Re: Changing CPU mix was Re: Any Gotchas going from V1.13 to V2.2

A zIIP runs at full speed and is about 10% the cost of a CP. No software license costs based on zIIP capacity or usage. z/OS 1.6+ on z9+ run zIIPs and used by Java / DB2 V8+ / Linux runs on zIFLs. z13 consolidates zAAPs onto zIIPs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZIIP

Re: Any Gotchas going from V1.13 to V2.2

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/e0z3m112.pdf I think the biggest new item is the Jes2 and z/OS simultaneous upgrade. z/OS 1.13 didn't require JES2 to upgrade at same time. z/OSMF is now included instead of separate package. On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Ward, Mike S

Re: Error in a simple COBOL program

stem-related interrupts." > > > On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 22:19:52 UTC+2, Mike Schwab wrote: >> I believe that is the Program Interrupt Code 1 as System 360+ hardware >> defines it. z/OS translates it to Abend S0C1 abend. >> > >

Re: Error in a simple COBOL program

I believe that is the Program Interrupt Code 1 as System 360+ hardware defines it. z/OS translates it to Abend S0C1 abend. On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Bill Woodger wrote: > Just to add, I have absolutely no clue (outside of ICL COBOL) what PIC 1 is. > I'm just an

Re: OT: Apollo11 source code on line - not IBM

Or use the SIMH emulator. http://svtsim.com/moonjs/agc.html On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Porowski, Ken wrote: > So now we can have a 'real' Lunar Lander game using the original source code? > > > > CIT | Ken Porowski | VP Mainframe Engineering | Information Technology |

Re: Command to display Enqueue

Not sure where the QCB comes from: xxx.CLIST(WHOHAS) PROC 1 D CONTROL PROMPT NOSYMLIST NOLIST NOCONLIST NOCAPS MSG NOFLUSH /* ADDED IF THEN SET TO WORK WITH ISPF 3.4 (REMOVE QUOTES) */ IF (1:1,) EQ (') THEN + SET = (2:()-1,) QCB SYSDSN/ WRITE QCB SYSDSN/ END /* PROC */ On

Re: IBM Knowledge Centre

Bit savers would be interested in scans of old manuals. Can you give them a list of what manuals you have? On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 8:03 PM, J R wrote: > " > We programmers just tend to be highly nervous packrats, and we should > probably get over it. " > > Guilty as

Re: Short description of system address spaces

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246366.html?Open This would be a good starting point for them. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > While educating colloeagues new to z/OS, I promised to come up with a short > decription of all the system address spaces

Re: Short description of system address spaces

JOBNAME *MASTER* ALLOCAS ANTAS000 ANTMAIN APPC ASCH ASCHINT AUTOTSO AUTOVIEW AUTOVSSI AXR BPXAS * BPXOINIT CADASTRT CAENF CANSO2 CAOMS CATALOG CEA CONSOLE CRONH9 CSSMTP DB2DBM1 DB2DDBM1 DB2DDIST DB2DHNON DB2DHTCB DB2DIST DB2DMSTR DB2HNON DB2HNON DB2HTCB DB2IPROC DB2LPROC DB2MSTR DB2RPROC DB2TDBM1

Re: Minimum Volume Sizes in the Wild

Yep. 100 for JES2 checkpoints. 500+ for catalog volumes. Some mod 3s for ML1 and Mobius datasets due to large number of small datasets. Mod 9s for most volumes. Storage groups are 1TB+ so new space is Mod 27s (due to IPL volumes). z/OS 2.2 installer wants Mod 40s, don't have uncarved space.

