There are some subtle to significant differences from real
TSO(tm),
The batch TMP jobs we've been running for decades aren't real TSO?
No of course they're not. For one thing, batch TMPs are not interactive
and they run in a batch service class - usually at lower priority than
TSO. The MVA
At 3:02 PM -0400 on 6/1/07, Craddock, Chris wrote about Re: Friday
musings on the future of 3270 applications:
The thing you are referring to is Mainview Alternate Access. It is still
available and it comes in two flavors. One allows you to run a locally
attached 3270 without either TSO or
Warner Mach wrote:
Mr. Mohan asked:
snip
Now we are planning to install the Linux in one of our LPAR, hence
please
give some valuable ideas where to start with how to go about.
snip
We recently did this, so I sent him, offline, a note about our experiences
We learned a number of things by
At the moment, the only IBMLink ETR support queue for RECEIVE ORDER
problems that I am aware of is 566894901 - the queue for SMP/E. The folks
on the receiving end of this queue currently take problem reports for RECEIVE
ORDER and pass them along to the organization which actually supports the
Is the possible to create a large '.new' and the rename a current to
'.old' and the '.new' to current name?
Why would you need to rename? You can certainly create a new data set and
add it to the concatenation using
SETLOAD PARMLIB, unless you are already at the maximum number of data sets
in the
I also thought I read on here somewhere that data sets in the IPL time
linklist
should never be deleted.
You might have been thinking of PDSEs. It was not possible to delete PDSEs
that were in the IPL-time LNKLST. That restriction has been lifted as of
z/OS 1.8.
How is a move less of a concern
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:19:42 +0200, Frank Allan Rasmussen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are about to use UniCode services for DB2 v8.
We have an active environment:
D UNI,ALL
CUN3000I 14.15.24 UNI DISPLAY 309
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:20:55 -0400, Warner Mach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For folks who want to 'fly under the radar' and install Linux in
an LPAR in order to experiment, there is not much straightforward
information. The Redbooks and the SHARE sessions are orientated
toward sites with VM and
I got the phrase Unicode on Demand from APAR OA14231. I haven't seen it
elsewhere, though it should be - it's quite apt.
Brian
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 08:03:31 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
(snip)
I think Brian referred to this as Unicode on
Demand (although I don't know if he was
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 16:43:57 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But John McKown has corrected us. The STRU R command makes it possible
to perform the operation half the time. I modified my failing JCL test
posted previously so the FTP settings and commands are:
binary
STRU
It looks like SAS on the PC may have been able to transfer the VS dataset
back in the days when the z/OS FTP server was the PASCAL based server.
http://www.caspur.it/risorse/softappl/doc/sas_docs/lgref/z0178980.htm
My pc based GUI client can not handle it. Still looking for other PC based FTP
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 21:33:34 -0500, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I think I have mentioned this before. Maybe its time to bring this to
the SHARE *BOARD* and let them tangle with IBM on this.
Isn't that what SHARE is for? (or any other user group for that
matter?) When an *IMPORTANT* item
While the SHARE *BOARD* has not to my knowlege raised this with IBM,
several volunteers within the SHARE MVS Program have, on behalf of the
SHARE membership. And, I believe we've been at least moderately effective in
raising awareness of the issues with ServiceLink availability with the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/01/2007
at 08:09 AM, (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
LOAD, you know, ADDRESS?? [1]
Like, the address
Isn't that ValleySpeak rather than generic American pop culture? I
bel;ieve that for true American culture you need to remove the like
and
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/01/2007
at 12:15 PM, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IIRC, the actual count of print hammers on the 1403-N1 was 132.
Perhaps I was thinking of the 1443. One of them definitely supported
144 columns.
I'm not aware of any IBM printer for which the limit was
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/01/2007
at 10:45 AM, Tim Hare [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've received a lot of help from this list, definitely, but when I
first signed up it was more along the lines of systems
programmer-related technical items, now it seems there are a lot
more questions that
On Jun 3, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
-SNIP-
Ed,
I think I finally understand what you've been saying about SHARE for
years. (Understand. Not necessarily agree.) My knee-jerk
reaction to
your comment was That's not what SHARE is for - no more than
On Jun 3, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Brian Peterson wrote:
While the SHARE *BOARD* has not to my knowlege raised this with IBM,
several volunteers within the SHARE MVS Program have, on behalf
of the
SHARE membership. And, I believe we've been at least moderately
effective in
raising awareness of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/01/2007
at 12:19 PM, Thompson, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In the non-mainframe world (particularly *nix), there are groups,
similar to this, that you ask questions of to figure out how things
are done or should be done.
In some news groups and other fora,
Hi,
I have been part of the discussion that Brian mentioned and in my
opinion IBM is taking the issue of Availability and Functional
Requirements for IBMLink seriously. They have acknowledged gaps and
moved to address them.
The MVS Program communicated clearly to IBM that Availability is the
On Jun 3, 2007, at 8:34 PM, Knutson, Sam wrote:
Hi,
I have been part of the discussion that Brian mentioned and in my
opinion IBM is taking the issue of Availability and Functional
Requirements for IBMLink seriously. They have acknowledged gaps and
moved to address them.
The MVS Program
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/01/2007
at 04:41 PM, Don Leahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I use WSA all the time, but I never use the GUIexcept as a Friday
afternoon party trick to show my colleagues how ugly it is. :-)
De gustibus non disputandem est. If IBM supported block copy/cut/paste
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/02/2007
at 12:54 PM, Clem Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It is possible to write code that runs on both the mainframe and a
PC.
Sure, in a language for which there are translators targeted to both
platform. That's not the same as running code that was not designed
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 02:42:08 -0400, Craddock, Chris wrote:
You could classify the STCs into the same service classes as TSO
Not a good idea. TSO should be defined with response time goals on the
order of seconds (or fractions thereof) . That would be a very bad idea for
a started
But what about TSO?
TSO has always been able to run with line-mode terminals. I don't know
whether there is an equivalent to NTO on a platform still in production,
but you can still use Telnet for an LU1 session.
-
TSO line-mode, as a primary LU, requires to work with a secondary LU where
Hi,
Thank you for the help.
I do not have a share UID, could you please send me that offline.
Thanks
Mohan
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:46:02 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:20:55 -0400, Warner Mach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For folks who want to 'fly under
Hi Kenneth,
I'm sorry, I meant the presentation Linux in an LPAR - Here's How It's Done.
to be sent offline.
Thanks
Mohan
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:46:02 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:20:55 -0400, Warner Mach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For folks who want
27 matches
Mail list logo
