Shmuel Metz writes:
S/370? Multiprocessing on mainframes goes back at least to the
late 1950's, and was common even before the S/360 was announced.
Bendix, Burroughs, General Electric and UNIVAC come to mind, but
there were no doubt others. What were they smoking?
In fairness, I don't think they
hi,guys
Thanks for your valuable informations,very appreciated!
Johnny Ying
2009/01/07
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
I actually got your question through another channel, so apologies if
you're getting the same answer twice. I hope my answers match. :-)
To expand on what John is saying, VSAM Record Level Sharing (VSAM RLS) is
the base technology. This is provided in z/OS as a standard feature with
DFSMS, and,
Hi Tim
We've met at several of your COBOL SHARE sessions in the past, and I hope
to see you in Austin.
You are correct, zcobol first release will have FLOAT-SHORT, FLOAT-LONG,
and FLOAT-EXTENDED usage options with global option to choose between
HFP, BFP, or DFP with DFP as the default. Some
Happy New Year to all.
Anyone having SAS/MXG JCL to findout the subsystem wise CPU Utilisation over
an interval ? We are having SAS 9.1.3 and MXG 23.09.
JAcky
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:28:18 -0500, Farley, Peter x23353
peter.far...@broadridge.com wrote:
6) Cannot do that here. DLL requires PDSE,
I don't belief that to be true... We are using DLLs (a lot) and have stored the
corresponding load modules (because in the end, that is what it becomes at
4!!
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] För P S
Skickat: den 6 januari 2009 16:03
Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Ämne: Survey says...
I'm trying to judge the level of penetration of the
(relatively) new DLL technology. So
But can You intermix non-DDLs and DLLs ?
In the same linkedit step ?
Or in the same load module ?
(Thats our problem !)
;)
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
In many parts of the world, auditor behavior is spelled out in ISO
9000.
And, as I recall, that behavior is much like Ted's posts. Not so in
the
US, it would seem. I wonder if that would account for the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
In a message dated 1/6/2009 6:32:36 P.M. Central Standard Time,
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com writes:
You can't run z/OS without PDSE.
So, issues or not, PDSE is here to stay.
Unless the
PDSEs are only an integrity issue when they are mis-used - as in, shared
DASD across sysplex boundaries containing PDSEs that are shared, sure way to
disrupt their stability, yet I've seen too many shops that still do this
(and, NO, MIM will not help the situation - PDSEs use XCF to provide all
I agree with Hal that it is a firewall issue. We typically recommend enabling a
keep-alive timer to satisfy the firewall inactivity timeout feature. The NOP
keep-alive option simply sends a couple of bytes from the client at a
configurable interval, which is usually fine. You can also use the
BANGALORE: The chairman of Satyam Computer Services, India’s
fourth-biggest software services exporter, announced his resignation on
Wednesday, triggering a 73.1 per cent drop in the company’s share price,
and dragging the main share index down by 7.36 per cent.
‘I think there is no future
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 06:59:45 -0600, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
Indeed. If management merely rubber-stamps whatever recommendations
or suggestions auditors make, it certainly can create the appearance
that the auditors are running the show. That doesn't change the facts
that management
Hi,
Amongst the current discussion of PDSE, I have a curious problem that I
wondered if anyone could explain. I do a logical copy of our SYSRES
volume to a new volume, but get the following messages for SYS1.SCUNTBL
- a large PDSE:
ADR717E (003)-FMSG (02), SYSTEM SERVICES ERROR OCCURRED WHILE
Thomas Berg wrote:
But can You intermix non-DDLs and DLLs ?
In the same linkedit step ?
Or in the same load module ?
(Thats our problem !)
;)
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
No. From a single module, dynamic calls
There can be different levels of policy. For example, when the national
bank examiners (aka, auditors) visited us they conducted audits according to
the policies established by the national body that chartered/insured our
bank.
It's the same in Canada.
But, the examiners don't make the policy
I agree that PDSE is here to stay. Static PDSE has been no problem. The OS
required ones fall into this category. The ones being updated often and from
different systems/plexes are a different story. These cross-boundary update
issues have/still apply to PDS if the rules are not followed (GRS,
Thats true, but with truly mixing and dynamic calls you need a DLL and a
no-DLL version of all modules, which is highly inconvenient and causes a lot of
grief.
LE supports mixing of XPLINK and non-XPLINK modules, why the heck it doesn't
support mixing of DLL and no-DLL modules? That would make
Don't get your hopes too high. They will hire even more in another part of the
globe resulting in more OUT OF OFFICE messages. There will probably be more
rants here about their hiring practices as well. Oh well ... the more it
changes
the more it remains the same.
