On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 01:20:43AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> I added "-O1" to travis builds.
> Can we apply it until a better solution will be found ?
Applied, thank you Ilya.
Willy
I added "-O1" to travis builds.
Can we apply it until a better solution will be found ?
пт, 12 июн. 2020 г. в 21:40, Илья Шипицин :
>
>
> пт, 12 июн. 2020 г. в 21:09, Willy Tarreau :
>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:57:44PM +0500, ??? wrote:
>> > ??, 12 ???. 2020 ?. ? 20:46, Willy
пт, 12 июн. 2020 г. в 21:09, Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:57:44PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > ??, 12 ???. 2020 ?. ? 20:46, Willy Tarreau :
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:11:52PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > > Has it ever reported a *real* issue ? I mean, we've been
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:57:44PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> ??, 12 ???. 2020 ?. ? 20:46, Willy Tarreau :
>
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:11:52PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > Has it ever reported a *real* issue ? I mean, we've been working around
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
пт, 12 июн. 2020 г. в 20:46, Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:11:52PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > Has it ever reported a *real* issue ? I mean, we've been working around
> > >
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/96
> >
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:11:52PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Has it ever reported a *real* issue ? I mean, we've been working around
> >
>
>
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/96
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/104
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/106
>
пт, 12 июн. 2020 г. в 20:01, Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 07:52:48PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > it should be detectable using
> >
> > #if defined(__has_feature)# if __has_feature(address_sanitizer)//
> > code that builds only under AddressSanitizer# endif#endif
>
> OK that
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 07:52:48PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> it should be detectable using
>
> #if defined(__has_feature)# if __has_feature(address_sanitizer)//
> code that builds only under AddressSanitizer# endif#endif
OK that could be useful indeed, thanks!
> I agree to remove asan from
пт, 12 июн. 2020 г. в 19:31, Willy Tarreau :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > Ilya,
> >
> > Am 16.03.20 um 07:52 schrieb ???:
> > > we use clang because of its address sanitizer. I found gcc asan more
> noisy
> > > and less usable.
>
>
Hi Ilya,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Ilya,
>
> Am 16.03.20 um 07:52 schrieb ???:
> > we use clang because of its address sanitizer. I found gcc asan more noisy
> > and less usable.
Going back to this, I spent the whole day trying to figure what
oops :)
Comment #4 on issue 323 by david...@chromium.org: boringssl fails on
travis-ci/clang-9
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/boringssl/issues/detail?id=323#c4
Looks like the issue is you've managed to convince it that your C compiler
is Clang and your C++ compiler is GCC.
-- The C compiler
пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 14:54, Willy Tarreau :
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > Ilya,
> >
> > Am 16.03.20 um 07:52 schrieb ???:
> > > we use clang because of its address sanitizer. I found gcc asan more
> noisy
> > > and less usable.
> >
> > I believe
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Ilya,
>
> Am 16.03.20 um 07:52 schrieb ???:
> > we use clang because of its address sanitizer. I found gcc asan more noisy
> > and less usable.
>
> I believe you broke ASAN with clang-9 anyway, because the Travis
>
Ilya,
Am 16.03.20 um 07:52 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> we use clang because of its address sanitizer. I found gcc asan more noisy
> and less usable.
I believe you broke ASAN with clang-9 anyway, because the Travis
configuration checks for 'clang':
пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 13:40, Willy Tarreau :
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:51:20PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > From 5d5891166389dc03ab4fb63ca9edaa35feca8fcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ilya Shipitsin
> > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:49:34 +0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] CI: switch BoringSSL
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:51:20PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> From 5d5891166389dc03ab4fb63ca9edaa35feca8fcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ilya Shipitsin
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:49:34 +0500
> Subject: [PATCH] CI: switch BoringSSL back to clang-7
>
> it turned out that BoringSSL is not
пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 12:09, Willy Tarreau :
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:52:27AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > ??, 16 ???. 2020 ?. ? 11:35, Willy Tarreau :
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:54:56PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > ??, 14 ???. 2020 ?. ? 14:23, Willy Tarreau :
> > > >
> > >
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:52:27AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> ??, 16 ???. 2020 ?. ? 11:35, Willy Tarreau :
>
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:54:56PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > ??, 14 ???. 2020 ?. ? 14:23, Willy Tarreau :
> > >
> > > > Hi Ilya,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at
пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 11:35, Willy Tarreau :
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:54:56PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > ??, 14 ???. 2020 ?. ? 14:23, Willy Tarreau :
> >
> > > Hi Ilya,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:46:45AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > let us use
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:54:56PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> ??, 14 ???. 2020 ?. ? 14:23, Willy Tarreau :
>
> > Hi Ilya,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:46:45AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > let us use clang-9 instead of default clang-7 for linux builds.
> >
> > It
сб, 14 мар. 2020 г. в 14:23, Willy Tarreau :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:46:45AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > let us use clang-9 instead of default clang-7 for linux builds.
>
> It seems I missed this one. Now applied carefully, we'll see. If it
> causes new
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 11:26 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:46:45AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > let us use clang-9 instead of default clang-7 for linux builds.
>
> It seems I missed this one. Now applied carefully, we'll see. If it
>
Hi Ilya,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:46:45AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> Hello,
>
> let us use clang-9 instead of default clang-7 for linux builds.
It seems I missed this one. Now applied carefully, we'll see. If it
causes new failures, we'll adjust accordingly.
Willy
23 matches
Mail list logo
