It seems, we've got enough real storage and enough Flash Memory. There is
hardly any paging. We've got two local page data sets mainly because VIO paging
will not go to Flash Memory.
We're starting to see local page data set usage at ~30%. I conclude that this
must be VIO data being paged
Note: This might be a classic case of overnight batch steals online's
pages. The perpetrator's left the scene and you're left with the victim.
:-) Take the DeLorean* :-) back a few hours and you might find the
culprit.
Cheers, Martin
* Sorry: A certain trio of movies have been on UK
If you have mainview, try:
F pasname,*asm,total
For more details: F pasname,*HELP ASM
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: 23 October, 2014 8:44
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: What
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
It seems, we've got enough real storage and enough Flash Memory. There is
hardly any paging. We've got two local page data sets mainly because VIO
paging will not go to Flash Memory.
We're starting to see local page data set usage at ~30%. I conclude that this
must be
Hi Peter
I added some functionailtiy to EasySMF to try to answer this sort of
question.
You need the SMF type 75 and type 30 (all subtypes) records.
Select the RMF Paging Activity: Page Dataset Usage report, and select
the system you are interested in. Click and drag on the chart to select
We're starting to see local page data set usage at ~30%. I conclude that
this must be VIO data being paged out.
What let you arrive at that conclusion? Just curious if you don't mind please.
We're using only a few percent of the Flash Memory, so I see no reason paging
should go to AUX.
If you have mainview, try: F pasname,*asm,total For more details: F
pasname,*HELP ASM
We do have MAINVIEW, but I'm just a beginner in finding my way around, so
please bear with me. Where would I enter these commands? MAINVIEW ISPF rejects
F
--Peter Hunkeler
Ron, I believe that is what it does with the statements you have. The two input
files (F1 and F2) are sorted based on the specified FIELDS operands before they
are joined, unless you indicate that an input file is already sorted on the
JOINKEYS statement.
Or are you expecting the actual input
Lua is a powerful, fast scripting language with vibrant user communities
on many platforms. Lua celebrates its 20th birthday this year.
From the Lua website (http://www.lua.org/about.html):
Lua has a deserved reputation for performance. To claim to be as
fast as Lua is an aspiration of
Thank you. I guess this means that I need to learn lua now grin/.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:38 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
Lua is a powerful, fast scripting language with vibrant user communities
on many platforms. Lua celebrates its 20th birthday this year.
From the Lua
This is a console command, use SDSF:
/F ...
Do you have access to the mainview ispf interface?
Start it, select 'Z', select '1', enter 'JSTOR' and you will see the ASM Slot
usage under the column Avg Slots, next to it are Avg Vio and Avg NVio.
Put 'SO D' after command, put your cursor on the
On 23/10/2014 7:46 PM, John McKown wrote:
Thank you. I guess this means that I need to learn lua now grin/.
That shouldn't be too difficult for a man of your abilities 8^)
Scripting languages are generally very easy to learn. Lua is has an
almost identical feature set to Javascript. They
If I perform a ldapsearch with IBMUSER it works
If I perform same with my id that has the SPECIAL attribute I get this message
in SYSLOG.
ICH408I USER(MYID ) GROUP(MYGROUP ) NAME(ME ) 383
LOGON/JOB INITIATION - PASS PHRASE IS NOT VALID
We are not using password phrases. Does
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Yuhas
I have been asked to install Enterprise COBOL 5.1 which went GA in October of
2013.
We are currently running z/OS 1.13 with a current RSU Level of 1404. We have
Enterprise COBOL 4.2 and
the
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:00 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/10/2014 7:46 PM, John McKown wrote:
Thank you. I guess this means that I need to learn lua now grin/.
That shouldn't be too difficult for a man of your abilities 8^)
Scripting languages are generally very
On 23/10/2014 8:42 PM, John McKown wrote:
Well, I got it installed. I ran into a problem with the
./lua4z-1.0.0.bin when I ran it a second time. The first time, it said it
couldn't find the PDSEs (LOADLIB and SAMPLIB) and did I want to define
them? All is good. I reply Y and they are
You need to enter the y in lower case - otherwise those dataset errors occur.
