Hello: I have a need to determine if an address in storage is page protected
in order to determine if a PGSER UNPROTECT needs to be done.
The best I have tried and seen in earlier posts is to look for a CC=1 on a
TPROT backed up with an ESTAE.
Are there any other methods to do this?
Thank you.
This thread still begs the issue of benchmarking a representative
business application across multilple platforms.
It may beg the issue, but the answer isn't (solely, or even much) a
benchmark. Running a single payroll application (for example) doesn't cut
it either. These systems are built to
Hi,
Stirring the pot some more
Maybe if you used the CALL...RETURNING syntax :
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/igy3pg32/4.2.4.3?SHELF=DT=20061117131343
?
Or, write your COBOL function as OO COBOL function. Then, you have a
whole object to give and take than
Mark,
Try IP VERBX LEDATA 'CEEDUMP'. This will give you the same info as a
CEEDUMP, including call linkage . If your main module is not LE complient you
may need to add TCB(tcbaddr), or CAA() or DSA() , to give it a clue where to
start. LEDATA is a very powerfull command with lots of
I have posted this on the COBOL.LANG newsgroup, but thought I would as here
as well.
I ran into a problem where a programmer stated that the PERFORM THRU EXIT
was not functioning for one of many. I felt it was a missing IF END-IF
combo. Other than doing an exclude all and the manually paring up
Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
J R wrote:
Yes, ABSTR is limited to 64KiB-1.
ITYM 64Ki-1.
You may think that, but he doesn't. K and Ki are prefixes, meaningless
without a unit to modify. Kilo is the rare exception in Europe, where
it's used as an abbreviation of Kilogram as a unit of mass and
Paul,
You are in the right way. I think this is the same technique used in NUCLEUS
by CSECT IEAVEVAL but with a FRR instead.
Regards,
Philippe Leite
z/OS Systems Programmer
Portugal
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:32:43 -0500, Paul Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello: I have a need to determine
Nagesh wrote:
Hi Mark,
Try these IBM Redbooks :
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247318.html?Open
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/sg247434.html?Open
Regards,
Nags.
Those books are for the IBM Encryption Facility not for base ICSF but
thanks anyway.
--
Mark Jacobs
Minor chide: It is too bad that folks take their valuable time on ibm-main
to point out deficiencies in the documentation (pointing out is a good
thing) but then do not submit requests to get them updated. The reason we
in IBM follow and participate in ibm-main is not for the purpose of seeing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe
Discussion List)
In a message dated 7/23/2007 2:31:04 P.M. Central Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
H. ISTR that IBM has a DFSMS lab in sunny Tucson,
Arizona..
Don't know
Chapter 10 of the pops manual. IVSK instruction will tell you the key,
access control bits, and fetch protection bit of a page.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:32 AM
Timothy,
Internal customers do not ask your question, How do you measure the total
performance of the whole IT organization?
They are really only interested in the total cost of acquistion or internal
chargeback (excluding power and environmentals) and application performance.
Hi Lizette,
I haven't tried thisbut, it might do the trick.
Open the COBOL source in edit mode and type HI on the command line and
hit Enter. You will see the below. Select 5 for COBOL and select option
3 for Coloring.
File Languages Colors Help
Is there any way to secure certain clist from unauthorized use?
For example if I don't want applications to get into the wlm,
Application, how would I do it? If it can be done.
Thanks In Advance.
Bill Carroll
EMAIL DISCLAIMER:
The information contained in this message may be
privileged or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carroll, William
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Secure clist
Is there any way to secure certain clist from unauthorized use?
For example if I
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:44:28 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carroll, William
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Secure clist
Is there
I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a PDS into a
flat file (for modifications) and then back into a PDS. Having the
original ISPF stats present in the final PDS is not necessarily a critical
part of the process for us --- nice, but not absolutely necessary.
I have an REXX
z/OS 1.7
We are trying to map a RMM managed cart using DITTO
//*
//*
//S3 EXEC PGM=DITTOA,PARM='JOBSTREAM',COND=(0,NE)
//SYSPRINT DD
David,
Actually, ISVK cannot tell you if a page is protected or not, it only shows you
the storage key and fetch bit. The Page protection bit (bit 54) is in Page
Table Entry and Segment Table Entry.
