https://www.ibm.com/it-infrastructure/resources/tools/z-mainframe-product-comparison/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
IBM z15
11 Sep 2019 ... Trusted platforms for today's digital transformation. Explore
and make use of the advanced capabilities of the IBM z15
IBM z15 Technical Introduction
11 Sep 2019, Draft Redbooks ... This IBM® Redbooks® publication introduces the
latest member of the IBM Z® platform,
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/sg248850.html?Open
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Jesse,
Nowadays you would still be long gone, but depending on media, pool occupancy,
and page migration, there will likely be large areas of in the clear content,
unless accessed by CKD.
Next time, ask your vendor about disk scrubbing.
RON HAWKINS
Director, Ipsicsopt Pty Ltd (ACN: 627 705
Kees,
I believed the design of EOS is your latter case, but I feel there is some
questionable belief out there that it can address the first case. Nerfing HAR0
addresses your latter case.
Have you ever swapped out an old DASD controller for a new one? What did you do
with the old drives?
A later version of the Announcement (July) makes no mention of WSA. I am
not sure what to make of that.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 2:23 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> ObGungaDin It was clunky; it badly needed multi-line and block copy. But
> it was better than nothing.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.)
1 Meg reminds me of some assembler function that would move 1 mb of below..
above .. magically.
Rob
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019, 17:48 Mark Zelden wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:06:59 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:
>
>
> > So, I'm not sure why
> >IBM is going to all this trouble to ban it, then unban it
Does anyone know if the netcat Intel vulnerability has been looked at for z
chips or power?
Rob Schramm
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:06:59 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:
> So, I'm not sure why
>IBM is going to all this trouble to ban it, then unban it a little bit.
>
I think I alluded to it in my OP and IBM also responded that it was for "a
particular set
of customers". It wasn't because IBM thought
On 9/11/19 12:15 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:58:58 -0400, Bob Bridges wrote:
>
>> LOL. What gave me that idea is sheer, unadulterated ignorance. I came into
>> the mainframe world through applications development. I was given a solid
>> grounding in JCL back in the
In article <9767139758844518.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:40:42 -0500, Len DiCristofano wrote:
> >IBM Explorer for z/OS using the z/OS perspective is also an alternative to
> >TSO in submitting batch jobs.
> >
> Could do likewise with UNIX System
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
PINION, RICHARD W.
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 2:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Submitting batch if you don't have TSO
> We can dismiss TSO as a simple tool with no special comic book powers. But
> try to get anything useful done without it
BTDT,GTTS. You'd be amazed at what you can do without TSO. Some easy options
come to mind:
1. Wylbur
2. A virtual card reader under z/VM
3. ZZSA
Of course, once you
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:40:42 -0500, Len DiCristofano wrote:
>IBM Explorer for z/OS using the z/OS perspective is also an alternative to TSO
>in submitting batch jobs.
>
Could do likewise with UNIX System Services:
IBM Explorer for z/OS using the z/OS perspective is also an alternative to TSO
in submitting batch jobs.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
Larre,
This has proven useful, as the number of votes for this RFE have gone up
overnight. This will help us in identifying priorities. One thing we noticed
was that this will require changes in microcode and software, but there is no
open RFE on the DS8k side for this function. Would you be
Been there, done that. Fortunately, the company still had a card reader and a
card punch, lat 1980's.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Submitting
This reminds me of the tale I related recently about having to revive a data
center 400 miles away after VTAM got broken in a sysres switch. It seems so
simple to 'run a job to rename a data set'. But if you cannot logon to a
system, how will that job get submitted? If you are clever enough to
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:58:58 -0400, Bob Bridges wrote:
>LOL. What gave me that idea is sheer, unadulterated ignorance. I came into
>the mainframe world through applications development. I was given a solid
>grounding in JCL back in the beginning of my training, decades ago; to me
>"INTRDR" is
My only experience with EOS was as the *last* step of a DR test conducted
(across country) at IBM Business Recovery Center in Tampa. Per IBM
recommendation, we reinitialized all customer DASD volumes with full-volume
data sets marked as EOS. Then we started a mass delete procedure and left for
> And maybe I'll end up limiting the answers I collect to the obvious ones,
> those likely to be accessible to the average CICS user or developer.
Keep in mind that there are a lot of CICS users and developers out there; what
is not obvious to you may be obvious to a lot of them.
--
Shmuel
Thanks for the answers so far, but I don’t think I am explaining it correctly.
DFHSM scratches the tape, RMM shows as scratch also, but within I guess my VTS
volume definitions it does not scratch.
