Hi all,
I have a situation where we'd like to replace SNA connections to remote
printers with pure TCP/IP.
The print devices are ordinary LAN printers like HP LaserJet, etc.
Currently these are connected by DLSw-attached Microsoft HIS servers.
Replacing DLSw with Enterprise Extender is not
In listserv%201005240750423059.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 05/24/2010
at 07:50 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
The old name goes away immediately, even if someone else is using the
file arbitrarily long.
To be more precise, a program that opened the old name will continue
using the old
we use IBM PCCOM for CICS print .
why do you need to use a PDT? or think you should? IBM pccom is support PDT.
you can define in your VTAM several IP LU . and open several pcom on a
station where the printer is defined.
after trying to get the same result with HIS EE i found this is the most
Jacques Swanevelder wrote:
I am looking for an ICKDS INIT UNDO utility. Can anybody help with such a
tool?
Ouch. Jacques, you are 100% out of luck.
Did you ever received ICK003D or similar WTOR confirmation messages?
Restore from a good backup is your only alternative.
Consider using
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Yeah. I just have not investigated how to deal with the side file.
It's on my list of things to look
at. :-)
Thanks,
Frank
If you don't need the contents of the side file you can allocate it to
Hi John,
That's correct, but I believe for it to work correctly, if you specify
separate, then the sysdebug DD needs to point to a file
Kind regards,
Peter
Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
02/06/2010 01:33 PM
Please respond
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Nuttall
Hi John,
That's correct, but I believe for it to work correctly, if you specify
separate, then the sysdebug DD needs to point to a file
Enterprise COBOL v4.2 with //SYSDEBUG DD DUMMY produced
I apologize to those who think this is a waste of time and bandwidth.
http://technologizer.com/2010/05/31/ibm-muppets/
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
Fair enough, though I was sure I read somewhere that with 'Separate' coded
the file created by the sysdebug DD was used during the Debugging process
? ...
Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
02/06/2010 02:05 PM
Please respond to
IBM
We use VPS/TCPIP and I do not see why it would be a larger project to implement
than setting up TN3270 for printing, which is a lot less flexible, so I heard.
Our VTAM applications use DRS/VPI, another LRS product, along with VPS/IP to do
the actual printing.
And LRS support has been great
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Nuttall
Fair enough, though I was sure I read somewhere that with 'Separate'
coded
the file created by the sysdebug DD was used during the Debugging
process
? ...
Indeed; that is its intent, and its contents
Peter Nuttall wrote:
Fair enough, though I was sure I read somewhere that with 'Separate' coded
the file created by the sysdebug DD was used during the Debugging process
? ...
Right. But the file created by the sysdebug DD statement at
compile time has its name stored in the load module;
Indeed, I can no longer find any pages on the Inet with System Resource Block
and BMC other than copies of the IBM-MAIN posts with those character strings.
All findable pages now say Service Request Block. I seriously doubt that the
folks at the Register follow this mailing list, but we know
McKown, John wrote:
I apologize to those who think this is a waste of time and bandwidth.
No need to apologize... ;-D
http://technologizer.com/2010/05/31/ibm-muppets/
Thanks. Very interesting.
Hmmm, I remember this very old joke:
What do you get if you hold two green balls in your hands?
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:58:06 -0500, Glen Gasior
glen.manages@gmail.com wrote:
*There is theory and there is reality. If you have a shop where the software
management process is essentially whatever was a good idea at the time,
software and hardware upgrades will be painfully time consuming
Or does it search in the home address space? This does not seem to be
described anywhere.
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 17:09:46 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
Or does it search in the home address space? This does not seem to be
described anywhere.
Purely a guess, but for a task mode invocation, since your TCB is in Home, I
would expect CSVQUERY to search in Home
Hi,lister
I know SMF99 record contain many useful information including the decisions
WLM have made.In our installation SMF99 record is not collected due to the
huge data volume.So if I take a console dump with WLM address space,is
there any available tools that can extract these SMF99 record
Johnny Ying wrote:
I know SMF99 record contain many useful information including the decisions
WLM have made.In our installation SMF99 record is not collected due to the
huge data volume.So if I take a console dump with WLM address space,is
there any available tools that can extract these SMF99
I was intrigued by this. I'd love to see them. I wonder if these are
available for viewing anywhere?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 07:33
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: OT:
If you can 'push' the sysout to a windows server (FTP?), you may want to
have a look at http://smartprinter.co.il/en/smartprinter.html a cheap and
work maker solution.
ITschak
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.govwrote:
We use VPS/TCPIP and I do not see why it
Try using GOOGLE. Also check YouTube. Then report back with any URLs you find.
Bill Fairchild
Software Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.4503 * Mobile: +1.508.341.1715
Email: bi...@mainstar.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original
Anyone else having trouble with the SCRT data submission website?
Ken Porowski
VP Mainframe Administration
CIT Group
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 10:08:50 -0500, Johnny Ying johnny.y...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,lister
I know SMF99 record contain many useful information including the decisions
WLM have made.In our installation SMF99 record is not collected due to the
huge data volume.So if I take a console dump with WLM
We do collect Type 99 records. Do you collect the SMF 100-102 records
(DB2) and or the SMF 110 records (CICS) records? They have a lot more
volume in number of bytes recorded than the Type 99 records. Here is
the record count and sizes we collected yesterday. We are a small shop,
but the
Try using GOOGLE. Also check YouTube. Then report back with any URLs you
find.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtCqcKzSVCU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hK5CE3T0aoU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RowwNXKEt4k
--
For IBM-MAIN
I guess this could be a religious debate, but since they've existed I've only
needed them 1 time for a PMR - and that was a long time ago when a lot
of wrinkles surrounding discretionary work were still being worked out.
