Tom, I meant here not in IBM-MAIN, for sure ! Apologies, but it wasn't my
intention at all.
Max Scarpa
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
That one day is coming in 40 days, Shane. No worries, though.
Something will come through.
But to the point, I understand there are lots reasons why shops
implement soft-capping. I contend that doing it using strictly this
methodology could inhibit a revenue generating workload from meeting the
I've been trying to extract and sort some records where
a character form date field (Dddd) is found at two
different positions in the input record, depending on some
indicator in a fix position elsewhere.
I thought I could
1.) copy the date field to the beginning of each record
Jim Mulder wrote:
snip
It checks to see
if you specified WLM PAV when you defined the device in HCD. Since
WLM doesn't need to manage PAVs when the control unit has been told
to use HyperPAV mode, our intention was that the specification of
WLM PAV in HCD would be irrelevant for HyperPAV
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:34:08 +0200, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote:
Does anyone know for sure the order of INCLUDE vs. INREC?
The manual only says that INREC can modify records before they
are sorted, merged or copied.
Thanks, Norbert.
It seems I didn't do a good job on searching the manual.
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
snip
We are considering using PSF over IP to run IBM 6500 printers
snip
The line mode migration exit makes the implementation verot much of a
printing shop, so there's not a lot of different/complicated stuff.
JES2 parms
/* DEFINE A FUNCTIONAL SUBSYSTEM FSS FOR PSF
FSS(FSSPSF)
I am using the freeware version of QWS3270, specifying actual IP addresses.
2 of my co-workers are successfully using Cisco VPN software and QWS3270 to
connect to the mainframe. They are also using the same internet provider,
ATT. They are using an older version of the VPN software, but I do not
We are considering using PSF over IP to run IBM 6500 printers, we are zOS1.7. I
am looking to see if anyone is using this and how it is working out. Along with
that considering using the line mode migration feature to automatically load
FCB and page def information, looking for feed back from
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GAVIN Darren * OPS EAS
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JAVA un z/OS
Something to Remember,
Java is a Byte Code (two bytes actually)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GAVIN Darren * OPS EAS
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JAVA un z/OS
Something to Remember,
snip
Additionally in the case of
I need to pull out my WLM Managed Initiators to prepare for the
outsourcer. In preparation, in testing, when we issue a $TI or $SI for
initiators after initiator 99 I get $HASP650 IA0 INVALID OPERAND OR
MISPLACED OPERAND. Anyone hit a similar problem or have a solution, we
are at z/OS
We do the PSF to 6500's and 2105's and micr IBM printersconverted from
3900 and 4300's impact's.
email off line and will send you proc's --- APSPROC I use ...was a couple
of setup fdef's/pdef's I had to adjust but fcb's used on label was a
little sticky..
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 16:15 -0700, GAVIN Darren * OPS EAS wrote:
No matter how much you try and tune Java, or listen to Java Only folks
explain that it's just as fast. It simply is not, at best it is only
marginally faster then running REXX in interpretive mode.
You overlook the Just-In-Time
Man, I hate replying to my own questions. Our ops guys figured that you
need paren's around the actual initiator *after* initiator number 99.
Hopefully the formatting of the commands below comes out.
$SI99
$HASP892 INIT(99)
$HASP892 INIT(99) STATUS=STARTING,CLASS=,
$HASP892
I found the problem. It is with a software product called Performance
Essentials. It is a VSAM optimizer. It had an issue when writing the status
record to the PAGE dataset. The vendor had a fix (PSP30420). It was applied
and now it works. I discovered this when I could create a valid
Hi Steve and thank you a lot for replies.
1) I suspected it as regards service class not reaching its goal. I
suspected that the work was not set aside from what I understood (and from
the calculation I imagine WLM does) as this could complicate WLM or make
WLM algorithms 'weak' .
So you say
Thanks for all of the good discussions. What I am reading here is that the
only need to size the PLPA and COMMON is to save DASD space. If you have
the DASD space, then just allocate a 2GB (combined PLPA and COMMON) page
datasets and be done with it, until 64 bit addressing arrives.
One
Max,
I realize that I did not fully answer your second question: since
passage through periods is based on service accumulation, a unit of work
(batch job) accumulating only initiator delay (no service) will stay in
first period until it is fully in the system and receiving CPU and I/O
LLA and LNKLST no longer require datasets in mastercatalog…
Does JES2, or may we use a unit and volser?
John Donnelly
z/OS Systems Services
National Semiconductor
Corporation
2900 Semiconductor Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95051
PH: 408-721-5640
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:08:47 +, John P Donnelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LLA and LNKLST no longer require datasets in mastercatalog
Does JES2, or may we use a unit and volser?
I assume you are referring to JES2 PROCLIBs. JES2 has always supported
proclib data sets that were not cataloged in
I suspected that the work was not set aside from what I understood (and from
the calculation I imagine WLM does) as this could complicate WLM or make
WLM algorithms 'weak' . So you say that there's a waste of system resources
that are used to (try to) reach the given goal as it will never be
Peter Hunkeler wrote on 09/21/2007 02:34:08 AM:
I've been trying to extract and sort some records where
a character form date field (Dddd) is found at two
different positions in the input record, depending on some
indicator in a fix position elsewhere.
I thought I could
1.) copy the
Mark, thankyou...
John Donnelly
z/OS Systems Services
National Semiconductor
Corporation
2900 Semiconductor Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95051
PH: 408-721-5640
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mark Zelden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 8:18 AM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Friday, 21 September, 2007 06:13
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JAVA un z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL
Ron
That's the way with labels, they can be a little sticky.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: PSF Printer
We do the PSF to 6500's and
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:27:57 -0400, Richards.Bob wrote:
But to the point, I understand there are lots reasons why shops
implement soft-capping. I contend that doing it using strictly this
methodology could inhibit a revenue generating workload from meeting the
needs of the customer.