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:24:47 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
There can be different levels of policy. For example, when the national
bank examiners (aka, auditors) visited us they conducted audits according
to the policies established by the national body that chartered/insured our
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:00:29 +0100, Tidy, David (D) dt...@dow.com wrote:
Hi,
Amongst the current discussion of PDSE, I have a curious problem that I
wondered if anyone could explain. I do a logical copy of our SYSRES
volume to a new volume, but get the following messages for SYS1.SCUNTBL
- a
BTW I am 2nd generation
Dr. Merrill I bow to the power...very cool...
BTW I am 2nd generation IT ..Been around computers or EDP as it was once
called since the 50'sMom and Dad both in the industry
Scott J Ford
From: Barry Merrill ba...@mxg.com
Interesting statement. Mea culpa if I have mis-remembered or mis-read
the FM's on DLL implementation. I will have to go back and re-read
those FM's for my own (re)education.
But don't any DLL's dealing with long-name elements or interfaces need
to be stored in a PDSE? Or does the pre-link step
Yes. But the problem we had was an (eventual) environment
where modules existed in both DLL and non-DLL versions
(and DLL and non-DLL applications), where there was a
need to call between them and be linked together.
The typical problem situation is when You are linking
together a runtime
On 7 Jan 2009 06:00:59 -0800, wfarr...@us.ibm.com (Walt Farrell)
wrote:
While I generally support the position that auditors should not make
policy, having worked at a national bank previously I think there is an
aspect of this discussion that no one has mentioned yet.
But many times policies
Hi,
I was wondering if I can use IDCAMS to rename a USERCAT.
If I can, then I presume that I'd need to DELETE and DEFINE any ALIAS
related to the USERCAT.
Has anyone does this? What would I need to watch out for?
If there are datasets open that are defined in the USERCAT, then what are
the
Catalogs are also pointed from the VVDS for Vsam datasets...
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Barry Jones jones...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if I can use IDCAMS to rename a USERCAT.
If I can, then I presume that I'd need to DELETE and DEFINE any ALIAS
related to the USERCAT.
You'd have to close it and unallocate it to the CAS.
T-Rex !
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Barry Jones
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Can I rename a USERCAT
Hi,
I was
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:33:43 +0800, Barry Jones jones...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if I can use IDCAMS to rename a USERCAT.
In a word... NO. You can move a usercat to a new volume, but
you can not rename it.
You can create a new usercatalog and move the entries to the new
catalog
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) writes:
And it's a little tough to pin down when SMP began, because engineers
are going to quibble about the
No. You cannot rename a usercat. You will need to define another UCAT and
use REPRO MERGECAT to move the entries and update the VVDS backward
references. You will also need to reorient each ALIAS in the master
catalog.
You also cannot use IDCAMS to move entries from one catalog to another when
The prelink step is for resolving the long name issues. I did not work with
C++ but it works for PL/I and COBOL DLLs.
-Original Message-
From: Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 4:10 pm
Subject: Re: DLL and PDS(E)
Can anyone send me a URL for, or a PDF of, The ESA Principles of Operation,
SA22-7201-04 or 03? It's from circa 1998. TIA.
Bob Shannon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DZ9AR004/CCON
TENTS?DT=19970613131822
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 10:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Need
Thanks, but my bad. I need a PDF version, either via URL or an actual PDF.
Although I prefer boo format, it's not for me. It's possible that the pub was
never available in PDF.
Bob Shannon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Jeffrey Deaver
jeffrey.dea...@securian.com wrote:
Anybody know where I can find a list of the sessions held at the 2008
System z Expo? All the old links seem to point to the generic 2009 page
now. I'm trying to decide if my new Sys. Prog should head to SHARE
We started experiencing this TN3270 disconnect issue in early November.
It is only effecting folks who connect to our mainframe TN3270 servers
from outside it is typically after five minutes of inactivity.
Internal users are not seeing the problem can remain idle for ages. It
does not matter
Thanks, but my bad. I need a PDF version, either via URL or an actual
PDF.
Although I prefer boo format, it's not for me. It's possible that the
pub was never available in PDF.
Bob Shannon
It doesn't look like that particular edition has a PDF version.
Other edition levels do though. See:
I second Mr. Bowen's problem and observations. I have used the TDSLink
mainframe TCP/IP trace facility and it shows an ACK FIN being issued from the
TN3270 client side.
--- ngbo...@fedex.com wrote:
From: Nigel Bowen ngbo...@fedex.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN 3270
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:21:12 -0500, Bob Shannon bshan...@rocketsoftware.com
wrote:
Thanks, but my bad. I need a PDF version, either via URL or an actual PDF.
