Here is another draft that intends to cover the VN (VLAN, L2VPN, L3VPN, etc.)
and VC (TE LSP, PW, etc.) applications
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hares-use-case-vn-vc-00
Best regards,
Mach
From: i2rs-boun...@ietf.org [i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] on
Hi Russ,
Thanks for bringing up this discussion!
Please see my reply inline...
Best regards,
Mach
-Original Message-
From: i2rs-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ
White
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 8:45 PM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: zh...@gsta.com
-
From: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Raszuk
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 9:56 PM
To: Mach Chen
Cc: Russ White; i2rs@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; zh...@gsta.com
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Thoughts on
draft-chen-idr-rr-based-traffic-steering-usecase
as an I2RS Use Case
Hi Robert,
Please see my reply inline...
-Original Message-
From: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Raszuk
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 6:35 PM
To: Mach Chen
Cc: Russ White; i2rs@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; zh...@gsta.com; wangsb
Subject: Re: [i2rs
Hi Joel,
We discussed various models of conflict resolution for the case when one
client
adjusts a piece of data, and then another client goes to change that data.
Are there any specifications about the unit of the data ? I did not find this
in the architecture and IM documents.
decide
. This may need some guide/clarify text in the architecture.
Best regards,
Mach
-Original Message-
From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:17 AM
To: Mach Chen; KwangKoog Lee
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; Guanxiaoran
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Multi-Headed
I have read the draft, it documents a useful function of I2RS. I support the
adoption of draft to be a WG document.
Best regards,
Mach
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:03 PM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas'; 'Alia Atlas'
Hi Authors,
I just finished the shepherd review on draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture-06, it's
well written and easy for reading. I have the following comments for this
version, most of them are editorial comments.
1.
Some (not well-known) of the acronyms may need to be expanded in their first
. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:04 PM
To: Mach Chen; draft-ietf-i2rs-architect...@tools.ietf.org
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture-06
Thanks for the review. The editorial items we clealry should apply
-traceability is different from other references. So let's make it
as an informational reference.
Best regards,
Mach
-Original Message-
From: Joel Halpern [mailto:joel.halp...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 9:26 AM
To: Mach Chen; Joel M. Halpern; draft-ietf-i2rs-architect
Hi Feng,
Thanks for your comments!
Yes, you are right. We have considered using the “feature” and “if-feature” to
achieve the optional rib capabilities, but this version does not reflect that.
We will update it in a later revision.
Best regards,
Mach
From: feng.chon...@zte.com.cn
are not so clear when the use case draft
composed. Your suggestions are good, and we will incorporate the suggestions
into the next revision.
Best regards,
Mach
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:16 AM
To: Susan Hares; Mach Chen; i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Questions suggestions
Support as a co-author.
Best regards,
Mach
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 10:49 PM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas'; 'Alia Atlas'
Subject: [i2rs] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-i2rs-rib-data-model-02 (
This is a 3 WG
I have read this model draft, it is well written and useful, so I support the
adoption!
Best regards,
Mach
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:01 PM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas'
Subject: [i2rs] 3 week adoption call for
Hi,
I just reviewed the I2RS minutes of IETF 92th. There is a question as below:
Anoop: what is the use case for next hop in another routing instance?
One of the use cases is VRF-2-VRF communication within a single PE, this can be
achieved by configuring the RT or static VRF route. When
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your comments!
Please see my reply inline...
> From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chris Bowers
> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 9:32 PM
> To: i2rs@ietf.org
> Subject: [i2rs] feedback on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-03
>
> I2RS WG and draft authors,
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 4:32 AM
To: Mach Chen
Cc: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang; Nitin Bahadur; Manish Kumar (manishkr); Chris
Bowers; i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] feedback on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-03
From my perspective, adding encap for a next-hop in the RIB makes
ay, November 23, 2015 7:30 PM
> To: Susan Hares; i2rs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [i2rs] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-04.txt
>
> Sue,
>
> From: i2rs <i2rs-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares
> <sha...@ndzh.com>
> Date: Monday, November 23, 201
model just treats a tunnel as the nexthop, it does not intend to
create a tunnel and just uses an existing one.
Best regards,
Mach
> -Original Message-
> From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:56 AM
> To: Mach Chen; i2rs@ietf.org
>
nexthops.
Best regards,
Mach
From: Edwin Cordeiro [mailto:edwi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 3:25 PM
To: Mach Chen
Cc: i2rs
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Problem using rib-data-model RPC with rib-info-model
Information (draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-05 +
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-08)
Hi
OK, thanks for your prompt response!
Best regards,
Mach
> -Original Message-
> From: rtg-dir [mailto:rtg-dir-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 7:10 PM
> To: Mach Chen; rtg-...@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2
,
Mach
From: Edwin Cordeiro [mailto:edwi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 4:02 PM
To: Mach Chen
Cc: i2rs
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Problem using rib-data-model RPC with rib-info-model
Information (draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-05 +
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-08)
Hi Mach,
I mean the RIB
This version addresses the comments from Edwin and Routing Directorate QA
review (John).
Thanks,
Mach
> -Original Message-
> From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 2:39 PM
> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> Cc:
Hi Sue,
I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.
Best regards,
Mach
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 9:13 AM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: 'Russ White' ; 'Alia Atlas'
Subject: [i2rs] WG LC for
kat...@gmail.com>; wang_little_s...@sina.com;
h...@packetdesign.com; Mach Chen <mach.c...@huawei.com>;
amit.d...@ericsson.com; sriganeshk...@gmail.com; nitin_baha...@yahoo.com;
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-mo...@ietf.org; 'Russ White' <r...@riw.us>
Subject: IPR recall for draft-ietf-i
Hi Alvaro,
Thanks for the comments, please see my replies inline...
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 3:15 PM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares
Hi Alissa,
Thanks for your comments!
Please see my responses inline...
> -Original Message-
> From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 11:10 PM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: i2rs@ietf.org;
Hi Tom,
> -Original Message-
> From: t.petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2018 7:42 PM
> To: Mach Chen <mach.c...@huawei.com>; Alissa Cooper
> <ali...@cooperw.in>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
> Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-
Thanks Suresh, Martin and Sue,
The issues will be addressed in verion-11.
Best regards,
Mach
> -Original Message-
> From: Susan Hares [mailto:sha...@ndzh.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 10:08 PM
> To: 'Martin Bjorklund'
> Cc: sur...@kaloom.com; i...@ietf.org;
Hi Ignas,
Thanks for your comments!
Please see my replies inline...
> -Original Message-
> From: Ignas Bagdonas [mailto:ibagd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 7:14 PM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your comments!
It will be fixed in the upcoming version-11.
Best regards,
Mach
> -Original Message-
> From: t.petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:22 PM
> To: Alissa Cooper <ali...@cooperw.in>; Mach Chen <mach.
Hi Benoit,
OK, will use you suggested text below.
Thanks,
Mach
From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 10:08 PM
To: Mach Chen <mach.c...@huawei.com>; t.petch <ie...@btconnect.com>; Alissa
Cooper <ali...@cooperw.in>
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-
Hi,
Most of the IESG comments are addressed in version 11, below is the diff from
version 10
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-11
Some nits fixed in version 12, below is the diff from version 11.
Hi Alex,
That's the intention, this model conforms to the NMDA architecture.
Best regards,
Mach
> -Original Message-
> From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alex Campbell
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 7:12 AM
> To: i2rs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [i2rs] RFC 8431 on
34 matches
Mail list logo