On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:58 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
---SNIP---
Here's the problem. IFASMFDL does most of what IFASMFDP does (and
more),
but what it *doesn't* do is clear out the dumped SMF data. In other
words,
after archiving the contents of a log stream to a flat file,
On Jan 31, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Gary Green wrote:
Well, all us write in our resumes that we "look for a challenge".
From that
position profile, I can't think of anything more challenging. :)
Would you really take that type of a job... out in the middle of a
desert and LA is a good 90 miles
On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Gary Green wrote:
I have not followed this thread so forgive if this was covered
earlier...
Speaking off the top of my head (yeah, I know, I know...)
I need to leave aside the fact that any change to an OEM's SMF record
requires tweaking of any vendor record spe
I have two of them and neither took over 3 hours to format. I noticed that
they had accepted the auto update of Vista, which was pretty dumb of them in
the first place, and that appears to be what caused their problem. I
replaced 2 WD 500GB drives with these, and while I thought they were very
qu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Mednick) writes:
> it's not a case of how valuable the data is, more importantly it's to
> do with what the security classification is that has been assigned to
> the data. Depending on the data's security classification dictates the
> media overwriting/sanitisation metho
> Stephan:
>
> It comes down purely (IMO) how valuable the data is. If its
> nuclear bomb data (or the like) then I would suggest that
> cost is not an issue.
Ed,
it's not a case of how valuable the data is, more importantly it's to do with
what the security classification is that has been ass
Skip,
We're still at 1.7, so I can't speak to SMF data yet.
Operlog we just set up with a 5 day RETPD in the logstream def'n. After
that, Logger manages the datasets and makes them disappear. Copying to DASD
for archiving is still done from the Syslog, and happens the way it always
has. Syslog an
On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:15 PM, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Niall wrote:
---SNIP---
Unless there is some weird legislative standard which says that
encryption is
fine for transmission of data over open IP networks, but is not
fine for
resundant data held on permanent storage.
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Stephen Mednick wrote:
--SNIP
The downside of physically destroying the media as against using a
certified
erase solution to remove the contents is that the obsolete storage
media can
never be acquired on a lease-basis given that the box i
After a decade of parallel sysplexing, I feel like a rookie with log
streams. Up to now we've used system logger only for CICS and RRS. No
operlog, no logrec. So we've never had to deal with the question of how to
handle real data that needs to be kept (archived), massaged, and cleaned
up.
I'm now
On Jan 31, 2008, at 2:29 PM, George Fogg wrote:
I have worked at several top secret installations in the past and I
was told
that they take the old DASD and drop them in a acid bath then cut
them up.
Never saw it happened so not totally sure it was done or not.
George Fogg
George,
Well
Opps, posted to the news group by accident.
I will try and find the link, or you may find it when you do the Google,
but there has been an update.
The original migration to the mainframe was using IFL's on their
existing IBM mainframes. After 1 year they had something like 700
virtual images, 2
Tony Harminc wrote:
Then it seems that METAL inhibits use of the ARCH option, so METAL C must
generate code at the ARCH(CURRENT) level, which means it can (and does) use
LARL and the like from the long displacement facility. Well, no, actually it
accepts ARCH(5), which says is the default and gen
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
Young mainframers' group gains momentum
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/013108-young-mainframers-group-gains.html
Young mainframers' group gains momentum
http://www.computerworld.co
There are several data protection standards applying over here in Europe, but
I would guess that I could at least defend myself to SOX auditors if I chose
to use encryption in the scenarios I described. Alas, your mileage may vary in
all of these things.
My interest in the subject is at the
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Niall
> Sent: Friday, 1 February 2008 10:16 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Data Erasure Products
>
< SNIP >
> But none of these anecdotes answer my quest
I was looking forward to this, but now that I've found a little time to play
with it, I am a little puzzled.
There are options METAL and GENASM, and the doc says that METAL forces
GENASM, but when I try GENASM without METAL, I get
CCN0458(S) Option GENASM is invalid because option METAL is not sp
>Unless there is some weird legislative standard which says that encryption is
>fine for transmission of data over open IP networks, but is not fine for
resundant data held on permanent storage.
