Van Dalsen, Herbie wrote:
Lindy,
I agree with all the points you made below, but...
Surely the copy of windows that you are running is fully licensed?
Why expect IBM to give it away for free. Dell gives discounts on
desktops to employees of companies that buy enough Dell servers from
them, but
We were requested to display the JOB MAXCC on the SYSLOG on Job
completion
We customized our IEFACTRT exit for the required changes. We display the
return codes correctly except when a step is FLUSHED because of Condition
Code settings or when the job is FLUSHED e.g. when JCL ERROR occured.
We are having problems trying to implement FICON CTC. Our problem is
understanding what we have to code for the CHPID Path and Control Unit. We have
a
Switched point to point configuration with obe switch label C(. I see were we
have to code the Dynamic Switch value but I do not understand
Has IBM canceled its commitment to the P390 ? Have they developed a
64bit equivalent yet? I know very little about this, but I almost bought
myself one, but I was not a registered developer, so I could not get SW
upgrades. I am sure that is training instances / developers register,
IBM will still
I was reading in IBM TS3500 Tape Library with System Z Attachment: A
practical Guide to TS1120 Tape Drives and TS3500 Tape Automation? page
382 section 13.8.1 that a Batch Job could be used to Eject tapes from the
ATL.
But I could not find an example of the JCL.
I have searched several of the
Angel,
Is your 1.8 part of any Sysplex ? Monoplex ?
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Engenharia de Software - Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
Tel: 55 11 4197-2021 Fax: 55 11 4197-2814
HTMLfont face=Tahoma
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:33:10 -0600, Doc Farmer wrote:
What kills me (figuratively, of course) is when I look at the capacity of
today's
IBM drives. A 3390-3 seems like so much when you're talking tracks and
cyls, but it's really around 2.8 gig. Hades tintinnabulum, I've got over a
TERABYTE of
I love the letter Clement!
Maybe we can end it with: Mr. Palmisano we are asking you today...BREAK
DOWN THIS WALL!!! (Quoting president Reagan - incase somebody had doubt
where that came from)
Corneel Booysen.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
It's monoplex.
2007/12/5, ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Angel,
Is your 1.8 part of any Sysplex ? Monoplex ?
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Engenharia de Software - Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
Doc Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Geez, what am I supposed to do with all those years of feeling
*unofficially*
old?
What kills me (figuratively, of course) is when I look at the capacity
of today's
IBM drives. A 3390-3 seems like so much when you're
Hi Roger, Sam and Doc and other interested people,
I have just learned that Sam is in Oz (for the first time ever). See
http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,22874620-16123,00.html
In the past, I have spoken to a few people in IBM (gosh, I worked there
for 4 years), and, if we are
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:16:46 -, Van Dalsen, Herbie wrote:
In my opinion, what makes IBM code safe in terms Auditing risk, is the
fact that only IBM labs work on it. You need a really P'd-off IBMer to
plant a Trojan in the code, and a few P'd-off testers to miss it during
testing. So I would
http://www.snopes.com/photos/technology/storage.asp
I guess we can all feel really officially OLD.
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Jaco Kruger wrote:
We were requested to display the JOB MAXCC on the SYSLOG on Job
completion
What z/OS level?
We display the return codes correctly except when a step is FLUSHED
because of Condition Code settings or when the job is FLUSHED e.g. when JCL
ERROR occured.
What message(s) do
Art,
Seems there could be a list of ways you could do this .
1. DFSMSrmm - run RMM CV volser EJECT command in batch TMP
2. From rexx, use the console interface to issue the operator LIBRARY EJECT
command
3. Look at the sample (SAMPLIB) CBRSPLCS - it is a ready written program
that processes
Clem,
Nice letter.
I don't know how far this effort will get us in getting access to some
sort of developers license for z/OS and CICS but it is worth the
effort and it will show IBM that the users do care about the survival
of the Mainframe platform.
I do think though that getting the letter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed. Benoit
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 8:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Excel Question
Hello All,
Any Excel List that I can ask these questions?
I have some email
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:32:35 -0600, Rick Fochtman wrote:
Yeah? So when can we expect IBM to recognize its blunder and abandon
its commitment never to provide customers anything better than a 3390?
--unsnip---
Define better. One of the biggest complaints about
Peter,
yep this bit is on for AMODE 64. Danke
Roland
CSVQUERY doesn't return any info for AMODE64. Alternate function/macro?
