Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

ystem, not Connect:Direct. If this flag also applies to ZLIB on the mainframe, you could open a Request for Enhancement (or what IBM is now being referred to as an "idea for a new product feature") to see if it can be added. If interested, we can provide the instructions on how to open an

Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

Len: Even if they are not Mainframe based, they should have the "utility" for their system if they are running Connect:Direct for that system. Otherwise, they are going to fail the hand-shake for the XFER protocols used by C:D, unless the new owners have made other changes to ha

Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

EDU Subject: Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2   This Message Is From an External Sender Please use caution with links, attachments, and any requests for credentials.   Hi Len , Check with IBM on your open Case, but I suspect that GZIP is NOT compatible

Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

On Behalf Of Sasso, Len Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 1:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2 [[ SEI WARNING *** This email was sent from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown or suspicious

Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

Good afternoon, Tony! I found the manual and opened Case TS016307677 - Connect:Direct - DGASACMP Program Parameters: Can this program accept a parameter (QPL_FLAG_GZIP_MODE flag) to add GZIP header and trailer information to the output stream (when performing compression

Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

Len, Check out the following manual; IBM Connect:Direct for z/OSVersion 6.1. On page 653 is an example of the Batch Compression utility (DGASACMP). You can run this and then transfer the file Good Luck Tony -Original

Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

Customer Focused, Value Driven, Delivery Obsessed From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Steve Thompson Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 6:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2   This Message Is From an External

Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

Yes. You can either run compression in a run task, and then send the resulting file to the target system, OR you can compress it via a z/OS job and then have C:D pick up the resulting file and send it. The receiving site, if they are going to use it, must know what you used for compression.

Re: IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

What are you trying to accomplish by not de-compressing the file on the receiving system? Michael At 09:12 AM 5/22/2024, Sasso, Len wrote: Good morning! The Connect Direct set of cards below will compress the file during transfer to the destination and then extract the file at the

IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for z/OS Version 6, Release 2

Good morning! The Connect Direct set of cards below will compress the file during transfer to the destination and then extract the file at the destination. SIGNON CASE=YES SUBMIT PROC=COPYDISK =COMPRESS - SNODE=SFGTST SNODEID=(ABCDE,123stu456) -

Re: Connect:Direct question

it allow specifying target dataset(s) SMS classes, it even allows copying whole volumes or dsname-masked groups of files between z/OS systems. Michael At 07:50 AM 1/31/2024, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote: Hi, I am trying to transfer a file using Connect:Direct from one z/OS system to another. I need

Re: Connect:Direct question

: Hi, I am trying to transfer a file using Connect:Direct from one z/OS system to another. I need to specify both STORCLAS and DATACLAS. This is what I am writing: CPYSEQ PROCESS- SNODE=RTST COPY1 COPY- FROM (DSN

Re: Connect:Direct question

=) - CKPT=5M - COMPRESS EXT -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2024 12:12 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Connect:Direct question [You

Re: Connect:Direct question

: Connect:Direct question [You don't often get email from 04eb5e8da660-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hi Gadi Those aren't SYSOPTS options. You need to code it something like this. CPYSEQ PROCESS

Re: Connect:Direct question

: Connect:Direct question ⚠️ CAUTION: EXTERNAL SENDER - Please be careful when opening links and attachments. ⚠️ Please report any suspicious mail to phish...@nedbank.co.za. Nedbank Information Security Hi, I am trying to transfer a file using Connect:Direct from one z/OS system to another. I need

Re: Connect:Direct question

January 31, 2024 9:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Connect:Direct question This Message Is From an External Sender Please use caution with links, attachments, and any requests for credentials. Decades ago when I had first discovered the exciting geekery of computer program

Re: Connect:Direct question

--- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* To be humble to superiors is duty, to equals courtesy, to inferiors nobleness. -Poor Richard */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 08:51 I am tryin

Re: Connect:Direct question

ssion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 9:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Connect:Direct question I can make a suggestion. But if this fails, the following questions would need to be addressed. SYSOPTS=("STORCLAS=RKF1 DATACLAS=EXT") - Don't kno

Re: Connect:Direct question

24 8:50 AM, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote: Hi, I am trying to transfer a file using Connect:Direct from one z/OS system to another. I need to specify both STORCLAS and DATACLAS. This is what I am writing: CPYSEQ PROCESS- SNODE=RTST

Connect:Direct question

Hi, I am trying to transfer a file using Connect:Direct from one z/OS system to another. I need to specify both STORCLAS and DATACLAS. This is what I am writing: CPYSEQ PROCESS- SNODE=RTST COPY1 COPY- FROM (DSN

