Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

Dear Michael Havens Am 26.09.2016 um 15:18 schrieb Michael Havens: > I get it... they got rid of the optimizer tab and moved the settings > into Photos. Not exactly. You still get an optimizer tab when you set the Optimize -> Geometric setting to "Custom parameters" in the Photo tab. With kind

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

I get it... they got rid of the optimizer tab and moved the settings into Photos. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 3:09:51 AM UTC-4, zarl wrote: > > Michael Havens wrote on 26.09.16 01:18: > > What does 'optimize' do? I just ran almost the entire process through to > > the end (2 hours) when I was rereading what I hadn't done when I noticed > > it was said I did not

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

Michael Havens wrote on 26.09.16 01:18: What does 'optimize' do? I just ran almost the entire process through to the end (2 hours) when I was rereading what I hadn't done when I noticed it was said I did not optimize it. So I stopped, optimized, and started the process again. BUT what does

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 2:34:33 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: > > Dear Michael Havens > > On 25.09.2016 19:36, Michael Havens wrote: > > Please explain to me 2 unconnected image groups found: > > [0-19,21-33],[20]. 0-19 looks to me like 20 images, as does 21-33 (13 > > images),

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 2:34:33 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: > > > > As for the file system that runs out of space the last time I run > > this through and I was at my computer when the notification that I was > > running out of disk space appeared the notification appeared about

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

Dear Michael Havens On 25.09.2016 19:36, Michael Havens wrote: > Please explain to me 2 unconnected image groups found: > [0-19,21-33],[20]. 0-19 looks to me like 20 images, as does 21-33 (13 > images), while 20 looks like 1 image. Yes, exactly. You have one image (number 20) that is neither

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

Please explain to me 2 unconnected image groups found: [0-19,21-33],[20]. 0-19 looks to me like 20 images, as does 21-33 (13 images), while 20 looks like 1 image. Also, how do I find control points in the cloud images? As for the file system that runs out of space the last time I run this

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 9:50:11 +0200, Stefan Peter wrote: > Dera Michael Havens > > On 24.09.2016 03:56, Michael Havens wrote: >> >> >> On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 3:05:29 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: >> >> So, please, could you share the pto you used in this example? Please >>

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

Dera Michael Havens On 24.09.2016 03:56, Michael Havens wrote: > > > On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 3:05:29 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: > > So, please, could you share the pto you used in this example? Please > put > it up somewhere like pastebin.com and

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

I understand it now! I started with '1' while hugin starts its numbering with '0',so that is the right one. On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 9:56:16 PM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote: > > > > On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 3:05:29 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: >> >> So, please, could you share

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 3:05:29 PM UTC-4, Stefan Peter wrote: > > So, please, could you share the pto you used in this example? Please put > it up somewhere like pastebin.com and just send the link to this mailing > list. http://pastebin.com/QCX1z8Ra And another issue: Could you

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

Dear Michael Havens Thank you for the text files. However, I had some time earlier today, when the documents on google where still available, and I think I spotted something. However, the text files you sent are missing the log file from the Hugin run and there I found the following issues: Your

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

Michael Havens wrote on 23.09.16 07:55: I thought it was proper to place large amounts of text on a hosting service rather than on the mailing list. Do you wish for me to place it all on here instead? No, please don't attach large documents to your messages. When someone asks for "plain

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

I thought it was proper to place large amounts of text on a hosting service rather than on the mailing list. Do you wish for me to place it all on here instead? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 19:19:57 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > okay here is a series of issuances of commands spread out over a period of > time: > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2xvsVTZy4y1RzJlZ2tnRUZsRnM Ouch, is that painful. Don't you have the plain text? Greg -- Sent from

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

Status Report is a copy of the text in the status report window that hugin opens for you when the panorama completes (or fails). -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

okay here is a series of issuances of commands spread out over a period of time: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2xvsVTZy4y1RzJlZ2tnRUZsRnM the panos I am working with this time are the files that begin "DSC_0493 - DSC_0526-5" I believe what you are looking for is one of the last lines in

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 6:37:57 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 12:00:32 AM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: >> >> One thing that occurs to me is that this might be swap space. Do >> you have swap to file enabled? If so it could be that that is >> filling up

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 6:34:15 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:30:02 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: >> >> I'm sure that much of your issues relate to the fact that you write >> your reply away from what you're replying to. In case it's my >>

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 8:13:17 +0300, Markku Kolkka wrote: > 22.9.2016, 6.12, Greg 'groggy' Lehey kirjoitti: >> >> At least I have the information now, but unless nona or enblend are >> hiding something, there's no evidence of any large files being written >> to the temporary

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 4:13:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote: > > Okay, I just started a big pano with the custom temp directory set to > default and here is ls -l /tmp and ls -l in the directory where all of the > intermediate files are being put when I run out of disk space

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

Okay, I just started a big pano with the custom temp directory set to default and here is ls -l /tmp and ls -l in the directory where all of the intermediate files are being put when I run out of disk space (like ya all said the intermediate files go in the directory the images are in: a side

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 12:00:32 AM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > One thing that occurs to me is that this might be swap space. Do you > have swap to file enabled? If so it could be that that is filling up > your root file system. Try: > > $ swapon -s ~ $ swapon -s Filename Type

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:30:02 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > I'm sure that much of your issues relate to the fact that you write > your reply away from what you're replying to. In case it's my > terminology, that recommendation is to leave the temporary directory > specification

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

22.9.2016, 6.12, Greg 'groggy' Lehey kirjoitti: > > At least I have the information now, but unless nona or enblend are > hiding something, there's no evidence of any large files being written > to the temporary directory, so you might as well reset the preference > so that you don't have to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

[resequenced] On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 20:24:31 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: >> >> At least I have the information now, but unless nona or enblend are >> hiding something, there's no evidence of any large files

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > My guess is that whatever the problem was, > it has gone into hiding. > > but the problem is that when I give it a custom temporary directory none of the control point detectors work. And I meant before/after

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

but the problem is that when I give it a custom temporary directory none of the control point detectors work. On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 11:12:55 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:53:25 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:53:25 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:38:36 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:33:27 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: >>> In preferences->file name->Temporary directory I typed in >>>

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:38:36 PM UTC-4, Groogle wrote: > > On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:33:27 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > > In preferences->file name->Temporary directory I typed in > > "/home/bmike1/hugintmp" > > In the same location if /home/bmike1/hugintmp is

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: first attempt at a spherical pano

On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 19:33:27 -0700, Michael Havens wrote: > In preferences->file name->Temporary directory I typed in > "/home/bmike1/hugintmp" > In the same location if /home/bmike1/hugintmp is present when I search for > control points it will fail. We seem to be going round in