If your system is zOS 1.2 or above you can specify your proclibs
in JES2PARM using PROCLIB statment.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Engenharia de Software - Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
Tel: 55 11 4197-2021 Fax:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:20:36 -0400, Gerhard Adam wrote:
I suspected that the work was not set aside from what I understood (and
from
the calculation I imagine WLM does) as this could complicate WLM or make
WLM algorithms 'weak' . So you say that there's a waste of system
resources that are
Dave Kopischke wrote:
As your workloads increase, the lull periods decrease and you no longer see
that ablity to run at 90 - 100% of capacity (We've had a really hard time
trying to chart this and understand it from a forecasting standpoint). This is
the point where you're running out of
Mike Feeley said:
One other point of interest that I have read about is the different
between the PLPA and the COMMON page dataset when it comes to storage
protection. PLPA is READ and COMMON is READ/WRITE. Can this lead to
potential storage overlays? For example, the 1 cylinder PLPA situation
It's not clear to me if the whole service class will be ignored or just the
JOB or task that cannot achieve its goal will be ignored though.
WLM always works at the service class aggregate.
That's why a sparsely populated S/C is doomed.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
So, the PLPA pages residing in the COMMON page dataset (from overflow
condition) will have the page protection bit on also as if they were residing
in
the PLPA page dataset?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 09/21/2007
02:49:26 PM:
So, the PLPA pages residing in the COMMON page dataset (from overflow
condition) will have the page protection bit on also as if they were
residing in the PLPA page dataset?
Yes, they will.
Jim Mulder
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:29:32 -0300, ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your system is zOS 1.2 or above you can specify your proclibs
in JES2PARM using PROCLIB statment.
I mentioned the PROCLIB statement in my last post. The use of
PROCLIB statements instead of JCL in the
Yes,
The page dataset that the slot is loaded into storage from doesn't
matter. Remember that the page table for PLPA/COMMON never gets paged
out, just the page itself.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From:
Mike Feeley:
So, the PLPA pages residing in the COMMON page dataset (from overflow
condition) will have the page protection bit on also as if they were
residing in the PLPA page dataset?
The Page Protection bit gets set in the Page Table Entry by the OS when
PLPA is built. The page table is
Unsubcribe
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
You may try this out
Use ICETOOL
TOOLIN
COPY from Rawin to INVDATA using CTL1
COPY FROM RAWIN to FINAL using CTL2
COPY FROM INVDATA TO FINAL USING CTL3
COPY FROM RAWIN TO FINAL USING CTL4
CTL1CNTL
OUTFIL FNAMES=INVDATA
Rajeev wrote on 09/21/2007 11:48:32 AM:
You may try this out
Use ICETOOL
TOOLIN
COPY from Rawin to INVDATA using CTL1
COPY FROM RAWIN to FINAL using CTL2
COPY FROM INVDATA TO FINAL USING CTL3
COPY FROM RAWIN TO FINAL USING CTL4
...
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2007
at 12:26 PM, Anton Britz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So IBM is giving up on the Lotus Notes race and now declaring all their
software as Open Source
I wish. I'd settle for providing source to licensees. IBM is still very
much OCO on the mainframe side.
It's not clear to me if the whole service class will be ignored or just the
JOB or
task that cannot achieve its goal will be ignored though.
Yes, the entire service class is ignored by the Skip Clock setting. What isn't
so clear is what the status of resources is that are owned by this
Dave,
Ed Jaffe spoke quite nicely about the IPLA impact as long as your shop
has signed the IPLA sub-capacity agreement. If not, upgrade fees are
immediately due based on purchased capacity, soft-capped or not.
I believe it is the responsibility of capacity planners to make sure
there is
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:53:44 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Dave Kopischke wrote:
As your workloads increase, the lull periods decrease and you no longer see
that ablity to run at 90 - 100% of capacity (We've had a really hard time
trying to chart this and understand it from a forecasting
Dave,
Feel free to give me a call.
Bob Richards
VP, Enterprise Technologist
-
- Enterprise Technology Infrastructure-
- Mainframe Services Capacity Performance Mgmt -
- Office: 404-575-2798
Dave Kopischke wrote:
How can I tell what my entitlement is As far as I know, we're entitled to
the full capacity. But I don't know how that part is set nor negotiated.
If you haven't been paying software upgrade charges to IBM, then your
shop might not be using sub-capacity pricing
I was Googling for some MQ information this afternoon and happened upon
a state IT website. Since it was a state I've often thought of moving
to, I began browsing further to look at job postings and tried to find
out where they were physically located. Somehow I came upon a link for
HOD and
There is information at the bottom of each message that indicates how to
unsubscribe.
Stead, Joe wrote:
Unsubcribe
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
My first reaction would be to go back to their web site and try to find
a security individual or IT director level person and try to tell them
about the hole. I know I wouldn't want that hole in MY state's system
(or my company's)! If it was there, I'd want to know about it.
Rex
-Original
Jim Harrison wrote:
to click it. Lo and behold, I got the VTAM logon screen for their z/os
system! My question is, is this common? I can see doing it via a VPN,
but open to the public? Granted, guessing their applids, userIDs
This could be a huge exposure, or it could be the safest
In a message dated 9/21/2007 7:46:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This could be a huge exposure, or it could be the safest thing
in the world, as these things go. I once worked for a company
that had open access. They also had an egg-shaped device for
each user,
51 matches
Mail list logo