Best regards,
Philippe Leite
z/OS Systems Programmer
Portugal
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:28:15
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Schuster
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Is a page protected?--how to determine
Hello: I have a need to determine if an address in storage is
I'm not sure how you would secure a specific CLIST and a couple of
people have responded with suggestions. However, if it is access to WLM
you want to secure you can do that in RACF via the use of the facility
class MVSADMIN.WLM.POLICY. With this you can block access entirely or
give someone
I guess I read what I wanted to read, and not what the original question
was. Try to take more time in the future before replying. Paul, hope I
didn't send you on a wild goose chase.
--Dave Day
- Original Message -
From: Philippe Leite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups:
If you look at the posting, it was for a level II person, not a
developer.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi, All,
IBMLink on the web is unusually slow this morning (even by IBMLink on
the Web standard!), so I'd like to solicit a bit of help from one of
you with a 3270 IBMLink connection: I'm looking for the FMID for MQ
Series 5.3.1, compid 5655F1000. I am waiting for the Product Cross
Reference
William,
1 - You state that internal customers are only concerned with chargeback
and application performance, yet if that was the case, why are the
putting up with web apps with 10-12 second response time and the
requirement that they move their hands from the keyboard to the mouse
and back
Hi again,
I'm trying to write a TSO command processor which seems to be getting
addressability issues over 4095 bytes, e.g ASMA034E message.
I know there's a way of extending the addressability, but can't
remember.
Anyone know how to do it?
Ps. The IBM message for ASMA034E is of no use at
HMS5310
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLink Challenge
Hi, All,
IBMLink on the web is
Careful reading of the 2105 Command Reference doc shows that valid sector
numbers are not documented as being ignored. I take that to mean they are
used
as documented; i.e., the next action on the track will commence with track
orientation at a predictable position on the track. If the
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:35:43 -0500, Kelman, Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure how you would secure a specific CLIST and a couple of
people have responded with suggestions. However, if it is access to WLM
you want to secure you can do that in RACF via the use of the facility
class
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Kingston
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: How to extend addressability over 4095 with USING statements
Hi again,
I'm trying to write a TSO
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
Hi, All,
IBMLink on the web is unusually slow this morning (even by
IBMLink on the Web standard!), so I'd like to solicit a bit
of help from one of you with a 3270 IBMLink connection: I'm
looking
Micro Focus COBOL provides a mechanism for selectively compiling part of
the COBOL source. (controlled by $IF, $ELSE, $END)
IBM Enterprise COBOL for z/OS 3.3 do not support conditional compile. I
think about to write a REXX to do this.
Any other ideas ?
Albert
VERLAGSGRUPPE WELTBILD GMBH
Phil,
There are a number of ways.
1 - Add a second base register, for example if R12 is your base
register,
LR R11,R12
AHIR11,4096
USING label,R12,R11
2 - Constantly reload your base register (this is the method used by
many compilers) of course if you do this, then
In a message dated 7/24/2007 1:33:11 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a need to determine if an address in storage is page protected
in order to determine if a PGSER UNPROTECT needs to be done.
One way, not necessarily the most elegant, is to establish an
Is this the entire JCL? If so, you need a //SYSIN DD statement and
according to my documentation, you also need $$DITTO instead of DITTO as
the command within the //SYSIN.
Of course, my documentation is quite old, but that's what it looks like
to me.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Cheers Wayne,
Extremely helpful, thanks a lot :-)
Maybe IBM could update the Message to be a bit more obvious as to what
to do when you get the ASMA034E message.
Phil.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Earnie Allen
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: PDS to SEQ and back to PDS
I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a
PDS into a
Earnie Allen of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 07/24/2007 08:13:55 AM:
I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a PDS into a
flat file (for modifications) and then back into a PDS. Having the
original ISPF stats present in the final PDS is
(IBM Mainframe Discussion List) wrote:
Careful reading of the 2105 Command Reference doc shows that valid sector
numbers are not documented as being ignored. I take that to mean they are used
as documented; i.e., the next action on the track will commence with track
orientation at a
I just heard about this draft redbook and have just browsed thru it and it
looks like a good start for someone with little to no z/VM skills.
