Based on the videos from the last meetup, and the notes from the steering
committee, many of us got the impression that GWT was moving towards being
a pure Java-to-Javascript transpiler, and that the official recommendations
from the GWT team was for developers to plan ahead for this.
*GWT 2.8
>
> Yeah. The conundrum for me is that I'm addicted to the pure-JVM unit
> testing/debugging that MVP gives you.
>
I believe Angular controllers, Flux Stores etc. can be just as
JUnit-testable as MVP, when implemented in Java and exposed through
JsInterop.
There is a lot of pioneering to do,
the conference: 'J2CL != GWT3'.
This again is my own personal perception.
While the GWT team seems focused on doing the J2CL transpiler, and there
appear to be a clear expectation that the next major version of GWT will be
based on J2CL, the future of GWT seems unclear.
/Brian
Den fredag den 13. november
Thanks.
If it is any help, my code is here:
https://github.com/bitwerk/jspoc/tree/master/src/main/java/com/acme
/Brian
Den torsdag den 5. november 2015 kl. 06.41.35 UTC+1 skrev Goktug Gokdogan:
>
> This should work. I need to take a look why it fails.
>
>
> On Wednesday, Novemb
return 42, but
throws 'Uncaught [object Object]'!
Den mandag den 2. november 2015 kl. 11.11.35 UTC+1 skrev Brian Pedersen:
>
> Thank you Gortug for making my aware of the isNative attribute.
> Unfortunately the cast issue remains.
>
> I have taken the example from the new js
); // will return 42!
The image below demonstrates the issue at runtime.
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-9z2t_Q8R0oI/Vjc1qBoQgfI/BEc/CAbDBqNfUZc/s1600/debugger3.png>
I can't seem to find anywhere inside the generated javascript, where a
class literal is assigned to the value 33.
/Bria
I hate not being able to edit my posts on google groups :)
The comment "// will return 42!" should have contained "// Should return
42, but throws 'Uncaught [object Object]'!"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from
Ahhh, I just realized that the new annotations are in a different
package, jsinterop.annotations instead of com.google.gwt.core.client.js :)
/Brian
Den mandag den 26. oktober 2015 kl. 12.18.21 UTC+1 skrev Brian Pedersen:
>
> I am using GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT, but the new annotations does no
I have a dispatch method, exposed through JsInterop, which can take various
kinds of payloads.
Once called from native javascript, I need to cast the payload, but this
doesn't quite work as I would like it too.
Here is a simplified example.
*GWT:*
@JsExport
@JsType
@JsNamespace("foo")
public
n the jar file.
Same thing with the @JsExport and @JsNamespace, I currently have to use
them or things stop working.
My gwt-user-2.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar, which contains the annotations, is from
today.
This is the pom I am using:
https://github.com/bitwerk/jspoc/blob/master/pom.xml
/Brian
Den mandag
Cast_doubleCastMap[dstId]
|| typeof src_0 === 'boolean' &&
!!com_google_gwt_lang_Cast_booleanCastMap[dstId];
}
/Brian
Den mandag den 26. oktober 2015 kl. 13.01.40 UTC+1 skrev Brian Pedersen:
>
> Thank's for pointing that out. So i switched to the new annotations in
> jsinter
, everything works if I use the concrete type and remove the cast.
POM: https://github.com/bitwerk/jspoc/blob/master/pom.xml
Javascript:
https://github.com/bitwerk/jspoc/blob/master/src/main/webapp/jspoc.html
GWT:
https://github.com/bitwerk/jspoc/tree/master/src/main/java/dk/bitwerk/client
/Brian
I didn't get that quite right, the generated function seem to fail doing
the lookup in the castableTypeMap, which must be it's way of assuring that
the types are actually castable to the target type.
Den mandag den 26. oktober 2015 kl. 13.16.21 UTC+1 skrev Brian Pedersen:
>
> It
+1 all the way.
I use every chance I have to spread the word about the changes JS Interop
will bring to the web, but the apparent lack of engagement in the community
from the people driving GWT, is giving me second thoughts.