My fault, I didn't get the doc updated. I will get that underway. The
CSVQUERY macro prolog is correct.
The x'01' bit of the OUTATTR2 keyword is on to indicate AMODE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 7:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM RAMAC now an URBAN Legend:(
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:33:10 -0600, Doc Farmer wrote:
John,
What is a paragraph mark? I will attempt this if I can make the change from
comma to a paragraph mark.
Ed. Benoit
Recovery Knowledge
DB2 Automation Is Our Only Business
562-436-3660
**Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
products.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Van Dalsen, Herbie) writes:
And who came up with XA I/O? Amdahl, in order to do MDF and share
channels had to do floating I/O interrupts, and
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
It appears that VSAM can create a CA split without a CI split, see z/OS DFSMS
Using Data Sets Chapter 9.
See the RedBook De-Mystifying VSAM.
It tells us that splits are not to be feared.
I think you mean VSAM Demystified SG 24-6105. Good book, I read it
entirely few
I have to reorg some USER CATS because they contain the IMBED parm.
You shouldn't have to for z/OS 1.8, nor should you put it on your critical path
for implemementation.
Yes, support for IMBED is going away, but existing datasets don't fail, under
any release of z/OS, yet (unless I've missed an
RMM SV OWNER(*) VOLUME(V*) STATUS(SCRATCH) LIMIT(*)
But it will only list the scratch volumes to V0.
I have volumes defined out to V4.
Stupid mistake on my part. The query works fine. The final tape list I
was reviewing was created downstream in a job which contained additional
sorts to
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:37:52 -0600, David Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TMMODI_ATTR2,MODI_MINOR IS THIS A MINOR ENTRY POINT
BZGTLP0550NO
ICM R4,15,MODI_5_PTRGET PTR TO MODI_5 DSECT
BZGTLP0550NO MINOR ENTRY
USING MODI_5,R4
MVC
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~oscarptyltd/Letter%20to%20Sam%20Palmisano.html
I don't know if this is going to be convincing.
Especially with spelling errors:
1. It's z/OS, not Z/OS.
2. You have spelled student as studnt in one place.
It may seem nit-picky, but spelling errors always reduce the
On 5 Dec 2007 05:32:10 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clement Clarke) wrote:
I've written something fairly quickly, and stood on the
shoulders of others by incorporating their comments. I'll
send it to Sam first thing tomorrow (it is sleep
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 06:45 -0800, willie bunter wrote:
We will be implementing Z/OS 1.8 soon. I have to reorg some USER CATS
Oh, and lest I forget: you may want to disable autotuning, which has had
problems in z/OS 1.8. (Has IBM fixed this yet? I haven't been paying
attention.)
--
David
Jeffrey,
You dont say how you are issuing the command, or whether there are any
error messages or non-zero return codes or reason code.
I would never have assumed you were issuing this from Rexx and asking for
variables back; but Tom did, and he could be correct. TSO PROFILE VARSTOR
(HIGH)
On 5 Dec 2007 05:33:20 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doc Farmer)
wrote:
Geez, what am I supposed to do with all those years of feeling *unofficially*
old?
What kills me (figuratively, of course) is when I look at the capacity of
today's
IBM drives. A 3390-3 seems like so much when you're talking
Not really. Last week in one of the Hercules groups someone mentioned his
friend developing a personal finance application on z/OS using CICS and DB2. I
could not help asking if the person in question is Sam's son-in-law. On which
the original poster replied in negative but indicated that the
--snip---
We were requested to display the JOB MAXCC on the SYSLOG on Job
completion
We customized our IEFACTRT exit for the required changes. We display the
return codes correctly except when a step is FLUSHED because of Condition
Code settings
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 06:45 -0800, willie bunter wrote:
My question is should I need to code the CISIZE parm (CISIZE 28672
which is being used in the current USER CAT) or is the system default
of 4096 sufficient?
At the Tampa SHARE, Eileen McClintock gave a Tuning Techniques for
Catalogs
---snip--
I have heard this. I have heard likewise that IBM performed a sweep
of their facilities and all employees found running z/OS on Hercules
illegally were provided copies of Flex. Alll unsubstantiatable rumors.
I would think in the current
Our Z/OS Level is 1.8
Following is the output in the SYSLOG
IEF404I DSYSPJKA - ENDED - TIME=16.27.19
-DSYSPJKA ENDED. NAME-TEST TOTAL TCB CPU TIME=
.00 TOTAL ELAPSED TIME=.0 MAXCC=0
$HASP395 DSYSPJKA ENDED
Ed Gould wrote:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/technology/storage.asp
I guess we can all feel really officially OLD.
