their session? (i..e hit the wrong server because the hash has
changed)
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
Willy,
Just to confirm that I'm using
server backup 127.0.0.1:80 backup source 0.0.0.0
instead of
server backup 127.0.0.1:80 backup
and it works fine now, thanks.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
!
FinalBSD
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
issue but just
wanted to check)
Ps. forgot to mention I have patched with the request/receive health
check posted earlier but I don't think thats the issue.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
me examples?
Thanks,
Carlo
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
start
Starting HAproxy: [ALERT] 161/110810 (22011) : Starting proxy http_proxy:
cannot bind socket
[FAILED]
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
: printk: 156 messages suppressed.
Jun 19 11:26:53 lbmaster kernel: Neighbour table overflow.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
://www.loadbalancer.org/download/PoundSSL-Tproxy/poundtp-2.4.5.tgz
Willy,
You mentioned that it may be more sensible to do something like:
source 0.0.0.0 usesrc hdr(x-forwarded-for)
rather than having 2 sets of TPROXY set up.. but I don't think this is
possible yet?
--
Regards,
Malcolm
this option reduce the number of 503 errors?
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
a wakeup ?
Thanks for sharing this !
Guillaume
Malcolm Turnbull a écrit :
We have been playing around with the new RDP cookie feature in 1.4-dev4
and it works really well...
One of our guys Nick has written a blog about his configuration and
testing of Windows Terminal Servers with Windows
allow the first one?)
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
= 'Memmax_MB',
9 = 'Ulimit-n',
10 = 'Maxsock',
11 = 'Maxconn',
12 = 'CurrConns',
);
Has anyone already done this? Perl is not my strong point :-).
thanks.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
is not my strong point :-).
Yes, haproxy.pl-0.27 + haproxy-1.4 works.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
unsubscribe
logins starting
with 'a'
4) All servers in each shard use same database/storage/memchached to
handle just the users starting with 'a' etc...
Should give fairly unlimitted scaleability?
I notice my googlemail client is doing it right now:
mail.google.com/a/loadbalancer.org
--
Regards,
Malcolm
did trawl through the 1.5 docs, but couldn't seem to spot it...
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
Bye
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
...
How would you insert the marker in standard TCP traffic?
The only method I'm aware of is source IP for TCP persistence.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
individual entry?
acl foo1 hdr dev-1.foo.com
if acl foo1
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
)
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
On 15 February 2011 22:23, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Malcolm,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 08:35:05PM +, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
HAproxy can't seem to bind to more than 1000 ports? (well about 1017
which is suspiciously close to 1024...)
I'm probably being really stupid but I
HTTPPerf instead (which works).
Let me know if you get ab working though please!
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
on pattern [table table] [{if | unless} condition not in
maintenance mode...
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
may be: 5
So my question Is can you get actual connections/users per server i.e.
find out if:
Server1 = 48
Server2 = 52
?
And as a side question does leastconns use the value of 5 or 50 ? i.e.
what time period does leastconns use?
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull
;)
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
- jnebr...@eneotecnologia.com
Consultor TI - ENEO Tecnologia SL
C/ Manufactura 2, Edificio Euro, Oficina 3N
Mairena del Aljarafe - 41927 - Sevilla
Telf.- 955 60 11 60 / 619 04 55 18
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
).
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
then the OOM killer will be
invoked (but swap will only slow down the system even more and then
die, at least OOM has a small chance to take out the offending
process..)
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
suppors wccp, but i
don't know if haproxy support.
Because i didn't find any infomations about the wccp on haproxy, so i
think you can give me a good answer!
Thank you very much!!
Regards,
YueQiang
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0
appreciate hint where I can find tools or whats the current
state to handle this kind of task.
Cheers,
Jens
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
to the
backend servers?
Thank you in advance.
-J
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
servers).
So my question may come down to: Can HAProxy route to servers not
predefined in the initial configuration? I can easily imagine an
implementation that could handle this, but wanted to ask if HAProxy
already does this.