Re: HMC automation

IBM capacity is defined as the maximum usage over a 4 hour rolling period. If you have a temporary high usage period exceeding your capacity that isn't too high and not too long, you aren't impacted. You go too long or too high and the processor starts to slow down so the total usage does not

Re: TIOT exceeded

ALTER gdg.base.name LIMIT(1) DELETE gdg.base.name(0). ALTER gdg.base.name LIMIT(999) On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:43:18 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > >>>You could also try something a little more

Re: Windows based editor / reformatter for DOS/VSE JCL?

http://www.spflite.com/ (not the IBM version) http://planetmvs.com/spfeditor/ (over capacity?) On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:37 AM, John McKown wrote: > I'm asking this for someone who used to work with me. He is looking for a > DOS/JCL editor and reformatting software

Re: OT, funny. A good comic about "Code Quality"

Give APL\360 another shot: http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/the-apl-programming-language-source-code/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: > John McKown wrote: > >>http://xkcd.com/1695/ > > Haha! Good one! ;-D > > John, I remember that

Re: AW: Re: Highest address "below the bar"

I was thinking 64 bit Java uses the addresses from 2G to 3-8G for its storage. That allows it to use a 32 bit pointer that is shifted 3 bits to create the actual address for items, instead of a 64 direct address. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Steve Smith wrote: > It's the

Re: IBM Knowledge Center broken on IE

Internet Explorer didn't follow standards and changed between versions. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: > Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> >> There are HTML validators readily available, such as: >> https://validator.w3.org/ > > > These don't really work anymore

Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

You will need to maintain compatibility with your lowest level of hardware, prime or DR. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Bill Woodger wrote: > Why wouldn't ARCH(11) give the best performance? V5.2 has it? Of course, has > to be for a z13. > > I'm not sure what you mean

Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

No change in coding. Change in placement of object code. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Itschak Mugzach <imugz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure. Less cup and much more manual work when a subroutine is updated... > > ITschak > > נשלח מה-iPad שלי > > ‫ב-1 ביוני 2016

Re: Migration to Enterprise COBOL V5.2

Increase in size would indicate small subroutines converted to instream code. Branches are expensive, so more core means faster / less CPU programs, at expense of more memory / I/O. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Paul Strauss wrote: > My customer wants to start the

Re: TCPIP Help

You can run $INDFILE with the bottom half on ISPF 6 (Command input). On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:42 AM, John McKown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Scott Ford wrote: > >> All: >> >> I need some help guys/gals. I have installed z/OS 2.2

Re: Naviquest Report

List the volumes in the storage group. View the datasets on the volumes. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote: > What does ISMF say for that storage Group? > > If it has data, and you think this is in error, I would open an SR with IBM to > have them

Re: RFE's to consider

ver error message. > > > On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 2:45 PM, Mike Schwab <mike.a.sch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I was already logged in. I clicked on each link and I had already > voted for all of them. > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:12 PM, w

Re: RFE's to consider

I was already logged in. I clicked on each link and I had already voted for all of them. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:12 PM, william janulin <008d52e04f2e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > The additional RFE websites are not available. > > > On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 1:04 PM, "Dyck,

Re: ADRDSSU PRINT function not listing KEY (of CKD) as separate item?

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Greg Dyck wrote: > On 5/25/2016 6:51 AM, Peter Hunkeler wrote: >> >> So, just to be sure my memory is correct: On the hardware, the C, K and D >> fields are separate blocks of data separated by GAPs, right? It is only >> DFdss that combines

Re: Space Calculation on z/OS sytems

HSEND LIST TTOC SELECT(BACK) ODS('data.set.name.BACK') HSEND LIST TTOC SELECT(ML2) ODS('data.set.name.ML2') On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:47 AM, retired mainframer wrote: > For backup and archive tapes, HSM has a report that will tell you what > percentage of each tape is

Re: Another Connor writeup

https://www.channele2e.com/2016/05/24/college-student-installs-ibm-mainframe-in-parents-basement/ On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Gabe Goldberg wrote: > A Gen Z Mainframe Adventure > http://www.ibmsystemsmagmainframedigital.com/nxtbooks/ibmsystemsmag/mainframe_20160506/#/50 >

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: smp/e sha-2 support?

