On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 01:41:14 -0700, Roger Steyn wrote:
In the new release v1.4 , it no longer supports tape sorting . Hence it
becomes necessary that i have to identify all the jobs which are currently
using this feature and have them converted before going further
Have you considered changing
In CCC717517FE24B23A126DDC3AE363D20@ericnbPC, on 09/03/2013
at 05:01 PM, Eric Bielefeld eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com said:
The 2 1410's actually shared a 1310 (I think) disk drive.
1301 or 1302.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2http://patriot.net/~shmuel
We
Greetings ,
We are currently using syncsort 1.3.2 and would like to upgrade it to new
version 1.4 . In the new release v1.4 , it no longer supports tape sorting .
Hence it becomes necessary that i have to identify all the jobs which are
currently using this feature and have them converted
Subject:Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Greetings ,
We are currently using syncsort 1.3.2 and would like to upgrade it to
new version 1.4 . In the new release v1.4 , it no longer supports tape
-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 09/03/2013 09:49 AM
Subject:Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help
!
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Does Syncsort write its own SMF records, like DFsort, from which you can
identify the jobs you
03, 2013 11:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
That's true - but they're different. Not knowing them well enough I can't
say but there might be an indicator that says tape sort work in them.
By default they're SMF 208 (and most
: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
Hi,
As far as I know, Syncsort SMF does not have an indicator for tape sort.
But, it does have a section for each SORTWORK allocated, that includes a
device type, unit address and volser.
That may help, but you may need to write your
Roger,
What you mean by it's not supported? could you please extend on it...
We running with syncsort 1.4.1 version and tried below simple JCL to sort where
input and output both dataset are tape and it worked ok...
//SHOWDEF EXEC PGM=ICETOOL,REGION=0M
//TOOLMSG DD
/ Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Ravi Gaur gaur.ravi2...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 09/03/2013 10:44 AM
Subject:Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help
!
Sent
From: Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
I think it's tape sort WORK data sets that aren't supported - judging by
others' contributions
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:46:13 +0100, Martin Packer wrote:
Doesn't SMF 14 / 15 help you here? Probably 15 as it's SORTWK etc. The
problem will be identifying the actual sort work DD statement names. Maybe
30 can also do it - assuming it marks a DD as tape.
And assuming that the job in question has
W dniu 2013-09-03 14:17, Russell Witt pisze:
Roger,
In addition to reviewing your SMF14/15 records; you might also check what
information might be available from your Tape Management System. Many record
creating-program; and even better would be creating-DDNAME. I would do a test
using
: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 3:41 AM
Subject: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
Greetings ,
We are currently using syncsort 1.3.2 and would like to upgrade it to new
version 1.4 . In the new release v1.4 , it no longer
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:34:26 -0500, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
Can't you use a program that will read the members of a pds and search for
UNIT=TAPE on SORTWKnn DD statements? You should be able to search all of
your production libraries fairly quickly to identify all of the jobs.
Hopefully you have
.
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:34:26 -0500, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
Can't you use
-
m...@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
I hope there's still some sort of centralised control and/or library.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
.
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:34:26 -0500, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
Can't you use a program that will read
On 3 Sep 2013 06:21:34 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
W dniu 2013-09-03 14:17, Russell Witt pisze:
Roger,
In addition to reviewing your SMF14/15 records; you might also check what
information might be available from your Tape Management System. Many record
creating-program;
PDS 8.6 was the tool I used, but it was one of the special programs you had
to compile and add to it for added function. I can't remember if the 2nd
parameter had to be on the same line, or if it actually had logic to figure
out if it was on the same DD card.
Going back a few weeks, I
] On Behalf
Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 3:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
Unless you are really out of the ordinary, I would expect the use of SORTWKnn
on tape to be rare. AFAIK, It's purpose was for large
-8260 | M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 5:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape
Yes...I was referring to MFX 1.4 ...
From: Blaicher, Christopher Y. cblaic...@syncsort.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
The current Syncsort
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
The current Syncsort mainframe sorting product is MFX 1.4.
The shift of the product name from SyncSort to MFX happened while I was away
from Syncsort.
Chris Blaicher
11:29:12
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
Yes . That would work fine in the case of scheduled jobs . But in our
shop,there is one more challenge that we have
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
The current Syncsort mainframe sorting product is MFX 1.4.
The shift of the product name from SyncSort to MFX happened while I was away
from Syncsort
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:04:10 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
Back 40 years ago we sorted the name address file everyweek and
IIRC that was 40M records. Yes we used tape sort. It ran standalone
(except for the onlines) they finally broke it down to several sorts
and a merge as we didn't have tape/disk
http://gsf-soft.com/Products/PDSEDIT.html
The above link might help
Joe.
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 01:41:14 -0700
From: roger.st...@yahoo.com
Subject: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Greetings ,
We are currently using syncsort 1.3.2
27 matches
Mail list logo
