[I2nsf] how to derive a policy of "Deny traffic from HR destined to R" from "draft-xibassnez-i2nsf-capability"?

, Linda From: John Strassner [mailto:straz...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 12:39 AM To: Diego R. Lopez <diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com>; John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com> Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; i2nsf@ietf.org; draft-xibassnez-i2nsf-capabil...@iet

[I2nsf] Please send your presentation slides (in PDF format) for Tuesday I2NSF WG session to us as soon as possible

I2NSFers, If you are on the agenda for I2NSF WG session tomorrow (Tuesday 1:30pm -3:30pm), please send us your presentation in *.pdf format as soon as possible. Thanks, Linda & Adrian ___ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org

[I2nsf] questions about draft-hares-i2nsf-ssls

and agent? When you say APIs to application, who is issuing the APIs and who is receiving the APIs? Thank you very much. Linda Dunbar ___ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

[I2nsf] IETF 99 I2NSF WG Preliminary Agenda is uploaded.

I2NSF participants: Here is the preliminary agenda for I2NSF WG session in Prague: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/agenda/agenda-99-i2nsf-00 Please let us know if we miss anything as soon as possible. Looking forward to seeing you in Prague. Travel safe, Linda & Adrian.

[I2nsf] Which interface would the TUDA protocol be applicable? Questions on the draft-birkholz-i2nsf-tuda-00

Andreas, Henk, Ira, and Carsten, Thank you very much for a well written draft on "remote attestation". Your terminology section really helps me to comprehend the protocol. I am trying to put your draft in the context of I2NSF, which has the Client (or Consumer) facing Interface (i.e. the

[I2nsf] relationship between draft-hares-i2nsf-capability-data-model-03 & draft-kim-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-data-model-02? (was RE: Request for Timeslots in I2NSF WG Meeting

have a vague memory that those two drafts are to be merged, are they? Thank you very much, Linda From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:jaehoon.p...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 7:54 AM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> Cc

[I2nsf] Questions to draft-ietf-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-2

Rakesh, Anil, Dave, Nabil, Senad, and Frank: Thank you very much for updating the draft-ietf-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-2. A few questions for the latest draft: Are all the bullets listed in the Section 4 (Functional Requirements for Client Facing Interface) actual requirement? Or more

Re: [I2nsf] Framework Draft, section 6.2

John, Thanks for clarify the wording. It is much clearer and consistent with the terminology document. One question to the following wording (I see it is already in the 06 version): o When multiple instantiations of one single NSF appear as one single entity to the Security

Re: [I2nsf] SKKU Comments on Framework Draft

Diego, That would be great! Linda From: Diego R. Lopez [mailto:diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:00 PM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com> Cc: John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com>; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] SKKU Comments on Framework Dr

Re: [I2nsf] SKKU Comments on Framework Draft

Thanks John. You are correct that “I2NSF Controller” is really just a component of “Security Controller” or a component of generic “Controller”. Thanks, Linda From: John Strassner [mailto:straz...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 5:03 PM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com&

Re: [I2nsf] SKKU Comments on Framework Draft

To many people’s mind, a generic “Controller” can include other functions currently not in the scope of the I2NSF charter, like controlling the “routes”, “routing protocols”, “devices”, etc. How to restrict the scope of the “Controller” if we don’t use “I2NSF Controller” in documents? Linda

[I2nsf] If you want to remotely present to the I2NSF session during IETF 99, please let us know (was FW: Call for Agenda items for IETF99 Prague

Again, there will be Meetecho available for people to present remotely for IETF 99 Prague. However, we have to register the presenters ahead of time. So if you want to present something but can't physically come to Prague, please let us know. Regards, Adrian & Linda From: Linda Dunbar

[I2nsf] Call for Agenda items for IETF99 Prague

I2NSF WG is scheduled to meet on Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30 of the IETF week at Prague. If you'd like to present drafts at the meeting, kindly send the following - name of the draft - time requested - presenter's name In addition to the presentations, we are thinking of reserving at least 30

[I2nsf] Should the draft-xibassnez-i2nsf-capability-01 be characterized as "Information model"? or something else?

John, Frank, Diego and Aldo, It seems to me that the draft-xibassnez-i2nsf-capability-01 covers the I2NSF rule structure. In your view, should the draft-xibassnez-i2nsf-capability be characterized as the information model? If it is characterized as the information model, are they exchanged

[I2nsf] Will definitions related to "Attestation" to be added to I2NSF terminology draft? and the survey msg?