The url is
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/sg247316.html?Open
Abstract
This textbook provides students with the background knowledge and
Depending on what you need to change, couldn't you accomplish the
changes using IPOUPDTE/CPPUPDATE?
-Original Message-
I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a PDS into a
flat file (for modifications) and then back into a PDS. Having the
original ISPF stats present
I am an ICSF administrator, but I am not involved in that part of the
action. There is both a separation of duties angle as well as it seems
that every application does it differently.
I see ICSF as nothing more than an API and a secure key repository. How
you use those keys is up to the
darn, and I was in a meeting, oh well, web ibmlink is having problems, (I know,
I know, shock and surprise) ...sev1 issue # is 32585272
You should use the 3270 interface, it's working just fine.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Andy, Ignoring whether your JCL/DITTO statements are correct .
The IEF343I message is an indication that there are no tape units for
allocation. Looks like you are all system managed libraries and the JL3270 is
not in the TCDB, is either not defined to RMM or is defined in a way that RMM
Maybe IBM could update the Message to be a bit more obvious as to what
to do when you get the ASMA034E message.
I think that you're being a little harsh on IBM.
When you looked up message ASMA034E, it told you to
Increase the range of the active USING.
If you had then looked up the USING
In a message dated 7/24/2007 9:14:11 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The simpliest way that I know of is to use SAS and PROC SOURCE. That can
unload a PDS to a sequential file and put IEBUPDTE control cards (or
other control cards) between members. You then edit the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDS to SEQ and back to PDS
In a message dated 7/24/2007 9:14:11 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
Hi,
I don't know what manual your looking in? I'm looking in HLASM V1R5
programmers guide. The section on the USING statement doesn't seem to
have a reference to 'Range of an Ordinary USING Instruction'???
Phil.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Anyone know what platform they run the internet version of IBMLINK on?
Robert Justice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: darn, and I was in a meeting, oh
well, web ibmlink is having problems, (I know,
I know, shock and surprise) ...sev1 issue # is 32585272
You should use the 3270 interface, it's
I don't know what manual your looking in? I'm looking in HLASM V1R5
programmers guide. The section on the USING statement doesn't seem to
have a reference to 'Range of an Ordinary USING Instruction'???
For most HLASM information, you can think of the
documentation as a 2-volume set:
SC26-4940
Good Day Gentle Readers,
I am seeking your expert advice. We have a problem with our ML1 migrate
vols. We are unable to migrate to ML1 because of the following reasons:
ARC1001I HOPER.TTOC.LIST1 MIGRATE FAILED, RC=0037, REAS=
ARC1237I NO SPACE FOR MIGRATION COPY
See SYS1.SAMPLIB(ARCSTRST). Find for IEBDG
IEBDG generates a single record that is Loaded into the SDSP in the next
step.
HTH,
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Esmie,
See SYS1.SAMPLIB(ARCSTRST) look for ALLOSDSP.
Better yet see if you have HSM.SAMPLE.CNTL (There is probably a HLQ in front of
that name).
Once you've defined and primed your SDSP, issue an addvol for that volume with
the SDSP parameter.
However the message you received does NOT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is a page protected?--how to determine
In a message dated 7/24/2007 1:33:11 A.M.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Schuster
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Is a page protected?--how to determine
Hello: I have a need to determine if an address in storage is
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:28:52 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
Minor chide: It is too bad that folks take their valuable time on ibm-main
Cf. the Heresy thread.
to point out deficiencies in the documentation (pointing out is a good
thing) but then do not submit requests to get them updated. The reason
In a message dated 7/24/2007 10:56:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
very bad idea in general. if the page is not protected, then you
don't know what other processes are updating that page nor how
they serialize their updates. the OI is not an interlocked update
and
Getting lots of suggestions/ideas. Gonna take me a bit to sort them out.
My situation is that I need to take current production JCLlib(s) and modify
the ACCT info in each not the same change to all jobcards.