Thanks in advance
-- Langley
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull
And now I've re-read the section about what observe layer 7 actually
does so I am almost certainly talking rubish
On 7 March 2012 21:29, Malcolm Turnbull malc...@loadbalancer.org wrote:
Jonathan,
Correct me if I'm wrong but:
The httpchk is sourced from HAProxy as an application level
is going through there as well. I'm using
balance src so I'm not that fussed about sessions or state at
this point. Any info or pointers are much appreciated.
Timh Bergström
www.quickvz.com
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http
ATOM
boards or something similiar?
Can someone recomment anything special?
Best regards
Sebastian
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
.
ii. A list of patches and implementation overview via email to LoadBalancer.Org
So well, how about controlling weight via service checks?
cheers
thomas
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
Willy.
Yes. That sounds good to me.
Thanks. And have a nice Christmas...
On 24 December 2012 09:23, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Malcolm,
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:06:25AM +, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
Willy / Simon,
I'm very happy to add a down option, my original thought
be the network card that is suggested to put into the hosts? I have seen a
post that say the ixgbe driver is difficult to configure and am wonder what
card/driver would not be difficult.
Troy Klein
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http
...
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
the agent-port feature.
I want new connection to always go to the server with the lowest CPU usage,
which balancing algorithm should i use to achieve this?
thanx,
Sebastien Estienne
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
time out.
Vaibhav Pol
National PARAM Supercomputing Facility
Centre for Development of Advanced Computing
Ganeshkhind Road
Pune University Campus
PUNE-Maharastra
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
that Simon has been working on.
And yes, we'd all benefit from the new version !
Willy
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
different target servers for the same
stick on value.
I was hoping I could view the contents of the stick tables on both nodes so
I could troubleshoot this.
Cheers
Duncan
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
maintenance mode.
But again this is not really a priority with us as you say it clashes
with the CLI DRAIN logic
On 2 December 2013 14:30, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Simon,
thank you for your response, I felt a little bit alone :-)
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull
Forgot to reply to all:
Willy,
This looks good to me and make sense.
Long term it will be more flexible this way.
On 4 December 2013 18:17, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Malcolm,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:05:41PM +, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
Hi Willy,
Sorry for the lack
-%CPUusage and
sending that 1on1 back to the agent on a server with 99% cpu capacity
available wont come back up..
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
it passes a health check?
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
in 0ms, which is what I expect to see.
-Patrick
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
the difference between
*concurrent* connections and *cumulated* connections. You're measuring
the number of connections distributed over time. I'm talking about
concurrent connections, which is what leastconn is about.
Willy
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44
IS NO ISSUE. Unless it is so bad it is wearing your
delete key out. Seriously, there are other things to complain about.
Thank you for confirming my beliefs Kobus :-)
Willy
That¹s anecdotal evidence. LOL!
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http
Registergericht Berlin-Charlottenburg
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Jens Begemann, Philipp Moeser
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
as well would be
nice.)
On 15 August 2014 08:11, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
[Cc Malcolm Turnbull]
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:29:36AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Cyril!
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi all,
Le 07/08/2014 01:16
,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
browser chrome or firefox etc?
Is that easy to do?
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
Doh!
I'm getting old... thanks :-).
On 18 October 2014 15:37, David Coulson da...@davidcoulson.net wrote:
You mean like this?
http://blog.haproxy.com/2014/10/15/haproxy-and-sslv3-poodle-vulnerability/
On 10/18/14, 10:34 AM, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
I was thinking Haproxy could be used
using cookie SERVERID for the
persistence?
Or using a big IP stick table even though all the IPs will be the same?
Or am I just being really stupid today , which is not unusual :-).
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http
,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
on which it runs and will saturate them (even though the
overall average
looks good). Can anybody comment on this approach as our team member is
convinced
he has a silver bullet for performance.
Many thanks for any help/insight into this!
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org
ways of stopping *new* connections from hitting
backend nodes?
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
Ok. My immediate thought was..
Oh crap we are going to have to fork haproxy and hire loads of C developers!
Then when someone mentioned what day it was I felt incredible relief :-).
Nice joke. Well executed.
On 1 Apr 2015 10:06, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll have to find a way to code
Claudio,
What does a tcpdump on port 4321 tells you?
and what type of content do you see from the server to haproxy in the packet
captured?