The official blog used to be OK, but that changed when google open
repository and fails.
But it all works perfectly when I build it with the 2.7.0 version of the
gwt-maven-plugin, as long as I run it with jetty:run and not gwt:run.
What are your reasons for using the 2.8.0 version of the gwt-maven-plugin?
Thanks ...
/Brian
Den torsdag den 17. september 2015 kl
.
The generated javascript in the war file however, looks much better.
Maybe I just need to get the configuration of my gwt-maven-plugin right.
Thanks...
/Brian
Den tirsdag den 15. september 2015 kl. 23.32.36 UTC+2 skrev Jens:
>
> Ok just played a bit and its like the following:
>
>
> @Js
to verify that, and I can see
that the code server is started with '-XjsInteropMode, JS'.
Could I simplify it further, by removing the namespace or something?
Thanks ...
/Brian
Den tirsdag den 15. september 2015 kl. 14.46.01 UTC+2 skrev Brian Pedersen:
>
> So I am doing my first baby
help will be much appreciated ...
/Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
I am really looking forward to GWT CON in November, but so far no talks has
been announced on GWT 3 related topics.
I know that the blueprint are still in flux, but I also have a feeling that
the core team knows exactly which direction they are pushing GWT.
My biggest wish is to see a
:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq1NTzrXGWIindex=7list=PL1yReUCGwGvrqscLu1EAyYRPrr0ceEHLE
/Brian
Den torsdag den 27. august 2015 kl. 03.18.51 UTC+2 skrev Magnus:
Hi,
I want to install Eclipse Mars (4.5) with the GWT plugin.
But the latest version of the plugin is for Eclipse Luna (4.4
, but to
begin with, you can get pretty far with Javascript only.
Good luck ...
/Brian
Den mandag den 17. august 2015 kl. 01.37.16 UTC+2 skrev nick belterman:
I would like to get started with programming. does anyone know good
software that is good for learning. BTW i am 14.
--
You received
I believe 2.8 will be first: http://gwtcreate.com/videos/index.html#keynote
/Brian
Den onsdag den 17. september 2014 kl. 16.07.14 UTC+2 skrev Martin Kersten:
Hi There,
I am wondering what the current status of GWT 3.0 is. Is it already in
the making? Are there any release dates for GWT
Looks amazing.
When can we get our hands on Singular?
/Brian
Den lørdag den 7. februar 2015 kl. 14.25.57 UTC+1 skrev Daniel Kurka:
Hi all,
here is me talking about Singular at GWT.create:
http://gwtcreate.com/videos/index.html#singular
-Daniel
--
You received this message because
Release notes are here:
http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_7_0_RC1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
It looks like the gwt-codeserver jar will still exist, but the same classes
will also be in gwt-dev.jar. So it's ugly but should be backward compatible?
- Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group
Yes, merging the jars should be fine as a short-term fix.
Codeserver should be built as a separate library to enforce that there are
no circular dependencies. (We already have one for DevMode -superDevMode
but that should be fixed by splitting out DevMode; it doesn't belong in the
same library as
I think this is okay as long as it doesn't cause tests to fail. Elemental
is quite separate from everything else so it seems low risk. Daniel?
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Leif Åstrand legi...@gmail.com wrote:
Lots of Elemental patches have been merged in the last few days, but we do
still
- Make sure sample apps work with DevMode -superdevmode
- I think we're waiting on a patch to CLDR 25
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:15 PM, 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote:
Hi all,
we just settled on a GWT 2.7 release plan:
- We *code
It's experimental and hidden behind a flag, but it's there.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Cristian Rinaldi csrina...@gmail.com
wrote:
- JsInterop Preview is part of the release?
