Please some feedback on the following i18n dynamic templating idea:
1) Have text in separated files like xml (or json).
2) Have all html/css in html pages.
All wil recognize this approach, it's no rocket science, but I miss it.
I noticed there are some ideas/projects like dynamicUiBinder out
@Jens: thanks for your feedback. I looked at it. I like the component-based
annotation approach.
It sure gives me inspiration. It would be nice if this templating mechanism
can be used independently of the rest of the platform (haven't looked at it
yet), and that it's flexible to extend it (It
What do you think of having a google custom search for the gwtproject
site, which searches only that site?
+1
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To
FYI: the IsElement interfaces corresponds to issue 7497:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7497
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Stephen Haberman
step...@exigencecorp.comwrote:
If nobody else has any other concerns, I recommend you to start with
an example
Let me see if I understand this Type 1/2 discussion correctly:
yes, the short Has* interfaces are a bit of a pain: awkward names, mass of
small interfaces, must-use of class generics if you need to more Has*
interfaces.
Buttt, they make them very nice manageable through general Utils* methods..
The simpler thing than buffering is just to have a StubButton, e.g.:
A, how could I forget ;)... I just remember the Stubs* Widgets in your
gitHub ;)
But is this even needed ?
If you use a template mechanism it might not be needed.
The template is created during setStyle() and other
So, my point: Is the purpose of the IsButton *only* to be an interface for
com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Button?
Good point, when submitting my prev post, I was just think about:
What problem is being solved here? Or What is improved ?
Maybe good to summarize the list of goals and then
Related issue and discussion:
7497http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7497
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
it.
- Ed
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
useful?
- Ed
On Feb 28, 4:22 am, Stephen Haberman step...@exigencecorp.com wrote:
public Widget asWidget() {
return getEnsureUiWidget();
}
You shouldn't be doing this. asWidget wasn't added to allow lazy
initialization of widgets.
It was added so that dummy widgets can
Why not store the IsWidget instances as children in the Panel, instead
of the contained Widget?
At this moment Panels contain a WidgetCollection instance that
contains Widget instances. Why not use store the IsWidget instances.
I don't think this breaks anything as Widget implements IsWidget.
I
Please some advice on the following.
Sorry for reposting the question below, I tried the GWT user forum but
I think I have better luck here:
---
I am about to migrate 3 gwt app's to one gwt app. All gwt app's
contain code split points, and I want to connect them with 3 code
split points.
I am a
appearantly disappeared as I have
seen it now for a week. All tests run fine now.
Any idea how/why this is ?
After all the debugging/work I get the feeling that there exists some
deep hidden bug causing this timeout. ..
Ed
On Oct 13, 2:40 pm, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
I give up for now
test case that need the backend (through
RPC) as I can't work with this unpredictable behavior.
On Oct 5, 4:56 pm, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
running the test in your continuous build environment with remote debugging
enabled and attaching to it with a debugger to see what is going
Please feedback on this and how I can solve this ?
The only option I see now is: disable my GWT test cases as the current
sometimes-failures is unacceptable on the build machine :(
I have no idea how to solve it otherwise...
On Oct 3, 8:10 pm, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
Just played
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday my test was run with success and last night it failed again,
without anything changing in the meantime :(
I was digging a bit more in the GWT Junit test code and I think the
test fails because I don't use
responded back to JUnitShell since the
start of the test.
---
On Oct 5, 2:51 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
There are really two apps running in this case. First, there is the one
created by JUnitShell, which contacts
tricks to attach the remote debugger
correctly ...)
On Oct 5, 4:24 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
I found the servlet you meant: JUnitHostImpl
I see that the url that touches this servlet is correctly forwarded
Today the nightly build failed again and no compiler error occurred as
appears in the above log snippet :(
Below the concerning logging snippet.
In the logging you see that the Proxy servlet does forward calls to
the parent class: GWT servlet: GWTShellServlet (No Proxy forward in
the logging means
Just played with the -runStyle Manual option
I am afraid that is not a correct option for me as I will run the
tests during the nightly build and with -runStyle option Manual will
stop when running the test and I have to manually copy/past the
displayed url, like explained in:
, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the detailed explanation, that sure helps.
I have seen the timeout message happen due to a compile error in the GWT
code, but you'd see those errors in the log also.
Could it have something to do with issue 4700 ?:
http
Sometimes my GWT test's fail (during nightly build) and give me the
following error.
-
[INFO] com.google.gwt.junit.client.TimeoutException: The browser did
not contact the server within 6ms.
[INFO] - NO RESPONSE: 192.168.1.65 / Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows
NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1)
especially if
you see this happening sometimes you might want to experiment with either
-runStyle Manual or -runStyle External to see if those are better-behaved
for you.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes my GWT test's fail (during nightly build) and give
.
Can you by chance provide your SimpleComposite src?
Thanks,
Daniel
On Sep 12, 5:04 pm, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never used lazy-loading within my
composites and never felt the need for it;
Lucky bastard ;)
Of course you should always create your widgets as late/lazily
Having lazy behavior in this LazyPanel, why not put it in other
widgets like the Composite ;)
On Sep 14, 11:32 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:47 am, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
I remember there once has been a LazyPanel in the incubator especially
for
, Sep 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
Having lazy behavior in this LazyPanel, why not put it in other
widgets like the Composite ;)
On Sep 14, 11:32 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:47 am, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
I remember
at it (maybe after 2.1 is out).
Thanks,
Ed
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
12, 4:00 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 12, 1:57 pm, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
I long time ago I opened an issue about the Composite
widget:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2508
I think the Composite widget should be improved because
bits and pieces in the future but it's good
for now...