I'm interpreting this from a Canadian perspective, but after working for a
company headquartered in
Rick & Dave,
I can not locate the tape to know what the dataset or for that matter if its
really a alternate tape a migrated tape.. etc. In my search I have two other
tapes that are prefixed with H** and took care of those but can not find the
others..
If you know of anything else that I can t
>It was true back in the 90's that the mainframe was more expensive for most
>customers.
I actually disagree with that.
Back then, PCs and *NIX platforms were a lot more expensive.
If you looked at cost per seat, and cost for support personell, the M/F was
still cheaper.
The whole TCO argument
I've heard from my Amdahl days that the decommissioned machines had to be
destroyed rather than returned for their parts value - and that the destruction
was pretty definitive.
But none of these anecdotes answer my question: would you feel happy after,
for instance, a DR test, to know that the
I'd suggest that you do a seach on "mainframe TCO" on Google to get
some more information on this topic. I spend a lot of time at IBM
educating customers on what the true cost of ownership is for various
technology platforms they choose. It was true back in the 90's that
the mainframe was more expe
> What are the entries in your VLF that give your system a big performance
> boost?
>
Class names CSVLLA, IKJEXEC, IGGCAS, and for RACF, IRRGTS, IRRACEE, IRRGMAP,
IRRUMAP and IRRSMAP.
George Fogg
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
What are the entries in your VLF that give your system a big performance
boost?
John Norgauer
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! "JN 2004
"Hardware e
What a coincidence. We IPLed a sandbox system this morning and saw a
similar problem with SSHD. It appeared to us that OMVS had not yet fully
initialized. Automation complained about SSHD, and several minutes later it
was (re)started manually with no problem. The original return code 255 may
just b
Hey, that's great news! I used to run a forklift...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 3:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Migration from Mainframe to othre platfor
I think I've mentioned this here before, but I used to work at P&H Mining
Equipment in Milwaukee. They had a mainframe running SAP/R2, and several other
applications. It was an MP3000-H50. In the mid 90's, they bought Joy Mining
in Pennsylvania. Joy converted their old 3081 to an Lpar on our
> -Original Message-
> > Ed
> I have worked at several top secret installations in the past
> and I was told that they take the old DASD and drop them in a
> acid bath then cut them up.
> Never saw it happened so not totally sure it was done or not.
> George Fogg
>
Physical destructi
I stand corrected. OUTDD and MSGFILE are not related at all, and indeed
there seems to be no prohibition nor error in specifying different OUTDD
ddnames for different COBOL programs in the same enclave. I just tested
a simple main program and subprogram with different OUTDD values at
compile time
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:12:22 -0800, Keith E. Moe wrote:
>Second, there was one mnemonic that caught my eye. I do not know what
it does, but it's probably one that none of us will forget: PTF.
Are you certain that it wasn't PTFF (which was already described in the
current Principles of Opera
I see nothing at:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IGY3PG32/2.4.39
that says that you can't have different OUTDD values for different programs
within a single load module (or dynamic call sequence). If you want the
specific DD to be "in" the program, add a
Process
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pat Mihalec
> Sent: Friday, 1 February 2008 7:04 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Data Erasure Products
>
> I have used FDR Erase. It is easy to install and use. We last
> used
My uncle did design work on satellites and all his top secret work took
place in a vault. When it came time to replace/erase his personal disk
drives, all of them were physically crushed into a cube as I recall.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:48 AM, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Niall wrote:
>
>> How about encrypting the volume in its entirety before deletion?
>>
>> I've been through the DR/deletion exercise a few times, and used an
>> in-house
>> utility to overwrite the disk. If available, however, would
>> encryption not
Well, all us write in our resumes that we "look for a challenge". From that
position profile, I can't think of anything more challenging. :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 3:07 PM
To:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:45 AM, Mark H. Young wrote:
---SNIP-
NO, I meant "level 2 support" like IBM and OTHER vendors (OEM) have
THEIR
level 2 support (which is usually the developers, or AT LEAST some
coders).
Vendors' help desk is level one support, wh
I have used FDR Erase. It is easy to install and use. We last used it
after a DR test.
Not too expensive.