El miércoles, 1 de octubre de 2014 16:15:26 UTC-3, Daniel Kurka escribió:
Hi all,
we just settled on a GWT
Oops. This particular bug shouldn't be hard to fix.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just a thought, the folks that forget to update Java 1.6 to Java 1.7 in
their project and run SDM (super dev mode) will have issues. A warning
could be
Actually, that particular stack trace should be fixed by this uncommitted
patch:
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9361/
However, I haven't tested it on Java 1.6.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.com
wrote:
Oops. This particular bug shouldn't be hard
This sounds like it might be a deadlock. Could you jstack to get a thread
dump of the running process? It should tell us where it's stuck.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
recentish ones are:
267ad5efd00aae9b0f69eca793891e9fdad28e45 Opts compilePerFile
.
i don't know, +skybrian
Maybe by configuring java.util.Logger? What does the message look like? (I
assume you're passing -logLevel DEBUG to CodeServer? If so I haven't used
DEBUG level.)
- Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group
I'm eager to start using Java 8 too, but I think we should wait until we
have Java 8 committed (behind a flag) before having the discussion about
whether to require it for anything. As we've found with incremental
compile, sometimes we end up changing direction a bit to reach our goal, so
there's
It would make sense in principle but we don't know anyone who wants to
target older browsers without also using permutations.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe Google builds applications that use Elemental and/or JsInterop,
so they don't use
be.
- Brian
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino man...@apache.org
wrote:
Following the discussion here:
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/8150/2
What do you guys think about changing the way of how embedded jetty class
loader works?
Options:
- leave it as current
equivalent
should work.
- Brian
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino man...@apache.orgwrote:
That's intentional, it is the same behavior than tree menus in google
wikis and GWT trees.
Now the parent item link is only clickable when it has a page associated
(it was not possible
it practical to use.
- Brian
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Mario Jauvin mari...@gmail.com wrote:
People, this has been going on since beginning of February with no action
on the part of Mozilla. I have create a new mozilla bug
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996947 which
://localhost
:sdm-port/short-module-name
... except for the source map and the symbol map
Now, the latest source map is also served by the code server, using
another magic URL (which I don't recall at the moment).
But no such luck for the symbol map...
Brian: how hard would it be to alter
If you are debugging interactively, using pause on uncaught exceptions
can help. Then you can look at the stack frames in the debugger.
Another workaround is to log stack traces to the server and use
StackTraceDeobfuscator. This will also help you in production:
It's true these are disadvantages. There are some compensating advantages
that people are pointing out: the code executes faster, it works with
remote websites where latency is higher, it works with mobile phones, and
so on. But there's no question that losing DevMode (other than IE and
Firefox
In my testing they do sometimes work but it is certainly flaky. I recommend
adding a GWT.debugger() call and recompiling; that should always work,
unless something is really wrong.
- Brian
On Monday, March 3, 2014 12:44:06 PM UTC-8, Ben Hegarty wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone is seeing
.
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 18:19:59 UTC, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
In my testing they do sometimes work but it is certainly flaky. I
recommend adding a GWT.debugger() call and recompiling; that should always
work, unless something is really wrong.
- Brian
On Monday, March 3, 2014 12:44:06 PM UTC-8
I'm not sure what the Jetty problems are but they should be fixed. Do we
have a good bug report for them?
(In our setup we see stack traces but Jetty still runs.)
- Brian
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:51 PM, joerg.hohwil...@googlemail.com
joerg.hohwil...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I can
I believe it's just an idea. In practice, we have lots of GWT generator
code that's not easily migrated.
I'm not familar with APT but if I wanted to learn about it I would probably
start by studying Guice's AutoValue. If they're using JavaWriter then
that's a good endorsement.
- Brian
On Thu
Firefox 24 seems like an acceptable workaround.
Regarding the Firefox-specific debugger API's, I'm not sure it's worth even
figuring out if it's feasible or not since our plan is to move to Super Dev
Mode. But if someone wants to take a look then go ahead.
- Brian
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:47 AM
in the right place. I discussed other workarounds in my GWT.create talk [1].
It's an unfortunate transition and this experience is not as smooth as it
could be yet, but that's where we are.
- Brian
[1]
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/presentation/d/1DTWZ_06dQsTPhinIwzHSdoPMndRr92wpZoZWicK97YQ
pretty quickly.