Any ID that can grant privileges to another ID. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Jerry Whitteridge wrote: > I'd reply to the Auditor "Please define Admin access as there is no one > privilege that grants all access" > > Jerry Whitteridge > Manager Mainframe

Re: EAV bug or feature?

I often use this clist for Non-SMS recalls. 2 DSLIST xx.CLIST(HRECN) - 01.00Columns 1 00072 +1+2+3+4+5+6+7-- * Top of Data ** PROC 2 D V CONTROL PROMPT

Re: SMP/E Feature?

I recall recent versions of JES2 required changes to a couple of exits, or changing exit numbers. Definitely need multiple source libraries for these changes. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Mark Zelden wrote: > I never responded / commented on Andrew's post, but since you

Re: SAVING JOB OUTPUT IN A PDSE FROM SDSF

Maybe put Year in DSN, member name would include Month 1-9,A,B,C, Day 01-31, Time -2359, or Day of Year 001-366, Time -2359. On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Pedro Vera wrote: >>> Is there something I could do to prevent this from happening? > > I think JES2 can be

Re: An explanation for branch performance?

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:30 AM, John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Mike Schwab <mike.a.sch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Well, the obvious solution is to code the eyecatcher literals before >> the entr

Re: An explanation for branch performance?

:13 AM, David Crayford <dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29/04/2016 10:09 PM, Mike Schwab wrote: >> >> The pipeline is optimized for running many instructions in a row. A >> branch is not recognized until through a good part of the pipeline. >> Meanwhile the data to

Re: An explanation for branch performance?

The pipeline is optimized for running many instructions in a row. A branch is not recognized until through a good part of the pipeline. Meanwhile the data to be skipped is in the instruction pipeline. Results meet expectations. On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 7:40 AM, David Crayford

Re: How to copy one pack IPL'able z/OS to DVD.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Blu-ray? > > -- gil I think they are around 25GB. Why not an ADRDSSU IPLable backup tape image of a RESCUE volume? We use mirrored VTAPE and restore from it, no mirrored DASD. -- Mike A

Re: OA49446 on RSU1603 - RACF / DFSMS change

I would think this would apply to a discrete authorization, without an ending .**. I. E. authorize DATA.SET.NAME instead of DATA.SET.NAME.** Define DS(DATA.SET.NAME) would fail because of no authorization for DATA.SET.NAME.DATA (optional DATA.SET.NAME.INDEX, DATA.SET.NAME.PATH, etc) . On Thu, Apr

Re: Question about space allocation from Listcat display

HI-A is the maximum RBA in that extent or all extents. Maximum possible size of the dataset is not listed. HI-U is the current highest RBA in that extent or all extents. A record added to the end would be HI-U plus 1. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Nguyen Dt wrote: > Thank

OT: Cern makes raw data available

http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/25/11501078/cern-300-tb-lhc-data-open-access 300TB for the first half of 2011. Just so you can double check the discovery of the Higgs Boson. http://www.particlefever.com/ if you want to buy a movie about it. -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest

Re: can a program determine the capacity setting of a z-box?

I saw a paper a couple of months ago (I can't find it right now). It related the experience of an insurance company migrating to a z13. The performance tables indicated it should handle the workload, but it was pegged at 100% and not meeting goals. They upgraded a little bit, and the relief from

Re: VIRTUAL TAPE PECULIARITY

There are settings on the VTAPE server which will delete the contents under certain circumstances. On our EMC we set so many hours or days have elapsed or a percent free threshold has been reached. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:31 AM, John Dawes <00ff0e22811f-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>

Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge

3 o 20:46, Mike Schwab pisze: >> >> [...] >> Some vendors support 1 cylinder increments. EAVs (Mod 59+) must be >> incremented by 1113 cylinders. > > > I'm curious about 1113 cyl increment. > Is it requirement of EAV in z/OS or rather implementation specif

Re: any need?