IBM's Connect:Direct for z/OS;Batch Override=Y, SNODEID= use

Thank you Tony for the example. It is much appreciated. Sincerely; Kenneth James Kripke k.kri...@comcast.net -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: IBM's Connect:Direct for z/OS;Batch Override=Y, SNODEID= use

non-expiring password and authorize these for Connect:Direct and batch only!! You will also need to substitute your datasets for STEPLIB, DMNETMAP, DMPUBLIB and DMMSGFIL accordingly. Good Luck Tony -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf

Re: IBM's Connect:Direct for z/OS;Batch Override=Y, SNODEID= use

.ua.edu Sent: 22-Jan-23 12:15:35 Subject: IBM's Connect:Direct for z/OS;Batch Override=Y, SNODEID= use I apologize beforehand for asking, but, I am looking for the correct syntax to use Connect:Direct 6.x to transfer from one system to another, Specifying a different HLVL that is defined on the t

Re: IBM's Connect:Direct for z/OS;Batch Override=Y, SNODEID= use

but, I am looking for the correct syntax > to use Connect:Direct 6.x to transfer from one system to another, > > Specifying a different HLVL that is defined on the target system. I know > how to do this kind of submit using the product provided panels where I can > specify Override Security and

IBM's Connect:Direct for z/OS;Batch Override=Y, SNODEID= use

I apologize beforehand for asking, but, I am looking for the correct syntax to use Connect:Direct 6.x to transfer from one system to another, Specifying a different HLVL that is defined on the target system. I know how to do this kind of submit using the product provided panels where I can

Re: Connect:direct questions

er, so I don't remember much about it. > > In fact, all this stuff that was burned in my brain from working on C:D is > kind of fading. > > Regards, > Steve Thompson > > > --- aryeshe...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Arye Shemer > To: IBM-M

Re: Connect:direct questions

rye Shemer To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [IBM-MAIN] Connect:direct questions Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 21:53:27 +0300 Hello, Couple of questions regarding Connect:Direct. Q1: Is Connect:direct recovery procedures able to use alternate targets when transmission to primary target f

Connect:direct questions

Hello, Couple of questions regarding Connect:Direct. Q1: Is Connect:direct recovery procedures able to use alternate targets when transmission to primary target failed ? Q2: Is Connect:direct able to use Subsystem Interface to intercept JOB output written to DD card (like Alebra) ? I read

Re: Connect:Direct and ICSF (was ICSF and z/OS 2.3)

W dniu 2019-01-23 o 17:57, Todd Arnold pisze: In particular, you don't get any of the financial crypto verbs without a Crypto Express. The standards do not allow banks to perform functions like those unless they are executed in a physically and logically secure crypto device. Yes, but

Re: Connect:Direct and ICSF (was ICSF and z/OS 2.3)

In particular, you don't get any of the financial crypto verbs without a Crypto Express. The standards do not allow banks to perform functions like those unless they are executed in a physically and logically secure crypto device.

Re: Connect:Direct and ICSF (was ICSF and z/OS 2.3)

available in ICSF, you need a CCA Coprocessor. Greg Boyd Mainframe Crypto www.mainframecrypto.com On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:57:09 +, Cieri, Anthony wrote: > > I believe that it is the Secure+ feature for Connect:Direct that > exploits the Crypto hardware. If you are NOT using seure

Re: Connect:Direct and ICSF (was ICSF and z/OS 2.3)

(FC3863). Caution: I'm not sure, but even without CPACF some basic CSF services (SHA?) are available. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 2019-01-22 o 17:57, Cieri, Anthony pisze: I believe that it is the Secure+ feature for Connect:Direct that exploits the Crypto hardware

Connect:Direct and ICSF (was ICSF and z/OS 2.3)

I believe that it is the Secure+ feature for Connect:Direct that exploits the Crypto hardware. If you are NOT using seure+, then I believe that there is no "requirement" for ICSF. However, I also believed that even if secure+ WERE enabled and you attempted

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

Don't forget to increment the LABEL= In a message dated 7/10/2018 6:38:33 PM Central Standard Time, clementcla...@ozemail.com.au writes:   VOL=REF=*.Ddname can be used here. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 12:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? Wow, this doc is not formatted the way it used to be. When one does a copy, one can send the data or one can pull the data. Let us ass

Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

ist [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 12:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? Wow, this doc is not formatted the way it used to be. When one does a copy, one can send the data or one can p

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

AIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? Wow, this doc is not formatted the way it used to be. When one does a copy, one can send the data or one can pull the data. Let us assume that the system that starts the process is the one in control (Process control *AND* PN

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

age- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 7:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? Dyck, Lionel B. wrote: The problem was the TO was a GDG and the

