Hello Karsten,
you wrote:
However, if it *did* compile for you, I wonder where ALLOC_GROW (as of #02/13)
and alloc_nr (as of #10/13) came from? Or did we recently remove '#include
cache.h'
from upstream mingw.c?
you are right, the include needs to be added.
To test my modifications, I
Hello,
this is the remainder of Karsten's unicode branch, that is a time
proven part of msysGit. (If this code is accepted, only one patch
would only remain: gitk and git-gui fixes.)
When rebasing Karsten's work, I have eliminated two commits:
https://github.com/msysgit/git/commit/f967550
Stepan Kasal ka...@ucw.cz writes:
... only one patch
would only remain: gitk and git-gui fixes.)
Nice.
Will queue.
When rebasing Karsten's work, I have eliminated two commits:
https://github.com/msysgit/git/commit/f967550
https://github.com/msysgit/git/commit/290bf81
These commits only
Am 17.07.2014 17:37, schrieb Stepan Kasal:
Hello,
this is the remainder of Karsten's unicode branch, that is a time
proven part of msysGit. (If this code is accepted, only one patch
would only remain: gitk and git-gui fixes.)
Thank you so much!
I had to add '#include ../cache.h' to
Karsten Blees karsten.bl...@gmail.com writes:
Am 17.07.2014 17:37, schrieb Stepan Kasal:
I believe we prefer moving code to the right place over forward
declarations (IIRC I got bashed for the latter in one of the first rounds
of this patch series). If only to justify 'git-blame -M' :-D
Hi,
Karsten Blees karsten.bl...@gmail.com writes:
I believe we prefer moving code to the right place over forward
declarations (IIRC I got bashed for the latter in one of the first rounds
of this patch series). If only to justify 'git-blame -M' :-D
indeed, my position is the same,
Stepan Kasal ka...@ucw.cz writes:
If anyone thinks the resulting ordering is not OK, they can propose
one re-order patch on top of this series.
I agree that that would be a good way to go.
Junio wrote:
OK, so the series may need further re-polishing of the polishing
done by Stepan
Am 17.07.2014 21:00, schrieb Stepan Kasal:
Hi,
Karsten Blees karsten.bl...@gmail.com writes:
I believe we prefer moving code to the right place over forward
declarations (IIRC I got bashed for the latter in one of the first rounds
of this patch series). If only to justify 'git-blame -M' :-D
8 matches
Mail list logo