I recently had the need to inline and minify HTML templates. I would
normally use TextResource for that, but it doesn't do the minification
part, so I wrote an HtmlResource which does the minification. Published
here: https://github.com/ggeorgovassilis/gwt-htmlresource
Enjoy,
G.
--
You
ppen in the main optimization
> loop, with a small handful of notes on the order that these must take place.
>
> After this we're back to the compilerPermutation method, which finishes
> normalizing the code to JS and continuing to optimize this lightly, though
> not in a loo
Is there an up-to-date documentation of optimisations the compiler applies?
An older page [1] discusses some topics but it isn't clear what of that has
been implemented.
(apologies for posting here, I asked this question on the user forum [2]
but didn't get any replies)
[1]
Is there any (recent) documentation of compiler optimisations? I am
specifically looking for advice on which code constructs to use, which to
avoid and how they translate into Javascript - ideally an updated version
of [1]
Cheers,
G.
[1]
Apologies if this has been discussed before. The EventBus requires the
declaration of an Event class and a Handler interface for each activity of
interest, which often results in plenty of boiler plate. In one of our
projects we came up with a simpler notation which doesn't require event
SL 1.7 is out. This is a maintenance release which updates dependencies to
GWT 2.7.0 and Spring 4.2.5
Repo: https://github.com/ggeorgovassilis/gwt-sl
User group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gwt-sl
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Hi Dilan,
I run several GWT projects with Spring and Maven without a big fuss, but it
requires some tweaking until you get it right. I keep a bare (more or less)
project skeleton on github [1] to help me speed up new projects.
[1]
A new flatbus https://github.com/ggeorgovassilis/flatbus is available
with some minor improvements in the maven build and a public maven repo.
Flatbus is a GWT library/generator which generate at runtime an event bus
that works without events: listeners register their interfaces on the bus
and
When using super dev mode with chromium on a rather simple project I
stumbled over an exception about an undefined property - the only catch:
the property isn't undefined. It happens somewhere down the road of a click
handler, interestingly enough Window.alert(+this) says 'undefined'.
That's probably the funniest goof I've made in a while... and I owe you
a big apology! Unfortunately I can't find the original article about RPC
payload inlining anymore which I think was written by Matt Mastracci.
On 15/09/14 01:55, BRF wrote:
None. This link,http://jectbd.com/?p=1174,
Correction, Alex Moffat from Lombardi. Still can't find the article.
On 15/09/14 02:37, George Georgovassilis wrote:
That's probably the funniest goof I've made in a while... and I owe
you a big apology! Unfortunately I can't find the original article
about RPC payload inlining anymore which I
BRF, I don't know what kind of weed you're on.
On Saturday, 13 September 2014 17:30:37 UTC+3, BRF wrote:
It appears all the links to jectbd.com in the readme.md file are broken
and go to a japanese hentai site now.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
, 2014 4:35:24 PM UTC+2, George Georgovassilis
wrote:
Dear all,
It has been quiet for a while, but we're back with news:
- The project repository moved to github:
https://github.com/ggeorgovassilis/gwt-sl
- Updated dependencies to GWT 2.6 and Spring 3.2
- There is a maven
Hi Joseph,
I don't know much about spring4gwt other than that the GWT-SL predates it
by a while. After Robert Hanson and I released the SL in 2005 (or 2006, I
forgot - at the time a SF project called GWT Widget Library) it
continuously evolved covering many corner cases such as exception
Dear all,
It has been quiet for a while, but we're back with news:
- The project repository moved to github:
https://github.com/ggeorgovassilis/gwt-sl
- Updated dependencies to GWT 2.6 and Spring 3.2
- There is a maven repository hosted on github now:
repositories
repository
Hello all,
A while ago we had to work on a GWT application with the requirement that
the initial page should be visible in under 1 sec, but since it was a
single module, multi form application this requirement would hold for all
forms. We initially solved this by having all form markup in the
I'll be in Helsinki Sat-Mon, if anybody wants to catch up over a beer
or whatever it is you northerners consume that'd be great.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi Albert,
The way I did this is by reading SubmitCompleteEvent.getResults(), i.e.
uploadForm.addSubmitCompleteHandler(new SubmitCompleteHandler() {
public void onSubmitComplete(SubmitCompleteEvent event) {
if (event.getResults().contains(SizeException)
Window.alert(Data
I think that is a classic... you probably instantiated the controller
in an application-context rather than a web-application-context
On Jul 27, 6:49 pm, spandu spandana@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using GWT 2.0 integrated with Spring in the application, after
executing the
Hi all,
I'll be until Monday in Rome - if anybody wants to catch up for an
espresso or to, please drop me a line.
