Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Linux on Chromebook -> assert ""cr"" failed in wxPaintDCImpl(): using wxPaintDC without being in a native paint event

Hi Thomas, Thanks, it is good to know it has already been fixed although there is no 2024 build yet.. The wxwidgets versions on my Chromebook debian linux bookworm version are: apt list --installed | grep -i wx libwxbase3.2-1/stable,now 3.2.2+dfsg-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]

[hugin-ptx] Linux on Chromebook -> assert ""cr"" failed in wxPaintDCImpl(): using wxPaintDC without being in a native paint event

Hi, I am currently using an i5 Chromebook with the default Linux container available for the Chromebook. The linux version is Debian and on the lsterst patches. uname -a Linux penguin 6.6.21-01327-gc9107f2d4947 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:40:09 + x86_64 GNU/Linux

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Xpano

It is possible to tweak the opencv algorithms for keypoint detection, feature matching, descriptors, etcetera for both panos, blending but also "fusing" layers of images. I wrote an extremely simple python script to try it out for panos and also write some python scripts for "fusing". But to be

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux 1.2.2 released

> > > I uploaded a debian package > for debian > 12 stable. It might be usable for other debian-based distros. > > Thanks, downloaded, tried it. It installed over the 1.1.6 that was there > before. Trying to run lux in a terminal gave

Re: [hugin-ptx] Disappearing posts

Same for me. I saw two identical posts from you about "align_image_stack parameters" Harry -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free

Re: [hugin-ptx] opencv based CP detector for use with Hugin?

Which ones do you mean? In the 4.6 prebuilt libraries WITH the python bindings, I have ORB, SIFT, ECC, AlignMTB, mergeMertens exposure fusion, stiching, blending.. SIFT is free now, SURF is not, but ORB does a great job for keypoints and feature detection. Better than the other two (in my

Re: [hugin-ptx] opencv based CP detector for use with Hugin?

Yes, it is already there in opencv and works pretty well. There are multiple algorithms can do the "control point find" and multiple algorithms like the MergeMertens that can be combined as well. And it also contains blending algorithms. I did some work in Python. Not in C. Take a look at

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux for Linux as AppImage

You use: $APPDIR/usr/bin/lux -w $APPDIR/usr/share/lux/fonts/NotoSans-Regular.ttf "$@" Please try with: $APPDIR/usr/bin/lux -w $APPDIR/usr/share/lux/fonts/NotoSans-Regular.ttf ${1+"$@"} & Harry Op vr 14 jul 2023 om 20:28 schreef Harry van der Wolf : > Hi, > >

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux for Linux as AppImage

Hi, Using ./lux-1.1.6-x86_64.AppImage ~/128GB/Afbeeldingen/1JTG/1tifpanos/2003-0713-0608\ zomervakantie-Thisted-0725-0728_Thisted-038-Thisted-051-overall.tif does work. Using ./lux-1.1.6-x86_64.AppImage "~/128GB/Afbeeldingen/1JTG/1tifpanos/2003-0713-0608

Re: [hugin-ptx] lux for Linux as AppImage

Hi, i tried it on my Chromebook under the builtin linux which is Debian 11. I tried creating a pano, viewing a pano and did some bracketing. That all works fine. I completely stopped with panos and bracketing so I had to take some old series. One remark: when specifying files or a single pano on

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Command-line tool sequence to emulate GUI process

Hi, Did you have a look at https://wiki.panotools.org/Panorama_scripting_in_a_nutshell ? Op vr 28 apr 2023 om 14:57 schreef PanoSeek : > I did something similar to stitch 360 panos from my drone. I wanted to do > as much scripting as possible to avoid manual work when I have hundreds of > sets

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2022.0 beta 1 released

Op zo 27 nov. 2022 om 09:38 schreef T. Modes : > > > @Harry: There is still 1 fuzzy string in your po file. Do you need help > with the understanding or it is just an oversight? > > Yes, I know. I put the "fuzzy" marker myself :) It is the #, fuzzy msgid "Focus stacked images" Yes, I didn't

