[Gimp-user] Suggestion: ZOOM>Fit Image to Window (leave some padding)
>The place to suggest enhancements is now >https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/issues/ Thank You! ...I'll post there. -- KevinYork (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Suggestion: ZOOM>Fit Image to Window (leave some padding)
>(P.S. shouldn't there be a separate forum for suggestions; as I am not
>looking
>for Help nor Support)
>
>"Zoom>Fit Image to Window" is great except for:
>If you zoom a portrait image; how can you start a selection at the top
>of image
>without grabbing a guide bar?
>
>We just need a small canvas padding to fix this.
>
>Else I'm back to:
> {CTRL-mouse-wheel to zoom out};
> select ZOOM-TOOL;
> draw rectangle around image;
> re-select the tool I just left
The place to suggest enhancements is now
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/issues/
--
rich404 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Suggestion: ZOOM>Fit Image to Window (leave some padding)
(P.S. shouldn't there be a separate forum for suggestions; as I am not looking
for Help nor Support)
"Zoom>Fit Image to Window" is great except for:
If you zoom a portrait image; how can you start a selection at the top of image
without grabbing a guide bar?
We just need a small canvas padding to fix this.
Else I'm back to:
{CTRL-mouse-wheel to zoom out};
select ZOOM-TOOL;
draw rectangle around image;
re-select the tool I just left
--
KevinYork (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Suggestion
On 8/16/19 12:05 PM, awoodg...@austin.rr.com wrote: > For the next Gimp update, on the "Help --> About GIMP" info box, please add > a line that shows the latest downloadable version of Gimp. This would make > it easier to update the local copy. Thx. That would require the GIMP to 'phone home' over the network, to find out what the latest official release is. I would suggest a button that says "check for updates" and on click, opens the system default web browser at the appropriate address. That seems relatively simple option. On Linux systems, the package manger already announces the availability of patches and upgrades to the user - so, no need for notifications inside applications. On any platform, programs that do not need network connections should not have them, as they present potential privacy and security exposures. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Suggestion
For the next Gimp update, on the "Help --> About GIMP" info box, please add a line that shows the latest downloadable version of Gimp. This would make it easier to update the local copy. Thx. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Suggestion for opening raw images
Hi Rick, as Guy already wrote, Gimp 2.8 only supports 8-bit. Gimp 2.10 supports 16-bit as internal format and in the raw loader. And perhaps you are interested, Gimp 2.10 has support for the HGT file format, gathered by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). I blogged about it here: https://dablogter.blogspot.com/2018/01/gimp-now-supports-hgt-file-format.html And I have an blogpost how to import the NOAA GLOBE elevation files here: https://dablogter.blogspot.com/2018/09/howto-open-elevation-data-from-noaa.html What is missing is import of 32-bit float values in the "Load Image From Raw Data"-plugin. I opened a feature for that: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/issues/2804 Do you have a link to one of thePDS images? Regards, Tobias Am Mi., 30. Jan. 2019 um 20:35 Uhr schrieb Rick Kline : > > Hi, > > Starting a new thread instead of getting this one lost in the last > conversation. > > Thanks for the suggestions, Liam and Guy. I was at least able to access the > PDS (NASA’s Planetary Data System) .img image in GIMP 2.8.20 (!) by changing > the image file type to .data. > > Unfortunately, there’s no bit depth parameter available. How difficult would > it be to provide that in the “Load Image From Raw Data” GUI? P’shop provides > the following in their "Photoshop Raw Options" dialog: > > > > If there was even just an option to choose 8-bit or 16-bit image depth, > that’d be a big help. > > Many thanks. > > Rick Kline > Data Manager (ret.) > Spacecraft Planetary Imaging Facility, Cornell University > > * * ** *** * * * > It’s better to wave at a stranger than to ignore a friend > * * ** *** * * * > > > > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Suggestion for opening raw images
Rick, GIMP 2.8.x is 8-bit not 16-bit capable. To get 16-bit capability you need the new 2.10.x version. That's what I have and it does, in that dialog, have options for bit-depth (including Endian options). Guy On 1/30/2019 1:35 PM, Rick Kline wrote: Hi, Starting a new thread instead of getting this one lost in the last conversation. Thanks for the suggestions, Liam and Guy. I was at least able to access the PDS (NASA’s Planetary Data System) .img image in GIMP 2.8.20 (!) by changing the image file type to .data. Unfortunately, there’s no bit depth parameter available. How difficult would it be to provide that in the “Load Image From Raw Data” GUI? P’shop provides the following in their "Photoshop Raw Options" dialog: If there was even just an option to choose 8-bit or 16-bit image depth, that’d be a big help. Many thanks. Rick Kline Data Manager (ret.) Spacecraft Planetary Imaging Facility, Cornell University * * ** *** * * * It’s better to wave at a stranger than to ignore a friend * * ** *** * * * ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list -- “Happiness is the meaning and the purpose of life, the whole aim and end of human existence.” ― Aristotle ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Suggestion for opening raw images