Ed
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this
email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
environment.
Ed
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I gave the above remote context some more thoughts, and it's not an
option:
- I run in the following environments: dev, test, acceptance,
production and build.
The dev and build environments are the ones that give me problems as I
run GWTTestCase's in these mode's with a proxy servlet to forward
about
it :(.
Any idea's on how to do this are more then welcome?
Ed
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
He,
to fetch them using HTTP connection to appropriate client.
Indeed, that doesn't sound that bad, but I will need to maintan a mapping
between the moduleBaseUrl that I receive in the backend and the actual http
url of the module location where I can find the policy file. And these
mappings are
I like to start a discussion on the usage of the RPC policy files in
noserver mode, and I am interested if this might be improved.
Let me explain my use case and show my problems that I experience.
I have 4 GWT app's connecting all to the same backend app. All GWT
app's have two backend
Hi Ladislav,
Thanks for your response.
I do almost the same thing as Acris does, I only have my files located in
the classpath (I also use GWT-SL to read my policy files)..
But Acris also doesn't solve the problem of having all these policy files
scattered around and assumes that you have them
Please some advice on the above?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I like the idea of the symbol map in gwt 2.0 and would love to be able
to use/extend it myself.
I would like to get feedback on the following idea:
I would like to put a placeholder in my gwt code that is replaced by a
GWT unique ID and that is put in a symbol map.
Wny? I like to use this in my
Thanks for the feedback Joel and John ..
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I asked around on the net and got the idea that it's not possible at
all. I think because these events are received from the underlying OS
and simple forwarded, which makes sense
I think it would be possible if you use a kind of delayed-pipeline
(pattern): holding on to an event till some
Hello Ray,
If you have a minute, could you please answer my question above?
I am very curious what you mean.
Tanks
On Aug 31, 4:33 pm, Ed post2edb...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Ray,
Thanks for your reply.
Don't fake it, replace it: have your composite widget implement
HasValueDate
Tanks Ray,
I understand what you mean but don't really see how this could solve
my problem.
My problem is to detect a single focus/blur event of a group of
widgets.
Looking at your explanation I do translate these events to a general
ValidationChange event.
However, to trigger the validation
Hi,
I need to support a single focus/blur of a group of widgets.
Please some advise on this?
Examples:
1) Date (Birtyday) field that consists of 3 small text boxes, that can
be filled in by the user.
2) Date picker field: two date pickers to select a period.
It's important that 1) and 2) form
Hello Ray,
Thanks for your reply.
Don't fake it, replace it: have your composite widget implement
HasValueDate (or whatever).
I am sorry, but I can't follow you here :(...
What do you mean ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Hi Bruce,
My first reaction to you email: laughing ... but on second thought I
can't resist to react.
People warned me for your, but I never expected this!
I don't like the tone of your post just like you don't like mine.
If you want to kick me out of the forum, or want to filter any of my
Hi Miroslav
Thanks for the feedback.
You make a good point there about the increase in the amount of
javascript due to the interface..
I wasn't aware of that and would love to hear about this.
It makes you wonder what is better. I mean: using these interfaces
also safes code as I can re-use
He Joel,
You are right about this.
Like explained, I will be more careful next time, as I didn't realize
it would be taken this way. Maybe it's the world/country I live
in... I don't know... but it's not important..
Anyway, in this case, the patch was already in the issue not ? If
you
Even do it's dead, let me give some pointers on the Source generic
issue that came in mind:
- My Source isn't part of my HandlerManager, as in the example of Joe
above.
- My Source is contained in the event builder and his type indicated
on the event builder through Generics.
- The source can be
It costs me a bit to go back in time as these issues are already from
some time back..
Let me try to give some input on these points.
2) I don't fully understand what the problem is here. Could you give
an example that shows that it breaks?
Anyway, let me explain a bit how my handlermanager
j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Ed post2edb...@hotmail.com wrote:
It costs me a bit to go back in time as these issues are already from
some time back..
Let me try to give some input on these points.
2) I don't fully understand what the problem is here. Could you
, and I'd like to declare this thread dead
for now so that we can move onto other things. We have a lot of other things
to be giving attention to so that we can get GWT 2.0 out. If we need to
revisit these issues in the future, we certainly can.
-- Bruce
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Ed
my thoughts,
Ed
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
He Joel,
Sorry for the trouble.
Last night I came home and all of sudden my whole hotmail was changed
and got all kind of failed mail deliveries :(...
Yep, changed my password already.
-- Ed
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit
if the
library isn't supported anymore or isn't up2date with the next gwt
release (my experience in the past). So I am a bit careful with it.
-- Ed
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
this... (It's back to the stoneage to do everyting yourself. Btw:
don't get me wrong, I am not blaming GWT for this it's simple
javascript that doesn't support this all)
I would love to hear experiences of other developers have bounced
their head against this issue.
-- Ed
. These
listeners are added to the Form Field.
I also have a Form listener that receives these kind of notifications,
but couldn't be used in the form field builder as Form isn't know
there, where as the Form field is.
I hope it's of some use to others.
-- Ed
feedback/advice on this.
-- Ed
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
unregistering a
listener.
Basically what I do now (and have to do more): before making a form
field variable NULL, call the formField.remove() method, that he
forwards to his nested objects, and so on
A bit cumbersome, but I don't see no other way, do you ??
-- Ed
Ahhh the famous lock-in reason. Yep, understandable...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
58 matches
Mail list logo
