May 18, 2016 2:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
All,
It's hard to imagine that any customer is limited to specific volume size
nowadays.
For a decade or so now all the storage vendors have delivered the ability to
make right-sized v
Of Ron Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 2:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
All,
It's hard to imagine that any customer is limited to specific volume size
nowadays.
For a decade or so now all the storage vendors have delivered
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
As far as I have seen, it's quite simple: create a symbol (using
and changing last char from 1 to 2, for example) and update MCAT
accordingly.
Once I've worked for a client that had 3
Years ago (pre-9) respacks had to be 'split up'. Now, we ask the risk!
-teD
Original Message
From: Lucas Rosalen
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 05:14
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
As far as I have seen, it's
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:31:42 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
Once a volume exceeds 64K cylinders, the allocations must be a
multiple of 21 cylinders, and the volume must be a multiple of 1113
cylinders. That is the z/OS requirements for EAV volumes.
More precisely, allocations
-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 9:02 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
>
> We use through to ha
On Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:31:42 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>Once a volume exceeds 64K cylinders, the allocations must be a
>multiple of 21 cylinders, and the volume must be a multiple of 1113
>cylinders. That is the z/OS requirements for EAV volumes.
More precisely, allocations from the
Once a volume exceeds 64K cylinders, the allocations must be a
multiple of 21 cylinders, and the volume must be a multiple of 1113
cylinders. That is the z/OS requirements for EAV volumes.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:41 AM, R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2016-04-23 o 20:46,
W dniu 2016-04-23 o 20:46, Mike Schwab pisze:
[...]
Some vendors support 1 cylinder increments. EAVs (Mod 59+) must be
incremented by 1113 cylinders.
I'm curious about 1113 cyl increment.
Is it requirement of EAV in z/OS or rather implementation specific
feature of DS8000 disk system?
I
half Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 1:32 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
>
> After living in close quarters for some time with a single Mod-9 sysres, we
> seem to have finally outgrown our britches for the next
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Nims,Alva John (Al)
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 10:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
Wow, I guess I have
UFIT
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
After living
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 9:02 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
>
> We use through to have a 5 pack resvol set (note these incl
essage-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 10:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
After living in close quarters for some time with a single Mod-9
Nims,Alva John , Al wrote:
You think 3 packs was crazy, for a time I worked with up to 10 packs, now it
did include the entire SMPe data sets, but what we did there was include the
primary res volume ID as part of the data set name, yep, the copy job was huge
process. Eventually the SMPe
r 3
UFIT
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Eells
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 7:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
Lucas Rosalen wrote:
>
rame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lucas Rosalen
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 2:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
As far as I have seen, it's quite simple: create a symbol (using
and changing last char from 1
At one shop I worked at a long time ago, we had a 6 pack Sysres system.
They were all 3390 Mod9s. It worked quite well.
Currently our only issue is the OMVS datasets needed. We have put those on a
Sysres volume that is a 3390 Mod54 with all other SYSRES volumes being a 3390
Mod27. We may
Lucas Rosalen wrote:
As far as I have seen, it's quite simple: create a symbol (using
and changing last char from 1 to 2, for example) and update MCAT
accordingly.
Once I've worked for a client that had 3-volumes respack. It indeed worked.
We used to keep datasets like LINKLIB, MACLIB,
As far as I have seen, it's quite simple: create a symbol (using
and changing last char from 1 to 2, for example) and update MCAT
accordingly.
Once I've worked for a client that had 3-volumes respack. It indeed worked.
We used to keep datasets like LINKLIB, MACLIB, NUCLEUS, etc in 1st volumes
20 matches
Mail list logo