I did not find anything relevant.
Also, the first installation has been done with the 32 bits version ahead
of moving to the 64 version. So I believe that the best solution is to
unsinstall everything (clearing also user data if they are not removed) and
restart a proper installation with the new
Hi,
After unstalling 2.6.10 everything was not cleared. So I cleared everything
concerning GIMP in C:\Program Files (x86) ; C:\Program Files then in User
Data (there is nothing concerning GIMP in the Regedit).
I reinstalled the Gimp with the unstable installer and everything seems to
work pro
Steve, I had meant to ask you about the Gimp vs Pshop
discussion you were having, before all the "name calling" began.
:)
I'm glad I found the original topic.
What I wanted to ask you, goes to what you were saying about the
benefits of Photoshop being basically in bit depth etc.
I used to work wi
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> Beware of "free download" fonts.
Dafont.com is a good source for truly free fonts.
Some are marked "Personal Use Only", however this is almost unenforceable*.
The whole area of typeface licensing is murky as hell. For example, I
have a ful
On 12/30/2011 07:37 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
On 12/30/2011 04:14 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
Hai guise,
Beware of "free download" fonts. A lot of the fonts on the big
sites are under "all rights reserved" copyright. I once had an
employer who was a "font Nazi": He insisted on documenting the
terms of u
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
> or has anyone heard of using/modifying Gimp for mobile dev purposes?
It doesn't make a terrible lot of sense :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
g
To all early New Years partiers...
Just to be clear, though it's funny,
I didn't mean using gimp ON mobile
devices, I meant using gimp to develop
FOR mobile devices. Now reread those
links I sent, rethink, repost.
Thanks
Dan
On 12/31/11, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:14
* Daniel Smith [12-31-11 12:17]:
>
> I used to work with Photoshop every day for 10 years, and I think that
> people who truly have a preference merely like the interface better
> because they're used to it. I haven't been in graphics for a while
> now, and I find Gimp every bit as good as the ol
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
> To all early New Years partiers...
There are, you know, timezones ;-)
> Just to be clear, though it's funny,
> I didn't mean using gimp ON mobile
> devices, I meant using gimp to develop
> FOR mobile devices.
http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2010/1
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> I don't understand this statement, last sentence. RAW support for/in gimp
> is provided by the same decoder most of the commercial apps utilize,
> dcraw. And is updated much more frequently and w/o cost compared to the
> "commercial" ap
* Alexandre Prokoudine [12-31-11 14:11]:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> > I don't understand this statement, last sentence. RAW support for/in gimp
> > is provided by the same decoder most of the commercial apps utilize,
> > dcraw. And is updated much more frequ
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> Only if you mean DCRaw. Because UFRaw development pretty much
> stagnated. Two releases in last two years. Compare that to ACR.
Yeah, the current version of UFraw is pretty far behind. Gimp does not
make use of dcraw directly, it uses
On 12/31/2011 01:45 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
>
>> or has anyone heard of using/modifying Gimp for mobile dev purposes?
>
+1 - a bitmap image is a bitmap image, as long as the editor and the
target app support one relevant format in com
Alina Laue wrote:
Kind regards from Alina, - from Denmark
Alina,
One of the areas of law where there is least conformity between
jurisdictions is in the area if intellectual property, which includes
copyright. The answers to your post seem to be mostly from the US, and
in my experience may
In message
, Frank Gore wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
> wrote:
>> Only if you mean DCRaw. Because UFRaw development pretty much
>> stagnated. Two releases in last two years. Compare that to ACR.
>
>Yeah, the current version of UFraw is pretty far behind. Gimp doe
* Ronald F. Guilmette [12-31-11 16:42]:
> I've been planning on buying a Lumix DMC-FZ150 next year, when the prices
> come down some more.
...
> I'd just like to ask if there is going to be any problem in reading those
> into Gimp and/or getting them converted into something like standard tif
* Patrick Shanahan [12-31-11 16:54]:
> * Ronald F. Guilmette [12-31-11 16:42]:
> > I've been planning on buying a Lumix DMC-FZ150 next year, when the prices
> > come down some more.
