Sorry, accidentally sent from wrong email address!
On 8/22/23 12:05, david wrote:
Replies interspersed below.
On 8/21/23 16:36, dgjohnston wrote:
Greg, thanks for the additional information. The images in this set
are well suited to the quick run though using the Fast Pano Preview
because of
I downloaded these files and I've found that the image stacks message only
pops up when adding the eighteenth image to the list of imported images. It
appears not to matter which image is the eighteenth - it can even be a
duplicate of one of the already selected photos. I retried after
On Monday, 21 August 2023 at 20:36:26 -0600, dgjohnston wrote:
> Greg, thanks for the additional information. The images in this set
> are well suited to the quick run though using the Fast Pano Preview
> because of the randomness of the rocks, trees, and water. It’s hard
> to detect any minor
Greg, thanks for the additional information. The images in this set are well
suited to the quick run though using the Fast Pano Preview because of the
randomness of the rocks, trees, and water. It’s hard to detect any minor
discrepancies like one would with images of manmade structures. With
On Sunday, 20 August 2023 at 6:34:23 -0400, Stanley Green wrote:
> If the link is still active, you can try to get the images directly:
>
> https://wetransfer.com/downloads/c5b1b40878f4f80c5b68af6a6767392b20230817102250/51d164ee951b6c084af7ed1d0d27730e20230817102250/2ee2fd
Thanks for that.
I'm
Excellent!
Try the various drag-and-drop options, see how things turn out. I think
the problem is rooted in drag-and-drop identifying bogus stacks, but I
could be wrong.
On 8/20/23 13:51, dgjohnston wrote:
Stanley … thanks, the download worked. If I run into anything
interesting I’ll send
Stanley … thanks, the download worked. If I run into anything interesting I’ll
send an update.
Don J.
> On Aug 20, 2023, at 4:34 AM, Stanley Green wrote:
>
> If the link is still active, you can try to get the images directly:
>
>
If the link is still active, you can try to get the images directly:
https://wetransfer.com/downloads/c5b1b40878f4f80c5b68af6a6767392b20230817102250/51d164ee951b6c084af7ed1d0d27730e20230817102250/2ee2fd
It is supposed to be active through 8/24.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is
Hi, is there somewhere I can download the original files. I’d like to try out
this process on my Mac as a learning experience.
Thanks … Don J.
> On Aug 17, 2023, at 11:56 PM, David W. Jones wrote:
>
> Hi, Stanley!
>
> I got your We Transfer. Good download speed from them!
> Notes:
>
> I'm
On Thursday, 17 August 2023 at 6:12:55 -0400, Hugin developers list wrote:
> David,
> We transfer is not cooperating. I tried sending it several time to
> the email address shown on your responses to me.
I'm almost happy. I set up an account, but it didn't make it clear
how it worked.
If you
Sure. I've never used We Transfer, but it sounds like they'll let you do it.
On 8/16/23 14:17, 'Stanley Green' via hugin and other free panoramic
software wrote:
I’ll be glad to share the images. I have 18 images about 98 MB/image.
How do you propose that I upload them? I have “We Transfer”
I’ll be glad to share the images. I have 18 images about 98 MB/image. How do
you propose that I upload them? I have “We Transfer” that will let me transfer
2GB files.
> On Aug 16, 2023, at 7:26 PM, David W. Jones wrote:
>
> Hmm, just wondering. Could you upload your images somewhere? I'd
On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 13:35:48 -0400, Hugin developers list wrote:
> Beautiful day, less than beautiful results
>
> I shot a set of 18 images( 3 rows / 6 panels). I imported the raw
> images into Capture One and then exported the images as Tiffs. I
> tried to stitch the 18 images into a
Hmm, just wondering. Could you upload your images somewhere? I'd like to
see what I could do with them.
On 8/16/23 11:56, 'Stanley Green' via hugin and other free panoramic
software wrote:
I am continuing to explore options to using Hugin. After forcing
Affinity Photo, I just discovered that
I am continuing to explore options to using Hugin. After forcing Affinity
Photo, I just discovered that AP will automatically stitch my 18 images into a
3 row, 6 panel panorama. Now if the guys at Serif will just add some more
projection options
> On Aug 16, 2023, at 1:35 PM, 'Stanley Green'
Beautiful day, less than beautiful results
I shot a set of 18 images( 3 rows / 6 panels). I imported the raw images into
Capture One and then exported the images as Tiffs. I tried to stitch the 18
images into a merged image using Hugin. Hugin was a disaster, I cannot begin to
describe the
On 8/14/23 15:02, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 15:12:37 -0400, Stanley Green wrote:
Is anybody familiar with this video tutorial?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaLNFKh82Dg
"Producing multi-row image panoramas with Hugin"
No, I haven't watched it. I'll try to find
On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 15:12:37 -0400, Stanley Green wrote:
> Is anybody familiar with this video tutorial?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaLNFKh82Dg
> "Producing multi-row image panoramas with Hugin"
No, I haven't watched it. I'll try to find time to do so later.
> In this tutorial,
Am Sonntag, 25. Januar 2015 01:59:14 UTC+1 schrieb Tduell:
gigastart might be of use to you.
gigastart and cpfind --multirow are both using the same algorithm.
But gigastart has a lot of overhead and it writes and reads all
intermediate data to disc, which is slow.
Thomas
--
A list of
Hello luc,
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 07:06:22 +1100, lulutreizequinze
lulutreizequi...@gmail.com wrote:
hello everyone
I need to stitch a set of pictures taken with a gigapan automated
hardware.
I have a picture grid of 25columsn and 23 rows.(from topleft to
bottomright)
when searching
20 matches
Mail list logo