Re: [hugin-ptx] PyImageFuser 0.5.0 released

Hi, It is hard to say. It can be that your (old) image is not entirely correct. This error occurs when some of the blocks being read of the image is not correct. It is supposed to be corrected by adding "ImageFile.LOAD_TRUNCATED_IMAGES = True" to the code. I did that but can't reproduce the

Re: [hugin-ptx] PyImageFuser 0.5.0 released

start it from there. best, Harry Op wo 8 jun. 2022 om 18:32 schreef dgjohnston : > > > > On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:14 AM, Harry van der Wolf > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I now also added an Intel x86 MacOS bundle (stamped as 0.5.0.1). The > only modification (f

Re: [hugin-ptx] PyImageFuser 0.5.0 released

jun. 2022 om 12:23 schreef Harry van der Wolf : > Hi David, > > Sorry for my somewhat late reaction. I had a Go Live of a project and we > had a few more issues than anticipated. > > There are armhf and amd64 packages: > See below the Assets area of the releases page. > Don

Re: [hugin-ptx] PyImageFuser 0.5.0 released

W. Jones : > Hi, Harry! > > Sounds fascinating and useful to me! > > I went to the releases page, it mentions a pyimagefuser-0.5.0-amd64.deb > package but only has links to an AppImage. > > I don't do AppImages. Link for DEB package? I have Debian 11. > > On 5/2

[hugin-ptx] PyImageFuser 0.5.0 released

Hi, PyImageFuser is a Python3 PySimpleGUI program to exposure fuse bracketed images, reduce noise in stacks and do focus stacking. It uses align_image_stack and enfuse to accomplish this. github: https://github.com/hvdwolf/PyImageFuser Releases: https://github.com/hvdwolf/PyImageFuser/releases

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: HUGIN install

Hi, Why do you say you don't have a zip file? Your own screenshot shows that a zip file is created containing the debug report. We are not talking about a Hugin zip, but a system debug zip in the path mentioned in your screenshot. Op vr 6 mei 2022 om 09:19 schreef Josip Puškarić : > Good

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: focus stacking tool with Hugin

Op do 8 jul. 2021 om 00:19 schreef 'dkloi' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Hi Michel, > > You may want to look at > https://patdavid.net/2013/01/focus-stacking-macro-photos-enfuse/ Enfuse > is normally used for exposure blending >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: lux - FOSS multiplatform image and panorama viewer

Op ma 7 jun. 2021 om 10:01 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Am 07.06.21 um 09:28 schrieb David W. Jones: > > > Sorry, I don't do flatpack or appimage. I've tried both with a couple of > > different apps, with complete lack of success, and no interest in > >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: lux - FOSS multiplatform image and panorama viewer

Hi Kay, all, I created a Lux 1.0.9 app bundle for MacOS and a Lux 1.0.9 distributable binary version for MacOS. The first one for the GUI lovers, the 2nd for the command line lovers. Links via a PM. To be added (if you want to) to your bitbucket download section. Harry Op vr 4 jun. 2021 om

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: lux - FOSS multiplatform image and panorama viewer

This happens more often with manually installing debian packages. So you do a "sudo dpkg -i lux-.dpkg" and get this error. What you now should do is a: "sudo dpkg --configure -a" followed by: "sudo apt-get -f install" That should fix it. And if you had done a simple DuckDuckGo/Google search, you

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

This PV.icns is actually a MacOS package containing 5 or 6 icons for the several screen resolutions to use on. On MacOS you can simply open the package, select one of the icons and export is as png (or jpg). I will have a look. Otherwise you can use the original svg and convert it to png or ico.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 20.0 does not see external drive

; > > Am 30. April 2021 16:58:41 MESZ schrieb Brian Charles: > > > > > > Thanks. For the suggestions. I may have just > forgotten which > > > directory to look in. I upgraded Hugin and it had > previously > >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 20.0 does not see external drive

I guess you mean you see shortcuts in the left navigation pane of your file explorer with the name of your usb disk. If you want to find that same usb disk via Hugin in Ubuntu, you need to go to /media// Harry Op wo 28 apr. 2021 om 13:32 schreef Brian Charles : > I just updated Hugin on my