I am not up to snuff on UNIX lately and do not understand what the ? in the
environment variables mean.
They did work when I added them to my profile, but I never saw this syntax
before:
export LUA_PATH=./?.lua;\
... I'm trying two commands:
RECEIVE SELECT( ... ) FROMNTS( ... ) .
RECEIVE HOLDDATA FROMNTS( ... ) .
Interesting. SYSPRINT seems to show that it unpacks the HOLDDATA
twice (once for each command?), although only the second uses it.
But it unpacks SMPMCS only once.
In fact
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT/ICETOOL pondering
Thomas Berg wrote:
Sometimes I have a need to do
On 23/10/2014 9:36 PM, Barkow, Eileen wrote:
You need to enter the y in lower case - otherwise those dataset errors occur.
I have now changed the installation script to fold all input to upper case.
I am not up to snuff on UNIX lately and do not understand what the ? in the
environment
Mark,
Note this COBOL V5 PSP Bucket entry:
13/10/28 COBOL Version 5 now uses the SMP/E FIXCAT process to
identify requisite PTF's. See sections 3.2, 4.2 and 6.1.10
of Program Directory for details. Required PTF's are not
included in PSP. See technote
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:24 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I convince you to try it again. I've uploaded an updated IVP.
Well the install script does not give any error messages when I reuse the
same PDSE library names. But the ivp still fails. I can't shake the feeling
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:43:44 +0200, Thomas Berg wrote:
I want to copy position 31 to 40 of all records but from record 8 and 9 I
want
to copy also (concatenate) position 71 to 80 and from record 6 to 8 I also
(concatenate in front) want to copy position 1 to 3.
//*
Hi Kolusu,
The idea with symbols looks interesting. I haven't used them but from recent
RTFM they felt attractive.
1. As this is to be used in a tool for general usage it can be of any
(reasonable possible to implement) format.
2. No. This (primary) problem case is for a straight
Hi Alfred,
You can look at the answers I gave Elardus and Kolusu for the example data.
1. I'm not sure if I understand your question exactly, this (primary) problem
case is for a straight inrecord---outrecord transition
2. Not necessarily. I'm out for a general solution.
Best Regards,
Thanks for the explanation about the ?s but I still do not see what they are
being used to substitute for.
I passed the UNIX IVP test, but my profile contains this:
$ echo $LUA_PATH
Thomas Berg wrote:
An hypotethical example (monospace font recommended):
Input:
+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8
001aaa01cc01
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Norbert Friemel
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT/ICETOOL pondering
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:43:44 +0200, Thomas Berg wrote:
I'm at a loss! Can you do this quick test for me.
Invoke the Lua shell by typing lua in the shell
type
require cjson
post the stack trace
On 23/10/2014 9:51 PM, John McKown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:24 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I convince you to try it
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:07:41 +0200, Thomas Berg wrote:
Thanks for the example. Although the numeric sequence numbers were there
just to clarify the operation,
rather than be an indication of the assumed format of an actual case. Do you
have an example where you
can’t rely on a
Thomas Berg wrote:
Thanks for the example.
Thanks Norbert Friemel for your example showing IFTHEN and BUILD.
Although the numeric sequence numbers were there just to clarify the
operation, rather than be an indication of the assumed format of an actual
case. Do you have an example where
I was certain that I did something wrong, but I don't know what. Somewhere
I have missed a step.
require cjson
error loading module 'cjson' from file
'/HealthMarkets/lua4z/lib/lua/5.1/cjson.so':
dynamic libraries not enabled; check your Lua installation
stack traceback:
[C]: in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 4:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT/ICETOOL pondering
Thomas Berg wrote:
An hypotethical example
On 23/10/2014 10:02 PM, Barkow, Eileen wrote:
Thanks for the explanation about the ?s but I still do not see what they are
being used to substitute for.