So in ISMF, Then option 2 for Volume, then Option 3 for Mountable Tapes, it is
not scratch. This
Update for the archives: The problem seems to have been some very crude (and in
hindsight incorrect) coding in the FILE SECTION. The original coding used a
single fixed-length record definition for the variable-length input file and
for each of the variable-length output files. Changing that
LOL. What gave me that idea is sheer, unadulterated ignorance. I came into
the mainframe world through applications development. I was given a solid
grounding in JCL back in the beginning of my training, decades ago; to me
"INTRDR" is an argument that I can include in my JCL with the TSO SUBMIT
Thanks Carmen.
For some reason I do not find these posts when I search. only got it this time
because I caught it in most few recent posts.
I will try the mount, seems that would alleviate concerns.
I do have plans to take it off the sysres and convert to zsf.
Elaine;
I'm apparently not understanding what the issue is.
There were some questions asked with your previous posting on this same subject
matter.
What release of z/OS is your installation running? Do they have a SYSPLEX
(Basic or Parallel)?
I'm thinking that the space blocks in the HFS
Changing the subject?
same post?
it's been a long time since I've had any HFS files on any systems, IIRC until
the HFS is mounted, somewhere, its will not show dataset usage statistics, to
test that behavior mount the copied HFS file to your user directory and check
the dataset stats. can't
We have a 3 sets of sysre(s) we rotate through with maintenance and root is on
one of them (don't shoot the messenger)
I am trying to copy root to the next set using the same root name.
When I do a full volume copy with FDR and DSS, root utilization in 3.4 is blank.
this is true for all 3 of
Hi
If I have dynam(DLL) module and the load module has a number of CSECT
Can I still BASR to other CSECT
By browsing dynam(DLL) module Seems to be another type format than regular load
module
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Had a abend when trying to run it using eqanmdbg the program stopped at
CEELQSTRT
No source was display when I stepped thru got a abend message there was no main
or
I forgot the module CELQMAIN
Actually an IBM support person told me
That I have to use standard mode which seems to be remote
For NON-SMS volumes, autobackup is not controlled by MGMTCLAS (as there is
no MGMTCLAS)
For autobackup to occur:
The NON-SMS volume must be defined with:
ADDVOL volser UNIT(unittype) PRIMARY(AUTOBACKUP)
To control how many backup versions to keep:
SETSYS VERSIONS(limit)
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019
If the dsn is non-sms, then it doesn't have a MGMTCLAS.
Default MGMTCLAS rules do not apply.
Regards
Brian
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019, 6:39 PM Gadi Ben-Avi, wrote:
> Thanks
> In the Management Class there are to more options I would like to set:
>
> How many backup versions of a deleted dataset are
On 2019-09-10 5:06 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
To debug amode amode 64 xl c\c++ you need rdz or idz
Who told you that an IBM IDz salesman? I use the debug tool 3270 UI for
debugging 64-bit C++ programs all the time.
It seems to come with passport advantage meaning I’m guessing a working
Gadi,
Here is a random snapshot from ISMF's Management Class display for the
applicable columns:
# BACKUPS# BACKUPS RETAIN DAYS RETAIN DAYS
(DS EXISTS) (DS DELETED) ONLY BACKUP EXTRA BACKUPS
---(13) (14) ---(15) (16)-
1 0
Thanks
In the Management Class there are to more options I would like to set:
How many backup versions of a deleted dataset are kept.
How long the backup is kept.
Do these settings have equivalent setting for Non-SMS datasets?
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Look at the VERSIONS operand of the SETSYS command and the ALTERDS command
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:15 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
>
> OK,
> So how do
OK,
So how do I tell HSM to keep more than one backup version?
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 10:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
MGMTCLAS won't matter for Non-SMS
MGMTCLAS won't matter for Non-SMS datasets
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 11:39 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: HSM question
>
> Hi,
> I wanted to restore a PDS backed up by HSM.
>
Hi,
I wanted to restore a PDS backed up by HSM.
When I looked, I only found one backup version of the PDS.
When I looked through the HSM logs, I found that it was backed up many times.
The PDS is on a NON-SMS volume.
The addvol statement for the volume is:
ADDVOL vv UNIT(3390)
Ron,
Was EOS intended for disks that are removed to make sure they contain no
valuable data or was it intended to prevent deleted data from being read again
by another application? I thought the latter. Disks are usually removed because
they break down, with valuable, undeleted data on them.
40 matches
Mail list logo
