Excellent - reach out in https://gitter.im/gwtproject/gwt,
https://gitter.im/gwtproject/gwt-modules, or https://gitter.im/vertispan/j2cl
for any discussion around this, and people who are eager to help test.
--
Colin Alworth
co...@colinalworth.com
On Sun, May 3, 2020, at 11:40 AM, Manfred
Am Montag, 20. April 2020, 03:01:12 CEST schrieb Colin Alworth:
> That said, validation is basically the only thing that _isn't_
> ready for j2cl, and there is a small gwt-validation project that has gotten
> started that is compatible with both gwt2 and j2cl - do you have plans to
> finish
Jim, from this result, your classpath isn't correctly configured - the file is
there in the jar, as expected, but GWT isn't seeing it, so doesn't know to
include these sources.
I'll reach out off-list once we have a new zip and are ready to start testing
again.
--
Colin Alworth
>
> * JVM version: 8, 11, 14
> * Operating System: Linux, OS X, Windows (8, 8.1, 10)
> * Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, IE11, Edge
Obviously all major macOS browsers (Safari, Chrome, Firefox, Chromium
Edge), plus iPadOS Safari.
I'm currently testing two Eclipse build environments for
My development system here is macOS Catalina; is it helpful to get test
feedback from this environment? My biggest concern is to verify that our
GWT application builds and runs correctly in 2.9.0, but beyond that I'm
more than happy to run any other tests that you have.
On Tuesday, April 28,
scrappy:gwt-2.9.0-rc1 jimdouglas$ pwd
/Users/jimdouglas/Documents/gwt-2.9.0-rc1
scrappy:gwt-2.9.0-rc1 jimdouglas$ jar tvf jsinterop-annotations-1.1.0.jar |
grep gwt.xml
scrappy:gwt-2.9.0-rc1 jimdouglas$ jar tvf
jsinterop-annotations-1.1.0-sources.jar | grep gwt.xml
40 Wed Apr 08
...To further clarify, because in re-reading that email I might sound like a
bit of a jerk: If you would like to help with testing I'll add you to the group
- ideally we're looking for more testers with something other than Windows 10,
but more testing is usually better. The purpose in what I
Jim, the download zip is available for people who are helping with pre-release
testing - it is an error that the jars made it into maven central before we
completed this acceptance testing. Once we finish testing, we will announce it
and make a zip generally available for download.
With that
I've got the same build error that Michael reported here, and I'm not sure
how to get past it.
I couldn't find a complete self-contained gwt-2.9.0-rc1.zip distribution,
so I hacked one together by downloading 2.8.2 from here:
http://www.gwtproject.org/download.html
I extracted that GWT 2.8.2
On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 3:52:32 PM UTC+2, Alexander Bertram wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When moving to gwt-2.9.0-RC1 and elemental2 1.0.0 (from elemental2
> 1.0.0-RC1), it seems that HTMLElement no longer has a click() method
> defined. Is that intentional? Is there alternative? We use this to
Hi,
When moving to gwt-2.9.0-RC1 and elemental2 1.0.0 (from elemental2
1.0.0-RC1), it seems that HTMLElement no longer has a click() method
defined. Is that intentional? Is there alternative? We use this to trigger
the File Dialog for file inputs.
Otherwise compilation successful on OpenJDK 8
Do you use lombok in client code? If so, you may try to align your JDT
compiler version with one that used by GWT.
If lombok is used only in server code, then ensure that the server code and
the client code, both are placed in different maven modules.
Maybe there are other ways, but I'm not
thanks, you were right.
but we use JDT ECJ for lombok support.
without lombok does not work unfortunately
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
thanks, you were right.
but we use JDT ECJ for lombok support.
without lombok does not work unfortunately
понедельник, 27 апреля 2020 г., 12:28:48 UTC+1 пользователь Alexander
Leshkin написал:
>
> Maybe you have an overriden version of the JDT compiler on classpath that
> is incompatible with
Maybe you have an overriden version of the JDT compiler on classpath that
is incompatible with JDT compiler version from GWT dependencies.
On Monday, April 27, 2020 at 2:09:50 PM UTC+3, Alexander Tarasov wrote:
>
> hi
> 1) there is no gwt-maven-plugin:2.9.0-RC1 so I used 2.8.2.
> 2) i have the
hi
1) there is no gwt-maven-plugin:2.9.0-RC1 so I used 2.8.2.
