Every LPAR on your z9BC has a profile which defines it's resources. Such
as how much memory it has and the number of CPs it can use. Another of
the resources is how many zIIP engines it can use (likewise for zAAP
engines). You need to edit the LPAR definition to include zIIP engines.
This is done
Dear All,
I enable Ziip on our machine but I can see it active on any LPAR , do I
have to do something on HCM console please help.
Azimuddin Syed
System Software Support
Saudi Arabian Airlines
Jeddah Saudi Arabia
--
For
In
a90766b5039c59409110c92d47216f5905835...@s1flokydce2k322.dm0001.info53.com,
on 10/06/2011
at 02:00 PM, Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com said:
And it's not like MSM is a
light-weight product either, with ZFS file systems,
Are you saying that it won't work with HFS? While I understand that
MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 1:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA MSM v4 on z/os 1.9
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:18:55 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
a90766b5039c59409110c92d47216f5905835...@s1flokydce2k322.dm0001.info53.com,
on 10/06/2011
at 02:00 PM, Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com said:
And it's not like MSM is a
light-weight product
In 3312735105136745.wa.markmzelden@bama.ua.edu, on 10/07/2011
at 01:15 PM, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com said:
Are you thinking of PDSE?
I wasn't. Thanks for reminding me :-(
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
On 10/6/2011 8:10 AM, Silvio Camplani wrote:
The release notes for MSM v4 say z/OS 1.10 is required. This seems to be
because IBM supports current-2...
The current release is z/OS 1.13. z/OS 1.9 is four releases back
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive
The release notes for MSM v4 say z/OS 1.10 is required. This seems to be
because IBM supports current-2...
Is anyone running MSM v4 on a pre z/OS 1.10 lpar?
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
with MSM there was a conscious decision to follow IBM support policies, which
makes sense if you think about it. I have no idea whether anyone is running it
in an unsupported config. I would point out that if a vendor says release X is
required, it usually means just that. You can go off and
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Chris Craddock
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 11:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA MSM v4 on z/os 1.9
with MSM there was a conscious decision
I guess you could count me as one of those people who was an extreme skeptic
about MSM. However, after installing 3 and upgrading to 4, it really is a time
saver, as advertised. Maybe not so much if you only a couple CA products, but
we have many. The Datacom guys love it. And the only drawback
cell phone
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA MSM v4 on z/os 1.9
Speaking of MSM, and having Mr, Craddock responding
It sure
than
an hour, how much time can MSM save me?
Tom Chicklon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Petersen
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 1:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA MSM v4 on z/os 1.9
Actually, MSM V4
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA MSM v4 on z/os 1.9
Actually, MSM V4 is really great for downloading new Products or new
releases of Products or Maintenance for Products and then installing
them. For me, it has really speeded things up for getting new releases
or maintenance on current releases
Speaking of MSM, and having Mr, Craddock responding
It sure would be nice if there were a happy medium between doing
nothing, and installing/using MSM. It would be *really* nice if CA
implemented their own order server to support SMPE RECEIVE ORDER.
Jumping into MSM is not a small
called on later
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 2:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] CA MSM v4 on z/os 1.9
Jim,
You see that's the problem. I really don't
, October 06, 2011 5:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA MSM v4 on z/os 1.9
Well .
For CA-IDMS that's exactly what I do (we do not have MSM yet installed, but
even if we did - I would first want to non-MSM install a product, then a MSM
install and compare the results)
I put in a request
-MAIN] CA MSM v4 on z/os 1.9
Jim,
You see that's the problem. I really don't want to install another product,
just to help maintain the others. Just another product to keep current.
