On 01.02.13 at 8:26 PM Steve Kinney wrote:
On 02/01/2013 01:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
sizes varying between about 5 and 50 pixels, with relatively high precision.
The new dialog devotes the left 5% of the slider to this range.
To set the brush size precisely you can also click the number in
">> It might >> also be useful to be able to set the max and min values
(max in particular). >> I suspect there are very few people who want a
brush size more than 1000 >> (but hey, I don't design billboards). > > I
used to recompile my own gimp with a larger maximum brush size, > although
I have n
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 11:49 +0100, scl wrote:
> > In re adjusting brush diameter, I map the unassigned Alt+Scroll
> > (mouse wheel) combination to "Brush size increase" and "Brush size
> > decrease". Adjusting brush size on the fly without leaving the
> > canvas is a wonderful thing.
Intersting,
>I have recently uploaded a tutorial onto my Youtube account
>(DaviesMediaDesign) on the basics of photo editing. I think a lot of
>you beginners out there will find this tutorial very useful, and the
>rest of you experts could still learn a thing or two!
>
>http://youtu.be/NcIPME9X_r4
>
>Davies Me
>nice video! and well explained too ;) why do you prefer gimp 2.6 over
>2.8?
Thanks for checking it out! There are certain functions in 2.6 that I find more
fluent in my opinion- like the text editing, image scaling, and some of the
other manipulation features. Perhaps I'm just used to the 2.6 int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/2013 07:28 PM, Lailah wrote:
> Hi! Yes, I have a Wordpress where I published my work. This
> the link of my last post, but you can see any you want.
>
> http://viajeramental.wordpress.com/2013/02/01/post-abigarradito/
>
> Hope you like it.
On 02/03/2013 04:22 PM, DaviesMediaDesign wrote:
>> nice video! and well explained too ;) why do you prefer gimp 2.6 over
>> 2.8?
>
> Thanks for checking it out! There are certain functions in 2.6 that I find
> more
> fluent in my opinion- like the text editing, image scaling, and some of the
> o
>Thanks for checking it out! There are certain functions in 2.6 that I
>find more fluent in my opinion- like the text editing, image scaling,
>and some of the other manipulation features. Perhaps I'm just used to
>the 2.6 interface.
the only thing that could (maybe) confuse people that see your vi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey y'all,
The GIMP's tear-off menus do not seem to work on Linux platforms.
They "tear off" just fine but do nothing when used. This has
been constant for me across GIMP 2.6 and 2.8 on Gnome 2 and Gnome
3 (Cinnamon fork). Looking for solutions, I
I often use my digital camera to take pictures of flat, rectangular
objects, like framed paintings on a wall, book or album covers, or
pages of documents. Of course, I can't take these pictures straight
on and perfectly level, but that's OK. I know what the dimensions of
the objects are, so I can
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Elmer Wix
wrote:
> I often use my digital camera to take pictures of flat, rectangular
> objects, like framed paintings on a wall, book or album covers, or
> pages of documents. Of course, I can't take these pictures straight
> on and perfectly level, but that's OK
11 matches
Mail list logo