Share session 18476. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Cheryl Watson wrote: > Hi John, > > It's such a neat idea that IBM is already getting ready to provide it in z/OS > 2. It's called 'Streaming SMF' and was presented at SHARE in San Antonio at > session 18476 by

Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge

Requires software and hardware that supports it. Varies BY Vendor, and WITHIN Vendor. ICKDSF V 16+ has a REFRESH to pick up a new volume size, once changed in the hardware. Some vendors support 1 cylinder increments. EAVs (Mod 59+) must be incremented by 1113 cylinders. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at

Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge

Our system programmer has requested a Mod 40 to keep on a single residence volume for z/OS 2.2. Might want to get Mod 54s. Or a device that can expand existing volumes. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > After living in close quarters for some

Re: was I in a coma when this was discussed: z/OS FBA Services

http://www.amazon.com/Complaint-Department-Grenade-PINEAPPLE-CD-4/dp/B00APBED0C On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Chris Hoelscher wrote: > Take a number . > > Chris Hoelscher > Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services > Technology Solution Services > :

Re: z890 in my basement

https://twitter.com/ConnorKrukosky/status/722218600975724544 Connor turned 19 and accepted an IBM Internship. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote: > For those who saw Connor at SHARE or Hillgang. He spoke at POK today: > >

Re: Resize PDS/PDSE

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:55:50 -0500, gsg wrote: > >>Beside Serena-StarTools, is there any other products that can be used to >>resize(add tracks/cylinders) a PDS or PDSE or add directory

Re: Resize PDS/PDSE

http://www.cbttape.org/freepds.htm On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:55 PM, gsg <0053fe88ed35-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Beside Serena-StarTools, is there any other products that can be used to > resize(add tracks/cylinders) a PDS or PDSE or add directory blocks etc..? >

Re: SDSF Mystery

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PM24416 For z/OS 1.11 and up, suggests leaving HASPINDX in case z/OS can't resolve the log. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.isfa500/haspall.htm Sample job ISFISALC contains an allocation for the

Re: Fwd: Tech News 1964

/ Netflix runs FreeBDS on low power Intel processors. http://www.computerworld.com/article/2489741/networking/how-netflix-streams-movies-to-your-tv.html On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:33 PM, R.S. <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl> wrote: > W dniu 2016-04-07 o 21:37, Mike Schwab pisze: &

Re: Fwd: Tech News 1964

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/04/07/ibm_s_360_50_anniversary/ 96 of the biggest 100 banks in the world still run IBM mainframes. If there is job security in the world, that is it. Until we don't have electrical power to run them. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht

Re: Why more SAP processors?

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: >>Of course the computation(*) power per CPU is also growing significantly > => total power of SAP is growing even more. >>What is the rationale behind ? > > Good question. After some reading, I think it is

Re: How force dataset non-SMS?

Look at your list of STORCLAS ISMF 5. Column 8 (GUARANTEE SPACE) of YES should let you specify a volume. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Gibney, David Allen wrote: > I have to agree you need to talk with your storage people. There should be a > STORCLAS defined which when

Re: COBOL 5.2 Programs too large to compile?

wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:08:08 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote: > >>https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceea100/ceea1mst83.htm >> >> >>On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Cameron Conacher wrote: >>> We need up turning off optimiza

Re: COBOL 5.2 Programs too large to compile?

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceea100/ceea1mst83.htm On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Cameron Conacher wrote: > We need up turning off optimization and the program compiled. > We are now seeing some coding issues. We have programs

Re: EMC z/OS Migrator

Yes, I have used it. If they have RACF checking each dataset on, then you will need to have access. Tell them the RACF admin can contact the owner of each dataset not granting access to z/OS Migrator they will need to move their dataset to another volume themselves. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:53

Re: Another one bites the dust

Two trips. One with the gut, one with the disassembled frame. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Charles Mills wrote: > Call Connor. It should fit in his truck. > > Charles > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On

Re: COBOL 5.2 Programs too large to compile?

