Thanks for all of you for the replies.
Arye..
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 00:17 +0200, Ivan Warren wrote:
The instruction (SERVC (B220) instruction subcodes 0x00020001 and
subcodes 0x00120001) may be secret but it is used in the linux
kernel which source is legally available for anyone to
examine/modify/discuss !
H - a guest asking a
Don't know if this means anything, but DFP Storage Administration Reference
documents this:
ALLVOL The volume serial numbers specified for data set allocations when
ACSENVIR is not recall or recover.
ANYVOL The volume serial numbers explicitly specified for the volumes if
ACSENVIR is not recall
RACF comes with an assortment of ICETOOL reports. You should be able to locate
and modify one of those to suit.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Tommy Tsui
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 8:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
FYI
Going from 1.7 to 1.9 found that we were getting MSGIEC710I for old PS
DASD DSNs. The message indicates that the last volume indicator is not on
for this single volume data set. All of the 'problem' DSNs were one block
DSNs and that was a short block. Solution was to Opening the data sets
I would respectfully disagree. I posed this question to the group a while back
and the consensus was to let it crash. I believe the thought was that there was
just not enough time or information to make an informed decision. Plus, anytime
someone is frantically banging on a keyboard, screw ups
Applicable component levels
R400 PSY UK40432 UP08/10/08 P F810
R500 PSY UK40433 UP08/10/08 P F810
I'm in the process of installing CICSTS32 and need one of the above PTF's
however I don't understand which one to pick.
Can someone tell me what the difference is between the
We have a project which wants to copy about 1tb of data from prod to dev.
All the data will be in the same EMC DMX.
All the data will be in the same sysplex/SMSplex.
The datasets will be renamed when copied.
The data is DB2 and IMS - so lots of little files.
The process will be repeated every
David,
I saw in the manual the following commands :
RELEASE BACKUP(DSCOMMAND)
RELEASE BACKUP(DSCOMMAND(TAPE))
Would that just release my backup and not the automatic backup?
--- On Tue, 26/5/09, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] obrie...@mail.nih.gov
wrote:
From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT)
I've installed the IBM 64-bit SDK for z/OS V6 but the verification process
is failing.
export the path and display
# echo $PATH
/usr/lpp/java/J6.0_64/bin:/bin
# echo $DISPLAY
xx.xx.xx.xx:0.0
#
# java -version
Error: Port Library failed to initialize
Could not create the Java virtual machine.
I have inherited a disaster recovery system which I cannot change
quickly enough, so I have to make due. I have looked at it and realized
that restoring the HSM CDS', ML1 packs, and pointing at the ML2 volume
copies should generally work, but our current system does not back up the
Hi
z/OS 1.6 was the first release with 64 bit support.
We have never used
Our actual version is z/OS 1.9, but starting from bin:
MV19:/u/java/J6.0_64/binÄ272Ü:java -version
java version 1.6.0
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pmz6460sr1-20080416_01(SR1))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, J2RE 1.6.0
How big is your region?
Larry Gray
Large Systems Engineering
Lowe's Companies
704-758-5337
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mark Pace
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Java V6
On Tue, 26 May 2009 11:56:13 -0400, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
I've installed the IBM 64-bit SDK for z/OS V6 but the verification process
is failing.
export the path and display
# echo $PATH
/usr/lpp/java/J6.0_64/bin:/bin
# echo $DISPLAY
xx.xx.xx.xx:0.0
#
# java -version
Error: Port
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Applicable component levels
R400 PSY UK40432 UP08/10/08 P F810
R500 PSY UK40433 UP08/10/08 P F810
I'm in the process of installing CICSTS32 and need one of the above
PTF's however I
--snip
I would respectfully disagree. I posed this question to the group a
while back and the consensus was to let it crash. I believe the thought
was that there was just not enough time or information to make
the ones for R500 - cics 6.5 comes with cics ts 3.2
r400 is cics 6.4 for cics ts 3.1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: APAR PTF...Which one
--snip
A while back I posted something on punched cards here and got a private
email what does punched cards have to do the the mainframe? so I'm
half expecting a what does Poughkeepsie NY have to do with the
mainframe?.
# ./rexxstor
V I R T U A LS T O R A G EU S A G E
---
Region requested: 55296K
Max Priv Region Region Region Region
Reg Size Limit Size
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Pace
# ./rexxstor
V I R T U A LS T O R A G EU S A G E
---
Region requested: 55296K
It looks like you have plenty of 64-bit virtstor, but not enough 31-bit. I
can't recall how much you may need (check the Java doc or archives
perhaps), but I think you need at least 64M if not more and you only
have 32M.
How are you executing this? From TSO OMVS, telnet into OMVS? If TSO,
Thanks all for your quick replies.
The fog has clared...thanks again.
--- On Tue, 5/26/09, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
From: Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
Subject: Re: APAR PTF...Which one to use
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 11:31 AM
-Original
I determined that I don't require the 64bit version of JAVA, so removed it
an installed the 32bit version instead. That runs just fine.