So ... turn the current JCLLIB PDS into a flat file ... run a (yet to be
written)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is a page protected?--how to determine
In a message dated 7/24/2007 10:56:09
An edit macro might work just fine as well.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Albert Klimek
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Cobol Conditional Compile
Micro Focus COBOL provides a
There's no obvious way for an unauthorized program to discover that
information.
If you're a supervisor state program you can issue a TPROT with a key of
0. If the condition code is 1 then the page is protected. The
interpretation of the other condition codes is left as an exercise to
the
-snip
Does anyone know for sure which was the last DASD subsystem that cared
about Rotational Positional Sensing (RPS) values?
---unsnip---
IIRC, that would be the 3390 (real, not emulated). To my knowledge, none
of the RAID
Would someone be willing to provide the IBMLINK problem phone number ??
Thanks.
Greg Lang / ATT Inc.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
1-800-543-3912 at least that what is says on my screen.
Greg Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
07/24/2007 09:10 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
[IBM-MAIN]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Greg Lang
Would someone be willing to provide the IBMLINK problem phone
number ??
1-800-543-3912.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:08:43 -0400, Earnie Allen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Getting lots of suggestions/ideas. Gonna take me a bit to sort them out.
My situation is that I need to take current production JCLlib(s) and modify
the ACCT info in each not the same change to all jobcards.
Then
snip-
I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a PDS into a
flat file (for modifications) and then back into a PDS. Having the
original ISPF stats present in the final PDS is not necessarily a
critical part of the process for us ---
In a message dated 7/24/2007 11:16:19 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-snip
Does anyone know for sure which was the last DASD subsystem that cared
about Rotational Positional Sensing (RPS) values?
Phil Kingston wrote:
Hi again,
I'm trying to write a TSO command processor which seems to be getting
addressability issues over 4095 bytes, e.g ASMA034E message.
I know there's a way of extending the addressability, but can't
remember.
Anyone know how to do it?
Ps. The IBM message for
What does that REVIEW command processor do?
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It takes teamwork to make the dream work.
That PDS86 solution looks great ... if only all our production jobs had a
standard ACCT field/info in them already!!! But, alas, that's what this
process is intended to do.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:36:06 -0400, Earnie Allen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That PDS86 solution looks great ... if only all our production jobs had a
standard ACCT field/info in them already!!! But, alas, that's what this
process is intended to do.
As I said... if it is more complicated than a
My situation is that I need to take current production JCLlib(s) and modify
the ACCT info in each not the same change to all jobcards.
IIRC, the PDS command from the CBT can do that.
I seem to remember doing something similar a long time ago.
So, I would copy the JCLLIB, make the
IIRC? I'll have to look that one up.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It takes teamwork to make the dream work.
Does anyone know for sure which was the last DASD subsystem that cared about
Rotational Positional Sensing (RPS) values?
I would guess 3390-SLEDS connected to 3990-6's.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
David,
I looked at the SYS1.SAMPLIB(ARCSTRST) which had the define cluster.
Thanks for pointing it out to me. I had missed that.
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Esmie,
See SYS1.SAMPLIB(ARCSTRST) look for ALLOSDSP.
Better yet see if you have
On 24 Jul 2007 00:50:49 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Or, write your COBOL function as OO COBOL function. Then, you have a
whole object to give and take than just a few native arguments.
I spent a month trying to compile run OO CoBOL on the mainframe
before giving up a couple of
I encountered a similar situation a couple of years ago -- found that our SDSP
datasets were defined (in 1996) with secondary allocation quantity greater
than zero; SDSP dataset(s) had never been re-org'ed, and had reached max
123 extents.
Also found statement that SDSP should have secondary
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:03:16 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
The default was changed to ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) in z/OS 1.9.
Now I've got some work to do.
Hopefully there's a recommendation and procedure to check for this prior to
making the jump ??? Something non-catastrophic that doesn't require
Dave Kopischke wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:03:16 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
The default was changed to ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) in z/OS 1.9.
Now I've got some work to do.
Hopefully there's a recommendation and procedure to check for this prior to
making the jump ??? Something
On 24 Jul 2007 04:40:00 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
a lot of stuff written for mainframe involves business critical
dataprocessing ... which is significantly more effort than
a standard application. our rule-of-thumb has been that to
take a well-tested, well-debugged application
I have CBT471.FILE093 and it contains OFFLOADW and PDSLOADW.