Best,
G.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hello Ania,
This might be a browser related behavior - if the window is closed,
all activities related with it are cancelled.
It might be best if you tried an alternative aproach: instead of
having the browser explicitly signing the user out of your application
(which is what you are trying to
Hi Gal,
That's a good point - I'm actually using them in production (since we
are at it, I might throw in
set-property name=compiler.stackMode value=strip/)
However I've found none of those to affect actual RPC payload size,
though they most certainly reduce the compiled javascript size.
Hello Michele and Mike,
Thanks for the vote of confidence :-)
I'm afraid you can't do much there - most of the headers are set by
the browser and cannot be removed (you may want to try to hack
XmlHttpRequest in the xhr package). I was able to remove only the user-
agent header.
While you may
of them. I am testing some solutions at the
moment, any thoughts on that?
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:18 PM, George Georgovassilis
g.georgovassi...@gmail.com mailto:g.georgovassi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I've been spending some time with reducing RPC payload size and
optimising
Hello all,
I've been spending some time with reducing RPC payload size and
optimising the request pattern and thought I'd share my pain and
wisdom with you :-)
You can read the full story here [1], the main points I am discussing
are:
- rewriting RPC to use GET over POST for reduced network
Dear all, thank you very much for the valuable points you made!
@Christian: Big screen... lucky you :-) Some sites (think twitter)
solve this by center-aligning the content and providing an ambient
background. I hope, as the functionality of the site increases over
time, to make better use of
Hello all,
I'm happy to announce that Bararooma [1], a real estate site for the
Indonesian market is going live. It is based on GWT for the frontend
and Spring in the backend, making use of cool features such as RPC
over GET, MVP, Sprites and fine grained caching.
If you can spare a minute, I'd
Thank you for the great interest folks!
We've recorded nearly hundred visitors who we could trace back to this
post and who had, to a lesser or greater extent, a look at our site.
Unfortunately we've not received but very little feedback so far - I
hope we didn't scare or bore you away. If you
Dear all,
The SL, formerly hosted at Sourceforge, has been split from the Widget
Library and moved to Google Project Hosting [1].
BR,
G.
[1] https://code.google.com/p/gwt-sl/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to
-log/source/browse/trunk/Log/src/com/alle...
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:25 AM, George Georgovassilis
g.georgovassi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been toying with Maps Api v3 and markerclusterer and run into a
strange constellation with the following setup:
IE 8 (64 bit) both hosted
I've been toying with Maps Api v3 and markerclusterer and run into a
strange constellation with the following setup:
IE 8 (64 bit) both hosted and production mode, GWT 2.1.1
Markercluster apparently does something to the Map, so that the map
cannot be operated upon immediately when running IE8,
Hi Richard,
Sorry to hijack this thread (I promise I'll be quiet after that:-).
Since I've not yet had the chance to write any code with the
RequestFactory, I am still curious about the http payload size. For
example, what I didn't like with RPC was that it included the full
qualified class names
Wow, thanks a lot :-)
On 11.01.2011 19:45, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 5:51:59 PM UTC+1, George Georgovassilis
wrote:
Hi Richard,
Sorry to hijack this thread (I promise I'll be quiet after that:-).
Since I've not yet had the chance to write any code
To be precise, you haven't done _any_ research ;-)
Try searching this group with RPC get [1]
[1]
https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/search?group=google-web-toolkitq=rpc+getqt_g=Search+this+group
On Dec 20, 10:12 pm, bconoly bcon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
We're having
Hello Damien,
That is an uggly problem. Unfortunately I'm not too fluent on
generators, but if you are willing to consider some alternatives there
might be some:
- DeRPC. It's not exactly over-documented, so you might have to do
some searching but it's supposedly a lot faster than RPC while just
Hello Jeff,
Just checking: you havent't by accident enabled any zooming? Resetting
the dev mode browser (Ctrl + 0) doesn't normalize the fonts back I
guess?