- Brian
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Stephen Haberman
step...@exigencecorp.comwrote:
Yes it sounds like a bug. Want to add that to the issue tracker?
https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8575
I've verified that the patch fixes the behavior in our
Yes it sounds like a bug. Want to add that to the issue tracker?
I wonder why more people aren't seeing this? Does it only affect soft
permutations?
- Brian
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Stephen Haberman step...@exigencecorp.com
wrote:
Hey,
We upgraded to GWT 2.6 last week, and our
I'm not an Eclipse user, but we did upgrade to Jetty 8.1 in 2.6 and its
package changed. If you put the new version of Jetty in your classpath that
will probably fix it.
- Brian
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Stephan Beutel stephan.beu...@gmail.comwrote:
I also tried it with the Eclipse
I just ran a bulk edit to change all 2.6 bugs marked fixed not released
to fixed. Thanks for catching that!
(Switching to a different issue tracker is a whole different discussion.)
- Brian
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Gilberto Torrezan Filho
gilberto.torre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I
; when I said at GWT.create that Firefox
could stop working with any release, I didn't expect it to be the next one.
- Brian
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=920731
[2]
http://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/24.2.0esr/
[3] https://code.google.com/p/google-web
Perhaps have an occasional meeting day on the mailing list or in G+, sort
of like a Reddit Ask me anything? This might work better with people in
different timezones.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com wrote:
Just FYI, our gwt-team meetings didn't get enough
Generally I just exclude the super classes from the project; since there
should always a server-side equivalent, the rest of the code should still
compile. You lose syntax checking on the super files, though.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Danilo Reinert danilorein...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm
Sometime in January after people are back from vacation.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Cristiano
cristiano.costant...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello all,
it is many days I don't see info about the release date for GWT 2.6.0...
I see in GWT issues there are 7 issues for milestone 2_6 that are not
a @Rebind method is implemented in order to call the generator for
a call site? So we can run the generator in each module that calls a
@Rebind-marked interface method.
- Brian
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Andrés Testi andres.a.te...@gmail.comwrote:
The last 3 months I have been working on a GWT
I'm not familiar with Windows 8, but I believe you have to run Chrome
outside metro mode to get plugins to work.
http://blog.chromium.org/2012/07/npapi-plug-ins-in-windows-8-metro-mode.html
On Friday, November 29, 2013 10:24:24 AM UTC-8, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
Hi Millie,
I'm experiencing
then I could publish a cleaned-up
version.
- Brian
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:33:00 AM UTC-8, navels wrote:
What are the general steps involved to build the firefox plugin? How
involved are the fixes to maintain compatibility with new FF releases?
(I'm sure it depends on the release
For GWT 2.6, Super Dev Mode, and the RemoteServiceServlet, you could set
the gwt.codeserver.port Java property.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue comes up when we change a piece of shared code, like a DTO. What
we've found is that if we don't
I'm using Cloud Endpoints on App Engine with GWT and want to use a server
side annotation on a class in my Shared package. I think the GWT compiler
wants me to inherit a module, but obviously there's no source etc. It's for:
import com.google.api.server.spi.config.AnnotationBoolean;
import
wrote:
[+cc skybrian]
Brian, any idea?
On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 11:10:23 AM UTC+1, stuckagain wrote:
Thomas,
Should I file this as an issue ? Or is it not worth pursuing since
somehow the GWT dev team is thinking about replacing the DevMode with
SuperDevMode everywhere ?
David
Not a compiler expert, but I wouldn't be surprised since in the AST it will
be represented as a binary tree of JBinaryOperation nodes and the visitors
walk the tree recursively. So balancing the tree should result in a smaller
stack.
- Brian
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Julien Dramaix
is there.
- Brian
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit
. If they're not using GWT already then it's probably best not
to start now.