I passed the UNIX IVP test, but my profile contains this:
Lua has a module system that searches LUA_PATH substituting ? for the
module
Here is another thing I never saw before.
I do not have a PDSE in linklist (that I can use) so I am trying to copy the
LUA4Z.LOADLIB modules into a regular pds and get this error.
I do not want to have another linklist lib added for this product and was
always able to copy PDSE load modules
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Norbert Friemel
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 4:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT/ICETOOL pondering
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:07:41 +0200, Thomas Berg wrote:
Start it, select 'Z', select '1', enter 'JSTOR' and you will see the ASM Slot
usage under the column Avg Slots, next to it are Avg Vio and Avg NVio.
Thanks! Found it. I was starting with PGDSTAT.
The JSTOR view doesn't tell which AUX slots are Flash and which are page DS
slots. It's the sum
Thanks again for the explanation David - I am learning a lot installing this
product.
See my other posting about the PDSE to PDS issue.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Crayford
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014
Unfortunately that's not possible. Lua4z is a C/C++ XPLINK application
and it requires a PO library so a PDSE is mandatory.
I understand your position but XPLINK is the build and it results in
much faster code. I know you probably already know this but you can
always dynamically add a PDSE to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of
Norbert Friemel
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT/ICETOOL pondering
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSOUTDD SYSOUT=*
There seems to be a problem loading the SO from a symlink. Can you try
it without a symlink? It works on my system but if I can narrow it down
to that and recreate it at our lab I can cut a fix.
On 23/10/2014 10:18 PM, John McKown wrote:
I was certain that I did something wrong, but I don't
In 4454631278560122.wa.szwangxdgmail@listserv.ua.edu, on
10/21/2014
at 10:08 PM, Alex Wang szwan...@gmail.com said:
1. Under what circumstance, will the job have no job control table?
STC under MSTR. If you control the source, you could dynamically
identify the STC to the primary JES
In
caarmm9rskjgk-ypgufnhowtvkpbjbykdk0cr2i3vnnrrurx...@mail.gmail.com,
on 10/21/2014
at 11:59 AM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net said:
Here's the epilog code for a non-main function generated by an oldish
version of IBM C:
Doesn't the use of R1 violate the czlling convention?
00011A 051E
In 5447c687.3060...@us.ibm.com, on 10/22/2014
at 11:00 AM, John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com said:
This is perhaps the strangest marketing decision ever made by the
industry.
Stranger than units of 1024000?
most system limits are in powers of two,
It would help if you would start using SI binary
No joy:
LIH1:TSH009:/HealthMarkets/lib$
rm liblua.so
LIH1:TSH009:/HealthMarkets/lib$
lua
Lua 5.2.0 Copyright (C) 1994-2011 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
require cjson
error loading module 'cjson' from file
'/HealthMarkets/lua4z/lib/lua/5.1/cjson.so':
dynamic libraries not enabled; check your
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:36:04 +0200, Thomas Berg wrote:
When looking at this a second time, it seems very promising and more
customizable than SUBSET + other options.
One question: you placed the BI-field at the end. If it was very long
records, would it from a performance view be better
You are not running the correct version of Lua. You have another version
of Lua in your PATH which is why Lua 5.2.0 is being printed in the prompt.
That's a relief!
On 23/10/2014 10:53 PM, John McKown wrote:
No joy:
LIH1:TSH009:/HealthMarkets/lib$
rm liblua.so
Ah! yes. I have an alpha, which I got from you?, in /HealthMarkets/bin. So
the symlink commands (ln -s) for the new version into
/HealthMarkets/lua4z/bin silently failed. I removed that old version,
established the correct symlinks, and all is sunny and bright. This is not
likely to happen to any
Thanks again for the info. I will try to do without linklist for now.
I tried to set up the LUACONF member as documented and get this error:
And the parm //'SYS1.SAMPLIB(IVP)' is not accepted by the system.
