to do with floats.

:o)

Steve



___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-20 Thread Michael Schumacher
 Von: Donald Miller damill...@gmail.com

 I resized two images, made a new page canvas, copied and pasted both,
 opened grid. I can only move one image, can't toggle to other. Layer
 stack commands are all grayed out, except reverse layer order which
 does nothing. Pg-up/dn keys do nothing. Align does nothing.

If you haven't created new layers from the floating selections you got after 
pasting, then you now have a still floating selection around. But this has 
always been that way, so it is not a new problem with an old method...

If this doesn't help and you think somethings else must be the cause, then 
describe what you're seeing in the layers dialog.


HTH,
Michael
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-20 Thread Donald Miller
Hello

Update, I found and ran gimp-help-2-2.8.0-en-setup.exe
but gimp HELP still only connects to web version.

Regards,
 Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
==
Sunday, January 20, 2013, 1:08:16 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Michael

 I meant new problem with method I previously used.

 So how do I regain control of my image layers?
 Copy  paste is something I did a lot before
 abandoning  photoshop CS2 for misbehavior.

 On-line manual in HTML is not as friendly to searching
 as would a PDF or ebook version (which I have not found).

 Regards,
  Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
 ==
 Sunday, January 20, 2013, 12:44:26 PM, you wrote:

 Von: Donald Miller damill...@gmail.com

 I resized two images, made a new page canvas, copied and pasted both,
 opened grid. I can only move one image, can't toggle to other. Layer
 stack commands are all grayed out, except reverse layer order which
 does nothing. Pg-up/dn keys do nothing. Align does nothing.

 If you haven't created new layers from the floating selections you got
 after pasting, then you now have a still floating selection around. But
 this has always been that way, so it is not a new problem with an old 
 method...

 If this doesn't help and you think somethings else must be the cause,
 then describe what you're seeing in the layers dialog.


 HTH,
 Michael
 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-20 Thread Donald Miller
Hello

I started with new file, created a new layer and pasted one half image,
repeated with other half image. Still can't get from one layer to another.
Layer Stack  Reverse Layer Order
puts white over the subimages; repeat restores the color.
I un-/re-installed gimp, no difference.

Last week, I actually was able to move among layers, selectively hide and
reveal. I am mystified. Gimp is presently worthless to me.

Regards,
 Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
==
Sunday, January 20, 2013, 1:21:41 PM, you wrote:

 Hello

 Seems that manual setup is same HTML as on web.
 Is there a searchable doc in a Windows format?

 Regards,
  Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
 ==
 Sunday, January 20, 2013, 1:18:07 PM, you wrote:

 Hello

 Update, I found and ran gimp-help-2-2.8.0-en-setup.exe
 but gimp HELP still only connects to web version.

 Regards,
  Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
 ==
 Sunday, January 20, 2013, 1:08:16 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Michael

 I meant new problem with method I previously used.

 So how do I regain control of my image layers?
 Copy  paste is something I did a lot before
 abandoning  photoshop CS2 for misbehavior.

 On-line manual in HTML is not as friendly to searching
 as would a PDF or ebook version (which I have not found).

 Regards,
  Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
 ==
 Sunday, January 20, 2013, 12:44:26 PM, you wrote:

 Von: Donald Miller damill...@gmail.com

 I resized two images, made a new page canvas, copied and pasted both,
 opened grid. I can only move one image, can't toggle to other. Layer
 stack commands are all grayed out, except reverse layer order which
 does nothing. Pg-up/dn keys do nothing. Align does nothing.

 If you haven't created new layers from the floating selections you got
 after pasting, then you now have a still floating selection around. But
 this has always been that way, so it is not a new problem with an old 
 method...

 If this doesn't help and you think somethings else must be the cause,
 then describe what you're seeing in the layers dialog.