Pat Mihalec
Rush University Medical Center
Senior System Programmer
(312) 942-8386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subsc
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:48 AM, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Niall wrote:
How about encrypting the volume in its entirety before deletion?
I've been through the DR/deletion exercise a few times, and used an
in-house
utility to overwrite the disk. If available, however, would
encryption not
be a possible
>Now you can download the new MFNetDisk with the support of MIDAW.
Maybe, I'm too picky.
But, all I've seen from this poster is stuff about the product.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a
Ron,
I also am an MF bigot, but also realize that we live in a wide world,
and that far too many people who should know better sometimes have a
tendency to view the IT world as z/OS vs Windows, when in reality there
are a lot of UNIX servers that are approaching in many ways, and
surpassing in oth
Training employees works when the expectation by both employers and
employees is for career employees. Both sides need to favor the long
term over the short term.
Training a workplace works when expectation by both tax-payers and
tax-beneficiaries is long term. When politicians and voters are
HI,
Now you can download the new MFNetDisk with the support of MIDAW.
Some of the people assume that this product is a toy, OK but it can do all
the important tasks of EMC, HDS and IBM disk and also some tasks of backup
(in the PC), DR in no time, mirroring to any real disk (EMC, HDS and IBM),
33
Thanks to everyone who replied on and off list. We've been looking at all the
suggestions. Now it looks like we may have a resolution.
One of our server guys has been working with McKesson on the problem.
Yesterday they found a 4 gig log file on the server that bothered them. They
renamed the log
I have seen several shops get or try to get off the mainframe. The biggest
reason the upper management gives for trying to get off the mainframe is
no one coming out of college knows anything about the mainframe. When I
was hired as a SYSPROG I had never seen a mainframe the company gave some
t
Wayne,
Thanks for correcting me. I am a MF bigot, but I am also a realist. Do you
know if z/OS with RACF is the only server/software combination that has
these certification? One quick Google gave me this at the top of the page:
http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/government/doc/content/news/pressre
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:30:12 +0100, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Not having seen the original post (did it only go to the newsfeed?),
>
... I see it in the archives.
>this sounds suspiciously like a problem that was reported in the
>early nineties and that took more than 2 or 3 years.
Radoslaw,
I'm interpreting the original reference to mirroring to mean continuous
replication, and not a migration exercise. In this context PAS and TDMF are
solutions up to the Virtual Storage restrictions they have. For 100 volumes
they will probably be OK, but for 2000 volumes you will have som
Are you interested in just z/OS stories or in stories about mainframe
Linux also? One big story back in 2006 was the one about Nationwide
Insurance moving the processing from 400 servers to 2 IBM z900 Linux
systems. At the time they estimate the savings to by $15 million over 3
years. Here is on
Art,
If these are alternate tapes this is a normal message.
ThanksRick
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Art
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 11:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DFHSM ARC0184I error
All,
I issue
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:31:33 -0500, Scott Ford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... I think if my memory serves me correctly that
>NPDA was designed for usage with IBM modemsright ?
>...
One very small part of NPDA dealt with running tests on IBM modems.
The basic function of NPDA is/was to dis
Hi all,
Tivoli is great, but then again, sometime...
I have searched the web, but came up with nothing for this one...
We have z/890 Host and several Sun Solaris 10 FTA's
Last night we had a problem where the jobs were failing with OSUF, which
is understandable because the symphony file is not
Mark Pace wrote:
It was a surprise to me when I went looking for it on my freshly installed
z/OS 1.9 system and it was not there.
Check SYS1.MIGLIB. You should find AMATERSE there with its TRSMAIN
alias. MIGLIB is forced into the linklist, so you have access to it
without a need for a STEP
All,
I issue this command:
LIST TTOC SELECT(hsm.volume)
I received several of these messages:
ARC0184I ERROR WHEN READING THE DFSMSHSM CONTROL DATA SET X
RECORD FOR H1, RC=0004
and not figured out on how to resolve. Has anyone gotten these messages
and can recommend on how to resolve.
>It was a surprise to me when I went looking for it on my freshly installed
>>z/OS 1.9 system and it was not there.