Honestly, the biggest hassle is just finding the maintenance
and downloading it. And at that, not a huge
Hi Folks,
Steve McColley, who has been supporting the Mellon Mods to JES2 up
until now, has come up with updates to the Mellon Mods for z/OS 1.12,
which also work on JES2 releases back until at least 1.10. This version
of the Mellon Mods can be found at www.cbttape.org on the Updates
I checked my UTILITY ENTRY LKED and it has HIGHEST RETURN CODE,===,4
but my SMPE says: MAX ACCEPTABLE RC=0
There are three possible sources for the maximum acceptable return code
for a load module, used in this order:
1) RETURN CODE subentry in the LMOD entry. Gleaned from the JCLIN if
I am up the creek without a paddle. We are still on z/OS 1.9 and are going
to z 10 processor. There is a PSP bucket for the z10
that includes UA48080 and UA49199. When SMPE tries to apply these two I
get the following:
BATCH EMULATOR JOB(SYSJCNSM) STEP(S1 ) PGM= HEWLH096
IEW2322I 1220 65
without a paddle. We are still on z/OS 1.9 and are
going
to z 10 processor. There is a PSP bucket for the z10
that includes UA48080 and UA49199. When SMPE tries to apply these two I
get the following:
BATCH EMULATOR JOB(SYSJCNSM) STEP(S1 ) PGM= HEWLH096
IEW2322I 1220 65ENTRY IXCINRIM
-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 07/15/2011 08:41 AM
Subject:Re: need help trying to apply PSP bucket ptf's for z/OS
1.9
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
, 2011 10:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: need help trying to apply PSP bucket ptf's for z/OS 1.9
I am up the creek without a paddle. We are still on z/OS 1.9 and are going
to z 10 processor. There is a PSP bucket for the z10
that includes UA48080 and UA49199. When SMPE tries to apply
No info in the HOLD data or the SMPLOG.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! JN
I checked my UTILITY ENTRY LKED and it has HIGHEST RETURN CODE,===,4
but my SMPE says: MAX ACCEPTABLE RC=0
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: John Norgauer john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 07/15/2011 09:46 AM
Subject:Re: need help trying to apply PSP bucket ptf's for z/OS
1.9
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
I checked my UTILITY
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:17:54 -0700, John Norgauer wrote:
I am up the creek without a paddle. We are still on z/OS 1.9 and are going
to z 10 processor. There is a PSP bucket for the z10
that includes UA48080 and UA49199. When SMPE tries to apply these two I
get the following:
Any suggestions
SYSLIB is not used if NCAL is specified.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Thomas
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 9:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: need help trying to apply PSP bucket ptf's for z/OS 1.9
1:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: need help trying to apply PSP bucket ptf's for z/OS 1.9
SYSLIB is not used if NCAL is specified.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Thomas
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 9:07
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Schwarz, Barry A
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 1:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: need help trying to apply PSP bucket ptf's for z/OS 1.9
SYSLIB is not used if NCAL is specified.
-Original Message
+, Network+
ITIL V3 Foundations
CSC Lead z/OS Systems Programmer
ITSO
(404) 723-2017 (Cell)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
John Eells
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9
Thanks to everyone who responded, both on and off list. I have the COD ordered
and will order my 1.12 Serverpac today. I may try using our 1.9 system to
install the 1.12 SP but am going to wait until I see the COD doc before
deciding. At least our 1.9 system should have all available
Short version... We are running z/OS 1.9 and do not have a 1.10 or 1.11 system
to install. I'd like to install a 1.12 Serverpac on the road back to being
supported. I know about the n+2 rule but how do I get out of this pickle? I'm
not talking about toleration and coexistence, just a driving
We just used 1.9 as a driver system for our 1.12 install. Not a problem.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Johnston, Robert E
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: z/OS 1.9 to 1.12 options
Johnston, Robert E wrote:
Short version... We are running z/OS 1.9 and do not have a 1.10 or 1.11 system
to install. I'd like to install a 1.12 Serverpac on the road back to being
supported. I know about the n+2 rule but how do I get out of this pickle? I'm
not talking about toleration
Can you tell who/what is paging, (look in RMF).
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Hi,
We are seeing a paging increase after upgrading to z/OS 1.11.
Has anyone else seen this?
TIA
Gadi
לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי החברה וזכויות החתימה בה, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם
החברה, מחייבים מסמך נפרד וחתום על ידי מורשי החתימה של החברה, הנושא את לוגו
Hi,
We are seeing a paging increase after upgrading to z/OS 1.11.
Has anyone else seen this?
TIA
Gadi
When we went from 1.9 to 1.11 we saw this effect. We were directed to a GRS
PTF. I would open an ETR with IBM to see what other things they might have on
this issue.
This has helped to
-3579 | f:
402-325-4030
Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
05/05/2011 08:19 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: Paging increase when going from z/OS 1.9
Gadi
When we migrated from z/OS 1.9 to 1.11 we were hit by APAR OA33307 which
caused excess paging.
Description
-
At z/OS R11, if system is 2Gig REAL, RSM will schedule an SRB
( IAXUO IARUOGBS ) to perform Frame Steal operations running
under the *MASTER* asid if a PageFix against
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
05/05/2011 09:03 AM
Subject:
Paging increase when going from z/OS 1.9 to 1.11
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Hi,
We are seeing a paging increase after upgrading to z/OS 1.11.
Has anyone else seen this?
