is bound to understand and take on board. Funders such
as the Wellcome Trust are already doing important work in that regard.
Jan Velterop
On 28 Apr 2012, at 14:24, Stevan Harnad wrote:
The list of recommendations I made was strategic.
The objective was to maximize OA deposits
about hypothetical public interest in
accessing all peer-reviewed research, when the real public interest
(and researcher interest) is known, and now only needs OA mandates
from institutions and funders in order to meet it?
Stevan Harnad
On 28 Apr 2012, at 15:23, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Jan
that they provide OA.
Stevan Harnad
Enabling Open Scholarship
http://www.openscholarship.org
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
From: Wise, Alicia (ELS-OXF) A.Wise at elsevier.com
I suspect compliance enforcement may not be such an issue for NIH
because so many publishers deposit on behalf of their authors. It's
one of the ways publishers have constructively engaged with the NIH on
implementation of its open access
mandates can ensure that the publications are made OA
(especially if institutional repository deposit is designated
as the sole mechanism for submitting research for annual
institutional performance review).
See http://bit.ly/institutionalOA
Stevan Harnad
On 2012-04-23, at 8:03 PM, LIBLICENSE
There is no Platinum Road to OA
http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/6442.html
(And the survey is pretty amateurish and slanted.)
On 2012-04-20, at 10:28 AM, Beall, Jeffrey wrote:
I have a quibble with one of the statements on the first page of this survey.
It says,
At
There is no Platinum Road to
OAÂ http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/6442.html
(And the survey is pretty amateurish and slanted.)
On 2012-04-20, at 10:28 AM, Beall, Jeffrey wrote:
I have a quibble with one of the statements on the first page of
this survey. It says,
institutional mandates.)
Stevan Harnad
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Stevan Harnad amsciforum at gmail.com wrote:
As Johanna McEntyre of EBI has raised an important series of questions
about institutional deposit and institution-external harvesting (by
PMC and UKPMC) versus direct
institutional mandates.)
Stevan Harnad
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com wrote:
As Johanna McEntyre of EBI has raised an important series of questions
about institutional deposit and institution-external harvesting (by
PMC and UKPMC) versus direct institution
of
harvesting from IRs instead of requiring direct institution-external
deposit.
Stevan Harnad
Jo McEntyre
On Apr 12, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
On 2012-04-12, at 5:44 AM, Steve Hitchcock wrote:
Do we know why Pubmed does not apparently link to papers in IRs
deposit.
Stevan Harnad
deposit.
Stevan Harnad
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
as exposable, they are likely to become
their own deterrents.)
http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/5497.html
Stevan Harnad
On 2012-04-10, at 6:41 AM, Philip Davis wrote:
Emergence of a Citation Cartel
10 April, 2012
The Scholarly Kitchen
http://wp.me/pcvbl-6xS
In a 1999 essay
as exposable, they are likely to become
their own deterrents.)
http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/5497.html
Stevan Harnad
On 2012-04-10, at 6:41 AM, Philip Davis wrote:
Emergence of a Citation Cartel
10 April, 2012
The Scholarly Kitchen
http://wp.me/pcvbl-6xS
In a 1999 essay
/OA first:
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/494-guid.html
Stevan Harnad
On 2012-04-02, at 5:42 AM, Kuil, van der Annemiek wrote:
The message below has just been posted on the SURF website and might be of
interest to you.
Open access to Dutch research stagnating
Higher
mandating ID/OA first:
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/494-guid.html
Stevan Harnad
On 2012-04-02, at 5:42 AM, Kuil, van der Annemiek wrote:
The message below has just been posted on the SURF website and might be of
interest to you.
Open access to Dutch research stagnating
Dear CN:
Where is Peter Suber (the primary drafter of the BOAI and the de
facto leader of the OA movement) in your design?
Best wishes,
Stevan
On 2012-03-28, at 5:02 PM, Constantinescu Nicolaie wrote:
Dear friends,
Some colleagues here in Romania asked me to put together a very brief
and their researchers that it is in their interest to
mandate and provide open access.