FREE FI(LUA)
Ignore this - the DD should be LUACONF, not LUA
-Original Message-
From: Barkow, Eileen
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:33 AM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: RE: [ANN] Lua4z: the Lua programming language on z/OS, with batteries
Thanks again for the info. I will try to
LOL, good catch! Better try it with UNUM. I would suggest defining LUA
source PDS data sets VB LRECL(256) BLKSIZE(32760). Lua reads config
files as if they were UNIX files as a stream, not record oriented card
image data sets. If that is not
in the doc I will make sure it is.
Thanks for the
On 23/10/2014 11:35 PM, Barkow, Eileen wrote:
Ignore this - the DD should be LUACONF, not LUA
Nope! The DD should be Lua and the member name should be LUACONF.
-Original Message-
From: Barkow, Eileen
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:33 AM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
On 23/10/2014 11:35 PM, Barkow, Eileen wrote:
Ignore this - the DD should be LUACONF, not LUA
Nope! The DD should be LUA and the member name should be LUACONF.
-Original Message-
From: Barkow, Eileen
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:33 AM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
On 23/10/2014 11:32 PM, John McKown wrote:
Ah! yes. I have an alpha, which I got from you?, in /HealthMarkets/bin. So
the symlink commands (ln -s) for the new version into
/HealthMarkets/lua4z/bin silently failed.
What I should do is test if an existing version of Lua exists and promt
to take
I got passed the LUA DD but cannot read the SAMPLIB
FREE FI(LUA)
IKJ56247I FILE LUA NOT FREED, IS NOT ALLOCATED
ALLOC FI(LUA) DA('XCICS.LUA4Z.CONF') SHR
CALL
On 23/10/2014 11:59 PM, Barkow, Eileen wrote:
I got passed the LUA DD but cannot read the SAMPLIB
FREE FI(LUA)
IKJ56247I FILE LUA NOT FREED, IS NOT ALLOCATED
ALLOC FI(LUA) DA('XCICS.LUA4Z.CONF') SHR
CALL 'XCICS.LUA4Z.LOADLIB(LUA)' 'XCICS.LUA4Z.SAMPLIB(IVP)'
lua: cannot open
Thomas,
As others have explained it is quite simple to get the desired results. I
am showing examples for both FB and VB files using symbols. With symbols
you have the flexibility of changing it and then not worry about changing
the control cards.
A brief explanation of the job.
1. The first
Ron,
Bart has explained as to what the control cards are doing. Are your Input
files VB? If so you need to modify your control cards to retain the VB
file attributes.
Thanks,
Kolusu
DFSORT Development
From: Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 10/22/2014
On 22 October 2014 18:34, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
Here's the epilog code for a non-main function generated by an oldish
version of IBM C:
Doesn't the use of R1 violate the czlling convention?
It's an internal czll/rdturn, so they can do what they like.
Tony
I certainly remember that some DFSORT gurus supplied answers in the
past on IBM-MAIN where you insert key/sequence field, then do your
selection/formatting/copy and remove the key/sequence field.
Elardus Engelbrecht,
And we still continue to answer questions related to DFSORT on IBM-Main
Thanks Kolusu!
It seems so easy when you (and Norbert) explains! :)
Of course I should RTFM, but when you are ignorant it takes time find the
relevant pieces.
(I wonder how many work hours the help here at IBM-MAIN have saved?)
Best Regards,
Thomas Berg
On 23 October 2014 07:38, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
Lua4z is available at no charge. Download it now from:
http://lua4z.com
Sigh - just what the world needs - another free as in free beer free
software licence. As proprietary licences go, this one is perhaps less
bad than many,
We can submit 'Request For Enhancements' to IBM using it's developerworks site.
You can submit a request to IBM and then other users may vote for it. The more
votes a request gets, the more likely it will be that IBM implements the
suggestion.