Look in SYS1.MIGLIB. It's on our 1.9 system and it was on the ESP beta's long
before GA.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
-
I have not followed this thread so forgive if this was covered earlier...
Speaking off the top of my head (yeah, I know, I know...)
I need to leave aside the fact that any change to an OEM's SMF record
requires tweaking of any vendor record specific downstream processing. If
all this processing
On Jan 31, 2008 10:57 AM, John Eells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500, John Eells wrote:
> >> See APAR OA19194, which makes AMATERSE, alias TRSMAIN, available on
> z/OS
> >> R7 and up. That's all supported releases since R6 is out of servic
Ron,
First I wanted to say I like HDS solutions, including storage
virtualization. I just wanted to complement your message, not to
criticize you or HDS solutions. However you said the good news and I
added the bad ones.
Regarding PPRC, etc. - yes it is paid feature, usually with
capacity-b
Radoslaw,
In your JCL PARM specify the LE runtime option MSGFILE(yourdd), for COBOL like
this:
//STEP01 EXEC PGM=yourcobolprogram,PARM='yourpgmparms/MSGFILE(NEWOUTDD)'
//NEWOUTDD DD SYSOUT=*
I don't believe there is a way for different COBOL programs in the same LE
enclave to use different OUT
The compiler option default is OUTDD(SYSOUT).
Q1: Is there corresponding runtime option?
Q2: Can I specify other ddname for the above in COBOL program ?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydz
Why not have the applications encrypt sensitive data before they write it.
Seems to me that this is the logical place to protect data. DASD shredding
would become an academic argument...
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of SUB
Radoslaw,
I think it's been two years and one generation of storage since you looked
at the pricing. I don't do sales so I don't know if it is still as ugly as
you make out. There are plenty of customers using it.
Are you telling me that XRC is free? Or PPRC, SRDF, Flashcopy and Timefinder
are f
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:00:18 -0600, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Wright
>>
>> Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500, John Eells wrote:
>> >> See APAR OA19194, which makes AMAT
Chase, John wrote:
Any plans to assign an RSU sourceid to them? I'm reasonably sure we're
not the only shop that "routinely" applies only RSUs, HIPERs and
PEFIXes.
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/PubAllNum/Flash10106
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeeps
This takes me back a few years...
I worked for a building society, that was eaten alive by RBS, and when I
joined I was told by the person who I was going to report to for the
next few years... that there are 2 Systems Prod, and 'the
LPAR'(referring to the development LPAR, of course for some time
Walt,
In regards to the EAL4+, that was what I remembered, but I was going by
the contents of
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/racf/whatsnew.html
because I wanted a reference page from IBM. You may want to try and get
this page updated.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Softwa
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:30:11 -0500, Wayne Driscoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Since z/OS 1.6
>RACF has had CAPP EAL 3+ certification, and LSP EAL 3+ certification.
>
Thanks for mentioning that, Wayne. Just a couple of points:
(1) It's z/OS (when using RACF) that has the Common Criteria certifi
I dont want AMATERSE ... I want PROFESSIONALS
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500, John Eells wrote:
>> See APAR OA19194, which makes AMATERSE, alias TRSMAIN,
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain CO
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Wright
>
> Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500, John Eells wrote:
> >> See APAR OA19194, which makes AMATERSE, alias TRSMAIN, available on
> >> z/OS
> >> R7 and up. That's all supporte
ISTMSFLD ??
>
>
>>I'm looking for the best way to suppress some informational VTAM
>>messages
in syslog. Is there anybody want to share this to me ?
>>
>--
Dennis Barrett
Systems Programmer
Laclede Gas Co.
