SuSE 6.3 is a 6 CD set. Also, Micro Center in Cambridge had the full SuSE
CD set for $29.95 last month when I checked. It is normally retail $49.95
with a street price of $34.95 normally.
Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
Does anyone know if there is as iso
In reference to your post on GNHLUG about Learning Perl...
Save yourself a lot of time and fooling around with
downloading etc., get a copy of Perl For Dummies book
at Barnes and Nobles for $19.95.
It has a CdRom with Perl 5, which will load on a Win 95/98 box.
Works fine, lasts long time.
Get
Re: Job postings
Send them to the Main List,
and let's run a process in the background
to plan for future traffic.
paulc
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the
I forgot to mention that once you edit the /etc/inetd.conf file you'll have to
restart inetd.conf, you can do the following:
[root@segv3 root]# ps auxww|grep inetd|egrep -v grep
root 234 0.0 0.4 1244 304 ? S Dec 14 0:02 inetd
[root@segv3 root]# kill -HUP 234
Ed
Ed Robbins
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Jim Ryan wrote:
What would be a comparable scenario for RH 6.1? Good book CD combo? Or
do I already have Perl on my machine?
If you did a complete install, you already have it. If not, you'll find it
on the Red Hat CD.
I know nothing about it at this point. Would
I already have Perl on my machine?
You almost surely do.
Type perl, and you will see.
Ferenc
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
NO NO NO NO NO NO!
There's too much noise already on the main list!
Send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thanks guys/gals!]
And subscribe to that list if you're interested in what's out there!
Paul Courchene wrote:
Re: Job postings
Send them to the Main List,
and let's run a process in the
One way of doing this is to have the linux box be the mail server for
the
domain, and then have .forward files in each user's home directory. The
.forward files would point to the system inside the domain that the user
want's their mail spooled to.
"Joshua S. Freeman" wrote:
...
There are other
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
joshua.threeofus.com, and is aliased to: www.threeofus.com,
discuss.threeofus.com, news.threeofus.com, mail.threeofus.com,
pop.threeofus.com
[...]
It is a redhat linux 6.1 box. this machine's permanent hostname in macDNS
is monica.threeofus.com.
I do just about all of my general scripting for both UNIX and Win32 in
Perl...I've never used VMS DCL, and I've only done a few CGI things
with Perl, but that's mostly because I'm always forced to work on web stuff
made for IIS platforms and which will be installable on any IIS platform
(In other
Here is the request. Please respond to him directly.
Please help me to find a non expensive Linux training place for my 16y old
son on weekend.
Jean-Luc Momplaisir
MIS Department
BostonCoach Corp.
(617) 394-3744 Phone
(617) 394-3755 Fax
"Momplaisir, Jean-Luc" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Dawson
OK... provisionally, I'm OK with that solution...
I do have a question though: how do I lock down smtp services on the
linux box if I move smtp services there (for users using clients from
other networks...)
Thanks,
J.
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Bruce Dawson wrote:
The easiest solution?
Move
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
dns for threeofus.com should be served by macDNS on the mac at
199.232.38.2
That would be no problem.
I want smtp for client users (non-*nix clients) to use mail.threeofus.com,
aka 199.232.38.2 (Eudora Internet Mail Server)... I want ALL pop
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Benjamin Scott wrote:
I do have a question though: how do I lock down smtp services on the
linux box if I move smtp services there (for users using clients from
other networks...)
Not sure what you mean by "lock down". Please clarify. :)
The only people I
Thanks Karl.
That's good info.
Paul W
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Karl J. Runge wrote:
Hi Paul,
I believe the standard philosophy is that if machine isn't utilizing
(in some way) nearly 100% of the RAM then it is wasting the RAM.
I agree with this for the most part.
So it caches files,
I don't think so! (If that's the case, then your system won't
be able to receive mail from anywhere on the network!) That's
the way SMTP works - its a mail receiving protocol - and its
defined to work (RFC 911 I think) such that the sender doesn't
have to log in!
However, with the
Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Chris Bourassa wrote:
I am planning on learning (at least start) Perl. How different is Linux
Perl compared to (yuch) Perl for Win32.
I'm going to respectfully disagree with the people here who have stated that
Perl on Win32 isn't like Perl
Hi,
The only people I want using my smtp server are people logged into their
shell account, or people who HAVE shell accounts using a mail client from
a remote network...
This is not gonna work. What you can do with smtp is to control the access from
ip numbers. Of course you have to have
Thanks. I actually found that ftp://ftp.linuxberg.com/pub/ISO/ has ISO
images of most of the major distro's.