TIA
Gadi
I always remembered these layouts being documented in the HSM Diagnosis
Guide. I've got an old guide from version 1.5, but can't seem to find
the layout in the 1.9 book. Did IBM move them or stop publishing them?
Thanks,
Jim
List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Darby, Jim
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:42
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Looking for the Z/os 1.9 HSM TTOC record layout
I always remembered these layouts being documented in the HSM Diagnosis Guide.
I've got an old guide from version
: Looking for the Z/os 1.9 HSM TTOC record layout
I don't know if this will help you: starting with z/OS r10, there is an
unnumbered book called DFSMShsm Data Areas at
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/r10pdf/#dfsms (order
number is NA). It contains the TTOC layout.
Alan
-Original
and there are probably hundreds of
thousands.
Up until Friday the job ran on z/OS 1.9 and took 10 minutes to complete. I
migrated to z/OS 1.11 yesterday and today the dump took 2.5 hours. I don't
know why and I can't find anything to explain it.
Any ideas?
Luke
)
All of the excluded datasets are VSAM and there are probably hundreds of
thousands.
Up until Friday the job ran on z/OS 1.9 and took 10 minutes to complete. I
migrated to z/OS 1.11 yesterday and today the dump took 2.5 hours. I don't
know why and I can't find anything to explain it.
Any ideas
This sounds like OA32120.
Larre Shiller
US Social Security Administration
410.965.2209
www.ssa.gov
The contents of this message are mine personally and do not necessarily
reflect any official position of the US Government or the US Social Security
Administration.
)-
OPT(4)
All of the excluded datasets are VSAM and there are probably hundreds of
thousands.
Up until Friday the job ran on z/OS 1.9 and took 10 minutes to complete. I
migrated to z/OS 1.11 yesterday and today the dump took 2.5 hours. I don't
know why and I can't find
Thanks all.
Luke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jim McAlpine
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 2:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DFdss DUMP DATASET runs longer on z/OS 1.11 vs. z/OS 1.9
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:57
When using the old parms, it's likely that they have not 'lost access but
that they have changed their settings and can't see the output because of
that.
To be sure, when they are in the output queue, they should type the PREFIX
command with no options.
If they still can't see it, they
Alan,
Have you had the user do a WHO in SDSF and confirm that you are using the
correct ISFPRM00? Maybe there is a default one shipped with the system you
do not know you are picking up? Or perhaps you need to check on if the
ISFPRM00 was compiled from before and the wrong version is in the
: Saturday, May 22, 2010 6:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SDSF Authority Change with z/OS 1.9
Alan,
Have you had the user do a WHO in SDSF and confirm that you are using
the correct ISFPRM00? Maybe there is a default one shipped with the
system you do not know you are picking up? Or perhaps
Hello group, I have another puzzler that I haven't solved yet. We've
migrated from z/OS 1.7 to 1.9 and some people have lost the ability to
view output that is in held class 5.
This doesn't seem to be affecting everyone as there's lots of entries
in class 5 and various jobs and I've only heard
I am interested in offline contacts with customers who have installed Tivoli
Output Manger Version 2.3 (HAAX230/5698-A26). In particular, I am interested
in user experiences, conversion experiences (from CA-View and
CA-Deliver), overcome problems, and tips and techniques.
William J. Smith
Hi all
I am trying to FTP to a customer’s FTP server, which is Axway’s
XFB.Gateway/Axway File Broker.
It seems to want the decision about whether we want to use TLS, and whether we
want to use Active or Passive mode, to be made at the time of connection,
rather than once the session is
is technically identical to a 'man in the middle' attack which TLS is
designed to prevent.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Bri P
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: z/OS (1.9) FTP client
Hello everybody,
Recently, when I was looking at RMF monitor III reports during End of Day
processing I have noticed (from time to time) following delays:
Job: WMJPXSR0 Primary delay: Swapped out and ready to run.
Probable cause:
Insurance Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Pawel Leszczynski
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: logical swapping in z/os 1.9
Hello everybody,
Recently, when I
and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Pawel Leszczynski
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: logical swapping in z/os 1.9
Hello everybody
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Pawel Leszczynski
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: logical swapping in z/os 1.9
Strange - during these delays CEC is not heavily loaded (75%),
we have 30% available frames
] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: logical swapping in z/os 1.9
I hear that overly aggressive WLM goal settings can do this. Look for
high
importance workloads not meeting their goals because the goals are not
achievable. I
10:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: logical swapping in z/os 1.9
I was just reading a presentation made by Rich Olcott at the August 2008
SHARE that might relate to what Hal is referring to. In it Rich is
discussing the unattainable goal. He says that after a time WLM will
realize
Just go into RMFMON III, select Option 1 OVERVIEW, then Option 4 DELAY and
you get a display showing who the job is waiting for and why.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Pawel Leszczynski
pawel.leszczyn...@pkobp.pl wrote:
Hello everybody,
Recently, when I was looking at RMF monitor III
The following fix and parm update solved my problem with Filezilla.