Hi, Starting a new thread instead of getting this one lost in the last conversation. Thanks for the suggestions, Liam and Guy. I was at least able to access the PDS (NASA’s Planetary Data System) .img image in GIMP 2.8.20 (!) by changing the image file type to .data. Unfortunately, there’s no bit depth parameter available. How difficult would it be to provide that in the “Load Image From Raw Data” GUI? P’shop provides the following in their "Photoshop Raw Options" dialog: If there was even just an option to choose 8-bit or 16-bit image depth, that’d be a big help. Many thanks. Rick Kline Data Manager (ret.) Spacecraft Planetary Imaging Facility, Cornell University * * ** *** * * * It’s better to wave at a stranger than to ignore a friend * * ** *** * * * ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Suggestion for dialog displayed on Gimp exit
Minor edit/update: > - In single-window mode, multiple images are displayed as a row of tabs ... however, when only one image is open the tab bar is not shown This little quirk was apparently fixed in GIMP 2.8.16, i.e. the single-window-mode tab bar is always shown. -- Stratadrake strata_ran...@hotmail.com Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Suggestion for dialog displayed on Gimp exit
Short answer: This dialog is used because there may potentially be more than one image open with unsaved changes. Long answer: First, a few questions... 1 - Are you running GIMP in single-window mode or not? 2 - How many image windows did you have open? 3 - What command/shortcut did you use to close the window and/or exit GIMP? Because here's the scenarios that may be in play: 1 - If you are simply closing the window, then in single-window mode this is interpreted as exiting GIMP entirely while in multiple-window mode it is interpreted as closing only that window (not exiting GIMP). 2 - In multiple window mode, when you close the last open image GIMP does not exit at this time but instead leaves behind an empty placeholder window (in case you need to open a new image, etc.). You have to close the empty window to actually exit GIMP. 3 - If you have multiple image windows open and you try to close all windows and/or exit GIMP, there may be more than one image open with unsaved changes. This is why the particular dialog shows a list of open images and only has choices to discard all changes or cancel. However, I do agree that the current logic is flawed and needs discussion -- the following points in particular: - In single-window mode, multiple images are displayed as a row of tabs (comparable to Internet browsers); however, when only one image is open the tab bar is not shown -- leaving the user without a VISIBLE button to close only that window (because hitting the standard Close button will exit GIMP entirely). Yes there is the menu command and the keyboard shortcuts work, but this is the touchscreen era. Other applications handle this scenario in various ways -- e.g. Firefox always displays the tab bar even when only one tab is open, Office displays a secondary Close button on the right side of the menubar (distinct from the window's main Close button). - When only one image is open, regardless of whether the user is closing the window or exiting GIMP, GIMP should ALWAYS use the single-image version of the "unsaved changes" prompt (i.e. save/discard/cancel) instead of the multiple-images version (list of images, discard/cancel). - The multiple-images version of the "unsaved changes" prompt should include, in its list of open images, buttons to save the individual images directly from this prompt. -- Stratadrake strata_ran...@hotmail.com Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 01:17:00 +0200 > From: for...@gimpusers.com > To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org > CC: notificati...@gimpusers.com > Subject: [Gimp-user] Suggestion for dialog displayed on Gimp exit > > I can't seem to find anywhere specifically for suggestions/improvements to > Gimp, > and GimpTalk seems to be pretty much inactive so here I am: > > When I make a change to a .XCF project and go to close Gimp after forgetting > the > save the file, I see the dialog in the (hopefully) posted Image. > > There are three buttons: "Help", "Discard changes" and "Cancel" > > Now, 9 times out of 10 when I get this, the thing I want to do is save the > file. > Why is there no "Save" button on this dialog? The accepted standard for this > scenario is a dialog with "Save", "Don't Save" and "Cancel" buttons and for > me, > this covers all the bases. > > Attachments: > * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/241/original/Gimp4.png > > -- > RrnR (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Suggestion for dialog displayed on Gimp exit