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Mac users, I uploaded a new LUX-1.0.8.dmg containing Kay's lux 1.0.8 to mega.nz link: https://mega.nz/file/dB8VTK4b#SsbNSPoU_D69ehcQixO3rCyT6iXy2jjYJUhGOhUEsxg Only very few app bundles support command-line parameters. That has nothing to do with lux, but how Apple wants to treat their "stupid"

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op za 10 apr. 2021 om 18:42 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > I tested 1.0.8 quite throroughly, so it's probably best if you pick that > version, just use > >git checkout 1.0.8 > > to get precisely that version. > > I had done that and got the exact

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Hi, I did not forget about lux. 8 days ago the graphics card of my laptop gave up. Yesterday finally my new laptop arrived after 4 days delay in the warehouse. This morning I downloaded the latest lux from git and compiled it. I got in general good results, but also ran it on a series of test

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op ma 22 mrt. 2021 om 10:47 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > This is done with --snapshot_magnification=..., as described in my post. > If your screen is 1920X1080, you work fullscreen, and you have > --snapshot_magnification=10, your output on pressing

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op ma 22 mrt. 2021 om 10:24 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Am 22.03.21 um 09:56 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > > > > Op zo 21 mrt. 2021 om 18:17 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other > > free panoramic software > <mailto

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op zo 21 mrt. 2021 om 18:17 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Am 21.03.21 um 17:54 schrieb 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free > panoramic software: > > > Am 21.03.21 um 13:31 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > >> So it

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op zo 21 mrt. 2021 om 17:54 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > I downloaded the three-image alaska 'panorama'. It uses translation > parameters, which lux does not process, hence the failure. The image is > not a panorama: The three partials have been taken

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op zo 21 mrt. 2021 om 13:05 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > Fine, so it didn't work. Why don't you just zip the PTO and images and > mail them to me? I'll have a look. > > The 2 image PTO is from my living room with a lot of "small rubbish" in there to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

can do that. Harry Op zo 21 mrt. 2021 om 12:22 schreef Harry van der Wolf : > > > Op zo 21 mrt. 2021 om 10:26 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other > free panoramic software : > >> >> This thread announces two new features in lux, namely stitching images &

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op zo 21 mrt. 2021 om 10:26 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > This thread announces two new features in lux, namely stitching images > and doing exposure fusion with the Burt and Adelson image splining > algorithm. Harry has used lux' exposure fusion

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op za 20 mrt. 2021 om 12:11 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > Okay, if you're both against the mac branch, I'm not too attached to it. > I've merged it back into master, so now the 'scripts' folder from the > mac branch is in master. I'll delete the mac

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op vr 19 mrt. 2021 om 18:53 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > @Harry: what do you think? > > Kay > > Although it is only a "git checkout mac", I also prefer one branch. The power of cmake is that you can combine it. This will allow users to make packages

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op vr 19 mrt. 2021 om 08:41 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Am 18.03.21 um 21:21 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > > I can't find the question backs, but you asked me about the speed after > > your improvements. > > > > The cur

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

I can't find the question backs, but you asked me about the speed after your improvements. The current version is about 10-15% faster. I built with cmake on linux and get a binary lux. sudo make install installs the font and font readme in /usr/local/share/lux/fonts where lux can find it. On

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Project files

I agree with Thomas. Why would you even do this? The AppData/Local/Temp folder contains temporary files (hence the name) These files contain temporary information while a process is creating other files, or while a process is doing something and "saving" the process steps in between. The files

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Question of compilation of pv/lux. Whether you use cmake or simply the makefile based make, compilation takes quite some time. When using "make -j 4" to use 4 cores for compilation instead of 1, the compilation is much faster. Of course not every software is suitable to do this. At least not

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op ma 15 mrt. 2021 om 11:55 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > Bear with me... it's a python script and the exiv2 module has changed > quite a bit, I'll need some time to get it running again. > No problem. You gave me a hint that I should have thought

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op ma 15 mrt. 2021 om 08:26 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > I usually work with folders. My workflow is like this: > > - initially, all images are in one folder > > - I run a script detecting brackets, which puts each bracket in a > separate folder, named