Stevan Harnad
On 2012-03-27, at 7:40 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Bravo to Mike Rossner for his position statement in favor of OA mandate
legislation. Everything he says is valid and true.
(But it would be just
with the robot's estimate for the unmandated
self-archiving rate. (The unmandated papers were not even
necessarily self-archived in the author's instituitional repository:
many were on their authors' personal or lab websites.)
Stevan Harnad
On 2012-03-22, at 4:20 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Comment
and build upon is.
(And no one said anyone was a second class citizen.)
Peace.
On 2012-03-28, at 4:18 PM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Stevan Harnad harnad at ecs.soton.ac.uk
wrote:
Some comments on Richard Poynder's interview of Mike Rossner in Open Shut
http
research institutions and funders), globally, now.
They're long, long overdue; and research impact and progress
keeps being wasted year in and year out while we keep worrying,
pre-emptively, about secondary contingencies...
Stevan Harnad
___
GOAL
and their researchers that it is in their interest to
mandate and provide open access.
Stevan Harnad
On 2012-03-27, at 7:40 AM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Bravo to Mike Rossner for his position statement in favor of OA mandate
legislation. Everything he says is valid and true.
(But it would be just
with the robot's estimate for the unmandated
self-archiving rate. (The unmandated papers were not even
necessarily self-archived in the author's instituitional repository:
many were on their authors' personal or lab websites.)
Stevan Harnad
On 2012-03-22, at 4:20 PM, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Comment
could believe fervently in the journal affordability crisis while at
the same time believing that their users can nevertheless get access
to all they need one way or another...)
Stevan Harnad
Many estimates have been made of the true costs of Gold Open Access (OA)
publishing
(e.g., by Claudio Aspesi, in the discussion of Richard Poynder's recent
article),
but the estimates are rather arbitrary and unrealistic if the other causal
factors
that could raise or lower them are not
.
http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/21818/
Stevan Harnad
PS Apart from desperate and appallingly maladroit (and doomed) lobbying efforts
with governments (and confidential bargaining efforts with customers) to try to
deter
or delay Green OA mandates, Elsevier has nothing to do with it, one way
On 2012-03-14, at 8:50 AM, Peter Suber wrote:
The Research Councils UK are seeking public comments on their draft new OA
policy.
http://www.openscholarship.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2012-03/rcuk_proposed_policy_on_access_to_research_outputs.pdf
Please send any comments to
Three years after the adoption of its Green Open Access Self-Archiving
Mandate -- http://roarmap.eprints.org/122/ -- MIT announces that its
articles are being downloaded worldwide:
http://libraries.mit.edu/sites/news/faculty-articles-2/7941/
(To draw any comparative conclusions, however,
rate, which will be posted soon, takes both the age and the strength of the
mandate into account.)
Stevan Harnad
-Original Message-
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] 3-Year Success Signs for MIT's Green OA Mandate
Three years after the adoption of its
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107980702132412632948/posts/a4DzVk9n7fG
-
CALL TO ACTION: Tell your Representatives to Support FRPAA
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107980702132412632948/posts/a4DzVk9n7fG
-
CALL TO ACTION: Tell your Representatives to Support FRPAA
anniversary
meeting of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI-II).
(There was no mention of mandates whatsoever in BOAI-I.)
Stevan Harnad
Reconstructed Archivangelist
On 2012-02-17, at 6:36 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
sorry if I'm spreading old news but I couldn't find any mention
of this on the list so maybe people find this interesting:
http://scoap3.org/
Here are some references to some prior discussions of scoap/scoap3:
http://bit.ly/amsci-scoap
your metadata-only records while Google Scholar is
looking for full-texts. Your GS/Google ratio will approximate how many of
your records have an attached open access PDF (.doc etc).
Sincerely,
Tim Brody
(EPrints Developer)
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 11:31 +, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Can we
.
All the rest is irrelevant, and just equivocation or question-begging.