On Dec 17, 5:54 pm, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,, I can. I will do so later.
On Dec 17, 2010 10:22 AM, Chris Conroy
Now I'm curious :-)
I've given the documentation a quick glance and to my unsuspecting eye
it looks quite the same as Easymock - would anybody of the Mockito
enthusiasts care to elaborate about it?
On Dec 8, 10:43 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 déc, 16:32, Raphael André Bauer
So I've been on a webapp of mine that does RPC, Google Maps, MVP, uses
a ton of stock and homebrewn widgets and plenty of other things,
touching most of the GWT API and, like in every other GWT App I've
done so far it also uses SuggestBox. And like in every other GWT App
I've written, I come to
Hello BurstUser,
You need to keep in mind that the returned code is not parsed into
javascript object by some mechanism that is native to the browser. The
returned string is parsed in javascript, so it is not uncommon that
complex objects take several seconds to parse. I've run into this
problem
How about ETag ? This should work out of the box with any tomcat.
On Oct 9, 8:16 pm, PeterT peterteunis...@verizon.net wrote:
We have a project.nocache.js file that included other .js and .css
files. The generated project has a long GUID like name which changes
each compilation, so that file
Hello Denis,
That is unlikely - cookie values are mostly set on the server side.
Since you are using Firebug, why don't you look out for the one
response that overrides the cookie? JSP pages for instance like
setting their own cookies in the default setup. Another thing to watch
for is the cookie
Hello Ray,
I can't see why the exact piece of code you posted should fail. You've
got probably more going on.
You can avoid this problem if you programmatically construct the page.
Thus, the html should contain only a div with an ID, which you get
through RootPanel.get(id) and then you keep
Hello Andrew,
A couple of ways spring to my mind:
1. Use conditional comments [1]. This way you can easily display a
message to IE6 users that their browser is not supported and focus on
IE7+ CSS
2. If you override the user agent in your module xml file with
everything but IE6 then the GWT
You hit a point there. Normally one shouldn't care, because there is
no urge to upgrade to a newer version of the library if it changes the
API or changes some behavior which you rely on. There problem is that
GWT does not backport fixes to older branches, i.e. issues 3757 or
5056, thus if you
Hello Itzik,
Your interface needs to speficy an Exception that extends
IsSerializable, and only those exceptions should be cast from the
service. Thus, if the exception you are throwing for unauthorized
access extends that base exception you should get it also in the
client side.
On a further
Hello Haris,
Not sure if I understand your problem, so I'll rephrase it:
You have a GWT page with a Form element and a submit button. When the
submit button is clicked, the page is reloaded.
Question: Do you programmatically construct the form or does it exist
in the static html?
The reason
Hello David al,
The SL is also actively maintained - releases are not that frequent
anymore though (there's not much to do) because of the high maturity grade.
David wrote:
Any other feedback about this ?
What's odd is that we are still asking this very same question after
several years of
Hello Stefan,
There is the Firefox Throttle (Windows only) addon, another tool
(Windows only) called NetLimiter which operates on a network basis and
I hear there is a Linux distro that can do this, also simulating
packet loss etc, you might want to check the discussion over at
stackoverflow [1].
Hello GWTViju,
I'm pretty sure you are running into a race condition. The 500 means
that an error ocurred in the server side - there should be somewhere a
detailed stacktrace, check your logging settings. Check for member
variables in your controllers, servlets and services which could be
on its way before reaching the RemoteServiceServlet. BTW, there are
filters in place, which is the SpringSecurityFilter
Thanks
Viju
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:22 PM, George Georgovassilis
g.georgovassi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello GWTViju,
I'm pretty sure you are running into a race condition
/2010 09:51 AM, sm wrote:
Hi George,
Thank you very much. We were using DialogBox panel which was causing
problem. There is one more entity like this, still trying to figure
out.
Thanks,
Sunil
On Sep 23, 12:43 am, George Georgovassilis
g.georgovassi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Sunil,
Maybe some
Hello Sunil,
Maybe some widgets you use implement their own mouse listeners without
you knowing it (i.e. calendar?). You could progressively remove
widgets until you find the one that's causing the CPU load
On Sep 21, 9:34 pm, sm sunilm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are using GWT 2.0.3 version.