Although I prefer boo format, it's not for me. It's possible that the pub
was never available in PDF.
Don't think so. Would a print of
Robin Jackson created a PDF for me. My thanks to him and to all who replied.
Bob Shannon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
I am reworking my 'soft cap' strategy to accomplish a business
objective. I need to set an overall budget and then set each LPAR so
that the sum of the 'defined capacities' is my target. I am at z/os 1.7
and on a z/890 so I lack the ability to set group caps.
It was my belief that there are
Thanks, but my bad. I need a PDF version, either via URL or an actual
PDF.
Although I prefer boo format, it's not for me. It's possible that the
pub was never available in PDF.
Bob Shannon
It doesn't look like that particular edition has a PDF version.
Other edition levels do though. See:
We just experienced a 4 minute 'outage' on our z/OS system. (single image
z/OS 1.9 system).
By 'outage', I mean we could not communicate with MVS through TSO or the
z/OS consoles. There is a 4 minute gap in SYSLOG. The same for CICS, IMS
and DB2 logs.
There were no system dumps or other
Yes - everything is fine from the firewall (or some other appliance in
the path). It is doing as it is configured to do - drop the session.
Look in your emulator for a 'keep alive' feature.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
The first thing I would check are the TimeMark ScanInterval TN3270 parms vs
any timeout limits in any firewalls the traffic must traverse.
Nigel Bowen ngbo...@fedex.com 1/7/2009 11:34 AM
We started experiencing this TN3270 disconnect issue in early November.
It is only effecting folks who
We are FINALLY replacing our OLD 3174's with IBM 2074 control units.
The 3270 software that we have been using for years does not support
TN3270e.
Any suggestions on what to get and contact info?
Thanks,
Jerry Fuchs
Senior Systems Engineer
Wendy's Arby's Group
One Dave Thomas Blvd.
Dublin,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:02:40 -0600, JE Thinnes jethin...@aol.com wrote:
We just experienced a 4 minute 'outage' on our z/OS system. (single image
z/OS 1.9 system).
By 'outage', I mean we could not communicate with MVS through TSO or the
z/OS consoles. There is a 4 minute gap in SYSLOG. The
---snip---
Audits, especially external audits, carry a lot of weight. The
enforcement does not come from the auditors, but the audits do not seem
to be questioned. And the audit groups seem to have their own SME which
in some cases really stretch
imho you can't do better than Vista TN3270
http://www.tombrennansoftware.com/
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
From:
Jerry Fuchs jerry.fu...@wendysarbys.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
01/07/2009 09:26 AM
Subject:
Need TN3270e software
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I'm partial to BlueZone, but then again it is one of our products grin.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:29:39 -0800, Lionel B Dyck lionel.b.d...@kp.org wrote:
imho you can't do better than Vista TN3270
http://www.tombrennansoftware.com/
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
From:
Jerry Fuchs jerry.fu...@wendysarbys.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
01/07/2009 09:26 AM
I'm very pleased to see that at least the IMAGE of Corporate
Corruption is not limited to the US. But in all fairness, each case
needs proof.
On the other hand, the state of Illinois seems to have more than its
share; the record speaks for itself :-(
LOGREC?
Thanks
John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
JE Thinnes
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: MVS 4 minute 'outage'
We just experienced a 4 minute 'outage' on our z/OS
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:16:33 -0500, Jerry Fuchs jerry.fu...@wendysarbys.com
wrote:
We are FINALLY replacing our OLD 3174's with IBM 2074 control units.
The 3270 software that we have been using for years does not support
TN3270e.
Any suggestions on what to get and contact info?
Just for your
---snip---
But many times policies are set by lawyers, interpreting laws created by
politicians. The auditors follow the lawyers' guidelines.
unsnip-
Have you ever met a
My experience in attending both several times is that SHARE offers
better content, and a wider variety of content from a wider variety of
resources. I have also spoken at both, and I can say that IBM appears
to try and restrict the content of zExpo, as well as the scheduling of
sessions. The
From SearchDataCenter today
Mark Fontecchio, News Writer
For some companies, making the decision to migrate off the mainframe is
tough,
but not for Meritz Financial Information Services. Even though the
company
added capacity frequently, at peak times it still encountered
application
EREP software error report. From SYS1.LOGREC or logrec logstream.
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com
z/OS Systems Programming expert at
I would suggest that some very high priority task got in a loop - something
that runs at dispatching priority x'FF'. But then if it were truly in a loop,
why did it stop after 4 minutes?
Do you just have 1 processor?