I remember standing on Madison Avenue and watching the arm go up
and down. Seems like a different world, almost.
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
Could be worse.
He could have chosen to sell sprouts instead of waffles, y'know...
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:17:44 -0500, Ed Philbrook
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dinges is Belgian(?) for the waffle toppings. He is Belgian.
EdP
OK, I'll put some logic in the MIPR to look for an entry I know to be an
alias, then force a dump. I'll let you know what I find. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, December 05,
Ed,
What are you trying to do in EXCEL that WORD will not do? I usually use the
WORD MAIL MERGE feature to create address lists.
You can mail merge EXCEL data into a WORD document to create Letters, mailers,
directories, etc.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Ed. Benoit [EMAIL
It doesn't on my system. Bit is not set in the MODI data area returned.
That is extremely unlikely, close to impossible. You likely have some other
coding error.
The information about it is an alias AKA minor is copied directly from
the CDE (for active LPA) or LPDE (for PLPA). It is not
Thanks to everyone the problem is fixed.
The replace with a ^p (caret p). is what I used but I thank everyone for the
help.
Ed.
**Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop000301)
Gene Hudders wrote:
[...]
I sure would hate to take too many CA splits in an on-line environment
especially if the CA split requires another extent for either the
data and/or index component.
That's why I wrote not so bad. g
Indeed CA split is painful (CI also, but the pain is CI/CA times
I agree with you and remember the conversations. I was just putting the
earlier thread into context.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of daver++
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
August,
Sorry, I didn't catch the exact location.
EdP
August Carideo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
12/05/2007 12:03 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re:
Steve,
It was a hot topic here not too long ago. An ex-IBMer gave up his
well paying job to sell Belgian waffles on the street in NYC. Maybe it was
only on the CICS-L.
EdP
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Is there a way to do this with copy and paste that I do not know?
PASTE SPECIAL -- UNFORMATTED TEXT
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
What do you think of the idea to make it a signature driven petition
rather than a letter from a single person?
Ian
http://www.pcs305.com
On 12/5/07, Doc Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me try to clean up the format a bit and correct a few of the structural
items...
-Original
Let me try to clean up the format a bit and correct a few of the structural
items...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ian
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:54
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its
Radoslaw,
Try F OMVS,SHUTDOWN instead. It works for me...
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?
McKown, John wrote:
In the deep, dark, past, I remember that we used the VARY command to
change the status of things such as storage, CPs, and channels. Now,
some things such as DEVICES are manipulated via the VARY command whereas
others, such as the CHPs, are manipulated via the CONFIG command.
John,
Somehow I have it stuck in my mind that the VARY command just works at
the OS level, varying devices online or offline to z/OS but nothing
else. Using the CONFIG command actually changed the configuration in
the I/O subsystem or other areas that are closer to the hardware. I'm
probably
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I'm trying to understand how it works. Analyze the guts of VSAM. I'm learning!
I've played with VSAM since before ICF (26 years).
I never intended to denigrate what you were doing.
I thought you were expousing a problem; I didn't realise it was a learning
experience.
Sorry
RS,
a) A CA split is still costly, but having extra data buffers normally
helps though (BUFND=); a CI split is almost nothing now.
b) Empty CIs are not read by VSAM. Almost empty CIs cost the same for
random read as for full CIs. For sequential read almost empty CIs does
cost extra. You can
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 6:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
Ever wonder how much money IBM is paying to Fujitsu for
Have to disagree with not making the source open again...as it once was...
Having the opportunity to modify / change as the need arose was great for
me coming up through the learning process .Learned much and taught/passed
on the same.
Think many Linux / Sun people would agree ..
But even when
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
think you mean VSAM Demystified SG 24-6105.
Yes. I read it when it first came out, and haven't looked at it since.
So, what I laughingly call a memory (old-timer's), couldn't retain the original
title.
But, the point is still: who needs to care about splits anymore?
Dinges is Belgian(?) for the waffle toppings. He is Belgian.
EdP
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
From: August Carideo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was he still in the same location ?
I have continued to see him on Broadway between Spring and Prince on
every weeknight I have been in the area since the original thread. He
posts a locater here:
http://www.wafelsanddinges.com/location.html
From: Pommier, Rex R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's talking about the former IBM'er who gave up the 9-5 grind to make
Belgium waffles in New York. There was a rather lengthy thread a few
weeks ago, with people thinking he changed because of outsourcing
overseas and so on.