Hello Alex,
Sure you can do that. Have a look at [1], there's a post about how to
do the very same thing with using the HTTP GET cache - so this will
work also with non-html5 speaking browsers. Still that solution faces
the same problem of how to serialize and deserialize the data.
[1]
The answer is not that easy. You can bring hibernate managed objects
(almost) transparently to GWT applications, have a look at Gilead [1]
Much has been said about Spring and GWT, a quick forum search will
surely bring something up
[1] http://noon.gilead.free.fr/gilead/index.php?page=gwt
On Sep
Hello Magnus,
That's called Breaking out of frames [1]. If you need your app to be
able to detect a valid login, then you'll need to communicate from
within the iframe to the hosting app that the login was ok (have a
look at window.name transport in this case [2])
[1]
Hi Sam,
The SL [1] is a community maintained integration of Spring and GWT
mainly focused at exporting Spring managed beans as RPC services. It
was launched four years ago and has reached through many releases a
high degree of maturity. The documentation is extensive, it's easy to
use (though I'm
RootPanel.detachOnWindowClose(yourWidget)
On Aug 31, 9:06 pm, myapplicationquestions parag.bhag...@cgi.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I have an existing html and i am adding a simple GWT script to that
page which will show an alert when an existing link is clicked. I do
this by the following code
Good point... I've been spending too much time writing my own widgets
lately :-)
Anchor.wrap() takes care of everything.
Gal Dolber wrote:
Are you sure that is required?
That should be automatic
2010/8/31 George Georgovassilis g.georgovassi...@gmail.com
mailto:g.georgovassi...@gmail.com
There've been some requests to perform RPC invocations with HTTP GET,
as the response is cacheable by the browser (and if you believe the
word on the net, it's faster [1] than POST).
I've written a wrapup on how to get it done [2], the essentials in a
nutshell:
Given a service you want to make
Hello GKotta,
That should happen only with an IE browser - I found that it doesn't
load images when you add more than a couple DOM elements in one bunch.
Basically there are three workarounds:
1. Use a DeferredCommand to add one image at a time
2. Preconstruct an array of images and re-assign
I'd normally ask you to the DTO code, but you really should check that
your deployment worked alright. So please check that:
1. your projects is refreshed after the build
2. old deployment is wiped and overwritten with the new one
3. logging is enabled
4. no errors about serialization policy are
Turns out this is a known issue (with workarounds) [1] with maps in
conjunction with GWT's layouting.
[1]
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-google-apis/issues/detail?id=366colspec=ID%20Type%20API%20Status%20Priority%20Milestone%20Owner%20Summary
On Jul 26, 10:22 pm, George Georgovassilis
I've recently run into the following rather bewildering issue where
maps display fine in all browsers but IE6 and IE7.
My GWT 2.0.4 client app is using GWT maps API 1.1 jar (against maps
API 2). The maps API loads ok, but IE6 and IE7 won't display the map
widget content - no errors thrown.
Hello Eric,
The page is in standards mode. How do I debug this?
On Jul 26, 8:48 pm, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote:
First, make sure your hosted html page is set to standards mode. The
first line should be something like:
!doctype html
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:17 PM, George
There are some libraries which handly cross site RPC, but they all
have one or another drawback.
You can read on here [1]
[1] http://development.lombardi.com/?p=611
On Jul 21, 2:09 am, VM thinker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello GWT Users,
I just wanted to check if anybody had success with Cross
You might do it with some CSS provided that you are not targeting IE6.
1. Make a div with fixed dimensions
2. Put the label and the image into the div
3. The initial style for the label should be absolute positioning and
hidden. You can play with margins to place the label anywhere ove rthe
image
Hello Sergey,
If the login url, the iframe url and the main application url are one
the same domain then these frames will be able to directly invoke
javascript on each other. If you are going to a different domain (i.e.
the login url is on https:// instead of http://) then this will not
work.
Hell Björn,
I know your pain. In this case you have really only one option:
loggin!
Grab yourself a nice div somewhere on your page and start mercelessly
logging what your application is doing to that div and try to narrow
down where the error happens.