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI21773 A couple of other fixes for the message Fall 2015. Can you check the last PTF applied to the compiler? On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Cameron Conacher wrote: > Hello everyone, > Just curious here. > We are

Re: Linux

I agree with the C suggestion. GCC is for Linux at https://gcc.gnu.org/ GCC is for MVS 3.8 - z/OS 2.2 is at http://gccmvs.sourceforge.net/ includes Hercules, MVS 3.8, GCC. On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Steve Beaver wrote: > First of all I am first and foremost an zOS

Re: IBM z/OS Product Documentation 2016

Could these be stored on an OpenMVS file and displayed on a 3270 or opened from a connecting device? On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On 2016-03-25, at 09:12, Eosze, Jonathan L. wrote: > >> Agreed. When DVDs were available

Re: OT: How my week has been.

Needs some background music. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU_rqm7WPPI On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:28 PM, John McKown wrote: >

Andy Grove, 79, R.I.P.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/21/technology/andy-grove-dead/index.html -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: CeBIT and mainframes

It has a small proof-of-concept box that it can make available to those running mainframe apps where they can see how it works and try out some of their own applications. This box, based on an Intel NUC running an i7 CPU, is smaller than the size of a hardback book, but can run workloads as if it

Re: CeBIT and mainframes

Sounds a lot like http://www.z390.org/ . It took about 5 years for one guy to develop. It emulates hardware instructions and operating system calls. No IBM software (other than macro definitions for the system calls). On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Joel C. Ewing wrote: > On

Re: Freeing up space in a VSAM file

On our HSM MCDS, BCDS, etc, we have 0 for the secondary extent. If we specified TRACK(5 1) so we get 1 track as the Control Area, 1. How much would the Index size go up? 15X? 2. Wouldn't CAs be reused a lot more frequently, since you only have to get 1 track empty instead of 15? 3. Which

Re: Problem applying UA71619 anyone ?

Double check the comma is not in column 72. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:03 AM, ESHEL Jonathan wrote: > Thank you John and apologies for not doing it earlier. We did use GROUPEXTEND > initially so OA44222 was in the package already. We also tried today to apply > it specifically,

Re: Alleged mainframe breach to add to the list

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_System_i Gives some good insight into portability on the different hardware. On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Charles Mills wrote: > Yer right! > > And http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/software/virtualization/index.html > would seem to imply

Re: gist.github.com unreachable [was: RE: rexx and tso alllocate]

I have requested http://www.siteadvisor.com/ to reclassify some sites and they have been changed. On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote: > I doubt if many companies make an explicit determination of which of the > gazillions of Internet sites deserve blocking but

Re: Alleged mainframe breach to add to the list

That must have been some quick selling info about that ship. Most trips are under 2 weeks. Hard to believe going through several sales that way. A handful, yes. On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Phil Smith wrote: >

Re: Private IP addressesRe: gist.github.com unreachable [was: RE: rexx and tso alllocate]

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1918 3. Private Address Space The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the following three blocks of the IP address space for private internets: 10.0.0.0- 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix) 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255

Re: rexx and tso alllocate

The LRECL should be at least the MAXIMUM record length. Additional space would be filler or trimmed by the actual length on a variable record. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Tim Brown wrote: > Yes to "So if you write X records and determine you need a different lrecl?" > >

Re: CBU test

No problems at all, you aren't billed for the usage. We do it ourselves during our annual DR test at our lukewarm site (VTape replicated, DASD not replicated). 2016-02-29 11:53 GMT-06:00 R.S. : > W dniu 2016-02-29 o 18:43, Rob Schramm pisze: >> >> Sounds like a

Re: CBU test

One big problem with an upgrade is the increase in software costs. Make sure all your software licenses are based on a MIPS rating and not the number of cores. http://watsonwalker.com/cheryls-list-189-5-february-2016/ reports USAA upgraded to a z13 and didn't get the performance they expected.

