> Have you tried working your way into the symbolMaps?
No, because I just figured the obfuscated code wasn't worth trying to
deobfuscate, but apparently symbolMaps is the key. Kirill provded the
details so I plan to refer to that. Thanks for the time!
--
You received this message because you
Great, thanks so much for this information, I'll study it and run some
tests, but I'm sure it will create some great leads. Cheers!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> There is a file (produces during build) with all names mapping to java
methods. You can de-obfuscate it manually.
This sounds like exactly what I need. Not to take more of your time, but
do you have any references where I can get more information about this?
Thanks!
--
You received this
Thanks for the response, and yes, totally inaccessible by any means.
So back to my main question: are there any serious ramifications, mostly
related to runtime (as I understand the issues with loading), with running
a non-obfuscated application?
Thanks!
--
You received this message because
Hi Vassillis-
Thanks for the response. A few comments:
> the problem is reproducible in the remote system and not just happens
after several hours of usage
It's not entirely reproducible, but does seem to happen with some
regularity. And yes, it has hours of usage, which could be the problem.
Thanks Thomas. I was hoping it'd be easier and I was just missing
something. Moving this call out of rpc is probably the best solution.
Thanks again for the guidance!
Since servlets 3 had been out for a long time now it'd be a great idea to
have the developers write this feature into
Hi Jens-
Thanks, I also thought of using the debugger and I think I might already
have a lead. Great advice! I didn't know about the other debugging
features you mentioned so I'll make a note of those.
I am finding that I need to use the bookmarklets most of the time. It
isn't a major
Hi Jens-
Just letting you know I found the problem using the pause on exceptions
feature. Handy that! Thanks for leading me in the right direction!
Robert
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Robert J. Carr rjc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jens-
Thanks, I also thought of using the debugger and I
It turned out my problem was mostly my own doing. I was using different
config files in different environments and didn't realize it. Hope your
problem is this simple!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from
Awesome, thanks so much for the help!
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mark Erikson mark.erik...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool, glad that was an easy fix.
Yeah, this is a good approach. See
https://github.com/richkadel/cesium-gwt for a larger-scale use of this
technique for wrapping the Cesium.js
Thanks for the response, but I'm fairly certain I've never started super
dev mode, certainly not on my build server, nor do I see any unexpected
cache folders in my working directory. I like the idea though, maybe there
is some other cache I can try? I vaguely remember seeing such a thing but I
control when the GWT files get loaded, but this will work as a backup.
Thanks again for the help!
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Robert J. Carr rjc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, true I guess, I'll try to sort it out. I was able to use the
throttling to reproduce the problem as you suggested so
Thanks so much for the detailed response. And I'll give those dev tool
suggestions a try.
And what you say makes sense about dereferencing a null, but it doesn't
explain how it would work most of the time, but sometimes it doesn't. If
the code is dereferencing null it should always be an error,
Thanks, true I guess, I'll try to sort it out. I was able to use the
throttling to reproduce the problem as you suggested so thanks!
Unfortunately dev mode isn't working for me so now I have to go figure out
super dev mode I guess.
Thanks again for the help. You certainly gave me a start!
On
=gwt.logging.developmentModeHandler value=DISABLED
/
set-property name=gwt.logging.systemHandler value=DISABLED /
set-property name=gwt.logging.simpleRemoteHandler value=DISABLED /
Thanks again for the help!
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Robert J. Carr rjc...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, thanks, I'll give it a try.
I read
Thanks for the lead, yeah, I am using logging. But I thought I had disabled
it all. Any idea which logging this is? I recall having to disable a logger
or two when upgrading to 2.7.
And why would this only show up on a Linux build?
Thanks again!
On Friday, December 5, 2014, Nicolas Weeger
OK, thanks, I'll give it a try.
I read that the popup handler doesn't exist anymore and that's why I
removed the config line. If it's not in 2.7 then why is it showing up in
my linux build? I just checked and I don't have the popupHandler enabled
but I do have logging enabled in general as well
This just burned me. Just curious why you couldn't have it load the file
from firefox or webkit instead of just doing nothing? Better to deal with
potential errors than to be a total non-starter.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors
Right, I first followed the static export example and got things working.
Then realized I actually wanted to use it non-statically and got help on
this forum with how to include the instance into the export (main.@...).
As I said, it would work sporadically, but not always. An non-static
Thanks, not exactly what I was looking for, but I can probably find a way
to make this work in the way i'd like. Thanks!
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Jim Douglas jdou...@basis.com wrote:
This might do what you need:
Thanks for the quick responses. That makes sense that since the jsni
method is declared static that you can't use this, but I'm not following
Thomas's explanation. Maybe I could just get an explanation from the docs
example here:
Thanks for the explanation and examples. I actually know javascript quite
well, including the ramifications of using this inside of closures, but as
I said, I didn't know that $entry was setting up a closure.
You've given me enough information that I believe I can figure out my
problems now.
Thanks for the gwt-exporter suggestion (it was already on my radar) and
thanks for the alternative dart web toolkit. I didn't catch the conference
but that is very interesting about GWT 3.0. Do you have any white papers
on that specific topic?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Ümit Seren
Thanks Jens. I was thinking the answer is not possible but I was just
hoping to get confirmation in case I was missing something silly. Thanks
for the link ... I'll check it out!