Also try/catch block which Window.alert()
I'll go with Stefan here.
MVC implies that the server handles much of the view - with a GWT
application the server is reduced to a glorified DAO. All you really
need is integrate services from the backend into the frontend. What we
really missing is something like RMI for the browser - GWT's RPC
Hello Quu,
You obviously control Server B because you load the application from
there. Can you also control server A? In that case you could wrap the
XML with a couple techniques. The iframe technique for example would
wrap the XML into a big javascript string and publish it to your
application,
Hello Chris,
I think, especially with respect to IE, the fastest way is still to
construct a string and assign it to div's innerHTML... provided that
you can find an intelligent and fast way to create that string, as IE
(at least prior to 8) has a notoriously slow string concatenation.
On May
Hello all,
if the unit/assembly test is enough for you, there is an RC [1] of the
1.1 SL which supports GWT 2 and Gilead 3.
[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/gwt-widget/files/
On Feb 16, 9:23 pm, maks makspaniza...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Do you have a working on example on how to use the GWT
There is a way using a button with the sliding door techique [1]. The
example does it with a link simulating a button, but it also works
with buttons.
Please be advised that buttons pose an unforseen behavior when
pressed: they displace their content by a few pixels. Unfortunately
not all browsers
Hello Christian,
I looked at the code of ArrayList, but couldn't find anything
suspicious. Are you sure your object is at 0? Maybe a null squeezed in
at 0, and your object is somewhere later in the list? On which
browsers does this happen?
On Jan 28, 6:16 pm, Christian Goudreau
Hello Meletis,
There is a report [1] that tells pretty much the same story, but this
time FF loses the session and Safari works ok.
Couple of things to check:
- Do you have any particular extensions installed in Safari?
- Are the requests launched simultaneously or in sequence?
- Are the
Hello Papick,
I had some of that too. You're not doing deRPC by any chance? Mind
pasting some stacktraces?
On Jan 26, 10:22 am, P.G.Taboada pgtabo...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am having trouble with GWT 2.0. I am trying to switch from 1.7 to
2.0, everything compiles fine, but...
When I
Hello All,
I've a case where I need to fiddle with the classloader before RPC
deserializes the request payload. With the RemoteServiceServlet there
was an onBeforeRequestDeserialized method which could be used to
substitute the classloader used by RPC, but I couldn't find an
equivalent for
Hello Marko,
If you run into any problems, just ask the SL forum. The easiest way
to get you started is with the GWTRPCServiceExporter - its a
Controller which you can bind directly to an URL handler (like Springs
SimpleUrlHandlerMapping) and to which you give a reference to your
service bean. It
To cut a long story short:
1. It is limited to IE6
2. If you use the 8-bit file format with a single bit transparency it
will work in IE6
3. As a workaround, you can use a div, put the image inside the div,
and use a filter (see IE filters)
On Jan 17, 5:02 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com
RPCs are gzipped only if the payload is large enough to be worth the
effort. So I'd say that only large RPC responses get gzipped, and your
application fails on large RPC responses. So there are two
possibilities:
1. You application cannot digest the response. Version missmatch? A
technical error
Hi Raul,
If you can't modify the server.xml then you have still two ways to
compress the html.
1. Use a filter. You can specify a filter in your web.xml and compress
all static content on the fly. Bad for server side performance, but it
will do the trick.
2. gzip the .cache.html files on the
-'+'-/scr'+'ipt');
We've had inlining working on dotspots.com in GWT trunk for a while now, but
I'm considering going back to an external nocache.js so we can more easily
decouple our static content from the GWT code.
Matt.
On 2009-12-17, at 12:40 PM, George Georgovassilis wrote:
Some time
Some time ago we discussed [1] inlining nocache.js into the host page
to speed up initial page load, which I find quite worthwhile a read.
While back in the 1.7 days I managed to inline nochache.js with a
modest effort of post processing (escaping some javascript), 2.0
defeats me. I can't find a
I've been playing around with :hover lately and thought my findings
and workarounds might be of interest to the general public :-)
An important step towards a responsive UI is to have widgets already
prepared when making them visible, since widget creation takes up
quite some time. We're
Recently I run into a problem with the following setup:
ScrollPanel
table
...
tr
td
FocusPanel
/td
/tr
...
