Hi List,
thanks for the discussion.
To my information, if I connect to WLM as subsystem DB2 from my
application, why should it not be possible to run enclave SRBs in zIIP.
So IBM does not allow to use purchased processors and keeps on changing
microcode that I am not able to use some clever
snip
If that were possible I would have continued to investigate if SRBs
could be used in IMS transactions. Some of our IMS transactions do a
lot of scanning of in memory tables, which requires a lot of CPU. Since
this pieces of code just do memory work, I thought that were candidates
for
Denis, I am technician, not marketing, so I don't use right words etc,
but...
All these specialty engines are introduced to save you money. How much, it
depends. If it is good for your particular workload - it depends.
If you pay workload based charges and you start to use zAAP, you can see
I received the following error message. Can someone please tell me what I
should do. Also, I looked at the vendor's website but I couldn't find the
books that would shed some light for this problem.
Wed Apr 5 09:39:59 2006: generic device 3590-1, esoteric 3590-1.
We are considering upgrading our DASD to IBM's DS6000. Our current
environment is ESCON-attached RAMAC3. Proposed is the DS6000 and an
upgrade to FICON. (Host system is a z900)
Everything I've seen points to significantly better performance, higher
reliability and improved management.
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:50 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
The bottom line, as we all know, is that IBM wants to keep the margins up on
engines running traditional workloads, while competing with cheaper iron for
work that they perceive might otherwise be in danger of migrating there.
Basically
Ned Hedrick wrote:
We are considering upgrading our DASD to IBM's DS6000. Our current
environment is ESCON-attached RAMAC3. Proposed is the DS6000 and an
upgrade to FICON. (Host system is a z900)
Everything I've seen points to significantly better performance, higher
reliability and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen postings that indicate JOBCAT and STEPCAT are being
deprecated by IBM. While researching something else, I came across
something in the DFSMS:Managing Catalogs book for 1.4 that they cause a
performance hit.
Can anyone validate if or when JOBCAT and STEPCAT
Ned,
We migrated from HDS to DS6800 last year.
1. FDRPAS - great product easy to use.
2. Get the Slideout PC monitor. Elso you will need a table next to it for
the monitor.
3. Get the VPN connection for alerts, failed drives, etc...IBM will mail a
new DDM (drive) and you installed it.
4.
Hello
Can anybody tell me what this means? and would it cause
WLM NOT TO FUNCTION PROPERLY ?
IWM041I WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT ADDRESS SPACE MODIFY COMMAND AVAILABLE
IWM049I STRUCTURE(SYSZWLM_WORKUNIT), CONNECT FAILED, RC = 0C RSN =
02010C29
Your attempting to connect to a coupling facility structure and either
you don't have one or the structures aren't defined. I get these at IPL
time because I don't have a CF.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Philip Miscione
You only need the structure if you want to use WLM's Multisystem Enclave
Support.
See z/OS V1R6.0 MVS Planning: Workload Management: Chanpter 3.4
Document Number: SA22-7602
Kees.
Dean Montevago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]...
Your attempting to connect to a
Down from here to..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 7:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Shopzseries
Has anyone had problems with Shopzseries today. I've just tried to
connect
I just tried and I also failed with the same error message.
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 10:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
I have not had that problem, but I ordered some PTF's this morning to
resolve some ERROR SYSMOD maint, and had orders rejected because
CO-rec's for maintenance ordered were not found. I just excluded the
offending PTF for now.
First time I've had that problem though.
Dave
New version of the RMF Spreadsheet Reporter appears to be available.
Have fun!
RMF Spreadsheet Reporter Version 5 for Windows 2000/XP and ME
Abstract: The RMF Spreadsheet Reporter serves as a front-end to the RMF
postprocessor on your z/OS system. With its graphics capabilities, RMF
We are z/os and z/os.e 1.4 in a basic sysplex (MAS but no CF).