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

, I also want that exact output name. ;) Harry Op zo 14 mrt. 2021 om 19:29 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Am 14.03.21 um 14:20 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > > Another script for pv for Linux/BSD/MacOS. > > > > ... > >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Another script for pv for Linux/BSD/MacOS. It uses align_image_stack from hugin tools and it also uses exiftool (if you have hugin, you almost certainly also have exiftool) It works for jpg, tif and exr. It uses "--build_pyramids=no --quality_interpolator_degree=1" as it is meant for batch use

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op za 13 mrt. 2021 om 17:20 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > If your job requires only 1:1 or > less, try passing --build_pyramids=no, which should reduce the memory > footprint and be faster as well. > > And you can also try and omit the separate

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op za 13 mrt. 2021 om 19:12 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > I sucked in the patch best I could and pushed --all, have a look if > you're both happy with the state of master and mac branches in the repo > now. and let's do single-file patches from now on,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op za 13 mrt. 2021 om 18:18 schreef Kornel Benko : > Am Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:51:26 +0100 > schrieb "'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software" > > > Is that okay with you guys? > > Yes from my side. > > OK from my side as well. > > > You might as well simply trust the user.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op vr 12 mrt. 2021 om 21:28 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > Sorry, I pushed a buggy version: the non-alpha stitching and exposure > fusion code went into an endless loop. I've fixed that and updated all > branches in the repo. > > I've also made a new

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

MAKE_BINARY_DIR}") message(FATAL_ERROR "In-source builds are not allowed.") endif() Best, Harry Harry Op za 13 mrt. 2021 om 15:30 schreef Kornel Benko : > Am Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:11:23 +0100 > schrieb Harry van der Wolf : > > > Sorry, > > > >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Thanks Kay, I use a likewise script but then using align_image_stack from the hugin tools (and optimised the pv command with your command. Thanks). I replace the lines pto_gen -p0 -o bracket.pto "$@" pano_modify -p0 --fov=AUTO --canvas=AUTO -obracket.pto bracket.pto cpfind --sieve2size=5 -o

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

And a macos bundle with 1.0.7 version which you can download here: https://mega.nz/file/ZMMmgRCB#5KLXkbNktlOSLLOxTJ1Ecg3Oq3u1x_La5r4w6fsYkZs Harry Op vr 12 mrt. 2021 om 11:50 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Dear all! > > I've just released pv 1.0.7, which

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Hi, You released version 1.0.3, but forgot to update the pv_version* files. Harry -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Hi, I compiled 1.0.3 on my 64bit GalliumOS 3.1 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) laptop. Started pv directly with 5 already aligned tifs. (In Align_image_Stack I created earlier both a pto and the aligned tifs: align_image_stack -v -p 8X.pto -a 8X P10048x.JPG ) command: pv 8X000?.tif interpreting trailing

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Sorry. Long mail. Op za 6 mrt. 2021 om 20:03 schreef yuv : > > From far away, it looks like there are four alternatives: > (a) do nothing; > (b) distribute pv along Hugin; > (c) integrate pv's functionalities into Hugin; or > (d) integrate Hugin's functionalities into pv. > > My vote would be

Re: [hugin-ptx] Multiblend 2.0 RC1 - better blending and 300x* faster than Enblend

And a distributable macos build for multiblend *2.0rc2*: https://mega.nz/file/lQtlgKRI#wNYpcmE4-XuZJOsXmxtBkBmB6Ekji-Vp65c38FCaGws Unzip to a folder of your liking with paths. It should give: multiblend-dist/ multiblend-dist/Libraries/ multiblend-dist/Libraries/libz.1.2.11.dylib

Re: [hugin-ptx] Multiblend 2.0 RC1 - better blending and 300x* faster than Enblend

-msse4.1 -pthread -ffast-math -Ofast -o multiblend multiblend.cpp -lm -lpng -ltiff -ljpeg Harry van der Wolf suggests the following for Mac: - for HomeBrew [install home brew] brew install jpeg-turbo libjpeg libpng libtiff gcc -I/usr/local/opt/jpeg-turbo/include -L/usr/local/opt/jpeg-tu

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Am 05.03.21 um 12:43 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > > > > > > Op vr 5 mrt. 2021 om 11:56 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other > > free panoramic software > <mailto:hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com>&