Good luck in finding the problem. Let us know if it happens again. I'm
Thanks Mark. EREP is running now. IBM had the same suggestion.
071 indicates Spin Loop action taken.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
And a happy new year to you.
MXG licensees have their own support forum, arguably one of the finest
concentrations of such expertise around. Check the MXG web site and
follow the links.
HTH and good luck.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On 7 Jan 2009 09:51:11 -0800, rfocht...@ync.net (Rick Fochtman) wrote:
The laws are mostly written by lawyers and accountants, who spoonfeed
the politicians thumbnail descriptions of the statutes and expect
everything to go as they had envisioned. And there's always the
competition betwen
2009/1/7 Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com:
Howerver, I don't anything about 360/65 multiprocessor was for anything other
than two-way.
In particular, the 65MP did not have a programmable prefix register to
relocate low storage for each CPU the way S/370 and later do. Rather,
the prefixing
While we wait for the EREP, it might be fun to look at the presented evidence
and do some speculating.
I don’t think a single task can do this, even at a FF priority. There are
interrupts and a task under the control of the dispatcher can't own the whole
box (even a uni processor) exclusively
We have a waxing and waning 'freeze' problem that occurs in synch with our
SMF/RMF recording interval. Nothing approaching four minutes, but
disturbingly long. A couple of points:
-- If the freeze was one time only and not chronic, it's probably not
SMF/RMF
-- Based on our experience, good luck
Check for co-incident processing. E.g. SMF and RMF (both) synchronized
on the hour. This has been know to cause spikes when everyone is trying
to do everything all at the same time.
DDCONS=YES for a long running system task (e.g. DFHSM) that was
terminated.
Perhaps a high priority batch job
Hi all,
I have an urgent requirement. Can anyone help me?
Requirement:
I need to prepare a JCL to perform the following task
1)I have a GDG base say xxx.xxx whose versions might be generated in
TAPE or DASD
2)I have to prepare a JCL
- Which will just copy the GDG Version
Interesting. Have you tried turning off DASD caching statistics in RMF?
That's been an issue in various software and hardware
vintages/combinations. Bit us once.
Since everything is WAD (albeit slowly), there would not be any smoke or
bodies.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Hi Ram - a file may exist on DASD or tape. You may move from one to the
other with a simple copy operation. You simply express your wises as to
the target device type on the output DD statement of the copy step.
Normally, you do not know (or care) what the input device may be.
In other words, you
Is anyone still using BatchPipes/MVS? If not, what are you using instead?
Thanks,
Cheryl
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jerry Fuchs
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Need TN3270e software
We are FINALLY replacing our OLD 3174's with IBM 2074 control units.
The 3270
Interesting ...
Is this single image system connected via CTC or shared DASD to another
system or LPAR (Test system, perhaps)?
If so, did somebody IPL or shut down this Test system at the time of your
'outage'? (This could have caused a DASD Reserve lockout or a disruption in
GRS and/or
In a message dated 1/7/2009 1:07:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
howard.bra...@cusys.edu writes:
And there's always the
competition betwen liberal and conservative. Does anyone really
understand those terms?
I doubt it.Heck, I don't understand the difference between
liberal and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of JE Thinnes
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: MVS 4 minute 'outage'
We just experienced a 4 minute 'outage' on our z/OS system. (single
image
z/OS
I think it is important to remember that SHARE serves many audiences ranging
from systems programmers to application designers and developers to IT
architects to Management.
It is also a great place to get a better understanding of how what each of
individually does fits in with the overall
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:01:51 -0700, Kopischke, David G. wrote:
From SearchDataCenter today
Mark Fontecchio, News Writer
For some companies, making the decision to migrate off the mainframe is
tough,
...
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci13
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:15:39 -0500, Ram Balaji ram23...@aim.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have an urgent requirement. Can anyone help me?
Requirement:
I need to prepare a JCL to perform the following task
1)I have a GDG base say xxx.xxx whose versions might be generated in
TAPE or DASD
2)I have to
Check for any 4 Min.MIH settingsand check the TCPIP log for
timeouts
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of JE Thinnes
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: MVS 4 minute 'outage'
Consider also that an Itanium core should be faster than a z990 CPU, so they
experienced a significant CPU capacity increase - going from 4 CPUs to 112
CPUs. If they had upgraded to a mainframe of similar size I would expect that
they would have solved all their performance problems also.
Jerry Fuchs wrote:
The 3270 software that we have been using for years does not support
TN3270e.
For simple functions (e.g., consoles) VISTA by Tom Brennan is
inexpensive, easy to install, and has the functionality you need.
