Re: [Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-12-17 Thread Kevin Cozens
On 16/12/2010 12:21 AM, Lambertus wrote: > Picture 2 is copied from an open GIMP image and pasted into the enlarged > canvas area of picture 1. > Picture 2 is invisible if it dragged outside the bounds of picture 1 into an > open area of the canvas. The other option you have is to use "Paste as

Re: [Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-12-16 Thread Patrick Horgan
On 12/15/2010 09:21 PM, Lambertus wrote: >> Hello David and thank you for the quick reply! >> Now, using the word "Canvas" rather than "Drawable area" makes things a lot >> more sane immediately, and your >> explanation is accurate and acceptable. > Maybe this is the same situation I have. > > I ha

Re: [Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-12-15 Thread Tőkés Ábel
12/16/2010 6:21 AM keltezéssel, Lambertus írta: >> Hello David and thank you for the quick reply! >> Now, using the word "Canvas" rather than "Drawable area" makes things a lot >> more sane immediately, and your >> explanation is accurate and acceptable. > Maybe this is the same situation I have. >

Re: [Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-12-15 Thread Ofnuts
On 12/16/2010 06:21 AM, Lambertus wrote: >> Hello David and thank you for the quick reply! >> Now, using the word "Canvas" rather than "Drawable area" makes things a lot >> more sane immediately, and your >> explanation is accurate and acceptable. > Maybe this is the same situation I have. > > I h

Re: [Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-12-15 Thread David Gowers (kampu)
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Lambertus wrote: >>Hello David and thank you for the quick reply! > >>Now, using the word "Canvas" rather than "Drawable area" makes things a lot >>more sane immediately, and your >>explanation is accurate and acceptable. > > Maybe this is the same situation I have

[Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-12-15 Thread Lambertus
>Hello David and thank you for the quick reply! >Now, using the word "Canvas" rather than "Drawable area" makes things a lot >more sane immediately, and your >explanation is accurate and acceptable. Maybe this is the same situation I have. I have a picture (picture 1). I expand the size of the c

Re: [Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-04-15 Thread Deniz Dogan
2010/4/15 Janne Kronback : > I used GIMP yesterday after a break of a few months and spend the first hour > being frustrated. > Part of it was because I was using a Swedish version which I haven't tried > before, so all the names were strange at first... > I think I managed to change this on my ow

Re: [Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-04-15 Thread Janne Kronback
Hello David and thank you for the quick reply! Now, using the word "Canvas" rather than "Drawable area" makes things a lot more sane immediately, and your explanation is accurate and acceptable. Is there a way to toggle the visibility of the content of layers outside the canvas? If not, I'd be ni

Re: [Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-04-15 Thread David Gowers
Hello Janne, On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Janne Kronback wrote: > I used GIMP yesterday after a break of a few months and spend the first hour > being frustrated. > Part of it was because I was using a Swedish version which I haven't tried > before, so all the names were strange at first... >

[Gimp-user] Why doesn't "drawable area" follow the dimensions of a layer?

2010-04-15 Thread Janne Kronback
I used GIMP yesterday after a break of a few months and spend the first hour being frustrated. Part of it was because I was using a Swedish version which I haven't tried before, so all the names were strange at first... Anyhow, the manual (chapter 8) says nothing about the issue I had. I copied a