I should add:
For encoding, realize, MCE requires all encoder cards (TV) to be hardware
encoders, and as such, we found no difference in any testing for capture of
video performance on any processor greater then 2.6ghz, even Celeron-Ds.
The only time it comes into play is with HDTV capture, where
At 05:03 PM 12/05/2005, Christopher Fisk wrote:
This is something I'm interested in. I assume thats 30 minutes of
keyboard time? I ask because a lot of times I'll start a scan and walk
away because I know it's going to take 1 hour to complete the scan. Do
you count that 1 hour scan as a 5
At 08:47 PM 12/05/2005, FORC5 wrote:
was a lot of work, no joy.
this may be one of those format times ppl are talking about. only thing i
needed to try ( system is gone ) is uninstall office and manually remove
all references everywhere.
not so sure why I gave it so much time as she uses OE, my
At 04:44 PM 12/05/2005, Greg Sevart wrote:
Ouch, that is definitely too steep to be worthwhile. At least you are
using quality power supplies--AOpen has always just been a rebranded
Sparkle/FSP (which makes my top 3 list). You looked to see if you can get
a Sparkle/FSP/Fortron branded supply
Since this has been a discussion recently, I think people will find this
interesting. I think he has the issue nailed: Yes, FF could be more
secure, but since it's better than anything other than Opera (who isn't
going to make it in a free browser world when they charge), it doesn't
matter.
- Original Message -
From: Thane Sherrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: [H] You need a stinkin POWER SUPPLY?
My problem is that the case I like comes with a 350W AOpen (AOpen won't
sell their case
good to start the day ROTFLMAS
thanks
means it will be better than yesterday
fred
At 03:16 AM 5/13/2005, Thane Sherrington Poked the stick with:
At 08:47 PM 12/05/2005, FORC5
wrote:
was a lot of work, no
joy.
this may be one of those format times ppl are talking about. only thing i
needed to try
I have two notebooks and two wireless NICs (one Surecom, and one
Linksys.) On the older notebook, both NICs get better reception than on
the newer one. Both are using XP Pro and the same drivers. Both are in
precisely the same position. The newer will get reception, but I have to
move
Are the NIC slots positioned in the same relative location on both
notebooks? Are the screens the same size? It would seem to be that the
NICs antenna, when used on the newer one, must somehow be less effective
in reception...could be due to positioning near the housing of the
notebook, or
At 10:22 AM 13/05/2005, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
Are the NIC slots positioned in the same relative location on both
notebooks? Are the screens the same size? It would seem to be that the
NICs antenna, when used on the newer one, must somehow be less effective
in reception...could be due to
Have you checked power settings? Are they both set up for 100 percent
antenna power for comparison purposes?
I have two notebooks and two wireless NICs (one Surecom, and one
Linksys.) On the older notebook, both NICs get better reception than on
the newer one. Both are using XP Pro and
Well Chris I did look at the MSI board but it has one minor and one major
flaw.
Minor flaw - no overclocking potential.
Major flaw - does not contain the gamut of Expansion Slots
The Asus/Intel version of the ATI chipset includes
3 @ PCI-E x1
Now I am not
Thane
as a programmer I know that when a program reaches
that point, two things are true: 1)it's my fault, and 2)I have to rewrite
it to make it easier.
Is 1) absolutely true even in cases where you have warned the powers that be?
But they insisted on the fast patch anyway?
On 5/13/05,
I do agree the option of 3 PCI-E x1 slots are nice, although as of right
now, I've seen no devices that use them :)
I guess I'm just on the other side of it.. for a HTPC unit, overclocking
potential is moot, and since MSI board has coax/digital output, the addition
of another soundcard is a
At 11:06 AM 13/05/2005, JRS wrote:
Have you checked power settings? Are they both set up for 100 percent
antenna power for comparison purposes?
All the settings are the same. The only thing I can figure is that there
is something wrong with the newer laptop. Perhaps something is wrong with
This is nice and all that but even with IE's ass hanging out *I* was
less at risk using it during these periods because I had problem
features turned off by default and only on for small list of sites.
Conversely I am relying on FF's internal sense of whwen to disable
features combined with
warpmedia wrote:
This is nice and all that but even with IE's ass hanging out *I* was
less at risk using it during these periods because I had problem
features turned off by default and only on for small list of sites.
Conversely I am relying on FF's internal sense of whwen to disable
features
thanks Chris
sounds like I need to try them, have had good luck with ecs and
intermittent luck with pc chips
I like Asus ( except their SLOW rma procedure
Fred
At 04:23 PM 5/13/2005, Chris Reeves Poked the stick with:
Asrock is wholly owned by Asus,
it's basically Asus value line.
-Original
I don't use Norton A/V anymore but there used to be a setting that protected
against macros being executed or written to Wordsomething like that.
Could it be that it may be activated, if you are using a version of NAV, and
blocking any permanent changes?
Jeff
From: Winterlight [EMAIL
I thought of that but tried disabling it... besides Norton would warn you
that it is blocking something, and it would do it with Excel as well. I
have no problems writing macros in Excel
At 06:09 PM 5/13/2005, you wrote:
I don't use Norton A/V anymore but there used to be a setting that
20 matches
Mail list logo
