Hear, hear ! ;)
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Edward Jaffe
Skickat: den 25 maj 2007 02:07
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
[snip
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 05/24/2007
at 09:23 PM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Which, according to an American lawyer I know, is bogus. The law was
never passed (as of a year ago).
Which law did he cite? S1648? The Murkowski bill was not passed, but
you CAN-SPAM (S877) was passed. Of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/24/2007
at 04:42 PM, Neil Duffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
An', yes, he did mention, As an FYI, by law this email is not spam.
along with the Congress citation.
So he's not only spamming, he's also lying to you. S877 says no such
thing.
--
Shmuel (Seymour
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 05/24/2007
at 05:42 PM, Thompson, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
While you and I agree it is SPAM, the U CAN SPAM act was passed into
law -- perhaps it is not the bill our friend has quoted, but
never-the-less it was passed into law.
Alas, yes, but S977 does *not*
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/24/2007
at 06:13 PM, Kenneth E Tomiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Wavemind replied:
I will honor your request and remove your contact from my list.
As an FYI, by law this email is not spam.
Rule 1: spammers lie.
Under Bills.1618 Title III passed by the 105th U.S.
: Thursday, 24 May 2007 1:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN
readership?
snip---
As is my want, I always respond with a terse opinion of spam when it
appears to be a real email
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 24 May 2007 3:52 PM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN
readership?
Rick,
I'll be stuck with it soon myself. I'm transferring to our Santa Clara
headquarters next week.
I hope
Me too. I thought they got a copy of the WAVV registration list because I get
a lot of unwanted solicitations right after WAVV every year.
--
Bill Dodge
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (703)627-2455
If you don't know where you are going, any road will take you there.
Lewis Carroll
If you
On Wed, 23 May 2007 18:44:22 -0500, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did and forwarded it to Darren.
Too late. They already accomplished what they wanted to - even if
Darren removes them now. That also won't keep them from spamming
in the future unless we all change our email addresses.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour
J.)
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject
Need help on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to
an address that I use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the
message
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
As is my want, I always respond with a terse
On May 24, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Ron Hawkins wrote:
Rick,
I'll be stuck with it soon myself. I'm transferring to our Santa Clara
headquarters next week.
I hope no-one beats me up for taking a job from an American...
Ron
Is it too late to change our immigration laws:) ?
Ed
On May 24, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
-
SNIP--
---
Too late. They already accomplished what they wanted to - even if
Darren removes them now. That also won't keep them from spamming
in the
Yes, I have received the same.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
In a message dated 5/24/2007 7:42:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Safe to say I would never consider giving them any business and I'm sure
most if not all the other spam-ees feel the same.
BTW, we don't need another 100 posts saying I got one too.
Off to
On Wed, 23 May 2007 16:18:48 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to an address that I
use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that it is in
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
On May 24, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
-
SNIP
On Wed, 23 May 2007 19:12:57 -0400, Bob Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're spamming the postership. This address got the spam but my work
address, which is subscribed but almost never posted from, did not.
If so, it's an old postership, since I haven't posted here for quite some
time,
Tony Harminc wrote:
They claim to be an IBM Business Partner. I wonder if IBM would be
interested to know that thay are partnering with spammers.
Partnering with???!! I get *lots* of unsolicited email from IBM for
product announcements, seminars, webcasts, etc. The ones I find most
offensive
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 05/23/2007
at 09:43 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Two, in fact. Yet another company to ignore.
Oh, I won't ignore it; I'll complain to his Internet providers.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/24/2007
at 12:42 PM, Ron Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As is my want, I always respond with a terse opinion of spam when it
appears to be a real email address. His response is that some wacko
bill in the US defines it as non-spam because it has unsubscribe
tagged
On 2007.05.24, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
main.lst wrote about Re: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-
MAIN readership? to IBM-Main:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 05/23/2007 at 09:43 PM, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Two, in fact. Yet another company to ignore.
Oh, I
As an FYI, by law this email is not spam. along with the Congress citation.
Which, according to an American lawyer I know, is bogus.
The law was never passed (as of a year ago).
Unsolicited e-mail is SPAM.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
As an FYI, by law this email is not spam. along
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
I told them:
I would not contract with any organization that culls email addresses from
just anywhere. I do add them to my list and warn
Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
[snip]
Since others recognize the sleezy practice I now will tell my colleagues to
avoid them. And start a web page with them on top.
You guys have way too much time on your hands. If WaveMind's spam
managed to get past our SpamBlocker, I probably deleted their
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to an address that I
use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that it is in
response to anything specific that I posted. Has anybody else received
these?
--
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
me too
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Yes, a few hours ago, and I immediately unsubscribed.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to an address that I
use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that it is in
response to anything specific that I posted. Has anybody
I got one earlier today as well.
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to an address that I
use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that it is in
response to anything
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to an address that I
use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that it is in
response to anything specific that I posted. Has anybody
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
I just received two e-mails from
On Wed, 23 May 2007 16:18:48 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to an address that I
use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that it is in
response to anything
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help on
your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to an address that I use
only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that it is in
response to anything specific that I posted. Has anybody else received
these?
I received on
They're spamming the postership. This address got the spam but my work
address, which is subscribed but almost never posted from, did not.
Bob
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to
I did and forwarded it to Darren.
Ed
On May 23, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to an address that I
use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that
I received one too. I spammed him right back by offering *him* the services
of my (one-man) consulting firm. :-)
- Original Message -
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:18 PM
Subject: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
I just
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
I just received two e-mails
] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject Need help
on your IBM Mainframe project?, one addressed to an address that I
use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that it is in
response to anything specific that I posted. Has
Subject: Re: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership?
I received one too. I spammed him right back by offering *him* the
services
of my (one-man) consulting firm. :-)
- Original Message -
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:18 PM
Subject
snip---
As is my want, I always respond with a terse opinion of spam when it
appears to be a real email address. His response is that some wacko
bill in the US defines it as non-spam because it has unsubscribe tagged
to the bottom.
Seeing as I
43 matches
Mail list logo