Re: Prefix save area - confused

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Tom Marchant <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > In addition, when an instruction references a storage > location whose upper bits match the prefix register, those bits are replaced > with 0. > This last function of prefixing was not

Re: History of Computing 1944 and the evolution to the System/360

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_700/7000_series Basically, the IBM 7xx and 7xxx had 4 branches in the family tree. Each incompatible with the other. The IBM 360 was a common design to satisfy all customers with one product. Businesses go the decimal instructions, science labs got the floating

Re: Mighty quiet on a stormy day...

That means 80% chance of a tornado within 50 miles. https://weather.com/tv/shows/amhq/news/tornado-torcon-index On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Ed Finnell <000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Wet but up TORCON 8 thru midnight. > >

Re: IBMMAIN bounces and related issues

I subscribe via gmail.com webpage. I occasionally get bounces. It looks like the email takes two routes to the list server and the second is rejected as duplicate (the first gets posted). Possibility of NSA copy leaking to list server. On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht

Re: On sort options orignally: zfs question root growth

Yes it is dynamically allocated. Yes he has configure going. On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 21:55:11 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote: > >>It is designed to translate a unix style name to

Re: On sort options orignally: zfs question root growth

If changes the slashes to dots. Sometimes the LLQ becomes a member name. Restriction of 8 characters, of course. On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 21:55:11 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote: > >

Re: On sort options orignally: zfs question root growth

It is designed to translate a unix style name to MVS data.set.names. If you use a DD name with a path statement it might work. On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:00:10 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:

Re: On sort options orignally: zfs question root growth

http://gccmvs.sourceforge.net/ Paul Edwards has a version running on MVS 3.8 that will recompile. Runs under XA and ESA and z/OS too. I am sure he would help solve any bugs in your version, if different. On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Bigendian Smalls wrote: >

Re: Which CP is used when ...

File transfer speeds start slow then speed up. 1.2KB is nothing. 100KB is a bare minimum test size, but can fluctuate greatly due to varying contention at the start of transfer even under similar network loads. 1MB is large enough that a slow start has a small impact on the total transfer time

Re: Introducing the New z13s: Tim's Hardware Highlights

Type then correct. Sometimes settings don't stick unless there is existing text having the attributes. On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Martin Packer wrote: > And if you think that's bad try making your favourite slide or email > editor keep the "z" lower case.

Re: Using IBM z/OS TDMF Product to Migrate 3390-9 to 3390-27's

ame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Mike Schwab > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 3:19 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Using IBM z/OS TDMF Product to Migrate 3390-9 to 3390-27's > > Yes, you can use TDMF / FDRPAS / etc, to move a volu

Re: Meaning of CSV0002I

Here is a local fix from last November. Does it fit? http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA47098 When you issue a LOAD for a Load Module, when done you should issue a DELETE for the load module, but some programs don't, and it is an non-fatal, non-harmful bug. If the total number

Re: Using IBM z/OS TDMF Product to Migrate 3390-9 to 3390-27's

I have moved z/VM volumes from z/OS with z/VM shut down. Should apply to z/Linux too. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jasi Grewal wrote: > Thank You Mike , Jerry and Steve for your recommendations and suggestions. We > only have z/VM and zLinux DASD minidisk/fullvolumes

Re: Using IBM z/OS TDMF Product to Migrate 3390-9 to 3390-27's

Yes, you can use TDMF / FDRPAS / etc, to move a volume to the same size or larger. After the move is complete TDMF or you run ICKDSF to pick up the new size. The VTOC and VTOCIX are not extended. You should select the volumes with the hardest to move datasets. If you need to increase the VTOC

IBM z13s article.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/3033464/ibm-unveils-z13s-mainframe-focused-on-security-and-hybrid-clouds.html N10 with 1TB or N20 with 4TB. -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

Re: Query: Will modern z/OS and z/VM classes suffice for MVS and VM/370

I heavily recommend signing up for the Hercules yahoo groups for installing VM/370, MVS 3.8, DOS/VS, Music, PDOS, MVT 21.8F with APL\360, etc. Yes, they have been working on emulators, but using these versions of software. They even have install tape images and scripts to load empty volumes.