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
At some point during the serialization
Thanks Didier, I already did exactly that and it appears my problem is
with the gwt-canvas library I recently added. IE is saying my problem
is here:
function
gwt_canvas_client_CanvasImpl_$init__Lgwt_canvas_client_CanvasImpl_2Lgwt_canvas_client_Canvas_2V(this$static,
canvas){
Hi Gursel-
Thanks for the response, but I don't *want* Pair to serialize. And
just marking it as transient doesn't fix the problem. The Pair class
is out of the gwt package, and therefore, the gwt compiler can't even
see it.
Sorry if this doesn't make sense.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:45 AM,
Hi Sri-
That's a great reference, thanks, but it is effectively what I'm
already doing (just encapsulating it better).
I think my point is, in the example they gave:
class JsArrayE extends JavaScriptObject extends JavaScriptObject { ... }
I feel this should be part of the standard library.
just not sure why this isn't
in the standard library.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Robert J. Carr rjc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sri-
That's a great reference, thanks, but it is effectively what I'm
already doing (just encapsulating it better).
I think my point is, in the example they gave
Thanks for the pointer, clearly I didn't know that existed or I
wouldn't have made the standard library comment.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 3, 9:30 am, Robert J. Carr rjc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah ... spoke too soon. You'll see
Thanks for the response. I however do not understand what you mean by
sounds like your gwt is using plain-old html, and not a jsp. The
redirect I am performing is to the host page (initial html page that
invokes the GWT application). Can this be a jsp instead of a html?
Sure, your gwt doesn't
Hi Thomas-
Basically, you don't want to try and send image bytes through RPC ...
avoid that and you should be fine.
could you elaborate on that. please. What's the problem with doing so?
Sure ... it's pretty simple. AFAIK, there is no way for a browser to
deal with image bytes. As I said,
Isn't the event bus just an implementation of the Observer pattern?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Grant grant.klop...@gmail.com wrote:
What you probably want is an Event Bus.
There is a great video available, google for 'gwt mvp'. It is well
worth a watch
Grant
On Dec 16, 7:01 am,
Actually, I tend to *only* use Exception for my remote service methods
and I still get the warning.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jim Douglas jdoug...@basis.com wrote:
a custom class that extends Exception
That must be it; we have a couple of custom classes that just extend
Exception:
Well, what you say here:
GWT is a one page show
Is absolutely true. Given that, you'll have to come up with the
solution that suits you best. Some options are:
1) Don't use GWT for the login and have it redirect you to your GWT
page when you've authenticated.
2) Integrate your login into
:)) But like i said -
it's kind of crazy.
On 22 Okt., 07:55, Robert J. Carr rjc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ian ... I had a feeling it was going to be complicated, I just
wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.
Looks like I'm relegated to building complex queries or making two
();
ImageIO.write(image, jpg, baos);
final OutputStream out = response.getOutputStream();
baos.writeTo(out);
baos.flush();
out.close();
greets,
Erik
On Oct 22, 10:37 am, alex.d alex.dukhov...@googlemail.com wrote:
Glad i could help ;)
On 22 Okt., 10:26, Robert J. Carr rjc...@gmail.com wrote
Thanks Ian ... I had a feeling it was going to be complicated, I just
wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.
Looks like I'm relegated to building complex queries or making two
requests. Thanks again for the time!
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Ian Petersen ispet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sumit-
Thanks for the response. I'm looking forward to hearing from Scott if
he has anything to say.
My example of doing simple arithmetic was only to explain the problem.
However, if I think about it more, maybe it is still applicable.
Say I have an application that allows users to input
Hi Jason-
Thanks for the response, but again, it is just an example of what I'm
doing. But you're right, and thanks for the suggestion, I'll take a
closer look at my specific application for any potential security
issues.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
Hi Ian ... thanks for the response.
Let me put it in code then:
Widget w = new MyCompilicatedWidget();
DeckPanel deck = new DeckPanel();
deck.add(w);
deck.showWidget(0);
RootPanel.get(main).add(deck);
// This doesn't work ... shows up as a single black line, however:
Widget w = new
%. The
SimplePanel doesn't.
Ian
http://examples.roughian.com
2009/3/4 Robert J. Carr rjc...@gmail.com
Hi Ian ... thanks for the response.
Let me put it in code then:
Widget w = new MyCompilicatedWidget();
DeckPanel deck = new DeckPanel();
deck.add(w);
deck.showWidget(0);
RootPanel.get
, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Joe Cole profilercorporat...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the problem may be that you are not using the deckpanel add
methods:
DeckPanel.add(String text, Widget widget, boolean asHTML)
Can you try that?
On Mar 4, 1:44 pm, Robert J. Carr rjc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ian
Great, that is mostly what I expected, thanks for the help!
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Shawn Pearce s...@google.com wrote:
There isn't really any effect either way. The additional module might take
a tiny bit extra time to compile (like under 1 ms) due to the compiler
needing to read
Hey Sumit-
Thanks for the response. Google Maps requires that you are connected
to the internet in order to both download the image tiles as well as
the javascript code. The environment I will be in won't be connected
to the internet, so I won't be able to download either of these.
I already
Great, good suggestion, I'll look into it. Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 sep, 06:21, rjcarr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has developed a GWT Widget for viewing a set
of GIS tiles very similar to Google Maps. I
45 matches
Mail list logo