One little trick you can use is use firebug to inspect the table you
want to experiment with and copy it's html to a flat html file and
open the html file with IE and play around with it till you get it
right. The trick is to get the html how you want it, then roll the
changes into the java code
hi, so what you want is actually NOT that user-written XML directly is
injected into the DOM, rather you're about to create an own UiBinder?
So, if someone writes the code
blab:button name=Run Me evaluate=MyEvaluator//b
you want to map the lab:button/ element to the GWT-Button widget,
right? -
?
2010/7/22 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com
Forgot the example:
Under a GWTTestCase..
public void testFailureGenerator() {
try {
GWT.create(BadInterface.class);
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
return;
}
fail();
}
2010/7/22 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com
Hi, I am
what you mean by page? so you mean not actually an entry point or
screen but rather a usual HTML page? then just write your .jsp , like
adminPage.jsp. Or if you really want to write a panel with much HTML
try using UiBinder.
and remember - there is no page in GWT applications, however, you
can
Hi Magnus,
I do it like this:
public static native String getUserAgent() /*-{
return navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();
}-*/;
public void onModuleLoad() {
if (MyMainClass.getUserAgent().contains(msie 6.0)) {
Ok will do,
Thanks for the help
Kind Regards
David
On Jul 22, 6:44 pm, cokol eplisc...@googlemail.com wrote:
hi.from architectonical perspective,the response IS A part of your
wrapping composite therefore ur maininterface should also manage
it.just put the response widget inside
On Jul
Hi Ladislav,
thanks for the link, looks good.
Greets Alex
On 22 Jul., 10:44, Ladislav Gazo ladislav.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
maybe you would be interested in integrating security with login on
the client and server side. If so you can check acris-security module
at
Hi,
I made further investigations. The strange thing about this error is
the fact that AccessControlException occurs for my project's src
directory. The path, which the error message specifies, is even an
absolute windows path. However, the resource files, which I open
inside the program, are
You could also use that strategie that is only viable with Internet
Explorer.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512(VS.85).aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512(VS.85).aspxCheers,
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Sven sven.ti...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Magnus,
I
Thomas,
Thanks for the reply - I could not see a problem with my config but
the debugger did not tell me exactly what the problem was...
In the link you provided you state:
This is actually the same as if you were using a JASPI custom authentication
in any
JASPI-supporting container
Hi everybody,
I've lots of widgets (extends Composite) that I would like to be able
to drag in the displayed web page?
How can I do that?
Thanks for your help,
Romain
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group,
Hi,
I am trying to build a offline gwt app using HTML5 cache manifest and
local storage, but to do that, i need to build the manifest file
listing all the GWT generated files, right?
Can i do this during the compile process or is it better to do this in
a shell script?
Thanks,
Julio
--
You
Ok ... but I already add the latest gwt-gadgets (and its dependencies:
gwt-ajaxloader) into my own maven repository.
Here is the deployed POMs:
1) gwt-ajaxloader
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi=http://
Hi to all,
There is no need for jsni.
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.0/com/google/gwt/user/client/Window.Navigator.html
Window.Navigator.getNavigator()
should do the job.
a link to the download page(s) of modern browser may be useful, too.
Stefan Bachert
The notion of pages in a GWT app for someone experiences with a
traditional web app (for example, a JSF based app) is definitely a bit
confusing.
The basic scheme of displaying different panels (in the same page) is
the GWT approach, but how would you handle the situation where the
admin section
Hi,
but aware Spring Roo 1.1.0M1 is not useable at all. Not even in a very
protected environment.
I have seen there is a M2 release now, but I did not tried, yet.
Stefan Bachert
http::/gwtworld.de
Inquiries for professional GWT support are welcome.
I am sorry, I won't do free personal support.
Ive noticed that if I change my links to just #! google interprets
them as;
_escaped_fragment_=
Which is how its documented.
However, this means a php $_GET command cant read the first key/value
listed.
So;
$_GET['DisplayReview'] returns as empty if the url is, say, ?
Sorry to bump this, but nobody knows anything about this? There must
be something obvious I'm missing.
On Jul 21, 11:24 am, Asfand Yar Qazi ayq...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys,
This is ONLY RELEVANT TO GOOGLE CHROME.
I've been googling for this for a while now, so excuse me if it is a
(of course, Id have to code my gwt java to remove the from the
history string before processing)
On Jul 23, 3:54 pm, darkflame darkfl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ive noticed that if I change my links to just #! google interprets
them as;
_escaped_fragment_=
Which is how its documented.
However,
Are you using Fred Sauer's gwt-dnd? If you are using it, this could
help you.
Fist at all follow Fred's example:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-dnd/wiki/GettingStarted
Now you must make a change to your widgets, first your widget class
must implement HasDragHandle. And second i guess that you
Is so easy and free to install FF in any computer, that i don't know
why developers must keep loosing time with IE6.
When someone's want's a web development we must say Ok, but i will
not do it IE6 compliant, Google doesn't losses any more time in that,
why should we?
I don't loose time in that.
I still have some with IE7 lol At least it's lesser than with IE6
:D
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:28 AM, nacho vela.igna...@gmail.com wrote:
Is so easy and free to install FF in any computer, that i don't know
why developers must keep loosing time with IE6.
When someone's want's a web
My understanding is that the scroll wheel is like anything else, and
only applies to what has focus. So even though your dialog box is
open, it somehow doesn't have focus yet. I would start with using
DialogBox#setModal(boolean) to see if that helps.