Thanks for everyone's input.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.comwrote:
It looks like you have plenty of 64-bit virtstor,
XMLSS actually broke one of our application's programs. They had to
re-compile to change it to COMPAT for that program to make the
application work properly. Also, in COBOL 3.4, we used to specify
TEST=(NONE,NOSYM). There is no equivalent in 4.1 other than to specify
TEST=NO. Anything else,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 9:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC)
I just read that in detail again. The automount lead me to
Actually, 10M is not much storage above the bar - you might want to specify
at least 2G, the default for z/OS 1.10, if you wanted to try the 64-bit
version again.
On Tue, 26 May 2009 13:31:35 -0400, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
I determined that I don't require the 64bit version of JAVA,
On Tue, 26 May 2009 11:18:58 -0500, Rick Fochtman
rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
...
the 1442 Multifunction Card Machine, also known as Mother
Fletcher's Card Mulcher? ...
I remember things a bit differently.
Back in the late '60s I was an operator in an IBM Datacenter and
Busuness System
Good catch... I didn't even notice is said 10M and not 10G. My default
is 10G so my mind just saw the 10 and missed the M.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com
z/OS
Most of the time if I am not real sure, I just order both. The RECEIVE
process will ignore the extra PTF, so it's no big deal. IBM's
nomenclature can be very confusing.
C. Todd Burrell, PMP, MCP
Lead z/OS Systems Programmer
ITSO
(404) 723-2017 (Cell)
-Original Message-
From: IBM
I remember 80-column punch cards. I don't remember the model of the
keypunch machine, but I do remember that it was large, heavy, and
unforgiving.
--
Jack Hamilton
Management Information Analysis - Analytic Information Services
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
1950 Franklin Street,
If you pull up the PTF entry you can see the FMID and PRE/REQ info that
you can compare against your SMP environment.
A little tedious but once you find the right one you'll know to look at
the Rxxx version from then on.
-Original Message-
Burrell, C. Todd
Most of the time if I am not
I remember 80-column punch cards. I don't remember the model of the keypunch
machine, but I do remember that it was large, heavy, and
unforgiving.
I remember two models -- KP-26 KP-29.
I had my own (as probably did others) card 'programmed' for certain stops, so I
didn't have to space over.
Actually, I'm just totally surprised that there has *not* been a lot of
thrashing
in the migrate/recall process for this storage group. I think I'm gonna be
content with things as they are (until something changes my mind).
I had already put a lot of effort into moving all of the always-open
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
rfocht...@ync.net (Rick Fochtman) writes:
Consider, if you will, the sweet innocence of childhood. ;-) How many
of us remember the days of punched cards, either
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) writes:
I remember two models -- KP-26 KP-29.
I had my own (as probably did others) card 'programmed' for certain stops, so
I
Take a look at www.mainstar.com
They have tools that clone DB2 and IMS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jennifer Currell
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 1:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Dataset FLASH/SNAP question
On 2009-05-22 at 16:15, concerning Re: FTP and SMS (and DYNALLOC),
Bob Lester bles...@oppcom wrote to IBM-Main:
We have an ftp batch job that reaches down to a squatty box and
pulls some data.
The LOCSITE parms are:
LOCSITE LRECL=8996 BLKSIZE=9000 RECFM=VBA +
unit=sysda
Punch cards were pre-me, but I do remember when someone told me why we
code JCL in 80 column data sets (or members). It's just an online
punch card, of sorts, right? I remember thinking that was so cool, so
I hope it is true. ;-)
Never heard of 96-column cards, though. Just some ignorance on
The 96 column card was actually 3 rows of 32, almost a square card. Tiny round
holes. I used them on a System/3 in the early 70sm.
- Original Message -
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue May 26 22:37:49 2009
On Tue, 26 May 2009 23:37:49 -0400, Scott T. Harder
scottyt.har...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Never heard of 96-column cards, though. Just some ignorance on my
part with that one.
...
The 96-column card was really 3 tiers of 32 columns. 6 bits per logical
column.It was small (3-1/4 inch wide by
VBG. Too funny. I've heard many stories about card decks being
dropped every which-way, but what did you have to do when that
happened? Were they numbered or denoted in some way where you could
put the deck back together? Must have been, but what a job; like
trying to find a mis-filed tape.
And now you know the origin of sequence numbers in columns 73-80.
Card reader/sorter/punch/printer machines predate these fancy new
computers :)
I never saw them (I started at a remote reader/printer attached to a
370), but I'm told we did have the machines that you rewired a circuit
board
The 96-column card was really 3 tiers of 32 columns. 6 bits per
logicalcolumn.It was small (3-1/4 inch wide by 2-5/8 inch high) with small
round holes.) It was used on the S/3. I'm not sure it was used by anything
else.
We used to joke about how IBM found a way to get rid of all their
43 matches
Mail list logo