/table
/ScrollPanel
When the table becomes longer than the page can accomodate, the
scrollpanel should normally display scrollbars and contain the entire
table. Which it does for all
at AjaxLoader:
AjaxLoader.init(your maps key here);
AjaxLoader.loadApi(maps, 2, new Runnable() {
public void run() {
//action to perform after api is loaded
}
}, null);
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 9:42 AM, George Georgovassilis
:
Yes, you are right indeed.
This is a tradeoff between clean code and performance penalty.
From where I test it is 184ms which is quite negligible compared
to the time it takes to load maps...
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:06 AM, George Georgovassilis
g.georgovassi
Hey David,
Supressing context menues should not be too difficult, every wannabe
webmaster does it in a futile attempt to prevent downloading his
images, just search the web for it.
Supressing selections would be a combination of javascript and some FF-
specific CSS:
public static native void
Hello Oliver,
I'd say Spring + some ORM (Ibatis, JPA, Hibernate) are a good deal
with GWT. With GWT the server is reduced to a data provider and
storage engine. The tasks a server carries out follow always the same
pattern:
1. map request to DTOs by interfacing with the client
2. perform
Sorry to hijack this thread, but since we're talking about this...
what's the best way of loading the maps API javascriptlibrary without
blocking (aka unblocking parallel downloads)?
So far I ended up with this:
script type=text/javascript
//![CDATA[
function loadGoogleMapsAPI(){
var script =
I've been recently struggling with getting Gilead to work properly
with dynamic proxy mode. When DTOs implement Serializable instead of
IsSerializable, RPC forces the use of a serialization policy.
Apparently not all domain classes end up in the serialization policy
(as a matter of fact, manually
Hi Spike,
I was pondering the exact same thing the other day. From all the
experiments I made, only FF was able to somewhat reliably remember
passwords. My understanding is that you need a structure with a form,
a login textfield, a password textfield and a submit button:
form action=...
input
not an option
Login is optionally in my app, you can, but you don't have to.
If I use an IFrame, I can't access the Information generated in there.
I could have used the User-Capability of Google App, but I did't
exactly for that reason.
I hate these Worarounds.
On 26 Aug., 11:48, George
Sure, it's gwt-module.dtd in the root directory when you unzip the
installation archive.
On Aug 21, 10:54 pm, Eric erjab...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an XML Schema or a DTD for the module.gwt.xml files?
If there is, I'd like to install it in my IDE so it can support me
while I write GWT
Hello Edoardo
Not everything, only server-side code. This means servlets, EJBs,
Spring Beans and DTOs for RPC. When you are running in debugging mode
then you can replace server code without a restart. Depending on the
capabilities of your JVM this can be as little as changing method code
up to
the simple provided RPC sample, newest gwt plugin and gwt 1.7
all running on eclipse 3.5
On Aug 12, 1:54 pm, George Georgovassilis g.georgovassi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Edoardo
Not everything, only server-side code. This means servlets, EJBs,
Spring Beans and DTOs for RPC. When you
replacement on the server side.
Of course I could bypass the jetty server and use another one in debug
mode etc etc. but wouldn't be nice to just use one?
On Aug 12, 2:12 pm, George Georgovassilis g.georgovassi...@gmail.com
wrote:
When you're running the server (i.e. tomcat) from within
You inherited the right module in your .gwt.xml module?
On Aug 11, 10:15 am, CI-CUBE e...@ci-cube.info wrote:
Want to process an XML document, everything looks good but I get an
exception when creating a NamedNodeMap, which obviously is just an
Interface. Using the Eclipse Debugger I saw that
Hi P.G.
I've seen a lot of ways to achieve that integration, and none looks
complicated. The fact is that spring-gwt integration is easy (thanks
to R. Jellinghaus' refactoring of the RemoteServiceServlet), which
explains the plethora of libraries. Hibernate-gwt integration on the
other hand is
Hello Dejan,
You could have Apache act as the front server and forward all requests
to a specific URL to a tomcat server, have a look at [1]. This way
they both share the same server and port for an external visitor.
[1] http://www.serverwatch.com/article.php/10819_2203891_1
On Aug 10, 12:59
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