On Jul 23, 8:59 am, Asfand Yar Qazi
Thanks Gal, it works fine now.
On Jul 22, 11:43 pm, Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com wrote:
thats border radious... for gradients you need to use literal()
Seehttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4877can...
2010/7/22 lineman78 linema...@gmail.com
You have to
Hi, i'm looking some info about how to create and package my own gwt's
lib.
Does anyone know where can i find some tuto?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
We're in the process of adding UI tests to our project with Cucumber
and Capybara and it's been a little cumbersome trying to access
textboxes with xpath expressions. I've searched on the board and found
a way of manually adding IDs to elements with the DOM but I don't like
the idea of adding
hi.its fairly easy to do.just google for a gwt module howto
On Jul 23, 6:14 pm, nacho vela.igna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, i'm looking some info about how to create and package my own gwt's
lib.
Does anyone know where can i find some tuto?
--
You received this message because you are
Sorry if that sounded confusing.
Hopefully, this puts it in a perspective that can be understood:
HTML-Entry Point class associations --
Module1.html - Module1:EntryPoint.class,
Module2.html - Module2:EntryPoint.class
Would it be possible to create something like that, where you can have
two
We use selenium. By using the ensureDebugId' method on any widgets
you want to identify during testing, inheriting the Debug module (only
for testing, don't ship the code with this module inherited), it makes
it much easier to use XPath and selenium. The best part is that GWT
compiles away the
Thanks for this post, it gets a 5 star rating.
Follow-up question to it, though. What if the server code is
distributed? For example, I have a three server cluster running on
WebSphere. Will these standard session techniques work here, too?
I'm with Jorel on this, I'm not sure yet what that
so you mean that
i can't validate that when the user refresh the current history token
not return to the first page ?
On Jul 22, 10:27 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 juil, 20:05, Ahmed Shoeib ahmedelsayed.sho...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you mean by showing
You can certainly define multiple modules in one web app. I use
Intellij IDEA, and this is as simple as hitting Alt-Insert and picking
GWT/ Module.
The downside of doing this is the GWT compile time goes up directly
with the number of modules since each is processed independently.
On Jul 23,
Wheres the stacktrace ? wheres the problem description ? A little help
might encourage someone to respond or fix the problem.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
Does anyone know of a GWT-based diagramming tool for creating visio-
like diagrams?
I found a javascript library called mxGraph, which *seems* perfect:
http://www.jgraph.com/mxgraph.html
But it doesn't have a GWT wrapper and in their documentation they say
this:
In summary, consider GWT for
I'm stuck on how to implement the server-side code for my app. At app
startup I want to authenticate the user, leave the credentials on the
server side and use the session ID for the client to make future calls
that need to be authenticated, in lieu of sending the user credentials
over the wire
On 2010/07/22 23:42:08, scottb wrote:
I just now took a look, and was curious about the rationale for some
of the API
changes. In particular, I'm trying to figure out the value of having
to do the
extra '.get()' at all call sites, vs. having static methods that do
the '.get()'
internally.
We've tried to get rid of the document.write() tricks before, but with no
success. There's always some squirrely case that crops on (especially on IE)
that's forced us to put them back in. There are also a couple of specific
corner cases that rely on document.write(), which would need to be
The multiple files in user/test with names ending in .orig should
probably be excluded.
On 2010/07/22 22:17:53, Ray Ryan wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Gah! Where do those keep coming from!?
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:34 AM, amitman...@google.com wrote:
The multiple files in user/test with names ending in .orig should
probably be excluded.
On 2010/07/22 22:17:53, Ray Ryan wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/show
--
There is a lot of copying going here which is bad. Would this be better
done by adding just the new classes to the DynaTable sample, and having
another gwt.xml in the DynaTable sample. The two gwt.xml could then pull
just the subset of files they require.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:53 PM, amitman...@google.com wrote:
There is a lot of copying going here which is bad. Would this be better
done by adding just the new classes to the DynaTable sample, and having
another gwt.xml in the DynaTable sample. The two gwt.xml could then pull
just the
Are the .orig files coming from git add -A? You could add that
pattern to your .git/info/exclude.
Will the Property API be removed?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/diff/4001/5001
File
bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/gwt/request/ExpensesRequestFactory.java
(left):
LGTM
Just a couple of nits.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/706802/diff/1/2
File
bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/gwt/client/Scaffold.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/706802/diff/1/2#newcode87
I'd rather keep the two samples completely separate, even though that
entails a lot of dup code. If I have one app that does both systems, it's
really hard to look at the code and know what is relevant to you and what
isn't. And it's not like DynaTable gets a lot of changes.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010
Working on the others, but figured I'd fire these questions back at you
while I'm working on them
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/706802/diff/1/6
File
bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/gwt/request/UserInformationRecord.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Ready for re-review
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/diff/4001/5001
File
bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/gwt/request/ExpensesRequestFactory.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/diff/4001/5001#oldcode50
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/706802/diff/1/2
File
bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/gwt/client/Scaffold.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/706802/diff/1/2#newcode87
bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/gwt/client/Scaffold.java:87:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/706802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Looks good enough for a first pass. I'll follow up with converting the
UI to UiBinder in preparation for wiring up the editor stuff.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/diff/18001/19001
File
bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/gwt/request/ExpensesRequestFactory.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Done, submitting.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/diff/18001/19001
File
bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/gwt/request/ExpensesRequestFactory.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/710801/diff/18001/19001#oldcode50
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/651803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
53 matches
Mail list logo
