On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:56:15 +0100, John Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From the horses mouth:
Mid to end of Jan.
John
From: Edward E. Jaffe
Based on the amount of information available from IBM's web site, I
suspect STP is not yet ready for prime time.
Well they'd better get their
Howard,
I've been reading these comments all along. If I try to
read the tea leaves, something I don't do too often, I'd
surmise that maybe you have some sort of ill will regarding
your old employer, and that this is a contorted method to
kind of stick-it-to-them by warding off prospective
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:40:34 -0600, Patrick Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi List - I searched the archives and did a lot of reading about the
IEA061E message, but I would like a clarification from the people who know.
In the explanation of IEF352I is the following:
Note: If started tasks or
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/15/2005
at 08:05 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MC expands on this. So, I'll echo Johnny Luo's perplexity
concerning this requirement, which the three of us apparently
perceive as frivolous.
Probably more. Have you submitted a requirement on this? If I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 5:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Bigger Libraries (was: Re: Extent SMPPTS Question)
snip
Ah! You expect an IBM product to
Patrick,
Did you read the thread about this a few days ago?
The title is Problem with reserverd address spaces
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:09:28 -0600, Giovanni Cerquone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot for your responses. It seems to me that no too many people is
planning for this change. Anyways, we have to wait.
We have an implementation assistance program (a kind of ESP) for STP. For
z9-109
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:56:34 -0500, Rob Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick,
Did you read the thread about this a few days ago?
The title is Problem with reserverd address spaces
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
I didn't see the original question, so I'm replying to a reply. Hopeful
it will help more than hurt. grin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John S. Giltner, Jr.
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 9:13 PM
To:
Yes - it would be a bit silly if it did not.
From my interpretation of the parameters, z/OS is trying to make it more
likely that you can start an STC (or mount something) when you are short
of ASVT slots in the hope that this might keep the system up longer.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
In a recent note, McKown, John said:
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:55:47 -0600
I agree that updating BPAM to fully support a UNIX subdirectory in
read/write mode would be the best thing since sliced bread. However, not
being privy to the internals of BPAM, I cannot comment on how
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:41:22 -0600, Patrick Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I downloaded Mr. Zelden's ASIDLIST rexx exec and here is the output:
ASID USAGE FROM THE ASVT
MAXUSER from IEASYSxx: 750
In use ASIDs: 238
Available ASIDs: 512
RSVSTRT from
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:58:12 +1000, Shane Ginnane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wonder no more. May have nothing to do with the code running (currently) in
the partition.
The days of LSQA shortage are by no means behind us.
Not too long back we had intermittent failures all over the shop -
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:12:22 -0600, Jeffrey Deaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two encryption questions:
I'm playing with an IDCAMs encipher job as part of my getting familiar with
encryption on the mainframe. I've found nothing, however, that will tell
me if its actually using the coprocessor to
Hi
I execute the program of CBTAPE VSAMPGM and i received the return code
below:
Can anybody help me ?
Thanks
Jorge Arueira Campos
Support Z/os
55-11-3685-6991
CAIXA ECONOMICA FEDERAL
São Paulo - Brazil
J E S 2 J O B L O G -- S Y S T E M S S P 1 -- N O
D E S U P S
I actually had a day off yesterday, so I didn't get to this until
today.
Don't panic. When you run out of RSVNONR you will use the ASVT slots
available from MAXUSER (which you have plenty of). You should
increase RSVNONR if you routinely use them up in-between scheduled
IPLs. If you are
I think that it is still true
that a JES2 logical initiator is not bound
to a specific initiator
started task (ASID). So, a CICS initiator
(ASID) could have had some
batch jobs run in it before running the CICS
job.
Initiators are now bound and have been since
at least 2.10, if not earlier.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:30:36 -0600, Patrick Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks Mark! I appreciate the reply! Yes, it was somewhat worrisome
having only 2 left and scheduling an emergency IPL.
And yes, I errored in the subject line of 62 instead of 61. Sorry about
that.
Also thank you for
IMHO you should get rid of IDCAMS REPRO ENCIPHER. This is obsolete,
IBM stopped to support it. Even on 2064 with CCF it required
COMPAT(YES), while suggested option is COMPAT(NO). This parameter
provides compatibility with quite ancient tihings like PCF (pre-ICSF,
pre-OS/390).
I disagree.
McKown, John wrote:
IMS does NOT run on any Linux. It does run on z/OS, I am not
sure if it can run on z/VM or z/VSE.