I am trying to do some routine reclassifications of online STC address
spaces. I made changes to three address spaces using the TN qualifier
type. One was added, one was changed, and one was deleted. I am making
the changes on LPAR
Sounds like a job for the SPLICE operator.
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to find an efficient way to get a
complement of to datasets. As result I expect
the records that appear in FILEA but not in
FILEB.
Example dataset:
FILEA:
record a
record b
record c
record d
record
We are implementing z/OS 1.7 and saw in writing that they are no longer
supported = confirming what John mentioned.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 7:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Are you using TNG's? (or other kinds of groups) Maybe you're getting a
hit there before you get to the TN's?
__
Dave Thorn * Senior Technology Analyst * SunGard Computer Services * 600
Laurel Oak
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 10:38:55 -0500, Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We are z/os and z/os.e 1.4 in a basic sysplex (MAS but no CF).
I am trying to do some routine reclassifications of online STC address
spaces. I made changes to three address spaces using the TN qualifier
type. One was
It should also be noted that the zap approach changes the address space
limits for all address spaces on the system, not just a select few. The
new program interface enables the change to a single (ostensibly high ENQ
using) address space.
Consider DB2, which wants to open up tens (if not
It's also pretty easy to do using ISPF services and skeletons.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] JCL-Generating Software Package
Dennis,
take a look at OpenTech's software offerings.
http://www.opentechsystems.com/
IIRC, they have a software package that controls your DASD backups, including
the JCL-generation for backups as well as restores. They also have software
geared towards D/R backup and restore.
Regards,
Ulrich
Hello all,
I was wondering if one of you could help me out. I'm trying to do BLP
processing from within my program, and I keep getting an:
IEC150I 913-18,IGC0002B abend.
I'm modifying the jfcb and the error indicates that I can't do that
unless I am BLP authorized. I have checked that the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: S913 Abend
Hello all,
I was wondering if one of you could help me out. I'm trying to do BLP
Ward, Mike S wrote:
Hello all,
I was wondering if one of you could help me out. I'm trying to do BLP
processing from within my program, and I keep getting an:
IEC150I 913-18,IGC0002B abend.
I'm modifying the jfcb and the error indicates that I can't do that
unless I am BLP authorized. I
Is there any way that I can identify if any volumes in the 2105 were created as
3390-9's.
Such as MVS console commands , HCD lookup or actually getting into the 2105?
BTW does any one out there who is operating with an MP3000-7060 know if I
could connect with a DS8000-2107.
There were no ICH messages. I also did a display of the tapevol class
under racf. It didn't find anything there.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
There were no ICH messages. I also did a display of the tapevol class
under racf. It didn't find anything there.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
for each address, issue DS P,devn
output type=example
IEE459I 13.31.55 DEVSERV PATHS 602
UNIT DTYPE M CNT VOLSER CHPID=PATH STATUS
RTYPE SSID CFW TC DFW PIN DC-STATE CCA DDC ALT CU-TYPE
2000,33903 ,A,000,I12CAT,0F=+ 10=+ 36=+ 37=+ 38=+ 39=+
21050100 Y YY. YY.N
DS QD, ( being the unit address) results in
IEE459I 11.34.41 DEVSERV QDASD 522
UNIT VOLSER SCUTYPE DEVTYPE CYL SSID SCU-SERIAL DEV-SERIAL EF-CHK
2819 SYSRS1 2105800 2105000 10017 2800 0113-25717 0113-25717 **OK**
1 DEVICE(S) MET THE
In a message dated 4/6/2006 1:30:01 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Such as MVS console commands , HCD lookup or actually getting into the 2105?
===ds qd,start_ucb,for__volumes,validate
Or if you have PDS85/PDSMAN vols * and sort on trks/cyls
If you do not wish to assist another person, you can save everyone time
and effort by not sending your negative response out.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 7:00 PM
To:
S913-18 - task is not authorized. Either RACF or TOP-Secret (or some other
security manager) is disallowing your task from its appointed duties...