My suggestion, 59845, is about providing a SRCHFOR
On 24/10/2014 12:36 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 23 October 2014 07:38, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
Lua4z is available at no charge. Download it now from:
http://lua4z.com
Sigh - just what the world needs - another free as in free beer free
software licence. As proprietary
5.25 in Floppy disks were 320KiB then 1.2MiB
3.5 in Floppy disks were 1440 sectors of 512 for 720KiB then 2880
sectors for 1440KiB or 1.40MiB but labeled them as 1.44M.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 5447c687.3060...@us.ibm.com, on
Why not just release it under the MIT license like the main lua code from
www.lua.org is released under? Unless, of course, the company does not want
to release the source. That is certainly allowable under the original's MIT
license. And is one reason that the MIT license exists and is used. I.e.
I am waiting for the LUA4Z.LOADLIB to be added to linklist.
I do not have access to the ISPF command tables.
HOWEVER,
This job worked in batch.
I put the LUACONF member in LUA4Z.SAMPLIB and ran this:
//LUA EXEC PGM=LUA,PARM=IVP
//STEPLIB DD DSN=XCICS.LUA4Z.LOADLIB,DISP=SHR
All good points yet again. The reality is that I work for a vendor and
they sponsored the project with my wages. That's not a lot of money :)
but they are used to a world in where IP = source code and
anything different is alien to them. I'm very open to suggestions on
this topic because you
Also ran HELLO
So it appears that the LUACONF member just has to be in the same dataset as the
script to be run, not a separate CONF dataset.
//LUA EXEC PGM=LUA,PARM=HELLO
//STEPLIB DD DSN=XCICS.LUA4Z.LOADLIB,DISP=SHR
//*UA DD DSN=XCICS.LUA4Z.CONF,DISP=SHR
//LUA
Sorry about the typo. We are running z/OS 1.13 and not 1.3.
However, Mr. Schwab pointed to the Migration Guide for Enterprise COBOL 5.1
wherein I found this bit of info in the Language Environment's runtime support
for different compilers: Enterprise COBOL for z/OS, Version 5.1 requires a
On 24/10/2014 1:30 AM, Barkow, Eileen wrote:
Also ran HELLO
So it appears that the LUACONF member just has to be in the same dataset as the
script to be run, not a separate CONF dataset.
That's correct. Lua was born as a configuration language so we chose to
use a LUACONF member as part of
On 24/10/2014 1:25 AM, Barkow, Eileen wrote:
I am waiting for the LUA4Z.LOADLIB to be added to linklist.
I do not have access to the ISPF command tables.
If you site is configured to do so you can copy the sample command table
into a USRxCMDS member in your ISPTLIB. See the ISPF docs for
I'm looking at RFEs at http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute
May RFEs are marked with a private symbol which means I can't look at it or
vote for it.
Why is that?
Best Regards,
Thomas Berg
___
Thomas Berg Specialist
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com
wrote:
All good points yet again. The reality is that I work for a vendor and
they sponsored the project with my wages. That's not a lot of money :) but
they are used to a world in where IP = source code and
anything
It is set by the area the suggestion applies to, not by the user.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se wrote:
I'm looking at RFEs at http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute
May RFEs are marked with a private symbol which means I can't look at it or
vote
I have not checked the rest of the doc but the installation doc is not clear at
all about running on MVS.
For one thing, it does show any actual batch jcl example.
The doc indicates that the LUACONF member should be in a separate dataset but
does not state how to specify it in
relation to the
Point taken. I have forwarded your mail to the ID person and I'm sure he
will update it pretty quickly.
Now you have Lua installed why don't you bench-test it against REXX and
report if you get similar results to what I get on my machine
Ok thanks Bart Kolusu for the clarifications. Thanks!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I suspected something like that, but why? It doesn't look like it's for
security reasons, at least for many of them.
(At least they should be readable.)
Best Regards,
Thomas Berg
___
Thomas Berg Specialist zOS/RQM/IT
If I was submitting an RFE, I would certainly want to know in advance
whether my submission would be readable by others outside of IBM, as
this would influence what details I included in the submission.