John, Sue, Diego, Frank, and Henk, During the I2NSF terminology discussion at I2NSF WG session in IETF98, there were some discussions on if terminologies related to Attestation need to be added to the terminology draft. Want to ask if there is any plan to add them. The IETF 98 meeting notes

Re: [I2nsf] sharing key among multiple end points vs. Group Encryption Key - draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protectio

:19 PM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com> Cc: ip...@ietf.org; Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: sharing key among multiple end points vs. Group Encryption Key - draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protectio Hi, Linda On 21 Apr 2017, at 0:40,

[I2nsf] IETF 98 - Chicago I2NSF Meeting agenda preparation

Hello WG! No change to time of I2NSF meeting in IETF 98 in the final agenda: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda Monday March 27 1pm-3pm Room Zurich C. The Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) for this meeting will be on 2017-03-13 (Monday) UTC 23:59.

[I2nsf] conflicts to avoid for i2nsf Meeting Session Request for IETF 98

etf.org] Sent: 2017年1月5日 1:44 To: session-requ...@ietf.org Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com> Subject: i2nsf - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 98 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by L

[I2nsf] WGLC for draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-06

Dear all, After many rounds of editing, the authors finally believe the draft is ready. We will start of the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-06 The WGLC lasts for 3 weeks and will end Dec 29 at 10 pm PDT. Please send your comments and reviews to the

Re: [I2nsf] Suggested updaste from Paul Jeong

Is there anyone objecting adding Paul as co-author? If not, please go ahead adding his name and upload the draft. So that we can start the WGLC. Linda From: Rakesh Kumar [mailto:rkku...@juniper.net] Sent: 2016年12月5日 13:19 To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; Susan Hares <sha...

Re: [I2nsf] Suggested updaste from Paul Jeong

o R. Lopez' <diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com> Cc: 'Myo Zarny' <myo.za...@gmail.com>; myo.za...@gs.com; christian.jacque...@orange.com; Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; Rakesh Kumar <rkku...@juniper.net> Subject: Re: Suggested updaste from Paul Jeong Hi Susan and all

[I2nsf] IETF97 I2NSF Meeting Minutes have been uploaded. Please let me know if there is anything that is missing.

Many thanks to Frank Xia and Sue Hares for taking the note during the IETF 97 I2NSF session. The minutes have been uploaded: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/minutes/minutes-97-i2nsf-00 If you notice anything in-correctly captured or missing, please let us know. Linda & Adrian.

Re: [I2nsf] Need minutes taker for I2NSF WG

Thank you very much Frank. Linda From: Xialiang (Frank) Sent: 2016年11月14日 13:54 To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Need minutes taker for I2NSF WG Hi Linda, I’d like to assist this job. B.R. Frank From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ie

Re: [I2nsf] Need minutes taker for I2NSF WG

Sue, Thank you very much. Linda From: Susan Hares [mailto:sha...@ndzh.com] Sent: 2016年11月14日 4:25 To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Need minutes taker for I2NSF WG Linda: I will take minutes. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ie

[I2nsf] Presenters to I2NSF WG session in IETF97: Please send your presentation slides as soon as possible

As I2NSF WG session will be on Monday afternoon, we don't have much time prepare during the IETF week. Could presenters send your slides to I2NSf chairs as soon as possible? Thanks, Linda ___ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

Sue, Sure. Are there any gating issues for moving it to WGLC? Linda From: Susan Hares [mailto:sha...@ndzh.com] Sent: 2016年11月3日 10:47 To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised Linda: May I tentatively get a tim

Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised

Thanks to people pointing out some missing items. The I2NSF agenda has been revised. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/97/agenda/i2nsf/ If you requested agenda time and don't see yourself there, or if you need to make a correction, please let the chairs know. Thanks, Linda & Adrian

[I2nsf] IETF-97 draft agenda posted

Hi All, The draft agenda is posted here https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/97/agenda/i2nsf/ If you requested agenda time and don't see yourself there, or if you need to make a correction, please let the chairs know. Thanks, Linda & Adrian ___

Re: [I2nsf] [i2nsf] Hacking I2NSF in IETF-97 Seoul Meeting

To: hackat...@ietf.org Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk>; skku_secu-brain_...@googlegroups.com; JungSoo Park <p...@etri.re.kr>; Tae-Jin Ahn <taejin@kt.com>; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <jaehoon.p...@gmail.com> Subject: [i2nsf]

[I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-xibassnez-i2nsf-capability

Dear WG: This email serves as a call for WG adoption of draft-xibassnez-i2nsf-capability as a WG document. Considering people will be traveling to Seoul for IETF 97 and the Thanksgiving holiday afterwards, the call for adoption will run for 3.5 weeks ending Nov 28, 2016.

[I2nsf] Questions to draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration

nesday, September 21, 2016 8:04 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: Alireza Ranjbar; i2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Is the “Security Service Function (SSF)” in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases? Hi Linda

Re: [I2nsf] Will you provide more details on the Rules' Information model in draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-im-00.txt?