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

Wow, this doc is not formatted the way it used to be. When one does a copy, one can send the data or one can pull the data. Let us assume that the system that starts the process is the one in control (Process control *AND* PNODE), and that one is going to copy *from* the PNODE to the SNODE

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

AIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 7:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? Dyck, Lionel B. wrote: >The problem was the TO was a GDG and the dsn needed to be in quotes :-) In quotes? It is not docu

Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

Dyck, Lionel B. wrote: >The problem was the TO was a GDG and the dsn needed to be in quotes :-) In quotes? It is not documented in the C:D manuals (at naming conventions and syntax diagram for VOL=) or I missed that somewhere. Where dsn (lowercase) is documented, no mentioning of quotes are

Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

mie [mailto:jamie.gib...@toysrus.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 6:02 AM To: Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek) Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? Try VOL=(,,,REF=dsn) -Original Message- From: Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek) [mailto:lionel.d...@va.gov] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 10:01

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:53:02 -0400, Joe Monk wrote: >I think it is saying that the system picks the volume from the referenced >dsn, which must be cataloged (i.e. can't be a temp data set). >On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> > >> >

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

I think it is saying that the system picks the volume from the referenced dsn, which must be cataloged (i.e. can't be a temp data set). Joe On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:07:07 -0400, Joe Monk

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:07:07 -0400, Joe Monk wrote: >REF allows you to place a data set on the same volume as the referenced >data set. It must be cataloged on the system where it is referenced. >

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

ion Partners -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 1:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:26:00 +, D

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

8 1:22 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:26:00 +, Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek) wrote: > > >The use of VOL=SER=xx works but that is only useful for the 1st data > set being co

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

ers -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 1:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:26:00 +, Dyck, Lione

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:26:00 +, Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek) wrote: >The use of VOL=SER=xx works but that is only useful for the 1st data set >being copied. I've tried variations of ,'s also without success. > >Time for a PMR :-) > What if they tell you that has to be an RFE? (I suppose

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

JCL and Connect:Direct syntax, while similar are not the same :-) -- Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor) < Mainframe Systems Programmer – RavenTek Solution Partners -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion L

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? Using C:D 5.2 and yes I had tried that :-) The 'error' message, if that is what you want to call it, claims invalid VOL=SER= usage. Banging head against the wall removes the pain of trying to figure this out

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

mer – RavenTek Solution Partners -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 12:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? On Mon, 2 Jul 2

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:31:58 -0600, Roger Bolan wrote: >The syntax you showed makes me think that preceding commas are required. > That's what it seems to say, but does it mean it? Is this JCL, or an attempt to replicate JCL syntax? I can produce from this either: VOL = ( , , , SER = (

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

n Partners > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 9:59 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? >

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

AIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ? Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek) wrote: >After pouring thru the connect:direct pubs and finding that REF= is support, >I've not been able to find the correct syntax to do a VOL=REF=dsn within a >Connect:Direct Proc on the TO param

Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek) wrote: >After pouring thru the connect:direct pubs and finding that REF= is support, >I've not been able to find the correct syntax to do a VOL=REF=dsn within a >Connect:Direct Proc on the TO parameters. >Can anyone offer any suggestions/advi

Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

After pouring thru the connect:direct pubs and finding that REF= is support, I've not been able to find the correct syntax to do a VOL=REF=dsn within a Connect:Direct Proc on the TO parameters. Can anyone offer any suggestions/advice/direction? The documented syntax is: VOL = ( [PRIVATE

Re: List Nodes in Connect:Direct with Secure Plus

RV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Gilson Cesar de Oliveira Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 9:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: List Nodes in Connect:Direct with Secure Plus Dear list: I'm looking for a process to list the nodes we have defined in Connect:Direct using Secure Plus in order to

List Nodes in Connect:Direct with Secure Plus

Dear list: I'm looking for a process to list the nodes we have defined in Connect:Direct using Secure Plus in order to check the encryption mode for each node when applicable. I need the process in batch. Online I already know that is possible but the result is a lista of nodes and I

Re: Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct?

: Thursday, November 16, 2017 11:42 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct? Hi ! Just curious, is there a Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct? Thank You, Len Sasso System Administrator TEAM: Together Everyone Achieves More RDC - 327 Columbia TPKE, Rensselaer NY

Re: Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct?

Yes there is, kind of, on Linked In. There are a few MFT groups, an IBM Connect:Direct group, and a non-Connect:Direct group. If you use the NON-C:D group, you will probably get a lot of people asking to connect with you, so they can market you to death. Regards, Steve Thompson On 11/16

Re: Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct?

> Subject: [EXT] Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct? > > Hi ! > > Just curious, is there a Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct? > > > Thank You, > Len Sasso > System Administrator > TEAM: Together Everyone Achieves More > RDC - 327 Columbia TPKE

Re: Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct?