That basically the same?
-unsnip-
Try this:
1. Use the REVIEW command processor from the CBT tape, with the OFFLOAD
subcommand, to create the flat file.
2. Do whatever edit(s) you need to do.
3.
In a message dated 7/24/2007 11:14:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because the fetch and the store are separated in time. Another CPU or an
I/O operation can store into the byte *after* your CPU fetches the byte
but *before* your CPU stores the byte. The other CPU
On 23 Jul 2007 17:05:35 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould)
wrote:
There is an option in SAFARI to imitate IE if you are desperate
enough. I have (I am using SAFARI) run across pages that were coded
*ONLY* to work in IE. Usually I write the name of the company down
and then boycott their
Earnie Allen of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 07/24/2007 12:53:14 PM:
I have CBT471.FILE093 and it contains OFFLOADW and PDSLOADW.
That basically the same?
Yes, the W suffix was added to the source code member to denote wide
record (80 bytes) support. You
Using a sector number of x'00' effectively disabled RPS on devices
that did care.
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Richards.Bob wrote:
Do you know of any DASD subsystem that does not publish RPM information?
I thought not. They still care. grin
But kidding aside, I would suspect the last time it
On 24 Jul 2007 at 05:05, concerning Tools for Validating COBOL
Source, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to IBM-Main:
[snip] a programmer stated that the PERFORM THRU
EXIT was not functioning [snip] I felt it was a missing IF
END-IF combo. [snip]
So, does anyone know of a tool
In a message dated 7/24/2007 1:12:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using a sector number of x'00' effectively disabled RPS on devices that
did care.
Not true. It forces the controller to position the track at index point,
the very beginning of the track. A
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:47:25 -0500, Dave Kopischke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:03:16 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
The default was changed to ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) in z/OS 1.9.
Now I've got some work to do.
Hopefully there's a recommendation and procedure to check for this
I have found copies in-shop of OFFLMOD and REVLMOD (from File134, I would
imagine) and they have fairly recent linkedit dates.
Perhaps these will assist in the project.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail:
Actually x'00' disconnects until position is just before index point so
the following search Id starts with
index point count at 1, maximum scan for the Id will be one revolution
till next time index point is detected.
Using x'FF' will not disconnect and search id starts at current
--snip---
What does that REVIEW command processor do?
---unsnip--
It's basically a PDS browser, started from a command line.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
---snip
I have found copies in-shop of OFFLMOD and REVLMOD (from File134, I would
imagine) and they have fairly recent linkedit dates.
Perhaps these will assist in the project.
-unsnip---
Only if you're processing load
In a message dated 7/24/2007 1:43:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually x'00' disconnects until position is just before index point so
the following search Id starts with
index point count at 1, maximum scan for the Id will be one revolution
till next time
A. I've used that one. Alias 'REV'..
Real handy ... especially for VSAM.
How does it work in conjunction with OFFLMOD/REVLMOD?
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It
Ooops makes sense.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It takes teamwork to make the dream work.
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:04:35 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Minor chide: It is too bad that folks take their valuable time on ibm-
main
Cf. the Heresy thread.
Ah, but that thread allowed us to streach our pedantry muscles,
an invaluable service for system programmers.
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:28:52 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can use do it with a monitor like MXI (very easy using MXI) or use IPCS.
Check the archives.
So I searched the archives... and I couldn't find anything on using IPCS
to do this (cookbook approach). So what would one
Firefox has an add-in called IE Tab which will open a URL with IE as
the rendering engine. It works with Windows Update and other IE-oriented
pages flawlessly.
Cheers,
Steve Samson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Jul 2007 17:05:35 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould)
wrote:
There is an
For the first part,
IP VERBX VSMDATA 'GLOBal SUMMary'
followed by
F '/ 8'
might be easier to deal with.
Bob
Mark Zelden wrote:
...
So I searched the archives... and I couldn't find anything on using IPCS
to do this (cookbook approach). So what would one do if they didn't have
MXI or
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