? Thanks, Linda From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: 2016年11月1日 12:10 To: Rakesh Kumar <rkku...@juniper.net>; i2nsf@ietf.org Cc: Adrian Farrel <afar...@juniper.net> Subject: [I2nsf] Will you provide more details on the Rules' Information model in

[I2nsf] Will you provide more details on the Rules' Information model in draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-im-00.txt?

Rakesh, Thank you very much for contributing the draft. Just curious, the current IM for Rules doesn't have much details: Will you add more in future revision? Linda Dunbar -Original Message- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rakesh Kumar Sent: 2016年10月31日 12

[I2nsf] FW: Cutoff date for requesting remote presentations support at IETF97

Is there anyone needing remote presentation to I2SNF session in Seoul (Monday Nov 14, 15:50-17-50 local time)? Please let us know. Linda & Adrian -Original Message- From: WGChairs [mailto:wgchairs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Meetecho IETF support Sent: 2016年10月27日 4:54 To:

Re: [I2nsf] Need two different names: One for the Set of rules with Users/tenants oriented attributes; another for Set of rules that are applied to NSFs (i.e. port/addresses based).

”. Thanks, Linda From: John Strassner [mailto:straz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 2:06 PM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com> Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Need two different names: One for the Set of rules with Users/tena

[I2nsf] Need two different names: One for the Set of rules with Users/tenants oriented attributes; another for Set of rules that are applied to NSFs (i.e. port/addresses based).

information from another I2NSF Component. See also: Provider, Role. Thanks, Linda From: John Strassner [mailto:straz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 2:10 AM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: you could be cor

[I2nsf] I2NSF session at IETF 97 is currently scheduled to be Monday afternoon 15:50 - 1750. Please let us know if you need to present but have conflict

Linda -Original Message- From: WGChairs [mailto:wgchairs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IETF Agenda Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 6:37 PM To: Working Group Chairs Subject: IETF 97 Preliminary Agenda The IETF 97 preliminary agenda has been posted. The final agenda

[I2nsf] with regarding to WG adoption for the revised draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-01.txt

. Linda -Original Message- From: Rakesh Kumar [mailto:rkku...@juniper.net] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 12:25 PM To: Youjianjie <youjian...@huawei.com> Cc: Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk>; Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>; Rakesh Kumar <rkku...@juniper.net&

Re: [I2nsf] Oct 5 2016 I2NSF Interim meeting slides, webex bridge and the Etherpad

Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:59:14 +0200 > Cc: Rafa Marin Lopez <r...@um.es>, Gabriel Lopez <gab...@um.es>, > Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varad...@oracle.com>, > David Carrel <dcar...@viptela.com> > > Hi Linda: > > El 30 sept 2016, a las 2

[I2nsf] relationship between draft-baspez-i2nsf-capabilities-00 & draft-xia-i2nsf-capability-interface-im

NSF-facing-interface. At today's Interim meeting, can you, John, and Frank explain the partition of the drafts? Thank you very much. Linda -Original Message- From: Aldo Basile [mailto:cataldo.bas...@polito.it] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 1:56 PM To: Linda Dunbar; i2

[I2nsf] questions about draft-kim-i2nsf-security-management-architecture-01

Hyoungshick, et al, How would you position your draft-kim-i2nsf-security-management-architecture-01 with regard to the I2NSF framework draft? I find there are a lot of duplicated content to the I2nsf framework draft. There are some differences, such as the following: Are you trying to define

[I2nsf] Questions about draft-baspez-i2nsf-capabilities-00

Aldo and Diego, The section 4.1 of your draft has this expression: Our capabilities are defined by a 4-tuple: (Ac; Cc; RSc; Dc) [ (AC; CC; RSC; DC)= K Is it intentional to have "[" without the matching one "]"? What is the relationship between "Ac" and "AC"? are they the same? If a NSF

[I2nsf] could you please address comments from Diego Lopez on draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-00 and revise the draft accordingly?

Rakesh, Searching through the mailing list achieve, I find the comments from Diego Lopez on your draft hasn't been addressed nor reflect in your draft. Can you address them and revise the draft accordingly? Thank you very much. Linda

Re: [I2nsf] Is the “Security Service Function (SSF)” in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases?