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op vr 5 mrt. 2021 om 11:56 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > In a way I'm surprised that so far nobody has actually reported doing > what I propose in this thread, namely performing a stitching job or > exposure fusion, using pv's adapted Burt & Adelson image

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op do 4 mrt. 2021 om 21:14 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > And did you check the compiler's version as well? > Sorry, yes. I forgot to mention. clang version 10.0.0-4ubuntu1 Target: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix -- A list of frequently

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Compiling pv on my Ubuntu Mate raspberry pi 4. A very short action: make clang++ -c -Ofast -march=native -std=c++11 -c -fno-math-errno -Wno-unused-value pv_no_rendering.cc -o pv_no_rendering.o clang: error: the clang compiler does not support '-march=native' make: *** [makefile:103:

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op do 4 mrt. 2021 om 16:48 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > Is it okay if I add put a link to your script and the bundle on the > bitbucket page? I'd also like to give you credit for the effort, is it > okay to mention you by name? > > That's OK. I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

mrt. 2021 om 11:43 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Am 03.03.21 um 22:20 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > > > > It is not so hard to create a bundle for pv after all. It took me an > hour. > > Currently the app does not have an .icns ic

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op do 4 mrt. 2021 om 08:47 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > Am 03.03.21 um 22:20 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > > > Hi Kay and everyone else interested. > > > > It is not so hard to create a bundle for pv after all. > > It to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Hi Kay and everyone else interested. It is not so hard to create a bundle for pv after all. It took me an hour. Currently the app does not have an .icns iconpack, so it has a default icon It also contains a minimal, strictly necessary Info.plist, but that should be expanded. [image: PV.png] If

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op wo 3 mrt. 2021 om 10:32 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > > The current Hugin builders on Mac are Niklas Mischkulnig and Bob > > Campbell. All credits to them (not to me). > > Maybe they'll take note of pv and become interested in the mac version - >

Re: [hugin-ptx] New release for mac?

On Thu, 2021-02-25 at 08:22 +0100, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > > I hate the MacOS > > policy and am therefore not a registered developer and certainly not > > release via the App Store, so my app has the same issue. (Users have > > to accept that or simply not use my app. I s

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Op di 2 mrt. 2021 om 11:43 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > Thank you for confirmig a mac build! This is great, you're now only the > third person I know of who's succeeded in building pv on a mac. I don't > have a mac myself, so it's hard for me to code

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

Hi, I understand that ARM is different. That's also why I mentioned to not put too much effort into it. Yes, I'm willing to cooperate in porting to armhf for the raspberry pi' s. I also have another rpi4 which runs Ubuntu Mate 20.04 (currently), but my (headless) server is always on. But I use

Re: [hugin-ptx] Image Stitching and Exposure Fusion with pv

I just build it on a Ubuntu derived 64bit system. It compiles fine. Before testing further I did the same on my Debian 10 buster armhf Raspberry pi 4. Now it ends in error. Don't put too much effort in it. The rpi4 is my server, but I just wanted to test if it would compile there (and then test it

Re: [hugin-ptx] New release for mac?

Having full disk access is not the only point. Hugin is not released via the App store and not via a registered developer. That's also why the MacOS Gatekeeper software is blocking it. You have to right-click every app bundle, click on open and MacOS will test the contents, say something about the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Feature requests for Multiblend 2.0?

Hi, I already built it on MacOS Catalina and reported my findings to David. I also created a portable version with all dylibs in one zip. (I also built the MacOS bundle quite some years ago. 2007-2011) Harry Op ma 22 feb. 2021 om 05:34 schreef Bob Campbell : > Now that I’ve got a working 2020

Re: [hugin-ptx] Feature requests for Multiblend 2.0?