John Hamman
Systems Programmer
BlueCross BlueShield of Mississippi
601.664.4410
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* The information contained in this
CORRECT...ADDED TO USERCAT AND IT WORKED.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2: Restoring OFFLOAD tape from DR.
In a message dated
On 4/6/2006 2:17 PM, Ward, Mike S wrote:
I was wondering if one of you could help me out. I'm trying to do BLP
processing from within my program, and I keep getting an:
IEC150I 913-18,IGC0002B abend.
I'm modifying the jfcb and the error indicates that I can't do that
unless I am BLP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to find an efficient way to get a
complement of to datasets. As result I expect
the records that appear in FILEA but not in
FILEB.
Example dataset:
FILEA:
record a
record b
record c
record d
record e
FILEA:
record a
record b
record x
record y
In a message dated 4/6/2006 2:08:46 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CORRECT...ADDED TO USERCAT AND IT WORKED.
Yipee! From times past, always made mine sys1.jes2.offloadn so if
I've got MCAT at least I can motor until other things are restored.
Why is one of these needed? We have FDR/ABR... if we wanted to do this for
some reason, why wouldn't we just generate a file with SELECT
CATDSN=dataset.name and process that file later?
Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
(850) 414-4209
Dennis, if you are an FDRABR customer, you can generate backup JCL and
control statements with FDREPORT. There are some examples in the
manual, and you are welcome to call if you need more help.
If you are not using FDRABR, Softek has a product called Sunrise (I
think). I don't know much
In a recent note, Hall, Ken (GTI) said:
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:59:41 -0400
It's also pretty easy to do using ISPF services and skeletons.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Thursday, April
Does anyone know how I would identify a 3390-9 in the HCD/IOGEN ?
I real life we do have some 3390-9's defined and in use but I can't identify
them using the HCD.
Thanks
-
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.
You don't specify whether it is a MOD-9 in the IOGEN.
-Original Message-
Does anyone know how I would identify a 3390-9 in the HCD/IOGEN ?
Disclaimer: This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of
the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, you
If you do not wish to assist another person, you can save everyone time
and effort by not sending your negative response out.
People should do their homework before asking IBM-Main.
I have no problem with helping people, but not if they aren't willing to help
themselves.
We are here to help,
Howard,
Unless you specify the device model as a comment in the HCD panel(s)
when you define your 3390s, there is no way that I know of to
distinguish the model type within the HCD. The HCD only specifies
generic device type information - i.e. 3390 (all models), 3390A and
3390B (for Base and
AFAIK, there is no real concept of a 3390-9 in a Shark. The term is used
only in a context of the number of cylinders to assign to the emulated
device. So the technical answer is 'no'.
The only attributes in this context are geometry (3380/3390), PAV (base
or alias), and number of cylinders.
Thanks Ray, thanks all.
Raymond Noal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howard,
Unless you specify the device model as a comment in the HCD panel(s)
when you define your 3390s, there is no way that I know of to
distinguish the model type within the HCD. The HCD only specifies
generic device type
Thanks for the tip. I placed it in an APF library and marked it AC=1 and
all is well.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: S913
Bingo! We have a winna. The RESET ..,RESUME produced the desired
results.
Thanks, Mark!!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WLM
The DADSM program on CBT file 527 will give you a list of all volumes and
the number of cylinders capacity, allocated, and free.
There is no way to tell the volume size through HCD. And the DS command is
a best estimate. Even -27s report at -9s.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:36:59 -0500, Hal Merritt
Big Iron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/06/2006 09:02:43 AM:
Sounds like a job for the SPLICE operator.
Actually, SELECT is better in this case (see my previous post).
But SPLICE can be used for more complex types of matching (and joining).
Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Team (IBM)
Specialties: ICETOOL,
Mike,
AFAIK - JES2 suppresses the ICH messages. You need to issue a JES2 command to
allow the messages to be seen. Not sure what level of JES2 you are at, but
this command should work with all levels:
$TDEBUG,SECURITY=YES
Then run your process again. You should see the ICH messages that
In SHOWzOS V710 I add support for so called 3390-27 and 3390-54 about 16 months
ago.