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
On 2014-10-23 13:53, Thomas Berg wrote:
I suspected something
I would guess it's the same reason vendors are asked to leave the room
when IBM has a SHARE session where customers are asked for ideas for new
features.
In article
a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e6294c136f...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet.se you
wrote:
I suspected something like that, but why? It
I can understand that. But it also means that no one can vote for it.
Nevertheless, your motive is reasonable for me.
Best Regards,
Thomas Berg
___
Thomas Berg Specialist zOS/RQM/IT Delivery Swedbank AB (Publ)
On 10/23/2014 10:22 AM, Thomas Berg wrote:
Thanks Kolusu!
It seems so easy when you (and Norbert) explains! :)
Of course I should RTFM, but when you are ignorant it takes time find the
relevant pieces.
Or ... you could take a class. I'd come out of retirement for a bit
in order to teacch in
Tony H wrote
| It's an internal czll/rdturn, so they can
| do what they like.
Not quite. There was[is?] an internal-to-IBM scheme for requesting
[and receiving] exceptions from programming standards which IBM PL/I
development groups used fairly often. A cogent, chiefly technical
case had to be
We do this always in our site-specific startup and return macros
for ASSEMBLER programs; this way in save area trace, the program
levels already returned show up by odd return addresses. It can be of
some help in strange situations, where save area chains are partially
destroyed.
Kind regards
Good one Dave, glad you were able to convince your powers that be to get this
out the door.
Let's hope it gets some acceptance.
Now you have Lua installed why don't you bench-test it against REXX and
report if you get similar results to what I get on my machine
Now don't you go training
Am 21.10.2014 19:53, schrieb Don Poitras:
In article caarmm9rskjgk-ypgufnhowtvkpbjbykdk0cr2i3vnnrrurx...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
On 21 October 2014 10:09, Tom Marchant
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
I've never seen a case where BALR is used to return to the caller.
There are several areas where LE does not agree well with the
calling conventions, as I learned them in the mid 80s.
- forward save area chaining (never done by LE, turning SYSUDUMP
save area traces useless ... we fix this in our site specific interface
modules,
which are used between every two
Doesn't the example in the benchmark show performance problems in EXECIO
instead of REXX? EXECIO, IMO, is not part of the REXX interpreter, but
instead
it is a vehicle (an external function) to do I/O from REXX on z/OS.
Other REXX implementations
(for example, on Linux or Windows) don't use
Lizette,
No, this is not RMM.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On 24/10/2014 6:50 AM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Doesn't the example in the benchmark show performance problems in EXECIO
instead of REXX? EXECIO, IMO, is not part of the REXX interpreter, but
instead
it is a vehicle (an external function) to do I/O from REXX on z/OS.
Other REXX implementations
In 54490f13.4040...@gmail.com, on 10/23/2014
at 10:22 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com said:
It's one of the big pluses vs REXX
More specifically, the classic REXX included in z/OS and z/VM. Is
there an open requirement to incorporate OOREXX?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg
Q). It says The Modify Function Cannot Be Performed. Besides turning on
SYSPLEX=YES, how can I get BPXOINIT to do a FILESYS=DISPLAY? Yes, I can work
with D OMVS,F for Filesystems, but the RedBook on z/OS V1R13 Implementation
shows that bpxoinit can tell me the UID and the OWNER.
Excerpt
My fuser -cu /tmp command shows many users of /tmp: MNPB4Ufuser -cu
/tmp /SYSTEM/tmp: 8c(IBMUSER) 25c(RMFGAT) 50331938(IBMUSER)
33554852c(AUTO2) fuser says these are TSO USERIDs. But when I enter d
omvs,u=IBMUSER I get back IBMUSER NOT FOUND. With ps -ef I can see the
PIDS with
I am with Bernd on the Rexx I/O has been a bottleneck, but logically speaking
I/O can be a bottleneck being slow than memory functions. My Rexx experience is
with VM, Netview, TSO, z/OS. Also Orexx on Linux and Windows. So I speak from
experience as I am sure Bernd does.
Scott ford
95 matches
Mail list logo