Baptiste
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
this first (eg: by using a function to get the color to report and another
one to report the description).
If your patch maintains the blue line for weight==0, then please ignore my
comment above.
Best regards,
Willy
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330
172.20.69.21:5900-6123 weight 10
server OVIR2 172.20.69.22:5900-6123 weight 10
But it seems I can't set a port range in the server directive. Somebody have
an idea how can I setup ?
Thanks a lot
--
Kevin
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0
and software at the
> same time, both whilst under pressure? It will be massively simpler to
> install your preexisting choice of (known "good") software on your new
> hardware.
>
> Jonathan
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 1604540
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
; Malcolm,
> The Piranha gui had some configurations about Virtual IPs and I am
> not sure how that works or how it is different than HAProxy. The firewall
> had some rules that pointed website requests to the virtual ips.
>
> Daniel
> -Original Message---
t; persist rdp-cookie
> stick-table type string size 204800
> stick on req.rdp_cookie(mstshash)
> server srv1 10.240.0.3:3389
> server srv2 10.240.0.4:3389
>
>
> 2015-11-20 5:38 GMT-02:00 Malcolm Turnbull <malc...@loadbalancer.org>:
>>
>> Dou
h loadbalancer: loadbalancer
>
> 2015-11-20 9:17 GMT-02:00 Malcolm Turnbull <malc...@loadbalancer.org>:
>>
>> Douglas,
>>
>> I'm a bit confused on the question but an example Session Broker
>> Config would be:
>>
>> listen Test
>> bind 192.168.64
are not the intended recipient,
>> please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original
>> and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
>
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)330 380 1064
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
wondered if we could start a discussion about the possibility of
>> having the stats socket return stats data in JSON format.
>
> After the discussion we had in July, I'm wondering what's the current
> status regarding this topic?
>
> Thanks and all the best,
> Georg
--
Rega
/5988
https://www.loadbalancer.org/products/hardware/enterprise-val
Its awesome, 92.3% of the time it does exactly what you ask and you
can also control the office music with it!
I hope you are as excited as I am by the possibilities.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone
code.
Sorry if this has already been discussed and I missed the conversation.
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
+44 (0)330 380 1064
people are constantly trying to 'work around the DMZ' rather
than just getting rid of them.
And don't get me started on bridges:
https://www.loadbalancer.org/blog/transparent-vs-explicit-proxy-which-method-should-i-use#bridge-mode
Malcolm Turnbull
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
www.loadbalancer.org
+44
Peter,
If you can use cookies then don't use session cookies with a stick
table - just put the SERVERID in the cookie:
i.e.
cookie SERVERID insert indirect nocache
That will work fine with NBPROC >1
Or if you really want a stick table then move the IRQ to a different
core(s) than the HAProxy
e do at Loadbalancer.org[2])
[1]
https://www.haproxy.com/blog/scalable-waf-protection-with-haproxy-and-apache-with-modsecurity/
[2]
https://www.loadbalancer.org/blog/blocking-invalid-range-headers-using-modsecurity-and-haproxy-ms15-034-cve-2015-1635/
Malcolm Turnbull
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
www.loadbalancer.org
Daniel,
Yes, That's expected :-).
It normally scares me when people say they are going to use TPROXY...
It's awesome but needs a bit of thought to implement properly.
This blog may help, it's a bit old, so ignore the Kernel stuff - you
don't need it any more:
just build a custom agent by hand (it's not hard...),
I've heard of Herald:
https://medium.com/helpshift-engineering/herald-haproxy-load-feedback-and-check-agent-1b8749a13f02
Does anyone know of any other options for server-side agents?
Thanks,
Malcolm Turnbull
Loadbalancer.org Ltd
Willy,
Thanks for that tip, sounds like a really good idea.
I talked to Pete and he's added it to the list for the next version along with:
Code clean ups, 64 bit values, reading settings from the netsnmp
configuration files, better HAProxy version support and so on...
Malcolm Turnbull
server scenarios...
--
Malcolm Turnbull
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
www.loadbalancer.org
+44 (0)330 380 1064
81 matches
Mail list logo