>
> ...
>
> > I'd just like to ask if there is going to be any problem in reading those
> > into Gimp and/or g
Steve Kinney writes:
> http://www.photolib.noaa.gov/index.html
>
> A huge collection of high quality images, including all the sky you
> could want and much else besides [ ... ]
Definitely a good one!
Here are some other good sources for freely usable images:
http://gimpbook.com/links.html#freei
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
> Anyway, I just now went and resarched it and found that the Lumix cameras
> produce their raw images into something called .RW2 files.
Might be worth checking if it can also generate .DNG files. All of my
Pentax cameras from the last
In message <20111231215357.gs25...@wahoo.no-ip.org>,
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>* Ronald F. Guilmette [12-31-11 16:42]:
>> I've been planning on buying a Lumix DMC-FZ150 next year, when the prices
>> come down some more.
>
>...
>
>> I'd just like to ask if there is going to be any problem in
In message <20111231215523.gt25...@wahoo.no-ip.org>,
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>Guess I should do the entire job :^)
>
>http://ufraw.sourceforge.net/Cameras.html
Yes, thanks. I saw that too. But if you will recall, is was just earlier
today that Frank Gore wrote:
>Yeah, the current version
In message
, Frank Gore wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, I just now went and resarched it and found that the Lumix cameras
>> produce their raw images into something called .RW2 files.
>
>Might be worth checking if it can also generate .DNG fil
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> But I also learned that there is a free "DNG Converter" utility available
> on the adobe.com site, an I just downloaded a copy of it, so I'll have it
> later on, just in case.
>
> The bad news? Of course, it is only available for Windo
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:55:21 -0800
"Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote:
> The bad news? Of course, it is only available for Windoze and Mac. :-(
> Oh well. Better than nothing if I can't get Gimp+DCRaw+UFRaw to work for
> any reason.
Did you check digikam?
http://www.barrypearson.co.uk/articles/dng/
On 12/31/2011 05:55 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> But I also learned that there is a free "DNG Converter" utility available
> on the adobe.com site, an I just downloaded a copy of it, so I'll have it
> later on, just in case.
>
> The bad news? Of course, it is only available for Windoze and Mac
* Ronald F. Guilmette [12-31-11 17:39]:
> So this explains why I asked about gimp support for .RW2 files, even though
> I did in fact already see the pages you helpfully pointed me to. I'd like
> to know if Gimp supports .RW2 files, or if it only "barely" supports them
> (perhaps even, God forbid
In message
, Frank Gore wrote:
>http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/373
>
>I've used Digikam for my photo collections for years.
Hey! Thanks a bunch! I didn't know about that one at all.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http:
I have an image sized 20" x 24". I just have a standard 8.5" x 11" printer.
Can I print the image in sections? If so, how?
I did this with a PDF document once.
Thanks,
George
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/
On 12/31/2011 07:32 PM, george seifert wrote:
> > I have an image sized 20" x 24". I just have a standard 8.5" x 11"
> > printer. Can I print the image in sections? If so, how?
> > I did this with a PDF document once.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > George
I think I would probably open that thing in the GIMP,
On 31-Dec-11, at 10:06 PM, Steve Brady wrote:
Ya I knowuse the webpage link in each forum message.
Done it several times and it has yet to work.
So would the moderator of said forum please remove me from the list.
Thank you kindlyand no I don't use photoshopI get my
pictures rig
On 12/31/2011 03:41 PM, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Here are some other good sources for freely usable images:
> http://gimpbook.com/links.html#freeimages
>
> ...Akkana
That started me poking around and I found this on Akkana's site:
http://shallowsky.com/software/gimp/arrowdesigner/
Making arrow
On 12/30/2011 11:10 AM, alain.sec...@lafauteaunet.net wrote:
>
> Howto dock some tabs (tool options, layers, colors...) in the
> toolbox? or dock the toolbox in a multitab tool window with ool
> options, layers, colors.. ? would be nice to have only TWO
> windows: one for the image (without polluti
32 matches
Mail list logo