 HTH,
 Michael
 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-20 Thread Richard Gitschlag

In GIMP every time you paste something into the image it becomes a floating 
layer by default.  In order to switch to another layer you need to:

1 - Anchor the selection down (it becomes part of whatever layer was selected 
before you used the Paste command).  (Layer  Anchor Selection or something)
2 - Convert it into a new layer.  (Layer  New Layer / To New Layer)

As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in GIMP and they 
really are something that needs to be killed off with fire because of how big a 
stumbling block they are to new users.

Now, if you know in advance you are going to be making a new layer out of what 
you're pasting, you can save yourself time and headaches by selecting Paste As 
 New Layer from the Edit menu, instead of the normal Paste.

-- Stratadrake
strata_ran...@hotmail.com

Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.


 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 14:17:01 -0700
 From: damill...@gmail.com
 To: schum...@gmx.de; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
 
 Hello
 
 I started with new file, created a new layer and pasted one half image,
 repeated with other half image. Still can't get from one layer to another.
 Layer Stack  Reverse Layer Order
 puts white over the subimages; repeat restores the color.
 I un-/re-installed gimp, no difference.
 
 Last week, I actually was able to move among layers, selectively hide and
 reveal. I am mystified. Gimp is presently worthless to me.
 
 Regards,
  Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
 ==
 Sunday, January 20, 2013, 1:21:41 PM, you wrote:
 
  Hello
 
  Seems that manual setup is same HTML as on web.
  Is there a searchable doc in a Windows format?
 
  Regards,
   Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
  ==
  Sunday, January 20, 2013, 1:18:07 PM, you wrote:
 
  Hello
 
  Update, I found and ran gimp-help-2-2.8.0-en-setup.exe
  but gimp HELP still only connects to web version.
 
  Regards,
   Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
  ==
  Sunday, January 20, 2013, 1:08:16 PM, you wrote:
 
  Hello Michael
 
  I meant new problem with method I previously used.
 
  So how do I regain control of my image layers?
  Copy  paste is something I did a lot before
  abandoning  photoshop CS2 for misbehavior.
 
  On-line manual in HTML is not as friendly to searching
  as would a PDF or ebook version (which I have not found).
 
  Regards,
   Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
  ==
  Sunday, January 20, 2013, 12:44:26 PM, you wrote:
 
  Von: Donald Miller damill...@gmail.com
 
  I resized two images, made a new page canvas, copied and pasted both,
  opened grid. I can only move one image, can't toggle to other. Layer
  stack commands are all grayed out, except reverse layer order which
  does nothing. Pg-up/dn keys do nothing. Align does nothing.
 
  If you haven't created new layers from the floating selections you got
  after pasting, then you now have a still floating selection around. But
  this has always been that way, so it is not a new problem with an old 
  method...
 
  If this doesn't help and you think somethings else must be the cause,
  then describe what you're seeing in the layers dialog.
 
 
  HTH,
  Michael
  ___
  gimp-user-list mailing list
  gimp-user-list@gnome.org
  https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
 
 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
  ___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods

2013-01-20 Thread Donald Miller
Hello Steve

Thanks much.

Regards,
 Don Miller   damill...@gmail.com
==
Sunday, January 20, 2013, 6:39:36 PM, you wrote:

 On 01/20/2013 03:21 PM, Donald Miller wrote:
 Hello
 
 Seems that manual setup is same HTML as on web.
 Is there a searchable doc in a Windows format?

 Quick and dirty solution:  Use google.  Add this to the end of your
 search terms when looking for GIMP help files:

 site:http://docs.gimp.org/2.8/en/

 Local help solution:  Go to Edit  Preferences  Help System, and
 change Use the online version to Use a locally installed copy.

 The layers question was already answered.

 In re printing with the GIMP, that's one for somebody with the same
 version of MS operating system and the same brand and model family
 or printer to answer.  Saving your image in any convenient format,
 and printing it with Irfanview, is a pretty much guaranteed solution:

 http://www.irfanview.com/

 Way back when, I always used to set up the GIMP as the default
 external editor for Irfanview:  A very practical combination.

 :o)

 Steve



 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list