- Brian
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:59:55 AM UTC-7, Jens wrote:
They have probably enabled compatibility mode in IE 8. Turn IE 8 into
standards mode and I am pretty sure the gwtproject.org site will show up
correctly
Modular compilation probably won't be ready for GWT 2.6. If it's there at
all, it will be experimental.
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:02:46 AM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 2:33:59 PM UTC+2, jesty wrote:
Thanks to all for the answer.
About this features:
*
I expect that by next summer devmode will *only* work in IE and perhaps an
older version of Firefox. Oddly enough, the IE plugin has apparently worked
for years with no complaints. (But the issue is that nobody currently on
the team has ever built it.)
- Brian
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:56 AM
For (1), Super Dev Mode supports multiple GWT apps out of the box. (but you
do have to recompile each GWT application you want to debug, one at a time).
For (2) I don't think we support multiple instances of the same GWT app. I
don't think it's a good idea because you'd be loading the same
to do in the spring. We shouldn't say anything about
what's going to happen next fall - we can decide that later.
- Brian
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds to me that you suddenly start talking about feature guarantees for
features that do not yet
much do you feel bound by decisions made a few years ago by people who no
longer work on GWT?
- Brian
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from
is certainly one of them. But if it's at all
doubtful we should leave things open and it's a good idea to hedge. A good
phrase to use is we don't have a crystal ball, but [...].
- Brian
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
But we now have a steering committee
I haven't tried it, but it says here that Gradle has support for publishing
to Maven:
http://www.gradle.org/docs/current/userguide/publishing_maven.html
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Cristiano Costantini
cristiano.costant...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
What do you think of having gradle (or
at any time.
-
SuperDevMode? Talked about IDE support. Not fast enough; would be
good at least get separate compilation in, perhaps as experimental.
-
Brian and Ray: maintaining Eclipse has been a hassle in the past.
Ray: we should keep the Eclipse plugins decoupled
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
In terms of Gradle vs Buck models, is there any possibility of writing
a tool that takes a Buck build file and produces Gradle files? That would
seem like a good option in lieu of waiting for Buck support in IntelliJ and
is
standardizing on it which is a plus.
Here's a good place to start reading:
http://www.gradle.org/docs/current/userguide/tutorial_using_tasks.html
- Brian
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Cristiano Costantini
cristiano.costant...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno venerdì 27 settembre 2013, Goktug
As a stop-gap measure, can you clean up and check in your IDEA module(s)?
- Brian
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@google.comwrote:
The biggest problem with being a GWT contributor today is that it is hard,
very hard, to set up an environment to develop. If you look
in the devmode.js. I wonder if there's
some way to detect the unload event in C++?
- Brian
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch I provided only tweaks the normal source, and leaves the
generated sources and binaries alone - I think that is already what you
. Brian: got
experimental debugger working with Showcase; going to look again at Eclipse
plugin. Ray: wrote a servlet to integrate with SuperDevMode so it's always
on for dev server. Maybe create a common Super Dev Mode servlet?
Performance dashboard (Daniel's project)
* Open source: 2.6 Release (Matthew
Here are some notes for our last few meetings. I'm sure a comparison
between our notes and the YouTube video [1] would show I missed a few
things. :-)
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIgR7-3ZAMc
September 4, 2013
Brian: meeting with someone working on Chrome devtools to get up to speed
Hi, my guess is that it's just an oversight; at Google we have our own
build stystem so we don't use the ant scripts all that often. If you want
to dive in, I'd be interested in what you find.
- Brian
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Daniel Trebbien dtrebb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am trying
smaller and less risky changes, and you'll likely learn things along the
way. Resist the urge to add more features since that makes a change riskier
and harder to get agreement on.
- Brian
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Alex Epshteyn alexander.epsht...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello folks,
I just wanted
smaller and less risky changes, and you'll likely learn things along the
way. Resist the urge to add more features since that makes a change riskier
and harder to get agreement on.
- Brian
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Alex Epshteyn alexander.epsht...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello folks,
I just wanted
(at the cost of
some verbosity).
(I bundled the arguments along with the class since that seemed like the
most conservative approach. I'm not sure what happens if you have
compile-time arguments coming from the different places than the class
itself.)