I can't seem to find anywhere specifically for suggestions/improvements to Gimp, and GimpTalk seems to be pretty much inactive so here I am: When I make a change to a .XCF project and go to close Gimp after forgetting the save the file, I see the dialog in the (hopefully) posted Image. There are three buttons: "Help", "Discard changes" and "Cancel" Now, 9 times out of 10 when I get this, the thing I want to do is save the file. Why is there no "Save" button on this dialog? The accepted standard for this scenario is a dialog with "Save", "Don't Save" and "Cancel" buttons and for me, this covers all the bases. Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/241/original/Gimp4.png -- RrnR (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 10 August 2013 12:52, maderios wrote: > On 08/10/2013 03:45 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: >> >> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:55:43 +0200, maderios wrote: >> >>> Good question but I'm not developer... >> >> >> Then how can you know it's simple? >> > *know* and *simple* are your words > > I wrote : > *I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and > maintenance would be small* maderios - Now, talking seriously - this subject has come, and come again in this list for months if not years. The answer for a second officially maintained GIMP changing just this small behavior is plain "No" as in "no" - niet, nada, zip, nil, não This won't be done! Just stop writing along these lines before everyone around ignores your e-mail Check Akana's plug-ins for automatically exporting/not asking for closing confirmation - come up with ideas for plug-ins that could ease the workflow for multiple simple edits, like most people seem to want (which would be moving forward, not backwards) Bind "ctrl + s" to "File/Export" or whatever please you. As for an unofficial fork keeping the old behavior, as far as I know someone had done that, and justa s every serious reply to you mentioned would happen: it just rotted away, unmaintained. > > -- > Maderios > > > > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 8/10/2013 9:52 AM, maderios wrote: On 08/10/2013 03:45 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:55:43 +0200, maderios wrote: Good question but I'm not developer... Then how can you know it's simple? *know* and *simple* are your words I wrote : *I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and maintenance would be small* Let's rephrase, then. How do you know both versions would not be different and coding would be small? ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 08/10/2013 03:45 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:55:43 +0200, maderios wrote: Good question but I'm not developer... Then how can you know it's simple? *know* and *simple* are your words I wrote : *I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and maintenance would be small* -- Maderios ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:55:43 +0200, maderios wrote: > Good question but I'm not developer... Then how can you know it's simple? -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
* maderios [08-10-13 08:58]: > On 08/10/2013 02:36 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: > >On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:11:55 +0200, maderios wrote: > > > >>I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and > >>maintenance would be small. > > > >Well, if it's that simple, why don't you do it? > > > Good question but I'm not developer... Then you will need to purchase a good paddle as you are caught in the stream! -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 08/10/2013 02:36 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:11:55 +0200, maderios wrote: I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and maintenance would be small. Well, if it's that simple, why don't you do it? Good question but I'm not developer... -- Maderios ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:11:55 +0200, maderios wrote: > I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and > maintenance would be small. Well, if it's that simple, why don't you do it? -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 08/10/2013 12:15 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, maderios wrote: Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors images. This would allow everyone to be satisfied Except for developers who would have to maintain two versions. But who cares about them, eh? I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and maintenance would be small. Another solution would consist in keeping single Gimp but in proposing two possible configurations. Even approach as for both interfaces. I realize it might sound arrogant, but do you understand the meaning of the word "no"? The word " no " exists only for the pessimists... :-) -- Maderios ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, maderios wrote: >>> Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: >>> - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior >>> - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to >>> save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors >>> images. >>> This would allow everyone to be satisfied >> >> >> Except for developers who would have to maintain two versions. But who >> cares about them, eh? >> > I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and > maintenance would be small. Another solution would consist in keeping single > Gimp but in proposing two possible configurations. Even approach as for > both interfaces. I