Thanks to all for the help, I'll probably stick with Bluezone myself,
but it's good to have another option for my users.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
Greetings,
I wanted to see if anyone has experienced or knows of any issues at all with
running the freeware MXI 4.3 under z/OS 1.9, z/OS 1.10 or z/OS 1.11?
This would include, but not be limited to the following functionality:
- MXI standard ISPF panels
- MXI server and subsystem
- MXI
The only problem that I am aware of is that starting with z/OS 1.9, MXI does
not process PCs correctly due to IBM expanding the size of the PC number and
MXI not being updated to cope.
Lou
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Michael Cleary
...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Michael Cleary
Sent: 18 October 2009 12:30
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Any MXI 4.3 Issues on z/OS 1.9/10/11 ?
Greetings,
I wanted to see if anyone
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 08:02 -0400, Rob Scott wrote:
Here are a few things for starters :
(o) No knowledge of 64-bit storage for address space and system level metrics
(o) No knowledge of 64-bit storage for memory browsing
(o) No knowledge of 5-digit UCBs
(o) No knowledge of PAV
(o) No
Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Message Flood Automation in z/os 1.9
I don't have the HOLD data in front of me, but as I recall 'exit
removal'
referred only to message suppression logic, not to the exit per se. For
example, we use the exit
The hold(action) states the userexit is to be removed from the mpflst,
and in consolxx the uexit be set to (N).
So how does the integrated mfa know which messages to suppress?
Any other actions required beyond whats in the hold data?
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
Kentucky Farm Bureau
Message Flood Automation in z/os
1.9
07/01/2009 09:44
AM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Skip Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Message Flood Automation in z/os 1.9
I don't have the HOLD data in front of me, but as I recall 'exit
in our z/os 1.9 system are:
CEE3739I LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT INITIALIZATION COMPLETE
CUN2046I AN EMPTY UNICODE ENVIRONMENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED
CUN2005I CONVERSION ENVIRONMENT SUCCESSFULLY INITIALIZED
Maybe it is related to unicode?
Sounds like a good guess. There is only 2/100
I'm trying to ipl the z/OS 1.9 ADCD on a FLEX-ES box for the first time and
getting as
far as -
CEE3739I LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT INITIALIZATION COMPLETE
A display of the psw shows -
PSW = 0706 (000a unknown instruction)
Apparently, this is not a known FLEX
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:56:15 +0100 Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.com
wrote:
:I'm trying to ipl the z/OS 1.9 ADCD on a FLEX-ES box for the first time and
:getting as
:far as -
:CEE3739I LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT INITIALIZATION COMPLETE
:A display of the psw shows -
:PSW = 0706
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
wrote:
No work wait.
What happens when you issue a command?
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
I can't. If I hit
The next messages in our z/os 1.9 system are:
CEE3739I LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT INITIALIZATION COMPLETE
CUN2046I AN EMPTY UNICODE ENVIRONMENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED
CUN2005I CONVERSION ENVIRONMENT SUCCESSFULLY INITIALIZED
Maybe it is related to unicode
Jim McAlpine wrote:
I'm trying to ipl the z/OS 1.9 ADCD on a FLEX-ES box for the first time and
getting as
far as -
CEE3739I LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT INITIALIZATION COMPLETE
A display of the psw shows -
PSW = 0706 (000a unknown instruction)
Apparently
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: First ipl of z/OS 1.9
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com
The next messages in our z/os 1.9 system are:
CEE3739I LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT INITIALIZATION COMPLETE
CUN2046I AN EMPTY UNICODE ENVIRONMENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED
CUN2005I CONVERSION ENVIRONMENT SUCCESSFULLY INITIALIZED
Maybe it is related to unicode?
Sounds like a good guess. There is only 2
Has anyone noticed an occasional 'hung condition' on DFHSM lately? Where
the task is just stuck and doing nothing?
This has happened about 2-3 times over the past few months and at
different times/conditions.
I am going to prowl IBMLINK, but wanted to ask here as well. I may open
an ETR later
completes.