When I spoke with him he
Steve,
He's talking about the former IBM'er who gave up the 9-5 grind to make
Belgium waffles in New York. There was a rather lengthy thread a few
weeks ago, with people thinking he changed because of outsourcing
overseas and so on.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
was he still in the same location ?
Ed Philbrook
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TATE.NY.US
Thanks John.
McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE
Thanks to
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:24:39 -0500, Wayne Driscoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
Actually, that would be Ms Choi on RACF-L.
Yes, she's very good, but I think Wai deals primarily with digital
certificate and PKI questions, not crypto in general.
--
Walt
Yea, judging from RS's comment, I guess it does
Many years ago, I thought I had understood from a knowledgeable source that it
didn'tEither it changed or the source was not that
knowledgeablegrin.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Michael PoilSent: Wed
12/5/2007
I know the arguments about people don't want to do another DASD conversion.
Having lived 3330 to 3350 to 3380 to 3390 (with emulation mode in there), I
agree with the sentiment.
But, 3390 does not entirely limit the size of a volume.
It's the software architecture.
With virtualisation and
LRR8,R1
USING MODI_HEADER,R8
ICM R7,15,MODI_1_PTRGET DSECT 1'S ADDRESS
BZGTLPMIPXCAN'T DO ANYTHING
USING MODI_1,R7
I don't know if it makes any difference, but the call to CSVINFO is made in
sup state, with a psw key of 0. My code runs normally sup state, psw key 8.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wells
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 1:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
Have to disagree with not making the source open
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:36:12 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the deep, dark, past, I remember that we used the VARY command to
change the status of things such as storage, CPs, and channels. Now,
some things such as DEVICES are manipulated via the VARY command whereas
others, such
Does anyone have any experience determining what service class was
assigned to a given IMS transaction? The IMS log records do not appear to
have this information.
Thanks,
Rob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
In the deep, dark, past, I remember that we used the VARY command to
change the status of things such as storage, CPs, and channels. Now,
some things such as DEVICES are manipulated via the VARY command whereas
others, such as the CHPs, are manipulated via the CONFIG command.
Anybody have any idea
I sure would hate to take too many CA splits in an on-line environment
especially if the CA split requires another extent for either the data and/or
index component.
That's the whole point of Demystified.
The only cost of the split is at 'split time'.
And, with today's disk and CPU capacity,
think you mean VSAM Demystified SG 24-6105.
Yes. I read it when it first came out, and haven't looked at it since.
So, what I laughingly call a memory (old-timer's), couldn't retain the original
title.
But, the point is still: who needs to care about splits anymore?
Regardless of the reasons
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:41:42 +, Martin Packer wrote:
Tom, did you ever get any offline responses to this?
By the way I feel a blog entry on BatchPipeWorks coming on. :-)
Martin,
No responses from that or from another recent request for information.
(Apparently I'm either off where
From: Doc Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, but were his waffles any good?
They are excellent, if a bit pricey. But what isn't in Manhattan?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
From: Ed Philbrook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was a hot topic here not too long ago. An ex-IBMer gave up his
well paying job to sell Belgian waffles on the street in NYC. Maybe it was
only on the CICS-L.
It was on IBM-MAIN.
I'm trying to understand how it works. Analyze the guts of VSAM. I'm learning!
I've played with VSAM since before ICF (26 years).
I never intended to denigrate what you were doing.
I thought you were expousing a problem; I didn't realise it was a learning
experience.
Sorry about that.
-
Too
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:34:43 -0600, Rick Fochtman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Looks a little like the old 2302 fixed disk drive.
...
I've never seen either in real life, but the sfuff to the left of the
platters in the picture look to me like verticle movement stuff for
the head. I think the
Looking for pro's/con's on tape drives from IBM vs STK and ?...
experiences ..
Looking at performance / reliability /encryption facilities ... so on...
any decent write-ups out there ??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail
Hi,
I have followed the T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly and seen
how it has changed from commentary on that issue to a dissertation on the
merits or otherwise of having ready access to z/OS and possible it's source
as in the pre-MVS days.
For its worth my observation is that the
Ed Philbrook wrote:
Steve,
It was a hot topic here not too long ago. An ex-IBMer gave up his
well paying job to sell Belgian waffles on the street in NYC. Maybe it was
only on the CICS-L.