Kenny
Kurth Bemis wrote:
At 09:04 PM 2/7/2000 , you wrote:
try ftp.linuxberg.com i think that theres one there
~kurth
Does anyone know if there is as iso image for suse out
Quoting Chris Bourassa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As much as this is blasphemous, but I do not have my Linux box up and
running yet (not for at least a month for parts) but I am planning on
learning (at least start) Perl. How different is Linux Perl compared to
(yuch) Perl for Win32. I plan on
Quoting Jamie Blondin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As for differences - there are a few. The work of ActivePerl
(www.activeperl.com) has not been without fruition, however, and they've
managed to create a usable (barely) port of Perl and several common
packages. Be warned, though, you may find
Corel to buy Inprise for $2.44B
The stock swap will create a "Linux powerhouse,"
officials say. Inprise CEO Dale Fuller will become
chairman, Michael Cowpland remains as CEO.
http://www.pcweek.com/a/pcwt0002072/2433708/
--
Lee D. Rothstein -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 603-424-2900
Fax:
Help
I just reread Madog's note to me and he has requested a LCD system capable
of 1024x768. Anyone coming that has the access to equipment like this?
We have 22 people reserved for Harlows after the meeting. Looks like a
great meetign shaping up
Jerry
Oh, now I get the drift. So there is a bash scripting language. On that
note am I to assume that I can do everything in Perl that I could do with
bash scripting and more? That it, in a very wide sense, a superset?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
hello everybody - i'm looking into ways to setup vhosts on my debian 2.1
box. every person i have talked to says use qmail but i don't know about
that. i looked at the howto at
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Virtual-Services-HOWTO.html and it also says
use qmail. i think that i'm goin to
UGH!!! sorry list ahah typed it up and then hit send without changing To:
haha
On Tue, 08 Feb 2000, you wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in your sons situation because I am a 17y old who has been using
Linux for about 2 years now. I'm also seriously considering starting to teach
linux classes
Well, just to be more precise, bash is a shell, and like all shells,
provides a scripting language. Perl is interpreted (like shell scripts are)
but is a much more powerful general purpose language. You can do quite a
lot with a shell script (with a fair amount of pain :-), but Perl can do
Thank you all for the explanations. How would I find out if Perl is already
installed on my system?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Dave Seidel
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Perl
Does Perl on Win32 have the fork() call yet? If so, is it reasonably
fast (as it is on Unix)? fork() is a nice, simple way to make a server
(for example).
I would guess if perl 5.005 is on Win32 it has threads, no? (not that
I'd really ever want to use threads in perl...)
Karl Runge
On Mon, 7
Some folks may say that it is _the_ scripting language for Un*x. :}
Beauty of Perl is that it runs many places and the folks porting it to different
platforms are now working to make your scripts as portable as possible.
I have Perl scripts that run on Unix, Mac, and WinNT.
Perl is not
Hi Paul,
I believe the standard philosophy is that if machine isn't utilizing
(in some way) nearly 100% of the RAM then it is wasting the RAM.
I agree with this for the most part.
So it caches files, buffers i/o, and keeps other "slow" data in the
RAM for quick access should the need for them
i know that this is off topic but - anyone know where i can grab a ISO of
FreeBSD or NetBSD or the other BSD ( i can't remember the name )?
~kurth
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text
My almost source for an LCD fell through for the Thursday meeting. Anyone
out there have the availablility of one for Maddog??
Jerry
-
Jerry Kubeck Customer Support Appropriate Solutions, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karl J. Runge writes:
Does Perl on Win32 have the fork() call yet? If so, is it reasonably
fast (as it is on Unix)? fork() is a nice, simple way to make a server
(for example).
$ uname -a
Windows_NT CLARK2 4.0 17.5 i686
$ perl -v
This is perl, version 5.004_04 built for cygwin32
Copyright
For FreeBSD, try ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD
For NetBSD, try http://www.netbsd.org/Releases/formal-1.4/
I don't know of any other BSD, but someone else should be able to help you
with that.
Kurth Bemis wrote:
i know that this is off topic but - anyone know where i can grab a ISO of
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Greg Dake wrote:
For FreeBSD, try ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD
For NetBSD, try http://www.netbsd.org/Releases/formal-1.4/
I don't know of any other BSD, but someone else should be able to help you
with that.
http://www.openbsd.org/
Kurth Bemis wrote:
OpenBSD
www.openbsd.org
it's goal is to be the most secure.
Bryan
Greg Dake wrote:
For FreeBSD, try ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD
For NetBSD, try http://www.netbsd.org/Releases/formal-1.4/
I don't know of any other BSD, but someone else should be able to help you
with that.
Thanks!
OK... I'd be happy shutting down the eudora internet mail server on the
mac and have all mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] handled on the linux box
(even though that machine doesn't handle DNS)... how do I get
started?... is anyone here using qmail? I sure could use some help
getting *that*
I have a shelf filled with books on everything from linux to programming
in c... yes, these books are filled with info... but there are times
where it's hard to grasp a concept no matter how well written the book
it's found in.