Issue d grs,c to confirm, although it should show up on the Q active
command.
HTH,
snip
Subject: DFHSM hang condition on z/OS 1.9.
Has anyone noticed an occasional 'hung condition' on DFHSM lately? Where
the task is just stuck and doing nothing?
This has happened about 2-3 times over
up until the CDS backup completes.
Issue d grs,c to confirm, although it should show up on the Q active
command.
snip
snip
Subject: DFHSM hang condition on z/OS 1.9.
Has anyone noticed an occasional 'hung condition' on DFHSM lately? Where
the task is just stuck and doing nothing?
This has
Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Richbourg, Claude
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 5:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DFHSM hang condition on z/OS 1.9.
Thanks for the reply Allan,
At the time(s) it seemed that DFHSM was finishing recycle processing and
would
that we're using igvnouserkeycsa.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Gibbons, Mark
We are bringing up z/os 1.9 using the default for igvnouserkeycsa. The
NFS client task abends indicating it is using CSA key 8. Has anyone
We are bringing up z/os 1.9 using the default for igvnouserkeycsa. The
NFS client task abends indicating it is using CSA key 8. Has anyone
else run into this? Did you need to make any changes to the NFS client
to get around this?
Thanks,
Mark
client B78 5C on z/os 1.9
We are bringing up z/os 1.9 using the default for igvnouserkeycsa. The
NFS client task abends indicating it is using CSA key 8. Has anyone
else run into this? Did you need to make any changes to the NFS client
to get around this?
Thanks,
Mark
Of
Gibbons, Mark
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: MVS NFS client B78 5C on z/os 1.9
We are bringing up z/os 1.9 using the default for igvnouserkeycsa. The
NFS client task abends indicating it is using CSA key 8. Has anyone
else run into this? Did you need
1.9 operating system? Mine is in SYS1.NFSLIBE and
is on the same volume as SYS1.LINKLIB for example.
If that's not the answer, I would open a problem with IBM for assistance.
Brian
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:49:41 -0700, Gibbons, Mark wrote:
We are bringing up z/os 1.9 using the default
Hi,
We cut over to z/Os 1.9 last week and we’re have some problems:
1. Performance on the Output screen is slow.
2. The order in which multiple SYSOUTS from the same job are displayed on
the output screen is wrong. We have jobs that create many sysouts. All of the
sysouts
Of gad...@malam.com
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SDSF problems in z/OS 1.9
Hi,
We cut over to z/Os 1.9 last week and we're have some problems:
1. Performance on the Output screen is slow.
2. The order in which multiple SYSOUTS from the same
Hi Cynthia,
Under the web-enabled heading are a several solutions that provide TN3270
emulator, or emulator-like access to Z. IBM does not ship one with Z but has
Host on Demand and HATS.
Since you are going to replace a real emulator with a web-enabled one, opt for
a product that downloads
over to z/Os 1.9 last week and we’re have some problems:
1. Performance on the Output screen is slow.
2. The order in which multiple SYSOUTS from the same job are
displayed on the output screen is wrong. We have jobs that create many
sysouts. All of the sysouts have the same
Gadi,
For ordering jobs by their submission sequence I sort on ST-Date and ST-Time
both descending. The job numbers roll over which makes them a bad choice to
sort on only when that actually happens.
Paul Gillis
3. The order of the jobs on the Status screen is different than it
was
Although not an answer (I would also suggest something like HOD or HATS) but
some years ago Netscape actually packaged 3270 into their Communicator so
you can access 3270 sessions via the browser. Basically just a 3270 session
in a browser, no transformations, etc. This would be a nice idea for a
Our Windows Server Team is looking for alternatives to our current Aviva
solution. Other than using a different tn3270 client application. Does anyone
have any suggestions or know of anything on z10's?
Not sure if the direction is to run this through an application which would use
TN3270 (say
Our Windows Server Team is looking for alternatives to our current Aviva
solution. Other than using a different tn3270 client application. Does anyone
have any suggestions or know of anything on z10's?
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:24 -0400, Cynthia Davis wrote:
Our Windows Server Team is looking for alternatives to our current
Aviva solution. Other than using a different tn3270 client
application. Does anyone have any suggestions or know of anything on
z10's?
Maybe http://h3270.sourceforge.net
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:24:46 -0700, Cynthia Davis wrote:
Our Windows Server Team is looking for alternatives to our current
Aviva solution. Other than using a different tn3270 client application.
Does anyone have any suggestions or know of anything on z10's?
What do you mean by web-enabled
1 - 100 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
