In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/26/2007
at 08:11 AM, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If everyone opted out of notification of vendor products - do you
think Share would continue to get the funds they need so that they
can put on the conferences for us?
The Devil is in the details. If the
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/26/2007
at 09:00 AM, Dave Thorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
At CMG we handle vendor emails differently than SHARE, and I
understand the spam problem. But as Lizette says, there's a delete
key. And we all know how to use it.
There's also a deny list, and some of us
Greg Shirey of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 07/27/2007 11:42:47 AM:
Yes, I got snubbed by a few of the same people as in Baltimore (and I
think they were snubbing each other) though I didn't get a sticker this
time.
I got snubbed by a fellow Lister whose
do you value Share ( Was Spam from SHARE)
snipped
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 08:11 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
And the only reason the vendors provide sponsorship is so
they can get at us.
I make a point of looking up people I like on the Expo floor, and
probably struck up conversations at a dozen booths in Tampa. These were
all folks who had
Time for a Subject change. Anyone get snubbed in Tampa?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
I'm so old, I can remember when the 49ers and Raiders were
contenders, LA had a team and my slobberkill file was 2 names!
I can remember watching a baseball game at the Polo Grounds between the
(New
In a message dated 7/27/2007 8:32:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
think I have deleted a lot more posts on this thread than SHARE spam I
received.
I'm so old, I can remember when the 49ers and Raiders were contenders, LA
had a team and my slobberkill file was
snip
I'm so old, I can remember when the 49ers and Raiders were contenders,
LA
had a team and my slobberkill file was 2 names!
/snip
raiders
2003, they lost to NE via the tuck rule (I have another name for it,
but in involves substituting a letter).
2004, lost to TB in the SB
as for the
Yes, I got snubbed by a few of the same people as in Baltimore (and I
think they were snubbing each other) though I didn't get a sticker this
time.
I got snubbed by a fellow Lister whose office is in north Dallas - mine
is in central Fort Worth. We both laughed at the notion that it we
found
I grumbled about this a couple SHAREs ago and was told that
vendors that are SHARE sponsers get to email SHARE members that
have not opted out of SHARE announcements. You don't have
use a spam filter; you can ask SHARE not to send them.
After hours on the phone to get to the right
On Jul 26, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Pinnacle wrote:
They just don't get it.
Does SHARE get monies from the vendors for the mailing lists? Or
for other
participation opportunities? Is it possible that vendor
advertising is
necessary in order to be able to continue SHARE and keep the costs
to
As much as I didn't care for it. IBM (when it co-hosted SHARE) never pulled
this type of crap (excuse my english). The DEFAULT for any mailing should be
NO unless I say YES
IBM never co-hosted SHARE. Check your facts once in a while.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Bob Shannon wrote:
As much as I didn't care for it. IBM (when it co-hosted SHARE)
never pulled this type of crap (excuse my english). The DEFAULT
for any mailing should be NO unless I say YES
IBM never co-hosted SHARE. Check your facts once in a while.
bob,
On Jul 26, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Jeffrey Deaver wrote:
They just don't get it.
Does SHARE get monies from the vendors for the mailing lists? Or
for other
participation opportunities? Is it possible that vendor
advertising is
necessary in order to be able to continue SHARE and keep the costs
It always amazes me how some people get so upset about spam. It seems
to be almost a religious war against it! Personally, I have to agree
with Lizette - if vendors can't send emails to people who belong to
Share, they probably wouldn't want to spend as much money on Share.
I seriously
On Jul 26, 2007, at 5:42 AM, David Boyes wrote:
---SNIP-
On the other hand, an organization that purports to provide IT
education
*ought* to know what is acceptable and not acceptable as good practice
in a well-run IT organization. SHARE's IT decisions are just
@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: How much do you value Share ( Was Spam from SHARE)
Listers -
I must now put my two cents in.
How much corporate sponsorship do you think Share gets? I would think
most
of their funding comes from the vendors. And the only reason the
vendors
provide sponsorship is so they can get
Listers -
I must now put my two cents in.
How much corporate sponsorship do you think Share gets? I would think most
of their funding comes from the vendors. And the only reason the vendors
provide sponsorship is so they can get at us.
If everyone opted out of notification of vendor products
In a message dated 7/26/2007 7:12:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am okay with this so long as Share continues to provide the conference at
the level it is at currently.
Think what's grating is as a Technical organization shows no sign of
intelligent life at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 7:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: How much do you value Share ( Was Spam from SHARE)
Listers -
I must now put my two cents in.
How much
On Jul 26, 2007, at 7:11 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Listers -
I must now put my two cents in.
How much corporate sponsorship do you think Share gets? I would
think most
of their funding comes from the vendors. And the only reason the
vendors
provide sponsorship is so they can get at
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: Spam from SHARE
They just don't get it.
Does SHARE get monies from the vendors for the mailing lists? Or for
other
participation opportunities
They just don't get it.
Does SHARE get monies from the vendors for the mailing lists? Or for other
participation opportunities? Is it possible that vendor advertising is
necessary in order to be able to continue SHARE and keep the costs to the
attendees reasonable? I can see this being the
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 06:42 -0400, David Boyes wrote:
News flash to SHARE: if you insist on combining junk mail with the
conference-related announcements, then both go in the trash. It's that
simple, guys.
I had SHARE and Smith-Bucklin remove our email address and fax number
from their records
: Thursday, July 26, 2007 1:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Spam from SHARE
On Jul 26, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Pinnacle wrote:
They just don't get it.
Does SHARE get monies from the vendors for the mailing lists? Or
for other
participation opportunities? Is it possible that vendor
Schwarz, Barry A wrote:
Is anyone else receiving spam from SHARE on behalf of various vendors.
One or two more and I'll be angry enough to look up how to block the
entire domain.
I checked (or was it unchecked?) a box during the registration process
that had to do with receiving email from
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:38:47 -0700, Schwarz, Barry A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone else receiving spam from SHARE on behalf of various
vendors.
One or two more and I'll be angry enough to look up how to block the
entire domain.
Instead of wasting my time with this garbage, maybe
Is anyone else receiving spam from SHARE on behalf of various vendors.
One or two more and I'll be angry enough to look up how to block the
entire domain.
Instead of wasting my time with this garbage, maybe they could fix the
web scheduling tools which consistently refuse to show more than
29 matches
Mail list logo