For more sophisticated uses (e.g., graphics, explicit
partitions)
If that's the case, why doesn't it drop my AS/400 sessions? Why doesn't it
drop my VSE sessions to the same physical machine? Why doesn't it drop my VM
session? Why does it only drop my z/OS 1.4, 1.5, 1.8 and 1.9 sessions?
The likelihood of it being an emulator problem is virtually zero. And
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
tz...@attglobal.net (Tony Harminc) writes:
In particular, the 65MP did not have a programmable prefix register to
relocate low storage for each CPU the way S/370
Yes it should be possible. One of the benefits of JCL is that for
simple sequential datasets you have a reasonable amount of device
independence.
You need to decide which utility you will use to copy the generation
(version) of interest. Since the generation must be cataloged, you
don't care
Have you looked at your TimeMark and ScanInterval settings?
David Logan loga3...@comcast.net 1/7/2009 2:57 PM
If that's the case, why doesn't it drop my AS/400 sessions? Why doesn't it
drop my VSE sessions to the same physical machine? Why doesn't it drop my VM
session? Why does it only drop my
Yup. Firewalls are configured port by port, IP address by IP address.
Combinations vary to infinity and beyond*. Happens all the time.
*A joke from the movie Toy Story.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of David Logan
Sent:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:51:43 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:15:39 -0500, Ram Balaji wrote:
2)I have to prepare a JCL
- Which will just copy the GDG Version to a Flat
file if the attribute is DASD
- If the GDG Version is TAPE the jcl
On 6 Jan 2009 13:09:50 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
for zcobol initial release at SHARE. It doesn't test things like EXEC CICS or
Enterprise COBOL extensions such as EXTENDED-FLOAT, but it sure looks like
There is no EXTENDED-FLOAT in Enterprise COBOL.
There are floating-point
In a message dated 1/7/2009 2:35:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
scott.r...@joann.com writes:
The kicker for me was where they claimed that the mainframe response time
was seriously degraded with more than 50 concurrent OLTP users.
Forgot his name, he was one of Bill Butterfield's
On 7 Jan 2009 11:37:05 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:listserv%200901071336050361.0...@bama.ua.edu)
m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com (Tom Marchant) wrote:
From SearchDataCenter today
Mark Fontecchio, News Writer
For some companies, making the decision to migrate off
the mainframe
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:27:05 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
wrote:
If in the future we decide to introduce a multisystem sysplex then we can
rethink our NJE naming conventions. Does this sound safe?
Not 100%.
Since you are doing changes now, why not be proactive on the NODENAME?
One
Clark,
Easy answer, there have been no recent changes to IBM's responses on
floating point (or bit) support.
Harder answer is that you keep getting confused about different terms and
requirements.
In the '02 Standard there are 3 new USAGEs
FLOAT-SHORT
FLOAT-LONG
FLOAT-EXTENDED
IBM (or
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:46:41, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl
wrote:
I did another test:
Created new IODF from scratch.
Defined CPC 2064
Defined 3 LPARs OS and 1 LPAR CF
Defined 10 CNC channels (40 - 49), online on all OS LPARs
Defined CU #1000, type 3990, connected to CHP 40, 41
Defined 256
I have seen some shareware code that uses SUBSYS calls to SMS to obtain such
information as the STORAGE GROUP a volser resides in, etc. I looked through my
manuals to find a discussion regarding some of the fields that were being set
in the SSSA prior to subsys call, but, I did not find any
In of76e979ec.2cbf127e-on49257537.00278b0f-49257537.002cf...@us.ibm.com,
on 01/07/2009
at 05:10 PM, Timothy Sipples timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com said:
In fairness, I don't think they (the original poster's foil) were talking
about multiprocessing in the multitasking sense (sharing one CPU).
In
110562328-1231275171-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-9239853...@bxe348.bisx.prod.on.blackberry,
on 01/06/2009
at 08:52 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said:
That's the point.
It's not their requirements; it's those determined by the company,
through SME's.
Every time someone
In 5411f4eec9c68f4ca6f78821e685165a027dd...@htxmail.jhacorp.com, on
01/06/2009
at 04:11 PM, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com said:
In many parts of the world, auditor behavior is spelled out in ISO 9000.
Crap is okay as long as you document that it is crap.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
Flat file is just a sequential file..
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:36:45 -0600
Subject: Re: JCL Logics involving TAPE and Normal File
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:51:43 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
On
Flat file is just a sequential file..
We know that.
Our concern is that you are doing another homework assignment.
You haven't been clear as to what you're attempting.
TAPE files are 'normal' files.
The same IEBGENER job (with slight modifications) can be used to copy DISK to
DISK, DISK to TAPE,
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
