are not generally|ever interchangeable when entering UNIX commands. I hope
it wasn't his iPad which assumed he must want a capital letter if
apparently starting a new paragraph!
-
Chris Mason
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:40:09 -0600, Glen Gasior
glen.manages@gmail.com wrote:
*
How can I display whether
*
How can I display whether the sendmail daemon is running ?
*
I have not been able to discover how to do this today.
*
T.I.A.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
*
still cannot order a ServerPac for z/OS 1.13, I have been told again that level
2 is working on it. I think it needs a speed team.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
*
I am getting a 505 for IBMLINK. I have also been getting disconnected multiple
times while trying to order a ServerPac, although a test order CBPDO worked
fine. Something bad is happening at POKL1, I imagine, and they do not seem to
be informing anyone.
*
*
My experience has been when all the above the line storage is exhausted,
additional allocations are made below the line. So the below the line error
message can be misleading, it might be that ALL the storage is exhausted, not
just the below line storage.
*
I have had problems with Shopz all week, with no satisfactory replies, except
to close my ticket with the resolution - investigating. CBPDO has worked for
me, ordering a ServerPac disconnects when trying to go to step 5. I did get to
step 5 two weeks ago and experienced a different problem
Does anyone recognize this DEVTYPE value? So far I am puzzled. This
should be a tape dataset. We have DFSMSrmm.
NONVSAM TP.DB3ICT.MCIUAT.RE1UPROL.G0010V00
HISTORY
DATASET-OWNER-(NULL) CREATION2010.213
*
I suspected it was an ESOTERIC catalogue entry, but could not find which
manual documented the meaning of the value. Thank you very much. This is
going to be a big help. Tivoli Tape Optimizer is rejecting these entries for
processing and I suspect we are missing some parameter.
Hello,
If anyone would be kind enough to email me a .txt copy of your
GLOSSMFR macro, it would be great help.
*
glen.manages@gmail.com
*
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
*There is theory and there is reality. If you have a shop where the software
management process is essentially whatever was a good idea at the time,
software and hardware upgrades will be painfully time consuming unless you
are willing to accept outages.*
**
*If the system has been designed to be
*
Thank you that is all that I need and I will also look at the two pack examples
while I am working. I will report any interesting results. This will be on a
z10
BC, with a DS8100 (2107). I am going to try the null configuration for the
first
test.
*
*
I am building a first copy of a stand alone sysres, commonly called a mini z/OS
and I would like SMS to come up in a null configuration.
*
I have found RTFM guidelines for setting up a MINIMAL configuration but no
specifications for a NULL configuration. Am I missing something or do I have
*
I do not think there is a simple or a right or wrong way to do your typical
usermods, as long as the data in the CSI correctly inventories your software.
*
The crux of the problem is installing the usermod is not the same process as
maintaining the usermod. I think blending the two into one
Correct IOCDS is important, I do not remember if any state of the IOCDS
would prevent a LOAD.
*
Does an activate of the LPAR work ?
*
Can you access the support element from the HMC ?
*
I would also check if the IODF dataset is in extents, it must be contiguous.
*
I imagine you are sev1 with IBM
I had to call my dad to find out what was meant by core.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Pinnacle pinnc...@rochester.rr.comwrote:
I have a need to zap core, but my client does not have OMEGAMON. I
searched the CBT mods tape and came up empty. What we're trying to do is a
SETPROG LPA,ADD,
Thank you for your replies. I was able to find similar discussions on this
topic in
the archives and used SYSTCPT to trace RESOLVER behaviour. (default
RESOLVER in use)
*
Invoking the PING command in TSO BATCH was very helpful.
*
The problem was an invalid SYSTCPD DD statement in the TSO LOGON
*
TSO PING LOOPBACK gives me EZZ3111I Unknown host 'LOOPBACK' and RTFM
and even REDBOOKS has not helped me.
*
I can ping 127.0.0.1 successfully, which makes me suspect a hosts entry or
dns entry, but I am getting lost in all the parms.
*
EZZ2500I NETSTAT CS V1R10 TCPIPROC 505
HOME ADDRESS
As it turns out, it was expecting a directory in /tmp/ which of course
disappeared when I unmounted /tmp/ to increase its size.
*
After the directory was defined, it ran fine under BPXBATCH.
*
//INSTWASM EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH
//STDPARM DD *
*
Does anyone know which manual would define this error code ?
*
6 *-* address syscall getpwnam (ZOSMFAD) pw.
getpwnam (ZOSMFAD) pw.
7 *-* address syscall chown /u/zosmfad pw.pw_uid pw.pw_gid
chown /u/zosmfad PW.2 PW.3
found this AI:
Special Variable RC
The REXX special variable RC normally contains the return code from host
command most recently executed. The special value -3 indicates that the
specified command was not found.
