I'd make an alternate index on both and then just boogie...
In a message dated 10/5/2012 12:42:39 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com writes:
put the unique key into a searchable store then
process the other file in current order. Or is there a report that
David,
What is the ultimate destination. Choose a method that will best arrive
at that destination.
If it a DB2 than use DB2. If a VSAM KSDS than load from one file and
update with the other acknowledging that you need processing for the
duplicates. If a sequential transaction file then
If 1. New or different files each run and 2. Neither is larger than mid GiB,
sort'em both and sequential match merge. Put one or both as VIO.
If there are many larger files, or the smaller key file does not vary greatly
from run to run, set it up as VSAM, DB2, Adabas, SAS or whatever and pass
Timothy Sipples wrote:
... that value units (IBM's software licensing metric) are deflating even
faster ...
Really? Where is that documented? Any pointers please.
Thanks in advance.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
This isn't meant as a marketing thing, but one of the best selling point we
have for our System Automation software is that the cost is less than 5% (a lot
less) of what IBM/CA etc. charges for the same function(s). IBM makes it even
easier for us by requiring Netview thus adding a whole lot
COBOL sample:
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.
PROGRAM-ID. COBTEST.
DATA DIVISION.
WORKING-STORAGE SECTION.
01 FACTOR PIC 9.
I suspect XML parsing with zAAP-on-zIIP in effect. Do you have zAAPs
because that would rule this out.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs:
That was one of our guesses also. Was interested if there are any records kept
of which application or feature used the ZIIP.
Thanks for the response.
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:43:04 +0100
From: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Identify us of Enclave and ZIIP
To:
Is that not a tautology ? :)
(Could You be in a *business* without the goal to make profits ?)
Regards,
Thomas Berg
___
Thomas Berg Specialist AM/SMS SWEDBANK AB (publ)
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe
Thomas Berg wrote:
Is that not a tautology ? :)
(Could You be in a *business* without the goal to make profits ?)
Yes, as long you have one or other tax evavise scheme [1] in place to make
serious PROFITS! ;-)
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
[1] - In the good old days, the shop owners
Of course it is a tautology. But many/most of us seem to forget the tautology
after we have worked at the same place for X number of years. We begin to
think that our employer owes us a living, or maybe our nation's taxpayers owe
us a living.
Bill Fairchild
Programmer
Rocket Software
408
reason code 401 from OAM tape processing means the library is not accessible -
well, we knew that, but there are certain paths in the rmm code that should
allow the rmm processing when this happens - allowing CDS cleanup. . . .
Well at least the DV worked - so that was good news.
Mike Wood
Look at your SMF type 30 records. There are fields in it for ZIIP and ZAAP
usage. Those jobs or tasks that have time in the fields are the ones that use
the ZIIP or ZAAP.
I personally only know about a few products that do use it such as DB2, BMC DB2
Utilities, SyncSort, and DB2 Sort. I am
As this started off on CICS-L I assumed the context of the question was
CICS potential usages. Hence my stab at XML - as the only one I can think
of.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email:
A sometime IBM chairman made Bill's point negatively, in a once
celebrated phrase. that phrase was
IBM is not an eleemosynary organization.
Profit seeking is not, however, a constructive objective. A company
must decide how to make profits and, crucially, over what time horizon
to try to
You can use DFSORT's JOINKEYS to match files. Check this link which
explains in detail about Matching files using Joinkeys
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ICE1CA60/4.0?
Just make sure to pass the larger file as input to SORTJNF1 dd
Sri Hari Kolusu
DFSORT Development
Hi all,
Sorry if this has been done before but I couldn't see it.
I've recently had to debug looping code in an SRB routine on a zIIP. The only
information I could find was the PSWs out of the MVS trace entries for the CPU
timer interupts. Fortunatly there were enough of them to
Ron,
There isn't, because while the SRB is running, there is no control block which
contains its status.
Here's a suggestion: obtain ColeSoft's XDC debugger product: it fully supports
debugging in SRB mode. Full disclosure: I have no connection with this vendor.
Tom
- Original Message
Tom,
We've got XDC and I agree it's a great product. However we could never
reproduce the problem to allow us to run it under XDC.
All we had was the dump from our customer.
Ron.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Ron,
Now I understand. Here are my suggestions:
Add SRBTIMER to each SRB to prevent uncontrolled loops to begin with. Your
recovery routine can then capture registers and other critical information.
Add PTRACE entries at critical code points, like maybe at start of SRB logic so
you can locate
The search for load modules as I understand is joblib , steplib, then
lnklst
The default system search order is tasklib(s), then steplib/joblib, then
LPA, then LNKLST.
Applications could conceivably check other things first (such as ISPLLIB).
I don't know if ISRFIND does this or not.
Try to XMIT a dataset from the linklist in TSO:
Step 1
Got
IEB1130E A TERMINATING MESSAGE FROM PDSE PROCESSING APPEARS ABOVE --
DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION IS X'2822009F'
The PDSE expert I asked thinks that this would be expected only if a
member has been deleted from the data set after the transmit
OK, understood. Do I have to license the Netview product if I want to use SA
for other purposes than GDPS?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] Im Auftrag
von Timothy Sipples1
Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 06:59
An:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:59:00 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
Try to XMIT a dataset from the linklist in TSO:
Step 1
Got
IEB1130E A TERMINATING MESSAGE FROM PDSE PROCESSING APPEARS ABOVE --
DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION IS X'2822009F'
The PDSE expert I asked thinks that this would be expected only if a
member
anyone...the manual not clear ..
this display mean MQ trace active ??
RESPONSE=AGFP
CSQW127I -MQP1 CURRENT TRACE ACTIVITY IS -
TNO TYPE CLASSDEST USERID RMID
01 STAT *SMF **
02 ACCTG 01 SMF **
END OF TRACE REPORT
On 5 October 2012 00:44, Timothy Sipples1 sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:
Suppose Proctor Gamble introduces a new laundry detergent that requires
25% less to wash the same number of loads of laundry. But it costs a bit
more to make: PG also announces a 3% price increase per gram in Canada and
a 5%
In 0061634022294882.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
10/04/2012
at 11:38 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Or, the OS can prohibit the occurrence of boundary values, and the
programmer need never be concerned with them.
No, the OS can prohibit the occurrence of boundary
In 0897781066770312.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
10/04/2012
at 03:51 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Was the null segment in VBS invented (partly) to deal with the
problem of noise record processing on tapes?
No The lower limit is higher when going to tape.
--
In 136401cda235$aff94dd0$0febe970$@mcn.org, on 10/04/2012
at 09:39 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
Who knows? Because it made sense to the programmer. We put lots of
empty lines in these e-mails. (Technically they contain one or two
delimiter characters,
No. Technically the message
In 0897781066770312.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
10/04/2012
at 03:51 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Are those current or historical?
SC26-7410-09, the 1.11 version of DFSMS Using Data Sets, still gives
the minimum length of an SDW as 5. However, it does not
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 17:51:13 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
on 10/04/2012 at 11:38 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
Or, the OS can prohibit the occurrence of boundary values, and the
programmer need never be concerned with them.
No, the OS can prohibit the occurrence of boundary values, and
31 matches
Mail list logo