realize it might sound arrogant, but do you understand the meaning of the word "no"? Alexandre ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 08/08/2013 09:53 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, maderios wrote: Hi This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion "save vs. export", etc Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors images. This would allow everyone to be satisfied Except for developers who would have to maintain two versions. But who cares about them, eh? I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and maintenance would be small. Another solution would consist in keeping single Gimp but in proposing two possible configurations. Even approach as for both interfaces. -- Maderios ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 08.08.2013 at 10:00 P.M., Jay Smith wrote: This is open-source software. You are welcome to become a developer, fork the project, and do all this yourself or you can build a team to do it. Or you can hire people to do it for you. But asking the developers -- all volunteers -- to increase their workload (the divergence would keep widening over time) is not how things work in open-source software as I understand it. +1. You hit the nail right on the head - we're mostly volunteers, doing it in our limited spare time. And the one who is working by profession on GIMP has AFAIK been overloaded for years. However, I know better than to waste more energy on the subject. +1 Let's not forget: GIMP has a plug-in architecture. This means you can remove and add plug-ins to make GIMP fit your needs and personal preferences. The plug-in registry* has a bunch of plug-ins and there are projects like FX-Foundry* or G'Mic*. And in the whole, long discussion on the Save./.Export-behaviour some plug-ins were mentioned to solve this problem for the users who don't like or can't stay with the new behaviour. From this point of view I don't think we need many separate versions. Kind regards, Sven *plug-in registry: http://registry.gimp.org/ *FX-Foundry: http://gimpfx-foundry.sourceforge.net/ *G'Mic: http://gmic.sourceforge.net/gimp.shtml ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
Am 08.08.2013 21:47, schrieb maderios: Hi This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion "save vs. export", etc Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors images. This would allow everyone to be satisfied Greetings that's sensless it is like it is and this is not a perfect world, so never ever everyone could be satisfied this whole discussion about save, export and so on is only a wasting of time so stop that and do what GIMP is for - (GNU) IMAGE MANIPULATION (PROGRAMM) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 08/08/2013 03:47 PM, maderios wrote: Hi This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion "save vs. export", etc Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors images. This would allow everyone to be satisfied Greetings I'm just a user, and do not speak for anybody other than myself, but... Your approach would mean maintaining *two* different programs which would continue to diverge over time. I very much doubt that "the developers" have the energy to do that -- sometimes it seems that they don't have enough energy to do all that they would like with just one version. It seems to me that "the developer's" point of view is that amateurs should use a simpler program and not use Gimp at all. This is open-source software. You are welcome to become a developer, fork the project, and do all this yourself or you can build a team to do it. Or you can hire people to do it for you. But asking the developers -- all volunteers -- to increase their workload (the divergence would keep widening over time) is not how things work in open-source software as I understand it. If my vote counted (which it does not because I am not in the "target user group"), I would vote against this export requirement also. However, I know better than to waste more energy on the subject. Jay ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, maderios wrote: > Hi > This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion "save vs. export", > etc > Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: > - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior > - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to > save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors > images. > This would allow everyone to be satisfied Except for developers who would have to maintain two versions. But who cares about them, eh? Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
On 8/8/2013 1:47 PM, maderios wrote: Hi This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion "save vs. export", etc Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors images. This would allow everyone to be satisfied Greetings -- Maderios You try to satisfy everybody nobody ends up satisfied. If enough people want it, they can fork it. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp
Hi This positive proposal could end the eternal discussion "save vs. export", etc Developers could offer two versions of Gimp: - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors images. This would allow everyone to be satisfied Greetings -- Maderios ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