So to me, collecting them and storing them all the time is a waste since
I just submitte4d our stuff successfully - 13:00 CDT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 11:29
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SCRT having trouble
Anyone else having trouble with
Seems like it was hung for a little while, all appears OK now.
-Original Message-
Porowski, Ken
Anyone else having trouble with the SCRT data submission website?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi Andrew,
We also use VPS, VPS/TCPIP, DRS, DRS/TCPIP. We run about 500-600 active
printers and we also use VPS/TCPIP and DRS/TCPIP to, among other things,
receive data from other platforms, write it to JES2 for printing, or write it
to z/OS datasets for for further processing on z.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ken Porowski
Anyone else having trouble with the SCRT data submission website?
The colleague who submitted ours at about 0800 CST this morning said
that the website indicated it was processing, but so far we've not
Thanks for the links. I liked the 3rd one best, the Cookie Monster and the
automated coffee making machine. If I had had access to that YouTube clip in
1987, I would have included it in my farcical SHARE presentation on the Hosed
System Architecture.
I first saw the Muppets on TV in the
I hope some of the network guru's out there can point me in the right direction.
I've been using command line FTP, doing PUT's and GET's to the MF for the
past couple of years.
I just migrated to a Vista PC. GET's work, PUT's appear to work - transfer
is successful, bytes are transmitted, the
The same could be said for many other SMF records that people collect and
store, but those could be looked at too. But since IBM has recommended to
turn them off (unless requested to collect) it's pretty much a no-brainer
to me.
You're correct that it is a religious debate.
And, since they
If there are any ibm-main watchers in Italy, please
drop me a line off list.
Thanks.
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com
* To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
+ Training your people is an
So to me, collecting them and storing them all the time is a waste since they
are really only useful (for the most part) to IBM and for diagnostic purposes.
Comparing SMF 99 to CICS and DB2 SMF records ... or SMF 30s and 70s is
not a good comparison. It's like keeping a trace on all time
All,
Has anyone set up hardware alerts logged on the HMC that goes to a
monitoring system? We had an issue this morning where due to a storm; we
lost power for 3 seconds (noted in a hardware message on the HMC) and
then threw a couple breakers that took out our cooling. We also had a
W dniu 2010-06-02 22:13, Leitner, Timothy pisze:
All,
Has anyone set up hardware alerts logged on the HMC that goes to a
monitoring system? We had an issue this morning where due to a storm; we
lost power for 3 seconds (noted in a hardware message on the HMC) and
then threw a couple
Radoslaw brings up an interesting point. No power then no comm.
Your HMC should have 'phoned home' and IBM should have attempted to contact
someone. Perhaps the HMC lost comm, which would have muted any alarm/alert
system in the first place. Perhaps that's also what happened to your facilities
In a message dated 6/2/2010 4:37:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
hmerr...@jackhenry.com writes:
No power then no comm.
This can all be covered in your environmental contingency plan. UPS for
HMC and modem, etc. Woke the operators up one night when the water sensors
left over from the
I would certainly expect a phone home.
Several years ago I got a call from California as I was driving on a weekend.
You have a
customer with a machine about to shut down because of thermals.
M - even on a weekend banks don't usually like to do that in the middle of
the day.
Gave the ops a
Sounds a little like the Vista firewall might be stepping on the FTP data
connections.
Try disabling the firewall completely (temporarily!!) and see if the problem
goes away.
HTH,
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:05 PM, C. Ardillo
Hi,
I know this idea might sound crazy, but I was wondering about the prospects
of an IBM mainframe for personal use. I'm aware of the hurdles considering
the Service Element (hard drives being detroyed, etc.) HMC, OSes, and other
problems. My question is where would one go about looking for one
Hi Kevin,
Just a thought, but for government entities (fed, state, local,
educational) and some large businesses, equipment is put up for surplus bid.
That generally results in getting someone to take it away for something between
a little bit of money going in either direction, or
We've got one sitting in the corner of the office computer room, holding floor
tiles in place. I suspect
others (closer to you) will be in similar situations.
I tried to get a couple of flavours of Linux running on it, but couldn't get
the comms side of it sorted.
Gave up in frustration.
Hi,guys
Thanks for your reply! and Don't argu about collecting SMF99 or not =^_^=.
I post the thread because IBM support asked for a WLM dump for diagnostic
purposes one time and another ,they also said they can get SMF99 from the
DUMP,so I think maybe someone can tell me how to do that.
I'll try
I received what purports to be an invitation to paracalls.com from
Md.Abdullah[1], addressed to an address that I use only on IBM-MAIN.
Has anybody else gotten this, and is there any indication as to
whether it is legit?
Normally I assume that such invitations are bogus unless the person
I deleted the one I got without reading it.
Shane ...
On Thu, Jun 3rd, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Shmuel Metz wrote:
I received what purports to be an invitation to paracalls.com from
Md.Abdullah[1], addressed to an address that I use only on IBM-MAIN.
Has anybody else gotten this, and is there any
Well I hate to look like a solicitor, but, if there is anyone out there,
particularly in the Houston area, with a multiprise (actually, any mainframe
for that matter, I mean it depends, but if you have ANYTHING talk to me)
that is just going to waste that'll be trashed anyway, it would be going to
I will be out of the office starting 06/02/2010 and will not return until
06/04/2010.
I will be out of the office on Thursday, June 3rd. I will return on
Friday, June 4. Thanks.
HCSC Company Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication is confidential, private,
proprietary,
50 matches
Mail list logo