Stevan Harnad
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
anniversary
meeting of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI-II).
(There was no mention of mandates whatsoever in BOAI-I.)
Stevan Harnad
Reconstructed Archivangelist
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman
will index your metadata-only records while Google
Scholar is looking for full-texts. Your GS/Google ratio will approximate
how many of your records have an attached open access PDF (.doc etc).
Sincerely,
Tim Brody
(EPrints Developer)
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 11:31 +, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Can
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:47:09 +0200
From: Iryna Kuchma iryna.kuc...@eifl.net
Reply-To: boai-forum at ecs.soton.ac.uk
To: boai-forum boai-forum at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [BOAI] Budapest Open Access Initiative anniversary
[Forwarded message from
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:30:25 +0200
From: Iryna Kuchma iryna.kuc...@eifl.net
To: boai-forum boai-forum at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [BOAI] Ten Years On,
Researchers Embrace Open Access - Blog post re BOAI 10 on soros.org
Blog post re BOAI 10 on
, but not the publisher's
version of record. (The rest don't endorse any form of immediate OA.)
Are we, in turn, going to endorse this mandate (which -- so far adopted
by only 200 institutions -- needs all the help it can get) or are we
going to continue debating the relative merits of that versus which?
Stevan Harnad
-- Forwarded message --
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:47:09 +0200
From: Iryna Kuchma iryna.kuc...@eifl.net
Reply-To: boai-fo...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
To: boai-forum boai-fo...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [BOAI] Budapest Open Access
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrea Higginbotham and...@arl.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:36 PM
Subject: [sparc-ir] Call to Action: Support the Bipartisan Federal
Public Access Act
To: SPARC IR sparc...@arl.org
We have
-- Forwarded message --
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:30:25 +0200
From: Iryna Kuchma iryna.kuc...@eifl.net
To: boai-forum boai-fo...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [BOAI] Ten Years On,
Researchers Embrace Open Access - Blog post
A HAPPIER ENDING: UNBUNDLING QUALITY CONTROL
Mike Taylor's allegory is brilliant. But its pessimistic ending is not
inevitable.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/feb/10/parable-farmers-teleporting-duplicator?CMP=twt_gu
The distributors (journals) performed two functions in the
A HAPPIER ENDING: UNBUNDLING QUALITY CONTROL
Mike Taylor's allegory is brilliant. But its pessimistic ending is not
inevitable.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/feb/10/parable-farmers-teleporting-duplicator?CMP=twt_gu
The distributors (journals) performed two functions in the
part of the debate recently.
Best wishes
David
On 11 Feb 2012, at 14:31, Stevan Harnad wrote:
A HAPPIER ENDING: UNBUNDLING QUALITY CONTROL
Mike Taylor's allegory is brilliant. But its pessimistic ending is not
inevitable.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/feb/10/parable-farmers
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Gerritsma, Wouter
Wouter.Gerritsma at wur.nl wrote:
Stevan
Mandated OA was announced early 2011 for Earsmus University Rotterdam.
Unfortunately this has had no effect on deposit rates whatsoever, it is
still one of the lowest deposit rates in Nl. Mandates
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Alicia L?pez Medina alopezm at pas.uned.es
wrote:
Mandates are needed but it is not enough if they are not accompanied by
the change ofthe evaluation criteria of scientific production in the
institution (ISI beeing the MOST important criteria for promotion) .
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Alicia López Medina alop...@pas.uned.es
wrote:
Mandates are needed but it is not enough if they are not accompanied by
the change ofthe evaluation criteria of scientific production in the
institution (ISI beeing the MOST important criteria for promotion) . It
Bullish report on Elsevier, despite boycott threats.
Now, enough of the hoopla, please, and let's get back to the only thing that
really matters, concretely, for OA today:
Institutions and funders mandating green OA self-archiving!
Stevan Harnad
Begin forwarded message:
Forwarded
Bullish report on Elsevier, despite boycott threats.