If a system abend occurs, the value returned is the negative of the decimal
*
You nailed it, ZOSMFAD is not defined in RACF.
*
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Has anyone had this shell script looping ?
/usr/lpp/zWebSphereOEM/V7R0/bin/WASOEM.sh
-n BBN0004W:ZPMT_WORK_ROOT directory
(/tmp/zWebSphereOEM/V7R0/zpmt/work) does not exist. Would you like to
create it? (Y/N)
BBN0229I: * Your response was ÝEnter¨
-n
*
Has anyone had WASOEM.sh loop trying to allocate a directory in /tmp/ ?
*
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
*
I have a requirement to share a production USER CATALOG with a test (not
development) lpar. Both lpars are MONOPLEX.
*
There is no GRS and will not be. No aliases on the test lpar will be assigned
to
this production lpar USER CATALOG.
*
I want to be certain serialization of the catalog takes
Thank you for all the replies. The 3390 devices are defined as SHARED, and
the SHAREOPTIONS on the user catalogs are (3,4).
*
My RTFM still leaves me with a question regarding how SHAREOPTION of (3,3)
would affect access to a user catalog on a 3390 shared between two lpars,
connected to two
It almost sounds like a strategy to produce evidence for a congressman to
introduce a bill to open the H1B floodgates.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Pinnacle pinnc...@rochester.rr.comwrote:
For those of you who think I overstate the case of IBM driving down bill
rates and salaries, check
*
Has anyone experienced no NIP console and no MASTER console with an IBM
2074 ?
*
During a D/R exercise the NIP console failed to appear on the PCOM emulator.
It was available at the HMC software console. The IPL proceeded using the
HMC console and after the Communication Server was started,
*
I was able to get the empty datasets to delete using this command:
*
AUDIT MEDCTL VOLUME(S33003) FIX
*
S33003 was the BVOL I was trying to empty.
*
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
*
I am trying to empty one ML1 volume by moving the datasets to a new ML1
volume or if I must delete these datasets since many of the volume names are
obsolete.
*
DFHSM.VTOC.T015300.VRESA15.D05231
*
Can someone please tell me exactly what this dataset represents and how can
I move it from the
*
I tried cloning a SYSRES volume for the first time at this site and received
this
message.
0ADR713E (001)-ALLOC(01), UNABLE TO ALLOCATE SMS MANAGED DATA SET
My suspicion is that there are 8 SMS datasets on the non-sms SYSRES.
I am hoping someone has encountered this before and can recommend
I would be curious whether the HMC had any data during that time.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:02 AM, JE Thinnes jethin...@aol.com wrote:
We just experienced a 4 minute 'outage' on our z/OS system. (single image
z/OS 1.9 system).
By 'outage', I mean we could not communicate with MVS through
Art I think the only way to make progress toward simplification and
standardization is creating automated tools that function similar to the IBM
healthchecker. In a large data center, it can be a full time job because it
has two components, removing exceptions found in the system and preventing
The same effect can occur when there is a coolant leak in the refrigeration
unit, and I know of at least one occurrance of this event. If an audible
alarm is appropriate on a Liebert Unit, I think it may be appropriate for a
CEC.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Skip Robinson [EMAIL
If a cancel appears not to be working one thing I would do is reset the job
being canceled into a high resource service class. Sometimes tasks that
appear to be hung are instead slow.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:58 PM, rdeguz1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone got burned by issuing the Force command
Assuming the holddata has all been addressed properly, and you are using
APPLY REDO GROUP, I would expect the error condition to be cleared.
For CICS I would have a higher level of confidence that the SMP MCS
statements for the PTFs and APARs were coded correctly. For OEM vendors I
would be very
IIRC, do not IPL any MVS image connected to that storage subsystem while
TDMF is running.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:42 PM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My shop is now the proud owner of a HDS 9990V. We are however novices in
the use of TDMF which the vendor has
When I was working with IBM SWG at RTP during system verification test of
WebSphere Portal 6.0.1, reviewing InfoCenter for errors was a large part of
the process. I got the distinct impression InfoCenter was the future.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know how it can be when the coffee hits home.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alaimo Zani [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
You could simply refer to it as 'management by airline magazine'.
ABZ
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:44:36 -0500, Glen Gasior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*
I am going to leave off
In z/OS 1.8, IBM introduced the ALLOWUSERKEYCSA parameter to prevent
applications from allocating User Key (E) CSA storage. This was done to
eliminate any potential security risks or exposures from unauthorized
programs modifying CSA storage. As of z/OS 1.9, the default setting for the
Congrats, I am still looking.