Re: Issues with VSAM Enqueuers and Batch job with IDCAMS

If you only use the dataset for two things, and right after the first completes the second fails, the ENQ might not have cleared when the second starts. How about an IEFBR14 with a DD for the dataset at the start of the STC task. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Lizette Koehler

Re: Manipulating system symbols

I would suggest they use the 3 character message prefix. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 03:33:36 -0600, Art Gutowski wrote: Please note that with z/OS 2.2 the length of system symbols names

Re: Reading the CA-1 Tape Catalog

Until the tape is overwritten the scratched tapes will still be in the database. On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Hardee, Chuck wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I have posted this to the IBM Mainframe and IBM Assembler lists. > > I was wondering if anyone has ever

Re: AW: Re: You thought IEFBR14 was bad? Try GNU's /bin/true code

>From A22-6821-0 S/360 Principle of Operations: CONDITION CODE SETTINGS FOR FIXED-POINT ARITHMETIC x'00', x'01', x'10', x'11' 0 (equal) 1 (<0) 2 (>0) 3 (error, overflow) Add H/F zero < zero > zero overflow Add Logical zero not zero zero, carry carry Compare H/F equal low high Load and Test

Re: zEC12

IBM Statement of direction: z13 will be the last processor that IPLs in 31 bit mode. z14 will IPL in 64 bit mode. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:14 AM, R.S. <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl> wrote: > W dniu 2016-02-09 o 21:03, Mike Schwab pisze: >> >> Last orderable in Summer: z

Re: zEC12

ux > in order to migrate beyond a z13.. > Joel C. Ewing > > On 02/10/2016 08:51 AM, Mike Schwab wrote: >> IBM Statement of direction: z13 will be the last processor that IPLs >> in 31 bit mode. z14 will IPL in 64 bit mode. >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:14 AM, R

Re: zEC12

meant to exclude that possibility, whether > follow-up versions of z/VM will allow for that support, or if there is > even a good argument for allowing it; but the strict wording of the > statements of direction that I have read so far don't seem to rule out > that possibility. > Joel

Re: zEC12

http://www.vm.ibm.com/zvm630/zvm63sum.html On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Mike Schwab <mike.a.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On a z14, you won't be able to run OS 2.9 or earlier, or 31 bit Linux. > Not even under z/VM. > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Joel C. Ewing <j

Re: Even after all the Y2K work....

Not too young to remember 2012. Who remembers the year without a December? http://www.androidcentral.com/santa-s-going-be-mad-google-forgot-about-december I guess that was one way to avoid the Doomsday of December 21, 2012. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Field, Alan

Re: AW: Re: You thought IEFBR14 was bad? Try GNU's /bin/true code

Germans got rid of anyone with a sense of humor in WW2. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > >>> Really? I learn something new every day, that's great :-) > > >>Indeed, it was written before there was a Time Sharing >>Option (possibly even imagined). And it was

Re: z14 Drops Support for ESA/390 Mode (Was: Re: zEC12)

The main takeaway should be: If you are running z/OS 1.4 or earlier in 31 bit mode, test running it in 64 bit mode. Just in case it won't, get a z/13 and you should be able to run it in 31 bit mode about another 8 years with supported hardware. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Tony Harminc

Re: zEC12

Last orderable in Summer: z900/ 2006, z990/ 2008, z9/ 2010, z10/2012, z196/2014. Estimating in Summer z12/ 2016, z13/ 2018 (last 31 bit mode cpu), z14/ 2020. Estimating 8 years of support past last sale. On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Lopez, Sharon wrote: > Does anyone know

<    8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   >