720 Olive Street, r
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500, John Eells wrote:
See APAR OA19194, which makes AMATERSE, alias TRSMAIN, available on z/OS
R7 and up. That's all supported releases since R6 is out of service and
AMATERSE is included in z/OS R9. The PTFs closed 4 November 2007. They
a
On Jan 31, 2008 8:45 AM, Mark H. Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:06:23 -0500, Don Leahy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >On Jan 30, 2008 11:51 AM, Mark H. Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> I've read ALL the responses on this topic. In reading the job posting, the
>
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500, John Eells wrote:
See APAR OA19194, which makes AMATERSE, alias TRSMAIN, available on z/OS
R7 and up. That's all supported releases since R6 is out of service and
AMATERSE is included in z/OS R9. The PTFs closed 4 November 2007. They
a
Here is the e-bay details with pictures and configuration
http://cgi.ebay.com/IBM-e-SERVER-zSERIES-890-2086-A04-MAINFRAME-
COMPUTER_W0QQitemZ260202032717QQihZ016QQcategoryZ64030QQssPageNa
meZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
--
For IBM-MA
I've come across a TLMS report which gives me the information needed to
build my export list. I'm looking at the manuals but haven't come across what
happens if the same volser shows up twice in the list...I know that the
EXPORT process will sort things according to the out code..but not what it
Ron,
With regard to "AFAIK it's been a long time since RACF had any sort of
special security
rating, and even then you had to disconnect the network", Since z/OS 1.6
RACF has had CAPP EAL 3+ certification, and LSP EAL 3+ certification.
Your above comment relates to the old DOD B1 rating that RACF,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500, John Eells wrote:
>
>See APAR OA19194, which makes AMATERSE, alias TRSMAIN, available on z/OS
>R7 and up. That's all supported releases since R6 is out of service and
>AMATERSE is included in z/OS R9. The PTFs closed 4 November 2007. They
>are:
>
>UA36927 - z/
Ed and Pat,
I was a VTAM old timer for a long time with 3745's , etc. I used Netview's
NLDM more than NPDA. I think if my memory serves me correctly that
NPDA was designed for usage with IBM modemsright ?
Regards,
Scott
IDF
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mai
We had an occurrence where BPXAS on behalf of FTPD ended with a return
code of 255. There were no error messages in SYSLOG or the log for BPXAS.
There were no software records in Logrec. It appears that it stopped as it
normally does but had this return code. Nothing appears to have failed.
Joe Denison wrote:
I'm having an issue with REXX EXECs (interpreted, not compiled) that seem to
*not* free storage after they terminate. Is this a known issue? Has anyone
else experienced this?
It would be helpful if you could go at least one step beyond what you
reported here to determin
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 01/28/2008
at 06:24 PM, Timothy Sipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Lots of products have already implemented that RFC,
What RFC? As of last month it was still just an Internet draft, as far as
I could tell.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
I
Try the following links:
IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998
An article to counterbalance all of those "we're moving off of the
mainframe" stories we see posted here.
http://blog.coleo.com/wp-content/uploads/200
Hi,
I am full of reports, sent to Management, about completely succesfull
conversions from the "old and expensive" "IBM Mainframe to other
platforms. And, as you may know, the most important argument is that the
Mainframe is very expensive and the same level of processing, with the
same degree of
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:06:23 -0500, Don Leahy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Jan 30, 2008 11:51 AM, Mark H. Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> I've read ALL the responses on this topic. In reading the job posting, the
>> first thing that struck me was the VERY FIRST line:
>>
>> The purpose of
Not having seen the original post (did it only go to the newsfeed?), this
sounds suspiciously like a problem that was reported in the early nineties and
that took more than 2 or 3 years. Unfortunately for the life of me, I don't
remember if it was fixed back then or if both the customer and I ga
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:50:08 -0600, Joe Denison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm having an issue with REXX EXECs (interpreted, not compiled) that seem to
>*not* free storage after they terminate. Is this a known issue? Has anyone
>else experienced this?
>
>(my apologies for the long post -- but w
My one concern would be to the future. If you were to leave, would a
replacement sysprog have to relearn a new vocabulary because there is a
different vocabulary in place? And since the people there don't know the
Z/OS equivalents, is there a risk that the gap between what they say and
what the new
How about encrypting the volume in its entirety before deletion?
I've been through the DR/deletion exercise a few times, and used an in-house
utility to overwrite the disk. If available, however, would encryption not
be a possible solution in that even if a shadow of the data were left, it
should
HI,
Yes, there are many ways to move data from one disk to another.
Easer and a free way are to use MFNetDisk ability to copy disks to other
disks without any cost and without any hardware and without any downtime for
the source disks.
The status of MFNetDisk is that the IBM MIDAW is under testi
88 matches
Mail list logo