IMS runs only on z/OS. Not on z/VM or z/VSE or any other operating
system. So any IMS application must run on z/OS. It cannot run on
anything else.
Most IMS/DB programs
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:17:54 -0200, Jorge Arueira Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
I execute the program of CBTAPE VSAMPGM and i received the return code
below:
Can anybody help me ?
Thanks
Jorge Arueira Campos
Support Z/os
55-11-3685-6991
CAIXA ECONOMICA FEDERAL
São Paulo - Brazil
We have an implementation assistance program (a kind of ESP) for STP.
For
z9-109 processors, it is planned to start 1Q06. For z890 and z990
processors, the program was kicked off a month or two ago. If you are
interested in participating, please contact Angelo Corridori
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or
The thing i do in this case is renaming the SMPPTS files in such a way the one
with the most free space became SMPPTS1, next one SMPPTS2 and so on. This will
avoid E37 and unneeded compresses. SMP does not have any trouble with that.
Regards Ron
- Original Message -
From: Howard
Hello Everyone,
I am a new member to the IBM-Main List.Am a mainframes sysprog .
I'm trying to run the REPTPROC job with only phase 1 (out of the three
phases 1,2 and 3)and all other steps included in the job.
The view direct successfully picks up the report from the spool,
initializes the
Hi
I submit the job of $DOC and have a pgm missing(AP1PISPF) not in dataset
CBT469, see below:
J E S 2 J O B L O G -- S Y S T E M S S P 1 -- N O
D E S U P S P
17.27.55 JOB08983 FRIDAY,16 DEC 2005
17.27.55 JOB08983 IRR010I USERID P938906 IS ASSIGNED
The name and email of the author are at the end of the $$DOC member, why
don't you contact him?
Geoffrey McIntyre
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL
From: Mark Zelden
Worry no more. If you have z/OS 1.5 and above ...
I wish.
Just rolled out a 1.4 RSU, the first in 18 months. I *may* get a shot at 1.7
around this time next year.
Maybe ... - the 1.6 rollout I had planned (and approved) got cancelled at
the last minute.
We work with what we
John Eells wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:09:28 -0600, Giovanni Cerquone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot for your responses. It seems to me that no too many people is
planning for this change. Anyways, we have to wait.
We have an implementation assistance program (a kind of ESP) for
Bruce Black wrote:
IMHO you should get rid of IDCAMS REPRO ENCIPHER. This is obsolete,
IBM stopped to support it. Even on 2064 with CCF it required
COMPAT(YES), while suggested option is COMPAT(NO). This parameter
provides compatibility with quite ancient tihings like PCF (pre-ICSF,
Hi
Sorry but the e-mail of goffrey is not OK, and no delivery. Have other
available ?
Thanks
Jorge Arueira Campos
Support Z/os
55-11-3685-6991
CAIXA ECONOMICA FEDERAL - SP - BRAZIL
On 12/16/05, Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The name and email of the author are at the end of the
Hello I hope some of you can help me with this...
We made a commitment to our user and applications teams that there would
be no JCL changes required when we cut over to a new tape infrastructure.
Our thinking was that we would virtualize everything. We are using STK
VSM4's and 9940 backend.
John,
I'm afraid, I don't have a solution to your problem, but here are a few
things to look at:
- Have you run the ICH message you got thru IBMLINK? Have you checked
the manual? This could be a RACF restriction that can be changed by a RACF
option setting (I haven't used RACF in a long time,
Actually, the 42-volume limit is a set limit within RACF for TVTOC's.
Instead of a limit of 255 (as is the limit for the number of volumes a
dataset can be cataloged upon) or a limit of (the number of volumes a
dataset can span across without being cataloged); RACF created a limit of
as400 wrote:
Thanks for the replies..I appreciate it..I know that SUSE Linux runs
only on the Z/VM, but can it also run on the Transactional Processing
servers?
In other words, can I run SUSE Linux on a Mainframe server that does
all the banking accounts, Credit Card transactions, billing, and
On Dec 16, 2005, at 7:55 AM, McKown, John wrote:
-
SNIP-
I agree that updating BPAM to fully support a UNIX subdirectory in
read/write mode would be the best thing since sliced bread.
However, not
being privy to
Thiru,
Probably you've already had the answer to this since there are people
attending to this thread who know much more about it than I do but I must
have missed the post. I found this note in my private to do list which
means I might be able to help failing other help.
I think the answer is in
36 matches
Mail list logo