2) i have the following error, looks strange because TryStatement
definitely has public "resources" field
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.InternalCompilerException: Error constructing Java
AST
[ERROR] at
hi
1) there is no gwt-maven-plugin:2.9.0-RC1 so I used 2.8.2.
2) i have the following error, looks strange because TryStatement
definitely has public "resources" field
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.InternalCompilerException: Error constructing Java
AST
[ERROR] at
Update on the broken samples in the gwt distribution:
The issue is some kind of interaction between Java 8 and ant - when a URL
is read from the classloader for a directory within a jar, it had a
trailing slash. When running the GWT webappcreator from command line, this
didn't happen, when
That helps, thank you.
Am Dienstag, 21. April 2020 19:11:12 UTC+2 schrieb Ignacio Baca
Moreno-Torres:
>
> gwt-user depends on jsinterop-annotations:sources (with the sources
> qualifier), and jsinterop-annotations:sources contains the
> Annotations.gwt.xml. It really seems right.
>
> We have
gwt-user depends on jsinterop-annotations:sources (with the sources
qualifier), and jsinterop-annotations:sources contains the
Annotations.gwt.xml. It really seems right.
We have tested in various projects and works perfectly. But, we downloaded
a corrupted gwt-user in one of the tests, and we
I've downloaded
- gwt-user-2.9.0-RC1.jar (
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.gwt/gwt-user/2.9.0-RC1)
- gwt-dev-2.9.0-RC1.jar (
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.gwt/gwt-dev/2.9.0-RC1)
- gwt-servlet-2.9.0-RC1.jar (
I verified GWT 2.9.0-RC1 in one of my applications without issues. The
tests I could not complete due an ant issues to build the samples.
Juan
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 22:01, Colin Alworth wrote:
> We're having an issue related to the java7->java8 update, the build isn't
> properly including the
We're having an issue related to the java7->java8 update, the build isn't
properly including the full sources for the included sample projects. By
itself, not a big deal, but it could imply that other assumptions of the
ant build are broken too. I'm looking into it, we'll have an updated
On Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 6:53:23 PM UTC+2, ManfredTremmel wrote:
>
> correct inherit order, supersource replacements of existing gwt classes).
>
Speaking of that, it's breaking
HEAD-SNAPSHOT:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit/7_-tpK8s_cM
(see discussion in
Hi Colin,
I've build and tested my libs and GWT-Applications this weekend against GWT
2.9.0-rc1 and elemental2 1.0.0. The good news is, everything compiled and
workes. I'm happy, to switch elemental2 form 1.0.0-RC1 to 1.0.0, which fixes
some problems I had in the past, so I can remove some
Absolutely, I build on Windows during dev, run SDM, etc, run
Jenkins in Linux
On 4/15/20, Freddy Boucher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any chance to include the following patch in 2.9?
> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/c/gwt/+/19800
> It has been sitting in Gerrit for years and it's a shame that
Hello,
Any chance to include the following patch in 2.9?
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/c/gwt/+/19800
It has been sitting in Gerrit for years and it's a shame that the core GWT
code doesn't convert dates correctly in all timezones.
Thanks in advance.
--
You received this message because
dev on: JVM 8, Windows 10, Chrome, Firefox. IE11 , Edge
build on Linux, deploy on Linux, QA w/ above browsers
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 1:05 AM Simeon Hearring
wrote:
> I have JVM 8, OS X, Chrome, Firefox, & Safari.
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:43 PM Colin Alworth wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> We have
I have JVM 8, OS X, Chrome, Firefox, & Safari.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:43 PM Colin Alworth wrote:
> Hi all,
> We have a build ready to test for GWT 2.9.0, and are looking for
> volunteers to verify that things are behaving properly on a variety of
> platforms. If you have an hour or two free
Yeah I’ll send it out once we’ve got some volunteers, and figured out who is
able to test what configurations.
--
Colin Alworth
co...@colinalworth.com
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, at 10:00 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> Could you please share the spreadsheet again?
>
> Juan
>
Hi Colin,
Could you please share the spreadsheet again?
Juan
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 23:43, Colin Alworth wrote:
> Hi all,
> We have a build ready to test for GWT 2.9.0, and are looking for
> volunteers to verify that things are behaving properly on a variety of
> platforms. If you have an
Hi all,
We have a build ready to test for GWT 2.9.0, and are looking for volunteers
to verify that things are behaving properly on a variety of platforms. If
you have an hour or two free and can help us out, we would appreciate it.