- Brian
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Andrés
It seems like a nice project, but integrating it into GWT will slow down
both the GWT developers and the SpiffyUI developers a lot. There would have
to be some pretty compelling reasons to do that. Otherwise, better to let
them keep doing what they're doing, and let them ask for specific changes
to work on features.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Stephen Haberman step...@exigencecorp.com
wrote:
Hi Brian,
Our plan is to make Super Dev Mode compile faster.
Have you gotten to discovering what parts are the slow ones?
- Stephen
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web
on (which also
allows you to set breakpoints in generated code), or you can browse the
source code directly on the codeserver.
It would be nice if we somehow got this working with an IDE, though.
- Brian
--
John A. Tamplin
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
for the
long run.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Brian Slesinsky skyb...@google.comwrote:
Hi, I've published a document [1] with my thoughts on some of the
GWT.create() proposals. This doesn't cover everything we've discussed but I
think it's a start. If you're on this mailing list you should be able
Our largest projects aren't using Super Dev Mode yet for the same reason -
not fast enough yet. But it varies; we have a lot of smaller teams that
like it.
- Brian
On Friday, August 9, 2013 1:56:13 AM UTC-7, Matic Petek wrote:
Ray got automatic recompile working in Super Dev Mode
Hi, I've published a document [1] with my thoughts on some of the
GWT.create() proposals. This doesn't cover everything we've discussed but I
think it's a start. If you're on this mailing list you should be able to
comment.
- Brian
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d
rather than
just sending a -2. I think it's possible to improve GWT.create() but I want
to make sure we fully understand what we're getting ourselves into.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@google.com wrote:
Andres,
You might want to wait a day or two. I think Brian
It might be nice to be able to say that anything defined in a .d.ts can be
imported into GWT. This will make it easier to work with JavaScript
programmers since they don't have to write any Java code. So perhaps it's
worth making sure that generating the Java interfaces from .d.ts files will
work?
I haven't been sending out emails for our meetings. Let's catch up:
August 7th:
- John got a hello world app running using separate compilation. We
talked a bit about how it might get pulled back into GWT.
- Brian: Firefox architecture changes may break the Development Mode plugin
by the end
some kind of standard plugin extension.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.comwrote:
It might be nice to be able to say that anything defined in a .d.ts can
be imported into GWT. This will make it easier to work with JavaScript
programmers since they don't have
writing
Super Dev Mode. (The debugger API isn't really suitable because if we take
it over for Dev Mode, there will be no way to attach a debugger to debug
JavaScript.)
- Brian
On Thursday, August 8, 2013 3:55:26 PM UTC-7, Jens wrote:
- Brian: Firefox architecture changes may break
But since Firefox 23 should be released today, it probably isn't worth
spending much time figuring out what went wrong with Firefox 22. I'd
recommend upgrading to Firefox 23 and trying it with the latest plugin.
- Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
shouldn't be used with Firefox 22.
Nonetheless, I was able to reproduce the bug using Firefox 22. It doesn't
happen with Firefox 23.
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 11:11:35 AM UTC-7, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
I just pushed out an update for Firefox 23 yesterday. Firefox 22 should
have been
: master
Gerrit-Owner: Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: John Stalcup stal...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received
Brian Slesinsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Super Dev Mode: deemphasize unused Java lines in
codeserver's UI
..
Patch Set 1:
(7 comments)
File
: master
Gerrit-Owner: Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: John Stalcup stal...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group
Brian Slesinsky has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: Super Dev Mode: deemphasize unused Java lines in
codeserver's UI
..
Super Dev Mode: deemphasize unused Java lines in codeserver's UI
Modified
with GWT designer documentation. The GWT
designer is currently not being maintained. No resolution yet.
- Discussed how to make mgwt available within Google.
- Discussed community outreach, possibly by having public Hangouts and/or
posting on YouTube. Still in progress. For now, Brian will write up
1 - 100 of 677 matches
Mail list logo
