> And please, try
> to be less aggressive on this mailing-list. If you want to, you can
> continue your pointless rants elsewhere but please let this list be a
> friendly place where GIMP users and developers can exchange their
> ideas and experiences and help each others.
a-fucking-greed (i.e., '
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No I am not. You are confusing the two. I have read the script and I
> > am pretty sure that what I said is correct. However that is not at all
> > the point here.
> >
> at this point a real german would back this up with documentation.
> i am the
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:14:54PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > apologize for what?
>
> I think I have been pretty clear here. I want your public apologies
> for calling me a liar. It's simple: you state that you have been wrong
> and apologize for i
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apologize for what?
I think I have been pretty clear here. I want your public apologies
for calling me a liar. It's simple: you state that you have been wrong
and apologize for it.
> you are confusing Copy Visible with Merge Visible
No I am not. Y
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 12:33:26PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > liar.
>
> Carol, I am not going to let you call me a liar on the GIMP
> mailing-lists. I hereby ask you to apologize for this. Otherwise I
> will have to ask for your gimp.org mail addre
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> liar.
Carol, I am not going to let you call me a liar on the GIMP
mailing-lists. I hereby ask you to apologize for this. Otherwise I
will have to ask for your gimp.org mail address to be revoked and you
being excluded from this list. I don't think y
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:06:20PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i must ask you, did you ever install gimp-perl, much less use it? i
> > don't remember this ever occuring. maybe some solemn vows and
> > promises to never use it but at no time can i r
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i must ask you, did you ever install gimp-perl, much less use it? i
> don't remember this ever occuring. maybe some solemn vows and
> promises to never use it but at no time can i recall you ever
> installing gimp-perl and using it.
I don't really
On Monday 13 September 2004 19:48, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
> > continue to be this:
> >-->Image -->Merge Visible Layers (think about those
> > options that you are presented, depe
happy birthday, Sven, btw. are you old enough to drink alcohol in the
united states legally yet?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:48:26AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
> > continue to be this
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
> continue to be this:
>-->Image -->Merge Visible Layers (think about those options
> that you are presented, depending on what you need from this
> special layer each o
hello, this was an interesting list.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 01:02:28PM +0200, cedric wrote:
> May be someone has another feeling, but i've found today strange behaviors.
>
> 1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer aspect.
> Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for
Hi,
cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer
>aspect. Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for exemple) the
>copy visible picture is the same as if they were all activated. Is
>there any way to overpass that ?
Well, y
13 matches
Mail list logo