On 8/13/08, Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally got a new job, starting Monday Aug. 18. As I don't know how my
employer will react to posting on IBM-Main, I'll wait to tell you who after
I start. I'll be working in St. Louis.
Anybody in St.
And every CEO will notice that, considering the client.
On 5/7/08, Gary Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the subject says...
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1312380,00.html?track=NL-576ad=638786asrc=EM_NLN_3601410uid=1900046
Watch the wrap.
Can the tape be read with DITTO ? IIRC, ditto is now shipped with z/OS.
On 5/6/08, Todd Burrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I have an oldie but a goodie. One of our user areas sent us 9 3420 tapes
today, and some of them appear to be 800 BPI. When I run tape map against
the tape I get
Do you have SAS ? What does PROC TAPEMAP show you ?
On 5/6/08, Todd Burrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I have an oldie but a goodie. One of our user areas sent us 9 3420 tapes
today, and some of them appear to be 800 BPI. When I run tape map against
the tape I get the data in the
I knew some VM'ers that belonged to something called CAVEMEN, is that still
active ?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean a 'new' technology like this reference?
VMSHARE has been the conferencing system of the VM Cluster of SHARE since
August 1976.
IIRC DB2 SPAS may not be the best practise anymore with the latest versions
of DB2.
On 1/14/08, Gary Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably the wrong forum to post this but I know I'll be told
where to go if it is.
I am about to setup WLM for DB2 SPAS; I know, I know, it should
We will go from 1.7 to 1.9
U.S. Railroad Retirement Board
On 1/24/08, Dean Montevago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We're running 1.7 now. We're planning an upgrade, does anyone have an
opinion on whether to go to 1.8 or 1.9 ?
TIA
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting
*They told me most of their support effort involves wading through source
code to see what might be going wrong. (No wonder they move so slowly!!!) I
almost laughed out loud! Their dump reading skill shortage was so acute,
the managers were convinced that dumps were useless clumps of bits
I recall in 1988 having some software step on an idcams control block that
was part of chain that dynamically grew and shrunk depending on how the
dataset was accessed. It only happened about every three months and by the
time the traps were fine-tuned to catch it, the software was all replaced
Two very large mainframe DB2 shops last year were experiencing failures in
virtual coupling facilities under VM, they could not duplicate the problem
at all. By sheer coincidence, the problem was reproduced during system
verification test of WebSphere 6.0.1 and the VM people copied the entire
A terrible, terrible loss. A friend to all in the profession. A man who set
a high standard for all to emulate.
- Glen
On 11/6/07, Dave Juraschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russ:
Thanks for letting us know.
Our industry has suffered a major loss.
I totally agree with the other comments
This is a bit OT, but will you be running as a uniprocessor on the z9BC ?
On 6/4/07, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We recently converted our 2086 (z890) to a 2096 (z9BC) via a suicide
swap.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
I love that old photo of you speaking at Share with a suit jacket over your
T-shirt. I bet you never got credit for being a fashion trend-setter. (East
side of DeKalb, commuting downtown).
On 4/19/07, Michael Stack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many of you know that I have decided to leave NIU and
Remember when 20% of the student enrollment wanted to major in COMP SCI ?
On 4/19/07, Michael Stack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many of you know that I have decided to leave NIU and that this is my
final semester (final month, now) teaching here. Reduced enrollments
have taken their toll on
Time may be the fire in which we all burn but it seems the flame burns more
slowly some places.
Job Title Mainframe Developer AutoReqId 43488BR Job Family Information
Technology Job Category Full-Time Job Classification Experienced
Division Corporate
MIS Shift First Job Description Accountable
z/OS sysprog with 20 years - I am out of work also - downsized and
outsourced (corporate officers caught in fraud), no reason to wonder why the
new generation is avoiding IT.
On 2/21/07, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--snip--
On 20 Feb 2007
I am trying to move a dataset from what appears to be an SMS volume to what
appears to be a non-SMS volume.
I get this message:
ADR440E (001)-RALLC(02), UNEXPECTED RETURN CODE FROM REALLOC MACRO:
00C0, WHILE PROCESSING DATA SET DB2WK8.DB2WK1.SDSNEXIT
I hope to bypass SMS just to allocate
*
Thanks for your reply, I interpret your reply to mean I cannot expect a
rexx exec issued through SDSF (to stop and start db2 ldap was and portal)
to be processed under MSYS as it was under NETVIEW. It was nice to get that
reply since I was trying to get the exec to work under MSYS today.
*
Just as a word to the cautious - I would not IPL any system that accesses
the HDS storage subsystem while an HDS microcode update is taking place.
*
On 12/28/05, Eatherly, John D [IT] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to pass on a heads up on some APARs that require HDS
microcode on
58 matches
Mail list logo