Now, enough of the hoopla, please, and let's get back to the only thing that
really matters, concretely, for OA today:
Institutions and funders mandating green OA self-archiving!
Stevan Harnad
Begin forwarded message:
Forwarded
While the worldwide researcher community is again busy working itself
up into an indignant lather with yet another publisher boycott threat,
I am still haunted by a keystroke koan:
Why did 34,000 researchers sign a threat in 2000 to boycott their
journals unless those journals agreed to provide
Forwarding a BOAI posting (with which I would fully agree!). -- Stevan Harnad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andras Holl h...@konkoly.hu
Date: January 21, 2012 10:08:49 AM EST
To: boai-fo...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Hi,
This is a delayed comment on a posting by Stevan Harnad, dated 18th december
Both Science (AAAS) and Nature have joined the publishes that have disavowed
the (U.S.) Research Works Act (H. R. 3699) which would make it illegal for
federal
funding agencies to mandate (require) Green OA (self-archiving).
(The Act is supported by the American Association of Publishers
to have access
to no version at all rather than have access to a refereed final
draft with a which where it should have a that...]
Stevan Harnad
From: Stevan Harnad har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:47:23 -0500
Sandy Thatcher wrote:
a better approach... would be to require any
Washington, DC and The Hague â
In a move that completes a year-long strategic restructuring of SPARCâs
operations in Europe, Dr. Alma Swan has been appointed to the position
of Director of European Advocacy, and Lars Bjørnshauge has been named
SPARCâs Director of European Library
Both Science (AAAS) and Nature have joined the publishes that have disavowed
the (U.S.) Research Works Act (H. R. 3699) which would make it illegal for
federal
funding agencies to mandate (require) Green OA (self-archiving).
(The Act is supported by the American Association of Publishers
be publicly available, but all
data generated as a result of federal funding should also be publicly
available.
Easier said than done (because of the first-exploitation rights
problem).
But wouldn't it be too much of a burden for the poor
researcher...? ;)
Stevan Harnad
on their institutional or personal web
sites.
And RWA would prevent their funders from requiring them to do it.
Stevan Harnad
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
Begin forwarded message [posted with permission]:
On 2012-01-10, at 3:13 PM, Sandy Thatcher wrote:
But the NIH-type mandate doesn't get you very far, does it?
Just Green OA after 12 months.
That's right, it doesn't get you very far, and it's a bad model for others
to imitate (though it's
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Jan Velterop velte...@gmail.com wrote:
nowadays, peer review is the only remaining significant raison dâêtre of
formal scientific publishing in journals...
This much is certainly true:
In the online era,of all the products and services bundled into the
Begin forwarded message [posted with permission]:
On 2012-01-10, at 3:13 PM, Sandy Thatcher wrote:
But the NIH-type mandate doesn't get you very far, does it?
Just Green OA after 12 months.
That's right, it doesn't get you very far, and it's a bad model for others
to imitate (though it's
-and-dumber-publishers.html
With best wishes,
Dominic Tate
UKCoRR External Liaison Officer
Phone: 01784 276619
Email: dominic.t...@rhul.ac.uk
-Original Message-
From: Repositories discussion list [mailto:jisc-repositor...@jiscmail.ac.uk]
On Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 08 January
journal publishing plays in US research and development and its
(public) fundingâ¦.
Continued at: http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/867-guid.html
Stevan Harnad
On Fri Jan 6 16:43:10, Jennifer McLennan wrote:
Subject: [GOAL] Take Action: Oppose H.R. 3699,
a new bill to block
have detailed spreadsheets and can redo the analyses if they are
interesting/useful.
--
les
On 24 Dec 2011, at 04:06, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Arthur,
Thanks for the data about Mendeley. I have a few questions about things I
don't understand;
1.4 million people have downloaded
that it
has created...
I have detailed spreadsheets and can redo the analyses if they are
interesting/useful.
--
les
On 24 Dec 2011, at 04:06, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Arthur,
Thanks for the data about Mendeley. I have a few questions about things I
don't understand;
1.4
://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/865-guid.html
and the Harvard response, below.