To: Linda Dunbar Cc: Alireza Ranjbar; i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Is the “Security Service Function (SSF)” in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases? Hi Linda, I apology for the delay. Please find my response and additional questions

[I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req

Dear WG: This email serves as a call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req as a WG document. The call for adoption will run for 2 weeks ending Oct 5, 2016. The requirement document is one of the key deliverables specified by the I2NSF charter. Please note that this

[I2nsf] Doodle poll for I2NSF Interim #2: NSF Facing Interface related drafts

I2NSF participants: Please indicate your availability for the I2NSF Interim #2: NSF Facing Interface related drafts http://doodle.com/poll/sc3u5rznh6ep325g Thanks, Linda _ From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2016 12:40 AM To: 'i2nsf

[I2nsf] Is the “Security Service Function (SSF)” in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases?

Daniel and Alirezza, Is the “Security Service Function (SSF)” in your draft equivalent to the Network Security Function (NSF) defined in https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-01.pdf ? NSF: Network Security Function. An NSF is a function that detects abnormal

[I2nsf] Why do we have "negotiation" for the "Control Plane"

Rakesh, Here is a use case to address your following question: Cloud (Overlay) Network needs the underlay network to enforce Rule A & B Not sure of the capability of the underlay network, the Overlay Network can send an inquiry to the underlay network asking if it supports Rule A The

[I2nsf] Terminology discussion #2: "capability" & "capability interface"

As the I2NSF Terminology has defined two types of the "capability": -the "capability" from NSFs and -the "capability" from controller (i.e. as the response to Client's inquiry). I find it not necessary to have the "capability interface" as we already have Client Facing

[I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model

John, et al, The "ietf-netmod-acl-model" has "ACL" defined as: An ACL is an ordered set of rules that is used to filter traffic on a networking device. Each rule is represented by an Access Control Entry (ACE). The "draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-01" has ACL as: ACL (Acess Control List): This is

[I2nsf] IETF 96 I2NSF preliminary agenda has been posted

functions *draft-you-i2nsf-user-group-policy-capability Please enter your available time at this poll: http://doodle.com/poll/7vcpm7agpx7ci5da Thank you very much. Adrian & Linda From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 10:46 AM To: I2NSF@ietf.org Cc: adr...@olddog.co.uk Sub

Re: [I2nsf] A New I-D on Northbound Interfaces for Security Policy Controllers : A Framework and Information Model

; Linda Dunbar Subject: [I2nsf] A New I-D on Northbound Interfaces for Security Policy Controllers : A Framework and Information Model Hi, I posted a new draft that proposes a framework for northbound interfaces (whatever terminology we finally agree on) from Security Policy Controller. We would

Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF

ope. Other comments are inserted below -Original Message- From: Rafa Marin Lopez [mailto:r...@um.es] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 1:06 PM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: Rafa Marin Lopez; I2NSF@ietf.org; ip...@ietf.org; Sowmini Varadhan; Sowmini Varadhan Subject: Re: [IPsec] [I2nsf] How does Ov

[I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology draft : Is it better to have two distinct terminologies to differentiate the “Client to controller” from the “Client to NSFs”?

Dear authors of the I2NSF terminology draft: I2NSF framework has two different types of clients: 1. One type of client sending inquiry/request for Flow Security Policy to a controller (who controls a network). For example: an overlay network controller sending inquiry/request for Flow

Re: [I2nsf] questions about some terminologies defined by draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-00

my.unt.edu] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 10:08 AM To: Linda Dunbar; John Strassner Cc: I2NSF@ietf.org; DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA (diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com); Susan Hares Subject: Re: [I2nsf] questions about some terminologies defined by draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-00 Hey, I am a novice in I2NSF

Re: [I2nsf] questions about some terminologies defined by draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-00

Interface. Thanks, Linda From: John Strassner [mailto:straz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:58 AM To: Linda Dunbar; John Strassner Cc: Susan Hares; DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA (diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com); I2NSF@ietf.org Subject: Re: questions about some terminologies defined by draft-ietf

[I2nsf] IETF 96 Preliminary Agenda comes out: I2NSF session time & location. Please let us know ASAP if you plan to present but have conflict

I2NSF participants, Based on the IETF96 preliminary agenda, I2NSF will be Thurs 16:20-18:20. If you plan to present but have conflict, please let us know ASAP. Even though we can't promise the change, we will try. 1620-1820 Afternoon Session II Tiergarten ART core

[I2nsf] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service laye

eding ECMP" or "Don't care ECMP" be good enough? Thanks, Linda -Original Message- From: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@herbertland.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 11:28 PM To: Xuxiaohu Cc: Lou Berger; Linda Dunbar; Liyizhou; NVO3; ip...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [nvo3] FW: Any

Re: [I2nsf] Help on turning I2NSF Information Models to Data Models

ity Polices that controller can pass down to NSF. The "capability" inquiry is over the "I2NSF Service layer interface" If my explanation is still not clear, please ask more questions. Thank you very much. Linda From: Susan Hares [mailto:sha...@ndzh.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 0

<    1   2   3