We're hoping for a cross-section of testing that verifies
*
I would be interested to try.
Thank you,
Oleg Cohen
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:24:16 AM UTC-4, Daniel Kurka wrote:
Hi all,
we are looking for help with testing GWT 2.7 RC1.
We are in need of people testing the release on these platforms (others
are already covered):
- Windows 7/8
Hi all,
we are looking for help with testing GWT 2.7 RC1.
We are in need of people testing the release on these platforms (others are
already covered):
- Windows 7/8, IE10
- some Windows, IE8
Please reach out to me directly if you want to get involved.
-Daniel
--
Google Germany GmbH
I'll do some testing, let me know what and how?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Anybody?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
I have following problem:
I have RequestBuilder, which calls http proxy servlet like this
onehttps://github.com/dsmiley/HTTP-Proxy-Servlet/blob/master/src/main/java/org/mitre/dsmiley/httpproxy/ProxyServlet.java
.
Now I try to test it.
I set up gwt maven plugin to use htmlunit. But when I
I have following problem:
I have RequestBuilder, which calls http proxy servlet like this
onehttps://github.com/dsmiley/HTTP-Proxy-Servlet/blob/master/src/main/java/org/mitre/dsmiley/httpproxy/ProxyServlet.java
.
Now I try to test it.
I set up gwt maven plugin to use htmlunit. But when I
On Monday, May 20, 2013 2:14:42 PM UTC-4, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Thad thad.hu...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
Can anyone clarify for me this Google testing blog entry?
http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2009/08/tott-testing-gwt-without-gwttest.html
Model
I am also in the process of making GWT-RPC method implementation
independent of GWT-RPC/Servlet for easier testing. I don't really bother
about introducing new short lived objects created for each request. Short
living objects are not a real problem in todays JVMs and you can probably
save a
Early on in the presentation Erik also mentions a recently released GWT
Mockito setup that might benefit your non-GwtTestCase goals.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kilmaSRq49g
Sincerely,
Joseph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
Can anyone clarify for me this Google testing blog entry?
http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2009/08/tott-testing-gwt-without-gwttest.html
Model, view, presenter I think I'm clear on (ha! yeah, sure), but I'm
trying to understand the Server.class. It's described as a completely
standard backend
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Thad thad.humphr...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone clarify for me this Google testing blog entry?
http://googletesting.blogspot.com/2009/08/tott-testing-gwt-without-gwttest.html
Model, view, presenter I think I'm clear on (ha! yeah, sure), but I'm
trying
`DevMode` works just fine when testing a GWT + GAE application. However the
problem arises when we try to deploy our app in GAE cloud, and suddenly we
get:
GWT module 'app' need to be recompiled
After a long update/upload time. The issue now is how can we test locally
and be sure at
I am currently using gwt 2.3 and smartgwtpower 2.5 nightly and using
Eclipse on Linux. My web app is using common code, developed in house,
and packaged to a jar called commonsmartgwt.jar. In this jar is the
entry point class and has its own gwt.xml file. In my web app's
gwt.xml file I inherit
I put together a simple applet implementing Touch-related event
handlers on a Canvas element, to test support for Touch in various
browsers on my Android Honeycomb tablet (Toshiba Thrive). I posted
the results on my Wordpress blog:
http://cs.jsu.edu/wordpress/?p=346
I was actually somewhat
Hi Chandrasekar,
you could of course simulate 20 users via Selenium - but that rather
load-tests the browser and not the application. From my point of view,
the server-side code is the one to be load tested.
What I did was: get myself tamper data for firefox (check out
Hello,
I need to implement Load Testing(say for some 20 users) on my GWT
application running in tomcat server on my machine.
I am working on Ubuntu OS.
On googling, I find NeoTys that satisfies my requirement, but the
trial version has few conditions:
1. It supports only Windows Users
2. the
services implementations, it seems
that you need something like JUnit; didn't you try it yet?
Salud!
Ezequiel.-
On 31 ene, 05:36, Amol12 amolkok...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can someone guide which tool should be used for testing GWT services?
I dont have UI and testing the services directly
which tool should be used for testing GWT services?
I dont have UI and testing the services directly. I need a tool
through which I can invoke the services and get the response.
Regards,
Amol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web
Hello,
Can someone guide which tool should be used for testing GWT services?