EdP
Ah, I remember the waffles thread but I didn't understand
the reference to Dinges, so it
Yeah, but were his waffles any good?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Philbrook
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:55
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Anyone else see the Waffle Dinges man on TV this morning?
I believe
Ed Philbrook wrote:
I believe it was CBS's morning program. They made a big deal of his being
a former IBMer.
EdP
What _are_ you talking about?
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com
z/OS Application development made easier
In a message dated 12/5/2007 12:07:04 P.M. SA Western Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
It appears that VSAM can create a CA split without a CI split, see z/OS
DFSMS Using Data Sets Chapter 9.
See the RedBook De-Mystifying VSAM.
It tells us that splits are
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CATALOG QUESTION - CISIZE
Thanks to all who responded. Last question, I compared the
In addition, if you are starting with data in a coma separated string
such as:
Joe Bolw, John Smith, Willard Brown,
Replace each delimiter with 5 or 6 delimiters and EXCEK will then start
a new row with each like -
Joe Blow
John Smith
Willard Brown
.
.
.
-Original Message-
From:
Either of these two listservs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed. Benoit
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Excel Question
Hello All,
Any
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: curiousity: why CONFIG instead of VARY?
Radoslaw,
Try F OMVS,SHUTDOWN instead. It
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:23:58 -0600, Chase, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
ICH408I JOB(AXR04 ) STEP(AXR04 ) CL(PROCESS )
OMVS SEGMENT NOT DEFINED
Anyone got this to work?
Looks like your job (started task?) needs a userID with an OMVS
segment.
...
I could be way off base, but I
This is exclusively a Workload Manager function (if implemented).
IMS has no internal knowledge of WLM service classes.
Check the workload classification rules in WLM
snip
Subject: Determining IMS transaction service class
Does anyone have any experience determining what service class was
I didn't know that there were z/VM or other z Series PC emulators available...
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:01:20 -0600, Rich Smrcina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm certainly in favor of that, in addition to expanding the letter to
include other System z operating systems.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Van Dalsen, Herbie) writes:
And who came up with XA I/O? Amdahl, in order to do MDF and share
channels had to do floating I/O interrupts, and
Art -
Here is the JCL that I use to eject volumes from our ATL.
//REMOVEV EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD *
//* REMOVE A VOLUME FROM THE ATL RMM
RMM DV xx FORCE EJECT
On Dec 5, 2007 6:41 AM, Art [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't mention (in origianl question)
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:55:23 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
But, 3390 does not entirely limit the size of a volume.
It's the software architecture.
z/Series HW design is far in advance of z/OS software design.
The bar is a delusion of z/OS, not a limitation of z/Series.
With virtualisation and
Well, I've got no problem with that. Alternately, we can add names to the end
of the letter (sort of a we the undersigned thing).
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:20:54 -0600, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think of the idea to make it a signature driven petition
rather than a letter from a
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 17:54:42 -0500, Angel Tamayo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently (15 days ago) we upgrade successfully our z/OS 1.7 to z/OS 1.8, but
5 days ago we noticed a difference in TSO between being logged on and not
logged on at the time the job completes with notify messages:
If I'm
We have the problem of keeping our z/OS 1.7 in sync with the rest of the
world here (lots of Windows and HP/UX). We looked at the sysplex timer, at
the time, the hardware was pricey, and the CPU (Amdahl Omniprise) could not
be order with the ETR feature (GOLC rules). Since then, we have moved
Hi,
we have a 3-way-sysplex (SYSA/SYSB/SYSC) with z/OS 1.8 (JES2 MAS).
We want to divert joblogs to a specific disc of SPOOL according to the CPU
executions of each one.
With this command /$TSPL(SPOO0%),SYSAFF=SYS% we've assign a disc of
SPOOL for each system. We have:
Thanks to all who responded. Last question, I compared the PRODUCTION USER CAT
against my TEST USER CAT and I noticed in the LISTCAT of the PRODUCTION verison
it had the TEMP-EXP but it did not show in the LISTCAT of my TEST USER CAT.
Should there be reason for concern?
David Andrews [EMAIL
Ed. Benoit wrote:
Any Excel List that I can ask these questions? I have some email addresses
in a WORD document separated by commas and I would like to get them in a
EXCEL document in the first column. Copy paste do not work because Excel
will spread them out to all columns.
(1) Is there a
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