Stevan Harnad
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter Suber peter.suber -- gmail.com
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:33 PM
Friends: Here's the Harvard
In November, OSTP issued two Requests for Information (RFI), one on
open access to scientific publications and the other on the management
of digital data.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/11/07/request-information-public-access-digital-data-and-scientific-publications
Yesterday, responding to
Some suggestions:
(1) Estimate the total number of papers P published per year y, Py, rather than
the number of researchers.
(2) Start with the Thompson-Reuters-ISI-indexed (or SCOPUS-indexed) subset.
(3) For Py, sample the web (Google Scholar) to see what percentage of it is
freely available
In November, OSTP issued two Requests for Information (RFI), one on
open access to scientific publications and the other on the management
of digital data.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/11/07/request-information-public-access-digital-data-and-scientific-publications
Yesterday, responding to
Harnad, S. (2011) What Is To Be Done About Public Access to
Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded
Research? (Response to US OSTP RFI). Technical Report , Electronics
and Computer Science, University of Southampton. (Submitted to OSTP)
their institutional and funder mandates
convergent and mutually reinforcing.
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/369-guid.html
Stevan Harnad
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:01 AM, brent...@ulg.ac.be wrote:
Dear Thierry,
In the French speaking community of Belgium (also called the
Wallonia-Brussels
Technology, whereas I am for directing advocacy efforts at promoting
the adoption of Green OA mandates (because I do not believe any form of
voluntarism will get us to 100% OA anywhere near as quickly and surely as
mandates).
Stevan Harnad
[ Part 2: Attached Text
Mandate Now: Deposit Institutionally, Harvest Centrally
Optimizing OA Self-Archiving Mandates: What? Where? When? Why? How?
Which Green OA Mandate Is Optimal?
Stevan Harnad
Bernard RENTIER
Rector of the Université de Liège
Vice-President of the FRS-FNRS
Chairman
.
I wish Arthur the best of luck in promoting Titanium. I'm sure he does not wish
me any less in promoting Green OA mandates.
Peace.
Stevan Harnad
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Arthur Sale a...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
[ARTHUR] It seems that I am back on-list again, so here
Green OA self-archiving.
Stevan Harnad
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Stevan Harnad
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 1:10 PM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Bold predictions for 2012
Â
My friend and comrade
From: Repositories discussion list  On Behalf Of Lawson, Gerald J. Â
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 5:40 AM
Subject: Monitoring Open Access Publications
Â
Colleagues - some of you will have noticed that the UK Government's
Innovation and Research Strategy for Growth,
yet have it)?
Stevan Harnad
Thanks,
Mike
Michael W. Carroll
Professor of Law and Director,
Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
American University, Washington College of Law
4801 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20016
(202) 274-4047 (voice)
(202) 730-4756
that researchers want or need it -- whereas it's certain that they
want and need Gratis OA (and they don't yet have it)?
Stevan Harnad
Thanks,
Mike
Michael W. Carroll
Professor of Law and Director,
Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property
American
as well as into the
implementation of OA mandates almost as fast as it is developed).
Stevan Harnad
Superannuated Archivangelist
On 2011-12-18, at 4:12 PM, Arthur Sale wrote:
Richard, you asked what weâd like to see in 2012.
Â
Iâd like to see more open access journals, and higher prestige
, Stevan Harnad wrote:
On 2011-12-15, at 5:58 AM, Donat Agosti wrote:
Dear Peter and Stevan
âI would feel more strongly about supporting
GreenOA if we actually built an index of itâ
I always thought
Begin forwarded message:
From: Arthur Sale ahjs -- OZEMAIL.COM.AU
Date: December 15, 2011 4:42:47 PM EST
To: JISC-REPOSITORIES at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Automating metadata extraction
My attention was taken by the good deposit interface provided by Mendeley:
the researcher simply
It is a great strategic mistake -- and a substantial waste of scarce research
funds in exchange for a negligible amount of Open Access -- for an institution
or organization to commit to funding gold open access publishing charges for
articles published in gold open access journals unless it first
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Poynder ri...@richardpoynder.co.uk
Date: Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:22 AM
Subject: AmSci Update
To: AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM at listserver.sigmaxi.org
Dear All,
I understand it has been agreed that I will be the new moderator of
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:02 PM
Subject: AmSci Forum Migrating to Global Open Access List (GOAL): New
Moderator, Richard Poynder
To: American Scientist Open Access Forum
AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM
the end of December, AmSci and GOAL will run in duplicate.