I dont have UI and testing the services directly. I need a tool
through which I can invoke the services and get the response.
Regards,
Amol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hi Amol,
If you are talking about remote services implementations, it seems
that you need something like JUnit; didn't you try it yet?
Salud!
Ezequiel.-
On 31 ene, 05:36, Amol12 amolkok...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can someone guide which tool should be used for testing GWT services?
I dont
hello
I'm testing my project in eclipse whit GWTTestCase, and getting
problem with startup url, geting messege: No startup URLs were
supplied -- add them to the end of the GWTShell command line, i
passing -startupUrl as program argument to test and it jast ignors it,
how can I pass startupUrl?
--
hi,
we have an application developed with GWT2.0.3 and GXT2.1.3. It works
perfectly with IE7 and IE8 but we have tried the application with IE6
and we are getting some errors. Does anyone know which could be the
cause of these errors ?
please recompile your application with code-generation: detailed and
run again, then you'll get at least meaningful stacktraces in your
exceptions, what running application in dev mode? did you try to
debug?
On 24 Nov., 14:28, pepgrifell pepgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
we have an application
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1043801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
will create RFC in Wave soon.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1043801/diff/1/4
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/cfg/SyntheticModuleDef.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1043801/diff/1/4#newcode50
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/cfg/SyntheticModuleDef.java:50: public
In general, not too bad. However:
1) the comment above is a rationale, but not a design doc. Please write
a design doc that explains how this solves the problem not just why it
is needed. Not being terribly familar with the JUnit infrastructure, it
took me a while to mostly figure out how it
Hi Ignat,
I definitely agree with you and follow this model. Not everyone does
and in some cases you're stuck unit testing your views. If you're
able, definitely one should follow what you said.
All the best,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Ignat Alexeyenko
Can you recommend a testing tool for testing GWT web app?
Thanks,
Guy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
QA team.
I use personally both according to my needs
regards
didier
On Nov 4, 2:06 pm, g_korland gkorl...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you recommend a testing tool for testing GWT web app?
Thanks,
Guy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
apply an identifying style class to all panels
you create.
Hope this helps - best regards
Sebastian Rothbucher
On 4 Nov., 15:06, g_korland gkorl...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you recommend a testing tool for testing GWT web app?
Thanks,
Guy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Arthur,
These rules are just good OO design - when you are depend on interfaces
rather than concrete classes.
One of the pros of following this principles - you can simplify testing by
using mocks instead of real objects.
You can read more about why programming to interfaces are so importang.
You can still mock out GWT widgets, but you'll need to use the
GWTMockUtilities. You can find more info here:
http://onthejvm.com/mocking-your-gwt-widgets-without-gwttestcase
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:14 AM, chrisr chris.robert.rowl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ignat, thank you
Hi!
In GWT you can write:
- plain JUnit tests,
- tests that are running inside browser (see GwtTestCase).
You can hide instance of DataPicker behind HasValue interface.
I.e. use:
HasValueDate dataPicker
instead of:
DataPicker dataPicker
This will allow you to create a mock for a dataPicker
Hi Ignat, thank you for the tip. I do remember reading that there is
a way to write gwt junit tests in a way that were much faster than the
way I'm doing it now. I wonder if this is it.
Is there some documentation for how to write unit tests of this
variety? I searched but didn't come across
I've been writing JUnit tests for my GWT code for a while, and I've
always come across issues where it feels like something very simple
doesn't work. Usually I can figure out a way to make it work, however
that usually feels wrong...
Right now I'm trying to write a test that involves an instance
The new E2eGWTTestCase enables application developers to write
end-to-end tests in a way that is similar to GWTTestCase, instead of
relying on tools written for JS, e.g. Selenium or WebDriver.
Why is GWTTestCase insufficient for end-to-end testing?
The main reasons are:
a) GWTTestCase does not
Reviewers: jat, scottb,
Description:
First pass of E2eGWTTestCase, an experimental feature for end-to-end
testing GWT applications
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1043801/show
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/cfg/ModuleDef.java
M dev/core/src/com
Pointer to a design doc? What is this used for?
