Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-11 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
*** Dave O'Brien NIH Contractor From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of L D Owen [ldowen2...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 3:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical I agree with don't

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-10 Thread L D Owen
I agree with don't cancel as many bad things can and do happen. When you hold RECYCLE, it will finish the tape it is currently recycling, and if I'm not wrong, it will finish the entire volume chain (if the volume was part of a chain). Try HOLD RECYCLE EOD instead as it will hold at the end

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-05 Thread Traylor, Terry
Storage Management Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg (602) 977-5154 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jacky Bright Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 7:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical But when DFHSM

DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread Jacky Bright
Hello, Since last 2-3 days observing very strange behaviour of DFHSM. In the midnight DFHSM is not responding to any migration and recall request. Its started task DFHSM is not taking any CPU. But it was responding to all DFHSM QUERY commands. Tried cancelling ACTIVE REQUESTS using CANCEL USER

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread Lizette Koehler
First, The CDS, OCDS, Journal backups will quiesce DFHSM during that time. Go back through SYSLOG and see when they start and stop. It just might be normal processing and you just need to wait until the backups of the CDS etal complete. How long do your backups take? Are you waiting long

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread Jacky Bright
But when DFHSM is hanging then even for 2 hours intermittently in response to QUERY ACTIVE command gets status CDS Backup in progress. When DFHSM is cancelled and restarted then backup completes in few minutes. Can CDS Backup run concurrently with other DFHSM operations ? Jacky On 3/4/09,

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread Staller, Allan
BTDTGTTS, This is what has been colloquially known as a 'fatal embrace' and is not just limited to DFHSM. In my experience this has been caused by multiple HSM functions running in parallel with w/DFHSM CDS backup. The CDS backup enqueues exclusively and seperately on all three CDS's and the

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan [allan.stal...@kbm1.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical BTDTGTTS, This is what has been colloquially known as a 'fatal embrace' and is not just limited to DFHSM. In my

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread Staller, Allan
I have modified my schedule to do the same. The CDS backups rarely (with the exception of SSM) occur during concurrent migration and backup. BTW, I have also had this situation occur when a recycle was processing concurrent w/CDS backup. In my most recent case, a multi-vol recycle was running

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan [allan.stal...@kbm1.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical I have modified my schedule to do the same. The CDS backups rarely (with the exception of SSM) occur during

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread Jacky Bright
...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan [allan.stal...@kbm1.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical BTDTGTTS, This is what has been colloquially known as a 'fatal embrace' and is not just limited to DFHSM. In my experience

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread Staller, Allan
Agreed. However the OP is the one that cancelled DFHSM. snip If it is a recycle impacting CDS Backups, the recycle can simply be held. Recycle will then end pre-maturely and CDS Backup will proceed. There should not be any need to cancel DFHSM in this instance. /snip

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
NIH Contractor From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jacky Bright [jacky.bri...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical Yes. Backing up directly to VTS

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Of Staller, Allan [allan.stal...@kbm1.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical Agreed. However the OP is the one that cancelled DFHSM. snip If it is a recycle impacting CDS Backups, the recycle can simply be held. Recycle

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread Gibney, Dave
) [C] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical If it is a recycle impacting CDS Backups, the recycle can simply be held. Recycle will then end pre-maturely and CDS Backup will proceed. There should not be any need to cancel DFHSM

Re: DFHSM Issue - Critical

2009-03-04 Thread Ambat Ravi Nair
Questions: 1. how long does it take for the virtual tape to be recalled from the stacked volume? or is that a native tape drive attached to the ATL of the VTS ? 2. i assume you're running HSM in a Sysplex: what are the values of CDSQ/CDSR? - ravi. On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:38:52 +, Jacky