Some people need lessons, handholding, mentoring, etc. to loearn
Rumor has it someone on this list has done this. I have
downloaded and built the pcmcia with wavelan2_cs successfully.
I also have the wireless tools iwconfig, iwpriv, iwspy.
I am able to run the Roamabout link test on a windows
laptop and the linux box replies. I cannot pass IP.
I'm also
Hi,
Some people need lessons, handholding, mentoring, etc. to loearn
concepts and skills that they might not have a natural affinity
towards...
Yes, I agree with this opinion. Until you reach a level, it's pretty hard to
get used to using linux, especially if all you had to do is click on Heretic
?
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Joshua S. Freeman | preferred email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp public key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.threeofus.com
kill -HUP inetd's PID
"Joshua S. Freeman" wrote:
?
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
Did you make any changes to /etc/inetd.conf? Something else that you may
want to check is if there is any sort of active process that has the
ports that you are using bound (some IDS tools like portsentry will do
this if it is satrtedbefore inetd).
Kenny
"Joshua S. Freeman" wrote:
Thanks...
It's strange...
I didn't make any changes at all to etc/inetd.conf, and I'm not running
anything else on that port (110) afaik... anything else I should check?
how do i check if there's a port conflict just in case?
J.On Tue, 8 Feb 2000,
Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
Did you make any changes to
I believe that both lynx and wget will do what you want. Both have multitudes
of options for doing this kind of thing.
Jeff
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Aaahh, a nice web interface Have you looked at webmin?
http://www.webmin.com/
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua S. Freeman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: new mx record question
no, there's no reason except if
That's a really good question (and I wish I had an answer). I'm guessing
that `netstat` can somehow tell you what's listening on what ports. A
port-scanner will do the trick, too. But what did you mean when you said
" I lost tcpd/pop3d"? What is happening? Can you connect to port 110 at
all (by
Thanks go Ferenc... i was trying to run it from a machine which, while on
my network, i hadn't added it's info to my DNS table... long, dumb story..
but Ferenc figured it out...
cheers all..
J.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Joshua S. Freeman
Oops... sorry Guy's this should have been sent to BOB not the List
- Original Message -
From: Robert W. Fowler III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 9:10 PM
Subject: Post
Hi Bob
Ive got your resume'and im sorry for the delay, its been pretty
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
Right now, Top reports X as using 31.7% of my memory and 2.6% of my CPU.
What's the Resident Segment Size of X? Not the Virtual Segment Size, mind
you. I believe X maps the video controller into virtual memory, plus who
knows what else, so VSS
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Jim Ryan wrote:
Thank you all for the explanations. How would I find out if Perl is
already installed on my system?
You're using Red Hat, right? If so,
rpm -q perl
will query the Red Hat package manager about the installed version of Perl, if
any exists.
--
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
Some people need lessons, handholding, mentoring, etc. to loearn concepts
and skills that they might not have a natural affinity towards...
Plus, some people learn well by reading, others by demonstration, others
still be lecture and explanation.
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Jamie Blondin wrote:
Even easier...Assuming your inetd keeps its pid in /var/run/inetd.pid (Most
boxes I've seen do.):
# kill -HUP `cat /var/run/inetd.pid`
Easier still:
# killall -HUP inetd
(But, to quote the manpage: Be warned that typing "killall name" may not
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
I didn't make any changes at all to etc/inetd.conf, and I'm not running
anything else on that port (110) afaik... anything else I should check?
What *did* you change? :-)
Check your system log files.
You can also try invoking "tcpd" and
You can get them off of the RH mirror sites in the `updates`
directories:
ftp://mrhankey.bizserve.com/pub/linux/redhat/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/updates/6.1/images/i386/
I don't know if they are the updated images, but you can get them from
Metalab.
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
If that doesn't work, you can try including "Magic SYSRQ Keys"
into your kernel.
So THAT'S what that is for I never did get around to reading the
docs on that...
Yup. I've become quite adept at killing X, resetting the keyboard,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but ps isn't available at that point, even if it might be installed.
We don't know where to find it. And the processes most likely are
not running, but waiting on something. If we only knew what that
something was. I never saw this happen
I love compiling stuff but I also like the ease of querying/removing/installing
rpm packages so what I'd really like to do is compile my own rpm packages. I
know I can go and download src.rpm packages and --rebuild them but what about
something where someone hasn't already made one. So on to my
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
I've been having the same problems ever since RH6.1. Right now, Top
reports X as using 31.7% of my memory and 2.6% of my CPU. If I run a WM
that is resource-intensive (such as KDE, Gnome, E, etc.), there have
been a few occasioins where my whole
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
That's a really good question (and I wish I had an answer). I'm guessing
that `netstat` can somehow tell you what's listening on what ports. A
$ netstat -an
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address
61 matches
Mail list logo