Hi Leonard, I can't help with the XCOM part, as I've never used it. However, I've been running Connect:Direct since the Sterling Labs days. Feel free to reach out (off-list if you prefer) for C:D questions. I'm sure there are others on this list that know more about it than I

Re: Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct?

] On Behalf Of Lester, Bob Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 1:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct? Hi Leonard, Not sure, but several users of C:D hang out on this list. I'm one. Have a question? Thanks! BobL -Original Message

Re: Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct?

To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct? [ EXTERNAL ] Hi ! Just curious, is there a Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct? Thank You, Len Sasso System Administrator TEAM: Together Everyone Achieves More RDC - 327 Columbia TPKE, Rensselaer NY 12144-4400 t

Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct?

Hi ! Just curious, is there a Discussion List for IBM Connect:Direct? Thank You, Len Sasso System Administrator TEAM: Together Everyone Achieves More RDC - 327 Columbia TPKE, Rensselaer NY 12144-4400 t: +1.518.257.4209 | m: +1.518.894.0879 len.sa...@csra.com | www.csra.com Follow us on Facebook

Re: Connect:Direct

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Connect:Direct Gadi: Regardless of pre-IBM or post IBM copy of C:D, it is a basic SMPE install, so follow the Program Directory or Installation manual. I haven't worked on C:D since 2013. So I don't know how the current Installation configuration manual is titled, and/or what

Re: Connect:Direct

: Connect:Direct Hi, CD v5.2 as same as V5.1.1, only new feature is network map and we need to create all VSAM files freshly and copy existing files to new files. Thanks, Shashi On Oct 16, 2017 3:35 PM, "גדי בן אבי" <gad...@malam.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I been tasked with installi

Re: Connect:Direct

Hi, CD v5.2 as same as V5.1.1, only new feature is network map and we need to create all VSAM files freshly and copy existing files to new files. Thanks, Shashi On Oct 16, 2017 3:35 PM, "גדי בן אבי" <gad...@malam.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I been tasked with installi

Re: Connect:Direct

later on. Thanks everyone Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 6:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Connect:Direct Gadi: Regardless of pre-IBM or post IBM

Re: Connect:Direct

. There are people out there that do C:D work to get things set up for customers. Regards, Steve Thompson On 10/16/2017 06:05 AM, גדי בן אבי wrote: Hi, I been tasked with installing Connect:Direct on z/OS. Does anyone one know of resources the will help me install and configure it. Thanks Gadi

Re: Connect:Direct

or is this a new install? Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of ??? ?? ??? > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 3:06 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Connect:Direct > >

Connect:Direct

Hi, I been tasked with installing Connect:Direct on z/OS. Does anyone one know of resources the will help me install and configure it. Thanks Gadi לתשומת ליבך, בהתאם לנהלי חברת מלם מערכות בע"מ ו/או כל חברת בת ו/או חברה קשורה שלה (להלן : "החברה") וזכויות החתימה בהן, כל הצעה,

Re: Is there a Connect:Direct User Group anymore?

Mark Regan wrote: >At one time there used to be a Connect:Direct user group before IBM bought the >product. Does it still exist or is there another user community, web page or >email group? Yes! There is a forum. This one is for C:D on mainframe, not windoze or other platfor

Is there a Connect:Direct User Group anymore?

At one time there used to be a Connect:Direct user group before IBM bought the product. Does it still exist or is there another user community, web page or email group? -- Regards, Mark T. Regan -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: IBM Documentation for Connect:Direct?

Thank you! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lester, Bob Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Documentation for Connect:Direct? Hi Peter, Try this? https

Re: IBM Documentation for Connect:Direct?

Thank you! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Documentation for Connect:Direct? Try this: https://www-01.ibm.com

Re: IBM Documentation for Connect:Direct?

for Connect:Direct? Does anyone have a link to the IBM documentation for the Connect:Direct (NDM) product? I tried using the regular z/OS library search mechanism but I am not getting any results. I also tried the Sterling site but that doesn't seem to have any publically available

Re: IBM Documentation for Connect:Direct?

Subject: IBM Documentation for Connect:Direct? [ EXTERNAL ] Does anyone have a link to the IBM documentation for the Connect:Direct (NDM) product? I tried using the regular z/OS library search mechanism but I am not getting any results. I also tried the Sterling site but that doesn't seem to have

IBM Documentation for Connect:Direct?

Does anyone have a link to the IBM documentation for the Connect:Direct (NDM) product? I tried using the regular z/OS library search mechanism but I am not getting any results. I also tried the Sterling site but that doesn't seem to have any publically available documentation. We are having