I still have my old Macbook with a hacked Catalina (as it officially doesn't support my old firmware) for my java testing. I can compile it (or try to compile it) for you if there are not too many exotic dependencies. Harry Op ma 15 feb. 2021 om 13:28 schreef Monkey : > Anyone on Mac OS who can

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-2020.0.0 AppImage for Linux x86_64

/hugin-appimage/releases Harry Op za 13 feb. 2021 om 18:08 schreef Harry van der Wolf : > i,H > > And I forgot to include enblend and enfuse. > So a new version with them (and their dependencies). > > https://mega.nz/file/JAskwC6B#nC8mB1_4BtSHEs-366jz8yv5LuUtE4MPvZc

[hugin-ptx] Fwd: hugin-2020.0.0 AppImage for Linux x86_64

i,H And I forgot to include enblend and enfuse. So a new version with them (and their dependencies). https://mega.nz/file/JAskwC6B#nC8mB1_4BtSHEs-366jz8yv5LuUtE4MPvZccqlpi0xY Harry -- Forwarded message - Van: Harry van der Wolf Date: za 13 feb. 2021 om 17:06 Subject: hugin

[hugin-ptx] hugin-2020.0.0 AppImage for Linux x86_64

Hi, After quite a long "panorama hibernation" I decided to create some winter panoramas. I could not find a recent build of Hugin for Ubuntu likes. It also seems that aferrero2707 no longer builds Hugin appimages. So I downloaded the hugin-2020.0.0 source and compiled it myself. And then I

Re: [hugin-ptx] [patch] typo "normaly"

I saw this one as well, but it actually is not An equirectangular image has normally an ratio of 2:1 but An equirectangular image has normally *a* ratio of 2:1 Sorry. bye, Harry Op ma 26 okt. 2020 om 08:23 schreef Andreas Metzler : > Hello, > > find attached a trivial typo fix, generated with

Re: [hugin-ptx] align_image_stack & EXIF data

If you are using a shell script or python script you would probably loop through the source images and use a counter starting at 0, as the created tiffs are starting as . And add the images to an array === #!/bin/bash img_array=() counter=0 for x in "${@}" do img_array+=( "${x}" )

Re: [hugin-ptx] align_image_stack & EXIF data

is not "electronically connected", you will not have lens data in your original image and neither in your AIS updated tif Op ma 20 apr. 2020 om 15:48 schreef Harry van der Wolf : > If you have exiftool on your pc, and I assume you have, you should/could > do the following. > > align_image_stac

Re: [hugin-ptx] align_image_stack & EXIF data

If you have exiftool on your pc, and I assume you have, you should/could do the following. align_image_stack -a ais_ Picture1.jpg Picture2.jpg Picture3.jpg Giving you ais_.tif, ais_0001.tif and ais_0002.tif Then do: exiftool -overwrite_original -tagsfromfile Picture1.jpg -exif:all

Re: [hugin-ptx] Why shouldn't Hugin trust exif data 100% ?

Well, Earlier my Samsung S5 mini, then my Motorola G5+ and now the Motorola G6+ all do a very fine job when it comes to Exif data. What's more: They also provide GPS data which my camera doesn't. And I don't understand why it should be worse than on a phone compared to a camera which only

Re: [hugin-ptx] Convert photo to scanned image

See this tutorial: http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/scans/en.shtml Harry Op wo 1 jan. 2020 om 09:01 schreef Milind Purohit : > Frequently one needs a nicely scanned image of a document, but only a cell > phone is handy. > It seems that Hugin can convert a photo of a page by appropriate >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2019.2.0 rc1 released

> Hi Harry, > > Am Freitag, 29. November 2019 19:09:50 UTC+1 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: >> >> It means that by using the "/usr/bin/env python3" (or /usr/bin/env >> javac") to use an "outside PATH" installation. >> >> So in t

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2019.2.0 rc1 released

The "/usr/bin/env" command is used for many programs, not only python. The "env" command checks the linux configuration where the default program has been installed in case of multiple versions like python2 or python3, but also java-8, java-10, java-11 and other multi-version installs. If there

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2019.2.0 rc1 released

Hi, Op vr 29 nov. 2019 om 00:18 schreef David W. Jones : > On November 28, 2019 12:11:47 PM HST, Bruno Postle > wrote: > >Fedora packages of Hugin 2019.2 rc1 are here: > >https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bpostle/panorama/ > > > >(Note that I'm still changing #!/usr/bin/env python3 to >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Python help needed

Op za 20 jul. 2019 om 19:10 schreef 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software : > > > On Saturday, July 20, 2019 at 1:13:09 AM UTC+2, Tduell wrote: >> >> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 18:40:22 +1000, 'kfj' via hugin and other free >> > I think forcing the linking-in of a python3 interpreter should

Re: [hugin-ptx] Linux distro of choice?