--
Bob Vawter
Google Web Toolkit Team
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I was hoping for something a little lighter-weight than selenium or
GWTTestCase, something I could just run through quickly before check-
in's. After playing around with GWT code, I've assembed some code
that helps me test scenario #2 (enclosed at end of post), to test if
GWT RPC can successfully
Hi All,
Has anyone written simple unit tests to test:
1) if a class will go in to the serialization policy file at compile
time? and
2) if GWT RPC successfully serializable/deserializable an object at
runtime?
This has ended up being a fragile part of our application as we fix/
enhance so it
Have you tried with gwt unittest?
I don't recall exactly, but we wrote some of them but then we decided
to remove them from our TDD flux because they were tooking too much
time to run.
Now we use unittest server side (also for gwt object that doesn't
require js compilation) and selenium test for
Hi,
Sure, we must use async communications when running GWT application in
browser.
However, it is slow when testing our apps using GWTTestcase, and
normally we want to extends JUnit's Testcase instead.
Let see the ExampleJRETest in
Hi friends,
Want to test RPC services (in both Sync and Async mode)?
See the post at
http://www.gdevelop.com/w/blog/2010/01/10/testing-gwt-rpc-services/
Cheers
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send
Don't know anything about that library, but there's something odd about a
synchronous GWT RPC library that can simulate async when GWT RPC is async
to begin with, and very few would recommend using synchronous RPC in a
browser since it would appear to hang while the RPC took place.
We've found
Hi,
All the following is when I test the gwt 2.0.
I create one application using webAppCreator and after I did ant
devmode, and I copy the suggest url to Firefox, chrome and i.e but
it
doesn't work. I got the following message: Firefox can't establish a
connection to the server at
Good Day,
I am new to GWT. Just as I thought I have crossed the first hurdle of
making a gwt application, the second big challenge is already staring in my
face. TDD might not be the right word with the approach that i am following
since i have almost completed development. But i would like to
I have no affiliation with this service, but I just started using it today
to set up some load testing for the site I just built, and I am really
impressed with it. Easy to use, great features / reporting, fully support
for AJAX / JavaScript heavy sites like GWT if you use their real browser
Thanks Jason.
I thought it might be possible to do the round trip testing with app
engine but this does not seem to be the case. Thanks for the code
sample.
/johan
On Jun 10, 3:56 pm, Jason Parekh jasonpar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Johan,
I don't think there are any frameworks that can let you
Have been trying to make a unit test for my GWT and App Engine app but
there is something I do wrong and I cannot find any documentation
about this combination.
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/tutorials/1.6/appengine.html shows
the relation between gwt and appengine but it doesn't explain how
Hi Johan,
I don't think there are any frameworks that can let you test a round-trip
between the two. Instead, you'll likely want to test each side individually
(see http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/howto/unittesting.html for
App Engine junit testing).
If you're using the Eclipse
Hi akutz,
The list of browsers that GWT currently supports are:
- Firefox 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0
- Internet Explorer 6 and 7
- Safari 2 and 3
- Opera 9.0
(current as of May 2008)
We can also add on Google Chrome, Android and iPhone to that list.
The reason why you've discovered that your GWT
I have created a new app focused on mobile management of various
virtualization platforms using GWT. I have tested the app with several
mobile platforms, and am keeping a list of those that work and those
that do not. You can find the list at
Hi again,
I just found a load testing tool that integrates with selenium :
PushtoTest.
As it is said on thier website http://www.pushtotest.com/Docs/selenium
: PushToTest repurposes Selenium tests into load and performance tests
and Business Service Monitors (BSM) with no additional programming.
Thank you for the advise...
I gave up ..i'm not trying to figure out a workaround for webload
anymore because of time limitations.. although I think it is doable
I prefer working on webload ;it is more like a commercial tool
anyhow.. I have installed grinder and kicking off...
thanks again
On
I'm currently selecting a load Testing Tool from several candidates:
JMETER, GRINDER, and Webload open source.
I actually prefered using webload but faced some problems in
customizing my data because of RPC calls..I'm still working on a work
around.
Please I need advice on which tool to use... I
I remember investigating this a bit a year ago (obviously the big
problem is the RPC calls) and at the time it looked to me that JMeter
was difficult to set up for GWT apps and didn't necessarily give
meaningful results even if you could get it to work (unfortunately I
can't remember why).
I was working on this issue for the company I work for and I came up
with a few leads. I've been pulled off the project for now to go on
to other priorities. But here is a brain dump of what I had so far
1. Use the DETAILED switch for generated javascript to make it easier
for HTMLUnit to
89 matches
Mail list logo