Although we hope the transfer will be smooth, there may be a few
glitches. We apologize and hope you will be patient until they are
sorted out.)
Stevan Harnad (soon to be replaced by Richard Poynder!)
---
Below are the complete results
From: barbara kirsop barbara -- biostrat.demon.co.uk
To: American Scientist Open Access Forum
american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: Â Â Â AmSci Update
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:41:05 -
Thank you
, progress and impact of the research that the public
funds, for the benefit of the public.
Stevan Harnad
At 8:26 PM -0500 12/11/11, LIBLICENSE wrote:
From: David Prosser david.pros...@rluk.ac.uk
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:00:56 +
The UK Government has just published its Innovation
Title:Self-Selection and the Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=17004555show=abstract
Citation:Jingfeng Xia, Katie Nakanishi, (2012) Self-Selection and the
Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles, Online Information
Review, Vol. 36
.
Stevan Harnad
EnablingOpenScholarship
http://www.openscholarship.org
for authors the benefits of depositing their articles.
http://wiki.eprints.org/w/IRStats
Stevan Harnad
Stevan and I, amongst others, Â have added comments on the list.
CharlesÂ
Â
Â
Professor Charles Oppenheim
From: Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com
To: CHARLES OPPENHEIM c.oppenh...@btinternet.com
Sent: Saturday
-- Forwarded message --
From: CHARLES OPPENHEIM c.oppenheim -- btinternet . com
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:50 AM
Subject: List of predatory OA journal publishers
See http://metadata.posterous.com/83235355
Stevan and I,
citation best-practice advice, but why is it being posted
in this Forum?
You might try the Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group:
http://groups.google.com/group/bibliographic-ontology-specification-group/about
?hl=en
Stevan Harnad Â
many thanks for your consideration and time
the door...]
Your worn and wizened archivangelist.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:05 PM, eugene.garfi...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
When I think about Stevan Harnad another information pioneer comes to
mind. The Belgian documentalist Paul Otlet. His collaborator Henri
LaFontaine, Â received the Nobel Peace
Begin forwarded message:
From: Peter SuberÂ
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: November 26, 2011 10:42:06 AM EST
To: SOAF post sparc-oafo...@arl.org, BOAI Forum post
boai-fo...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
[Forwarding from JISC, via the JISC-Repositories list. Â --Peter
discussion list rather than a bulletin
boardâ¦
HELENE BOSC: In memory of the remarkable work done by Stevan Harnad for Open
Access through this list, during 14 years, I wish it continues... Richard
Poynder would be a perfect moderator!
BARBARA KIRSOP: If Stevan feels he can better operate in support
boardâ¦
HELENE BOSC: In memory of the remarkable work done by Stevan Harnad for Open
Access through this list, during 14 years, I wish it continues... Richard
Poynder would be a perfect moderator!Â
BARBARA KIRSOP: If Stevan feels he can better operate in support of OA not as
the moderator
in this matter as you see it, not being a researcher
myself, and you would simply have snapped back with your usual
arguments. Too bad.
Ros
Begin forwarded message:
From: Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com
Date: November 22, 2011 9:06:47 PM EST
and there is no yellow OA.Â
Stevan Harnad
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Peter Millington
peter.milling...@nottingham.ac.uk wrote:
Dana
Be careful what you ask for. A list of the ~5% of journals that do
not allow any form of open access archiving whatsoever would contain
getting
601 - 700 of 3033 matches
Mail list logo