All of those display is based on the number of cyl. Haven't seen any other
indicator
Roland
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Stitt
We ran into a program that was compiled and executed in a COBOL2
environment successfully. When we re-compiled and executed the program
with Enterprise COBOL, it returned a S0C4 abend (rc4). The load module is
a combination of COBOL and assembler code. Anyone know if this is a COBOL
issue or LE?
All of those display is based on the number of cyl. Haven't seen any other
indicator
The information is available through QUERY DEVICE STATISTICS, but that just
tells you the number of cylinders, tracks per cylinder, and bytes per track.
This will allow you to query the size of any cusromised
Anyone know if this is a COBOL issue or LE?
A dump, error messages, register diagnostics, compiler,
or link edit (binder) error messages would help.
A S0C4 is a memory exception.
There are many reasons for one.
I'm not trying to obfuscate, but saying it's a S0C4, is like saying it's hot!
What a
This is not really an answer. I'm only a semi-COBOL-versions-expert, but I
suspect there's not enough information here for anyone to give you a good
answer. At the very least, you could post the mini-dump that prints out
with the JES messages (PSW, registers, data at address in PSW).
A wild guess
COBOL by itself doesn't usually s0C4 - COBOL in combination with ASM is
different.
Things to check
1. dynamic vs static call
2. ASM module marked as RENT or REUS
3, ASM truly coded as RENT or REUS
4. structure of the parm list passed to ASM
--
Mike
COBOL by itself doesn't usually s0C4 - COBOL in combination with ASM is
different.
I don't remember the OP saying a thing regarding assembler.
These off-hand comments really confuse the issue!
-
-teD
O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi i have a performance issue because of a VSAM file. There are
mutliple jobs running parallely try to access(i.e. Update) the same
VSAM file.I have used the option MOD, because of which an exclusive
lock it taken by each job. This causes a long time for all the job to
Does ANYBODY out there know how to locate through control blocks or whatever
how to find out what the JES3 initialization deck is meaning the fully
qualified PDS. Thanx
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Apr 6, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Warner Mach wrote:
Dear List:
.
We have a vendor program that produces various records at a fixed
blksize. It is necessary
to reformat these blocks into smaller recsize/blksize. We do this
with a
long set of
IEBGENER jobs.
Victor,
After doing more diagnostic checking with the client directly, it turns out
the problem is that they have the IEC507D in their MPFLST as suppressed.
Obviously, the WTOR is not suppressed (you can't suppress a WTOR with the
MPFLSTxx); however the initial IEC507D message (the one that
As others have pointed out, you really haven't provided NEARLY enough
information for us to help, but given what you have provided, I would
suggest:
1) Check your original (VS COBOL II) vs new (Enterprise COBOL) compiler
options. Particularly:
- RES/NORES (Enterprise COBOL only supports RES
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:30:34 -0400, Warner Mach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear List:
.
We have a vendor program that produces various records at a fixed
blksize. It is necessary
to reformat these blocks into smaller recsize/blksize. We do this with a
long set of
IEBGENER jobs.
.
It would appear
-- snip --
Is there any way that I can identify if any volumes in the 2105 were
created as 3390-9's.
Such as MVS console commands , HCD lookup or actually getting into the
2105?
-- snip --
As you've already seen in the other responses, emulated 3390-9 devices are
just 3390-3 with a certain
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:30:34 -0400, Warner Mach wrote:
Dear List:
.
We have a vendor program that produces various records at a fixed
blksize. It is necessary to reformat these blocks into smaller
recsize/blksize. We do this with a long set of IEBGENER jobs.
.
It would appear that 'MVS
From my usually reliable sources (at IBM),
Hi Bill,
The developer for this area has passed on some information that might be
useful
for you. A customer raised a service request recently about this. As a
result of
this there was an APAR PK17576 CICS GOES SOS IN ECDSA WHEN CREATING
LARGE WEB
69 matches
Mail list logo