Op di 16 jul. 2019 om 10:59 schreef David W. Jones : > > > But I was > >thinking of file system snapshots, available on UFS and ZFS. They do > >pretty much the same thing. I don't know which Linux file systems > >support them. > > Ah. I don't either. A quick duckduckgo search found BTRFS

Re: [hugin-ptx] Python help needed

Hi, Op vr 17 mei 2019 om 17:27 schreef Dr Rainer Woitok : > > If I didn't completely missunderstand the problem, this seems easy: just > use > >#! /usr/bin/env/python2 > If using this work-around, the shebang actually should not be "#! /usr/bin/env/python2". It should be "#!/usr/bin/env

Re: [hugin-ptx] Piranesi's perspective trick

Thanks a lot Bruno. Great article! Harry Op wo 1 mei 2019 om 10:57 schreef Paul Womack : > Yes - this is a perfectly usual way to specify a morph. > > e.g. Imagemagick's -distort Polynomial option > > http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php#distort > > BugBear > > On Wed,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2018.0 beta1

still feel "loyal" to the project. Harry 2017-12-12 17:21 GMT+01:00 T. Modes <thomas.mo...@gmx.de>: > Hi Harry, > > Am Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2017 08:57:58 UTC+1 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: >> >> I'm sorry. Those were correctly translated but poedit still thin

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2016.2 released

Hi Thomas, Thanks for all the work and time you spend to Hugin providing new functionality, bugfixes and an ever improving new version of Hugin. Kind regards, Harry 2016-09-18 10:02 GMT+02:00 T. Modes : > Hi all, > > today we are releasing the final version of Hugin

Re: [hugin-ptx] new image stitching software

As such I don't care that someone ceates another tool to do these kind of things. What bothers me more is this: http://molanisvr.com/78-molanis-vr/76-360-vr-image-stitching-software To me his now promoted software looks exactly like hugin. I assume (?) that mr. Valdes will act according all

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Call for translators

2016-06-22 11:11 GMT+02:00 Carl von Einem : > Isn't that covered in > ? > Yest it is :) And sometimes you (I) do it wrong. Harry -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at:

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Call for translators

Hi, I thought I had set my mercurial to the 2016.2 branch but I accidently pushed to the default tree. I assume my knowledge is by now too rusty. I also checked and improved some older translations. By now that becomes a big job with 9682 lines in total with 7733 text containing lines (1949 blank

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Call for translators

Working on the Dutch one. Harry 2016-06-17 16:44 GMT+02:00 Carl von Einem : > Hi GS, > > try Poedit, you'll find the link and more information here: > > > Cheers, > Carl > > > Click From Mars - wrote on 17.06.16 12:29: > >>

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac Build

in the current dir, next to Hugin > You can try that out in bash. That is why I set enblend and enfuse to > alternative paths, since I couldn't find a path to enblend and enfuse in > the src. Or could Hugin change PATH ? > > > Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 09:41:10 UTC+2 sch

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac Build

With regard to the exiftool error: In the previous builds exiftool was also incorporated in the bundles. I assume that was forgotten for this bundle. W.r.t. enblend and enfuse: Please check whether they are inside the bundles. If not: then it is the same error as above. If the enblend --version

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac Build

i.app, reducing the total filesize from > 231 mb to 231-(2*35)=180mb. Putting the Resources/xrc folder there as well > would shave off another 15 mb (resulting in 165mb). > Is it worth the effort? > > Niklas > > Am Montag, 18. April 2016 18:05:10 UTC+2 schrieb Harry van der

Re: [hugin-ptx] Mac Build

The fact the mac bundles are that big is due to the "bundle all dependencies" inside the app. That gives a lot of redundancy in the apps. That is already for years and years a fact and as long as Apple doesn't change their policy it will stay that way. When compiling with XCode this strip

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2016.0 beta 1 released

I will try to build a win-64 version this weekend. At the moment I'm quite busy with other things and my windows laptop "is lying in a corner" as I'm back on ubuntu again. Harry 2016-02-02 3:01 GMT+01:00 Terry Duell : > Hello Martin, > > On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:04:28 +1100,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >