-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic SMP/E question
Individual PTFs, APARs, USERMODs, etc. can be selectively applied.
That's what I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Hewson
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Omegamon - How to
Hello Steve,
We protect the OMEGAMON commands via the security exit in the Omegamon
Is there a way to define in RACF and have Omegamon recognize, that a
user is authorized for the special features?
The idea is to avoid having each authorized user from having to enter
the special password. And we'd like to do it w/o having to put an exit
in Omegamon.
And I've looked at the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Susan Rice
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Omegamon - How to
Steve,
You can set up profiles in RACF. Look in the manual for Initial 1
intial 2
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SIO in SDSF vs read/write speed
I made the following observation:
1. WRITE. I put some data to tape (3592J). The
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Deaver
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 5:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: LPAR Org Security
SNIP
We systems engineers are, of course, arguing that we need that access as
a
matter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Walter Farrell
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 8:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM changed its mainframe URLs once more
SNIP
I'm told that site has been there for awhile already,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Hare
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: GDG question
I'm pretty sure I can do this, but I'm looking for a second opinion (and
you're ugly, too as my
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: M$ Vista Experiences?
The update is way too expensive. Too many versions (Home
Basic, Home
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?
Are they in Perth?
Yep - it was transferred down there a few years back.
SNIP
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of
mainframe costs.)
Steve
I'm afraid I have this bad
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lionel B Dyck
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Long Live the Mainframe
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
SNIP
This just showed up as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lucy Arnold
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 5:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Condition code checking for FTP
Hello,
I have a series of GET commands in a batch FTP job and when one of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SVCs
SNIP
Later when S/370 came along the designers had recognized the
deficiencies of SVC and they
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of
mainframe costs.)
SNIP
It depends on the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of
mainframe costs.)
SNIP
At SHARE I can remember distinctly
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 7:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe vs. Server (Was Just another example of
mainframe costs.)
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:10:11
Can anyone give me any reason why a REXX routine would cause ISPF to die
with a U0999 and dump you off to TSO READY?
OK, background to this: ISPF IPCS REXX. All the REXX exec does is look
at a dump to find a certain type of control block and list it, note some
comments, and exit.
The
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF
Steve,
From the ISPF Msgs and Codes book :
Abend code 999 (or X'3E7') This abend is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF
Have you checked the DCB attributes for the ISPF DD allocations? - if
you have a logon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF
Steve,
A couple of ideas to help debug :
(1) Run the exec under dialog test and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Steely
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Rolled Off GDG's
What does it mean when when a GDG status is ROLLED-OFF.
SNIP
It means that the generation
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 10:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Withdrawal of VM ServiceLink
In a message dated 1/8/2007 9:51:22 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just another example of mainframe costs.
Take a look
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Brock
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just another example of mainframe costs.
It wasn't that bad for me. Just so you can get to it, this URL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 3:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Withdrawal of VM ServiceLink
[The Peterson Principle is still in effect.]
If you mean the one where
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pinnacle
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: V2X2 vs. Shark (SnapShot v. FlashCopy)
SNIP
Steve,
Over what period of time were the volumes
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Just another example of mainframe costs.
I bought an external 500GB USB2 backup disk for a home
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pinnacle
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: V2X2 vs. Shark (SnapShot v. FlashCopy)
My current client has a V2X2 and is thinking about replacing it with a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF - Password rules.
SNIP
Hopefully password reset will include a provision for resetting (or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mautalen Juan Guillermo
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 7:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Data replication at a remote site - elementary doubt
Hi,
Sorry for this very basic question, but
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Max Allocation w/ Space= DD
Hi,
What's the max number of cyl's you can specify for primary/secondary
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Max Allocation w/ Space= DD
Can anybody comment on this: I specify 4000/4000cyl and z/OS allocates
I have a problem where I would like to pass some number of variables
between different REXX sources (in this case 200).
I have placed the variables into a single REXX source. And I know that
this can't be called and then have those variables available in the
calling REXX exec (if I can, that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Arthur T.
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 9:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Question - Variable Control Passing (IPCS/ISPF)
SNIP
Create a single string with all of the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 3:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about SVC 109
So type-3 or type-4 is the same nowdays?
SNIP
As I recall, TYPE 3 are
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ray Mullins
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 4:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
You make the presumption (sorry) that this doctrine
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 9:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Question - Variable Control Passing (IPCS/ISPF)
Assuming you want to stick to REXX
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 8:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
snip
Haven't their lawyers heard of Stare Decicis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 4:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IPCS ASID
I'm working on a little problem. I have an SVCDUMP that contains more
than one
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: HCD EDT's Generics
Hello,
I've create a new EDT 01 from the 00 menber.
I have the following listed for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 10:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion
SNIP
Since we're talking about DASD space, shouldn't those factors be 1000,
as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan
Altmark
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:52:45 -0500, Shmuel Metz
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 2:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Plurals and language confusion
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 5:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Plurals and language confusion
SNIP
Many blind people are in a passenger seat or walk around the car to
I'm working on a little problem. I have an SVCDUMP that contains more
than one address space. I have a LARGE exec library for diagnosing
various things.
The problem is, I just can't seem to establish the ASID to be used for
addresses, C/Bs, etc.
Would anyone have a quick hint on how to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: S0C1 with ILC 6
snip
You can get a S0C1 (PIC 1) with ILC 6 if the prior instruction that
executed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Decimal FP (was: vendor JCL)
Simultaneous Peripheral Operations On Line.
I know that's what IBM says
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
SNIP
I think trying to argue that IBM is a monopoly by
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:55:44 -0500, Thompson, Steve (SCI
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
SNIP
Trade secrets are exactly what the name says.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
How about LLA? It was implemented on at least 1 S/370-158
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: D U command for DASD
Hello,
Can anyone help me out with the command syntax for
what I think is a D U
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: OUTLIM aborts
I have a proc where I wish to override an output:
=20
//TEBC#1.REPORT2 DD
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: D U command for DASD
snip
Would you actually be needing the IODF data via HCD?
Later
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 4:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How recover from unrecoverable DCB ABEND?
Yes.
Charles
snip
Off the top of my head, you may have to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 5:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [OT] Merry xmas Chanukah
Galambos, Robert wrote:
You forgot one language! 'Sign Language' ...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
SNIP
Companies threaten each other all the time.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy White
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 11:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Get around Double tape marks?
I tried BLP didn't make a difference with Ditto it still honored the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:06:53 -0600, Phil Sidler
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nigel Hadfield
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones
It's difficult to see why they are suing, especially
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 2:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion
Thompson, Steve , SCI TW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message
news:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLink and EOS for z/OS 1.4
snip
Would anyone know if IBMLink will answer and ETR if it
isn't
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 9:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion
snip
Well, now you hit a topic on the head, that I, as non-English, never
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 10:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Cancelling a job/tso user in a 100% CPU situation.
This has come up here. We are in month-end. Our CPU
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stocker, Herman
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
The keylist that controls HELP are ISPHELP, ISPHLP2 ISPKYLST. If you
change
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
snip
Does someone have a list of various places that we need to go to to
change a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
On 30 Nov 2006 08:51:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Thompson, Steve , SCI TW
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping
snip
Under help / tutorial the function key assignments are
generally these:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 5:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion
SAY 'THE NUMBER OF TRACKS IS' TRK
UGH!
Where's your grammar?
Home. Baking cookies
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLink Internet access out to lunch again?
I called the IBMLINK 800 number and got put thru to some
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Dawes
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: [SPAM] DFDSS - DISASTER RECOVERY (RESTORE) QUESTION.
snip
Is there anything else I should include?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 12:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [SPAM] DFDSS - DISASTER RECOVERY (RESTORE) QUESTION.
Crystal ball option? Steve,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Seubert
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Where can you get a Minor in Mainframe?
snip
Take a look here:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Where can you get a Minor in Mainframe?
Would my 17 year old child, who works on mainframes be a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Arnett
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 3:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Where can you get a Minor in Mainframe?
What ever happened to the Virtual Universe Operating System that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Simpson
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Inflating Severity
snip
In one recent memorable case, the local rep actually called the support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: link to a real, working IBMLINK ?
I've been in and out of the manuals area several times today
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Justice
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: link to a real, working IBMLINK ?
Okay, so does anyone have a link to IBMLINK that is actually working
Suppose that for every time one needs to open an ETR, and IBMLINK is
down, that you were to call the 800 number and make your problem a SEV1.
Now further suppose that all IBM customers were to do this.
How long would it take before the pain would be felt high enough that
this would get fixed -
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 11:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management
snip
As a discussion point, I'm not sure how
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management
Nope, not the man behind the curtain. Think
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management
snip
I see 2 problems with this.
snip
You may get
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 4:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Assembler question
On 7 Nov 2006 10:34:33 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
snip
Back in the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Tsujimoto
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 9:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Assembler question
Is *discontinuity in assembler design* a nice way of saying, it's a bad
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nigel Hadfield
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: The PSI Letter V4
snip
ISTR there was a perception at that time that IBM could not legally
refuse
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phil Payne
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CA CEO in the slammer
Well, not yet. Many a slip twixt cup and lip:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Comparison of TN3270 Clients
snip
(By the way, does anybody else find Microsoft's use of the word Vista
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of NAIDOO Raleigh (AXA-Tech-AU)
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 4:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SMF JWT
1. The SMF JWT parm specifies the maximum amount of time that a job or
TSO/E user
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SHARE in Tampa Florida, February 11-16, 2007
snip
Daniel McLaughlin of the IBM Mainframe
I thought I'd get away from the original topic title.
REFR as an attribute, does this also imply that the code is
self-relocating so that if the code is reloaded at a different place, it
is still able to continue execution (of the task in flight)? So PRE DAT
days, this would be an overlay type
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Why would Rexx Date/Time be different from ASCBEWST Date/Time?
Would anyone have an idea as to what
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Why would Rexx Date/Time be different from ASCBEWST
Date/Time?
Very good point, Paul, thanks. That
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 9:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Resume cover letters.
snip
So what would *you* name a bank?
snip
Nobody Cares, Nobody Bothers (NCNB,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Quick I hope COBOL question
On 9 Oct 2006 14:24:46 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I know
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Software Pricing
You'd think IT was the name of a new religion instead of a business
expense.) Do the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Linkage Editor
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:28:28 -0500, Mark Hammond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 3:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 2007 DST Changes
snip
Alas, UNIX doesn't do leap seconds; forbidden by POSIX; always uses
UTC.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John H. Lang
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 1:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Wars and Allies (was: The Fate of VM)
These days, most war (and lots of other evil) is perpetrated
by
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMP/E
Gibney, Dave wrote:
Ok, I couldn't read such granularity in the syntax. It seemed all
or
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
